Introduction to the Law
Download
Report
Transcript Introduction to the Law
Jody Blanke, Professor
Computer Information Systems and Law
What Is Consequentialism?
Consequentialism: An ethics focused on the
results of actions, not the actions themselves
3-2
Utilitarianism: The Greater
Good
Utilitarianism: The ethical belief that an act is
recommendable if it brings the greatest good to
the greatest number, if it increases net
happiness—or decreases net unhappiness—when
everyone is taken into account
Global ethics: An ethics taking into account
everyone affected by an act, now and in the
future
3-3
Versions of Utilitarian Happiness
Monetized utilitarianism: The reduction of happiness
and sadness to monetary values within a utilitarian
ethics
Ex. Ford Pinto case p. 57
Hedonistic utilitarianism: Utilitarianism seeking to
maximize any and all sensations of happiness and
pleasure (Jeremy Bentham)
Idealistic utilitarianism: Utilitarianism seeking to
maximize sensations of happiness and pleasure
connected with intellectual life and culture (John Stuart
Mill)
3-4
Versions of Utilitarian Regulation
Soft utilitarianism: Frequently referred to simply as
utilitarianism, it’s the ethical belief that an act is
recommendable if it increases net happiness (or
decreases net unhappiness) when everyone is taken into
account
Hard utilitarianism: The ethical belief that an act is
recommendable if it increases net happiness (or
decreases net unhappiness) when everyone is taken into
account and when the total benefit is more than any
other possible act
3-5
Versions of Utilitarian Regulation
Act utilitarianism: Frequently referred to simply as
utilitarianism, it is the ethical belief that an act is
recommendable if it increases net happiness (or
decreases net unhappiness) when everyone is taken into
account
Rule utilitarianism: The ethical belief that a rule for
action is recommended if collective obedience to the
rule increases net happiness when everyone is taken
into account
Ex. Would we all benefit with a rule such as “don’t steal?”
[videos]
3-6
Advantages of Utilitarian Ethics
in Business
Clarity and simplicity – easy to understand that we
should all act to increase the general welfare
Acceptability – bringing the greatest good to the
greatest number is consistent with the understanding of
what ethical guidance is supposed to provide
Flexibility – weighing individual actions in terms of their
consequences allows for meaningful and firm ethical
rules without having to treat everyone identically
Breadth – attractive for public policy. Utilitarianism
provides a foundation and guidance for business
regulation
3-7
Disadvantages of Utilitarian
Ethics in Business
Subjectivity – it is difficult to know what makes happiness and
3-8
unhappiness for specific individuals
Quantification – happiness and unhappiness cannot be measured
with a ruler or weighed on a scale
Apparent injustices – utilitarianism can produce decisions that may
seem wrong
Utilitarian monster - a hypothetical individual capable of feeling
disproportionately high sensations of pleasure and happiness, one
who consequently requires many others to sacrifice their happiness
in the name of maximizing net happiness
Utilitarian sacrifice - an individual whose happiness is sacrificed in
order to increase the happiness of others
Altruism
Altruism: The belief that an action is morally right if
the action’s consequences increase net happiness (or
decrease net unhappiness) when everything is taken
into account except the actor’s increased or diminished
happiness
Altruism is a variety of selflessness but it’s not the same
thing
Selflessness: Acting without regard for one’s own well-being
3-9
This does not necessarily imply acting in favor of the wellbeing of others
TOMS Shoes
After a trip to Argentina, Texas entrepreneur Blake
Mycoskie decided to start a shoe company that would
donate a pair of shoes to a needy child in Argentina for
every pair of TOMS sold
The product became very trendy after a number of
celebrities started wearing them
The product line has since expanded to eyeglasses and
apparel and the distribution to Ethiopia, Guatemala,
Haiti, Rwanda, South Africa, and the United States
Altruism: Everyone Else
Personal altruism
Practicing an altruistic ethics
without regard for what others
are doing or should do
Impersonal altruism
The belief that everyone
should practice an altruistic
ethics
3-11
The Altruist in Business and the
Business That Is Altruistic
Altruism connects with business in three basic
ways:
There are altruists who use normal business
operations to do good
There are altruistic companies that do good by
employing nonaltruistic workers
e.g., The College Board; The Red Cross
And there are altruistic organizations composed of
altruistic individuals
3-12
Advocating and Challenging Ethical Altruism
Advantages:
Clarity and simplicity – the notion that one is
working to make others happy is easy to grasp
Acceptability – it is hard to criticize on ethical terms
someone who is working for the well-being of others
Flexibility – there are many ways to execute one’s
goals
Disadvantages
Uncertainty about what makes others happy
Shortchanging yourself
3-13
Ethical Egoism
It is the belief that an action is morally right if the
action’s consequences are more beneficial than
unfavorable for the person who acts
Ethical egoism mirrors altruism
Contrast can be drawn in this context between egoism
and selfishness
Egoism means putting your welfare above others’
Selfishness is the refusal to see beyond yourself
Egoists aren’t against other people; they’re for
themselves. If helping others works for them, that’s
what they’ll do.
3-14
Enlightened Egoism, Cause
Egoism, and the Invisible Hand
Enlightened egoism: The belief that benefitting
others—acting to increase their happiness—can serve
the egoist’s self-interest just as much as the egoist’s
acts directly in favor of him or herself
A simple and generic manifestation of enlightened
egoism is a social contract
Social contract: An agreement made between people to act in
certain ways not because the acts are themselves good or bad,
but because the rules for action are mutually beneficial
Ex. I agree not to steal from you if you agree not to steal
from me
3-15
Enlightened Egoism, Cause
Egoism, and the Invisible Hand
Cause egoism: Giving the false appearance of
being concerned with the welfare of others in
order to advance one’s own interests
Invisible hand: The force of marketplace
competition that encourages or even requires
individuals who want to make money to make
the lives of others better in the process
Adam Smith – free and competitive markets are the
best means for attaining utilitarian goals
3-16
Some Rules of Egoism
Personal egoism
Practicing an ethics of egoism
without regard for what others
are doing or should do
Impersonal egoism
The belief that everyone
should practice ethical of
egoism
3-17
Some Rules of Egoism
Rational egoism
Subscribing to ethical egoism
because it’s the most
reasonable of the ethical
theories, the one a perfectly
rational person would choose
Psychological egoism
The belief that we’re all
necessarily egoists; it’s an
inescapable part of what it
means to be human.
3-18
The Four Relations between
Egoism and Business
You can have egoists in egoist organizations
You can have egoists in nonegoist organizations
You can have nonegoists in egoist organizations
You can have nonegoists in nonegoist
organizations
3-19
Advocating and Challenging
Ethical Egoism
The arguments for an egoistic ethics include the
following:
Clarity and simplicity – everyone knows what it
means to look out for yourself first
Practicality – we know ourselves the best
Sincerity – isn’t our real motive to provide for our
own happiness first?
Unintended consequences – in the business world,
the concept of the invisible hand allows egoists to
claim that their actions end up helping others
3-20
Advocating and Challenging
Ethical Egoism
Arguments against ethical egoism include the
following:
Egoism isn’t ethics – we need rules so that everyone
is not simply looking out for number one
Egoism ignores blatant wrongs – does stealing candy
from a baby become acceptable because it serves
one’s interests
Psychological egoism is not true – the idea that we
have no choice but to pursue our own welfare before
anything else is just not true
3-21
Utilitarianism and Business
Adam Smith’s Invisible Hand
In classic free market economics, people are made
happy when they get what they want
Happiness is increased when the overall satisfaction
of consumer demand increases
Healthy economies produce those goods that
consumers want the most
Thus, competitive markets are seen as the most
efficient means to the utilitarian end of maximizing
happiness
Utilitarianism and Business
Public policy approach
Legislative bodies create the public goals that attempt to
maximize happiness
The administrative side (presidents, governors) executes
policies to fulfill these goals
This “administrative” version of utilitarian policy
can be contrasted with the “market” version. This
distinction is evident in many disputes in business
ethics
Ex. Product safety and risk should be regulated vs.
Product safety will be determined in the market place
Lawn Darts