Transcript Slide 1
All Students Ready for Success: State Efforts to Improve High Schools Becky Smerdon, Vice President & Deputy Director, U.S. Education and Workforce Development June 19, 2008 High School Students Want to Go to College……… • Most students expect to attend college (High School Survey of Student Engagement, 2005; U.S. Department of Education, 2006). • The number of students entering college after high school has increased nearly forty percent over the past 30 years (U.S. Department of Education, 2006). But Too Many Are Not Prepared…. • Only one-third of high school seniors scored “proficient” on the reading portion of National Assessment of Educational Progress, with less than one-quarter scoring proficient in mathematics (U.S. Department of Education, 2006a). • Among high school juniors and seniors taking the ACT college entrance exams, only half of the students were ready for collegelevel reading assignments in core subjects like English, mathematics, and science (ACT, 2006). • Nearly one-third of all freshmen enroll in at least one remedial course in a community college or four-year institution and the costs are high (Alliance for Excellent Education, 2006). • We spend a billion dollars a year to make up for what students didn’t receive in high school (Alliance for Excellent Education, 2006). And Too Many Are Not Even Graduating High School Approximately three-quarters of public high school students graduate in four years (NCES, Average Freshmen Graduation Rate, 2006), with graduation rates significantly and alarmingly lower in high-poverty and high-minority districts (EPE Research Center, 2006). Great Opportunities: The Perfect Storm? • Significant funding has been committed to creating data systems that track students over time. • Accountability provisions require that students who have been under the radar become visible. • Chronically low performing schools are mandated to reinvent themselves. • Even Oprah has talked about educational challenges and opportunities. EDVisions Center for Urban American Coalition of U.S. Department of Schools Perspectives Youth Policy Knowledge High Essential Schools Works Education-Adult Literacy National Association of Charter Forum Schools Great Lakes East and FamilyState Literacy Act Expeditionary Boards of Schools That Comprehensive Knowledge Works ATLAS Jobs Learning for the Learning Education Noble Network of Assistance Center Foundation Communities FutureWork ChicagoFirst ThingsCouncil Paideia of Chief State Charter FirstTrust Community EDC Schools School Officers Talent National Association Modern Red U.S School of Secondary School Development National Forum to U.S.Principals Department of House Institute Department High Schools Grades AcceleratedAccelerate Middle Education-Carl D. ReformNational Governorsof EducationPLUS Alliance for Excellent Perkins Grant Association-Phase State One Education Institute for Research Honor States High Scholars Chicago Project GRAD and Reform in Southern Regional School Grants Asia Initiative Charter School Education, First NewSociety Tech Foundation Career Education Board International Foundation Academy Things First Academy for Urban Great Lakes West Schools Network Support Bill and Melinda Development Comprehensive Forum for Youth The Learning Point Achieve Inc.Network, Gates Foundation GEAR Up Assistance Center Investment Associates American Consortium on UC Big Picture Schools College Board, National Conference ofSchool StateDiploma Chicago Berkeley Academy for Educational EXCELerator Schools Legislatures Research Project Rural School and Christo Rey Model Development Community Trust Annenberg Institute Great Challenges • A majority of states and districts are unable to track individual students over time. • Test participants, disaggregation and reporting requirements (and waivers), and accountability measurement and benchmarks have been contentious, decentralized, and difficult to interpret. • “Reinventing” low performing schools has been, in practice, merely tinkering around the edges. • Oprah hasn’t fully mobilize her Miracle Network for Education • Coordination vs. Chaos Key Foci • Readiness: Intensive focus on transition into high school • Rigor & Multiple Pathways: Standards & Coursetaking, data and monitoring system to diagnose and monitor, personalized learning environment • Capacity: Build human capital and school capacity State Policy: High School Readiness • Course requirements • Intensive focus on literacy and math skills – PD, incentives for certified math teachers • Secondary defined as 6-12 – Individual Learning Plans – Postsecondary planning – Drop out rates State Policy: Rigor • Graduation Requirements – 4X4 – Core Academic Curriculum • Focus on CTE – Meet academic and career requirements • Expand AP Access – Funding State Policy: Postsecondary Pathways • Bridging Programs – IL: 3 yr College and Career Readiness Program – OH: Graduation Coaches • Dual Enrollment – Credit transferability/alignment – Funding (PPE, College Tuition and Fees) • University/K-12 Partnerships – IN: Authorize contractual relationships btw districts and universities, Lab school, teacher training – Early College High Schools State Policy: Building Capacity • Teacher Quality provisions – NCLB Requirements – Recruitment and retention incentives – Targeted PD • Principal Development – IL: year-long mentorship Broad Strategies • Support innovation: Incentivize and learn from “chaos” – Fund R&D, including significant and continued commitment to the technological requirements of usable data systems. • Leverage existing funding streams to improve and align services/programs • Commit to equalizing opportunity, or as the Forum for Education and Democracy calls it: Pay Off the Educational Debt that we owe our most underserved children. Policy School Change? • What does it mean to change? How do we know if it has happened? How do we know if it makes a difference for kids and teachers? – “Reinventing” low performing schools has been, in practice, merely tinkering around the edges. High School Reform Implementation Toolkit • Project Overview: – Urban Institute, Johns Hopkins, Academy for Educational Development (Nettie Legters, Becky Smerdon, Kristine Early) – Funded by Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation – Launch October 2008 – Policy, practitioner, and research audiences – 80+ reform elements Example: Early Warning Signal • Definition • Research • Best Practices • Implementation Checklist 1825 Connecticut Ave., NW Washington, DC 20009-5721 Phone: (202) 884-8000 Fax: (202) 884-8400 www.aed.org