Transcript Slide 1
I 2 R I nnovative I maging & Research Mary Pagnutti Robert E. Ryan Kara Holekamp Innovative Imaging and Research Building 1103 Suite 140 C Stennis Space Center, MS 39529 18th William T. Pecora Memorial Remote Sensing Symposium Herndon, Virginia November 16, 2011 Spatial Resolution is the minimum distance between two adjacent features or the minimum size of a feature, that can be detected by a remote sensing system. (www.geocomm.com) Spatial Resolution is not simply ground sample distance Also depends on how well a system is focused Point Spread Function (PSF) I 2 R I nnovative I maging & Research 2 PSF describes the response that an electro-optical system has to a point source The sharper the function, the sharper the object will appear in the system output image In practice, directly estimating PSF can be challenging due to sampling and SNR issues 1 0.8 0.6 0.4 FWHM 0.2 0 4 2 4 2 0 I 2 R I nnovative I maging & Research 0 -2 Y -2 -4 -4 X 3 Sampling GSD 1 m Blurred Image 20 m x 20 m Target Input Image 20 m x 20 m Target GSD 2 m + PSF 4 m FWHM I 2 R I nnovative I maging & Research GSD 4 m 4 Sampling Input Image 20 m x 20 m Target Blurred Image 20 m x 20 m Target GSD 1 m GSD 2 m GSD 2 m + PSF 1 m FWHM I 2 R I nnovative I maging & Research GSD 4 m GSD 4 m 5 Measures of Merit Point Spread Function (PSF) Modulation Transfer Function (MTF) at Nyquist Frequency Relative Edge Response (RER) I 2 R I nnovative I maging & Research 6 MTF is a parameter described in the spatial frequency domain Mathematically allows you to model the imaging process by multiplication instead of convolution Not physically intuitive Evaluated in two separate orthogonal directions consistent with the along track and cross track of the image MTF is defined as the magnitude of the OTF (Optical Transfer Function) OTF is defined as the Fourier Transform of the PSF OTF ( u , v ) I 2 R PSF ( x , y ) exp[ i 2 ( u v )] dxdy MTF ( u ) OTF ( u ) I nnovative I maging & Research OTF ( 0 ) 7 Edge Response Modulation Transfer Function MTF 900 800 700 DN 600 500 400 300 200 -5 0 Distance / GSD 1 0.8 Nyquist frequency 0.6 0.4 0.2 5 0 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Normalized spatial frequency 1 Line Spread Function Differentiate I 2 R Line Spread Function 1 0.8 Fourier Transform 0.6 0.4 0.2 I nnovative I maging & Research 0 -2 -1 0 1 Distance / GSD 2 8 DN 3 examples of undersampled edge responses measured across the tilted edge x – edge tilt angle – pixel index Pixels – pixel’s distance from edge (in GSD) Solution: Image tilted edge to improve sampling I 2 R I nnovative I maging & Research DN Problem: Digital cameras undersample edge target Superposition of 24 edge responses shifted to compensate for the tilt March 8, 2006 Distance/GSD 9 Ringing Overshoot 1.0 Region where mean slope is estimated 0 Ringing Undershoot -2.0 -1.0 0.0 1.0 2.0 Pixels RER I 2 R Another measure of spatial resolution is a difference of normalized edge response values at points distanced from the edge by -0.5 and 0.5 GSD Relative Edge Response is one of the engineering parameters used in the General Image Quality Equation to provide predictions of imaging system performance expressed in terms of the National Imagery Interpretability Rating Scale [ ER X ( 0 . 5 ) ER X ( 0 . 5 )][ ER Y ( 0 . 5 ) ER Y ( 0 . 5 )] I nnovative I maging & Research 10 LT Part of radiance that originates in the pixel area is given by: RER = 0.50 PSF ( x , y ) L ( x , y ) dxdy 0 .5 0 .5 L P / LT RER I 2 R I nnovative I Line Spread Function 0.4 0.2 -1 0 1 Distance / GSD 2 3 -2 -1 0 1 Distance / GSD 2 3 0.75 0.5 0.25 0 RER2 = 0.25 means that 25% of information collected with the pixel PSF (blue square) comes from the actual pixel area (shadowed square) & -2 1 -3 2 maging 0.6 -3 0 .5 Relative Edge Response squared (RER2) can be used to assess the percentage of the measured pixel radiance that actually originates from the Earth’s surface area represented by the pixel: 0.8 0 ER(0.5) - ER(-0.5) = 0.75 - 0.25 = 0.50 ( x , y ) L ( x , y ) dxdy LP A simple example: Box PSF Width = 2 GSD PSF 0 .5 1 Normalized Edge Response Radiance measured for each pixel is assumed to come from the Earth’s surface area represented by that pixel. However, because of many factors, actual measurements integrate radiance L from the entire surface with a weighting function provided by a system’s point spread function (PSF): GSD Source: Blonski, S., 2005. Spatial resolution characterization for QuickBird image esearch products: 2003-2004 season. In Proceedings of the 2004 High Spatial 11 Resolution Commercial Imagery Workshop, USGS, Reston, VA, Nov 8–10, 2004 R I 2 R MTF and RER can be related to each other through Fourier analysis I nnovative I maging & Research 12 I 2 R I nnovative I maging & Research 13 Canon EOS Rebel 8 Megapixel Camera I 2 R I nnovative I maging & Research Max resolution 3456 x 2304 CMOS Bayer Array Manual mode Raw data Pixel size 6.3 micron 14 Measured building GSD = 1.2 cm I 2 R I nnovative I maging & Research 15 I 2 R I nnovative I maging & Research 16 e.g. AVIRIS, Hyperion etc. High SNR High Spatial Res. Hyperspectral Imagery Spectral Band Synthesis High SNR, High Spatial Resolution Multispectral Imagery Band-to-Band • Simulations based on spectral and spatial degradation of higherresolution hyperspectral images acquired with existing remote sensing instruments Registration MTF Transfer Function Resampling e.g. LDCM, Sentinel-2 I 2 R Coarser Spatial Resolution Multispectral Imagery I nnovative I maging & Research Data Quantization Noise Simulation 17 MTF = 0.3 GSD = 4.8 cm I 2 R GSD = 12 cm I nnovative I maging & Research GSD = 18 cm 18 MTF = 0.5 MTF = 0.1 GSD = 4.8 cm I 2 R I nnovative I maging & Research 19 MTF = 0.5 MTF = 0.1 GSD = 12 cm I 2 R I nnovative I maging & Research 20 MTF = 0.5 MTF = 0.1 GSD = 18 cm I 2 R I nnovative I maging & Research 21 MTF = 0.5 MTF = 0.4 MTF = 0.3 GSD = 4.8 cm GSD = 12 cm 2 nnovative R GSD = 18 cm I I I maging & Research MTF = 0.2 MTF = 0.1 I 2 R I nnovative I maging & Research 23 MTF = 0.5 MTF = 0.4 MTF = 0.3 GSD = 4.8 cm GSD = 12 cm 2 R nnovative GSD = 18 cm I I I maging & Research MTF = 0.2 MTF = 0.1 Laboratory measurements Vendor provided prior to delivery Operational field measurements Validate image quality over life of instrument Typically require engineered targets whose contrast should strive to maximize the dynamic range of the sensor being evaluated I 2 R Point source targets Edge targets Pulse targets Contrast transfer targets (tri-bars and radial targets) I nnovative I maging & Research 25 Validation of spatial resolution is typically performed using specially designed edge targets Deployable: Radiometric tarp edges Permanent: Painted concrete edge targets 3.7 deg QuickBird Imagery Panchromatic Imagery Feb 17 2002 Tarp Edge Concrete Edge 20 m Concrete Edge 10 m 10 m 20 m I 2 R I nnovative I maging & Research QuickBird Imagery Panchromatic Imagery Nov 14 2002 National Aeronautics and Space Administration 26 These types of targets however, will not generally be available in the imagery to validate spatial resolution Deployable targets at South Dakota State University Pong Hu, Taiwan Fort Huachuka tri-bar target Finnish Geodetic Institute Sjökulla Site I 2 R I nnovative I maging & Research Causeway bridge over Lake Pontchartrain Digital Globe provided satellite imagery 27 Most commonly used spatial resolution estimation techniques require engineered targets (deployed or fixed), which are not always available or convenient Target size scales with GSD Edge targets are typically uniform edges 10-20 pixels long and ~10 pixels tilted a few degrees relative to pixel grid (improve sampling) Increasing GSD increases difficulty Moderate resolution systems such as Landsat use pulse targets I 2 R I nnovative I maging & Research 28 Exploit edge features in nominal imagery Edge response estimation is performed without dedicated engineered targets Appropriate for high spatial resolution Imagery Automated processes exist that can Identify edges and screen them Construct resulting edge response Calculate MTF and RER Rooflines I 2 R I nnovative I maging & Research Building Shadows 29 Spatial Resolution is the minimum distance between two adjacent features or the minimum size of a feature, that can be detected by a remote sensing system In addition to GSD, spatial resolution depends on a system’s PSF (blur) Spatial Resolution is often quantified/specified in terms of MTF at Nyquist or RER Spatial Resolution should be monitored throughout a system’s lifetime For more information… Pagnutti, M., S. Blonski, M. Cramer, D. Helder, K. Holekamp, E. Honkavaara, R.E. Ryan. 2010. Targets, methods, and sites for assessing the in-flight spatial resolution of electro-optical data products, Canadian Journal of Remote Sensing, 36:(5) 583-601. I 2 R I nnovative I maging & Research 30