Transcript McAlpine Elementary School Improvement Plan Review

McAlpine Elementary
School Improvement Plan
Review
January 29, 2015
MAP Data Review (Winter)
2014-2015 McAlpine Elementary MAP Assessment Data
December 2013-September 2014 (blue columns indicate December 2014 scores)
Total Students With Valid Reading Growth Test
Scores
Students At or Above Norm Grade Level Mean RIT
Total Students With Valid Math Growth Test
Scores
Students At or Above Norm Grade Level Mean RIT
EOY
BOY
MOY
MOY
EOY
BOY
MOY
MOY
2014
2014
2013
2014
2014
2014
2013
2014
71
81
75
78
75
72
75
70
41
47
47
46
47
47
46
40
72
81
74
77
74
72
75
70
30
38
46
45
46
47
38
46
% Kindergarten At/Above Mean
Total Students With Valid Reading Growth Test
Scores
Students At or Above Norm Grade Level Mean RIT
Total Students With Valid Math Growth Test
Scores
Students At or Above Norm Grade Level Mean RIT
% First At/Above Mean
Reading
58%
58%
63%
59%
Reading
66%
65%
61%
57%
Math
42%
47%
62%
58%
Math
62%
65%
51%
66%
80
76
76
77
76
68
79
68
51
51
52
57
52
50
60
54
80
76
77
77
77
68
78
68
47
49
46
48
46
43
48
52
Total Students With Valid Reading Growth Test
Scores
Students At or Above Norm Grade Level Mean RIT
Total Students With Valid Math Growth Test
Scores
Students At or Above Norm Grade Level Mean RIT
%Second Grade At/Above Mean
Total Students With Valid Reading Growth Test
Scores
Students At or Above Norm Grade Level Mean RIT
Total Students With Valid Math Growth Test
Scores
Students At or Above Norm Grade Level Mean RIT
% Third Grade At/Above Mean
Reading
64%
67%
68%
74%
Reading
68%
74%
76%
79%
Math
59%
64%
60%
62%
Math
60%
63%
62%
76%
97
96
88
94
88
95
98
94
66
62
52
65
52
59
57
58
98
96
89
91
89
95
97
95
52
68
50
72
50
48
42
57
Total Students With Valid Reading Growth Test
Scores
Students At or Above Norm Grade Level Mean RIT
Total Students With Valid Math Growth Test
Scores
Students At or Above Norm Grade Level Mean RIT
%Fourth Grade At/Above Mean
Total Students With Valid Reading Growth Test
Scores
Students At or Above Norm Grade Level Mean RIT
Total Students With Valid Math Growth Test
Scores
Students At or Above Norm Grade Level Mean RIT
% Fifth Grade At/Above Mean
Reading
68%
65%
59%
69%
Reading
59%
62%
58%
62%
Math
53%
71%
56%
79%
Math
56%
51%
43%
60%
Goal 1-Duty-free lunch period
 Lunchroom monitor in cafeteria for 11 hours per week
 Teacher assistants eat lunch with kindergarten students
 Teacher assistant provides support for 5th grade lunch
 Zero office referrals for cafeteria behavior
Goal 2 – Instructional Planning
 Monthly half-day planning
 Monthly 90-minute planning
 45 minutes M, T, Th, F
 Data discussions during staff meetings once a month
 EC teachers meeting weekly with regular education
teachers
 TD teacher attending planning meetings
Goal 3 – Positive School Climate
 Bullying Prevention Week in October
 Monthly House Meetings – This month’s theme was
Filling a Bucket
 Social skills lessons during half-day planning (Evosevich
and Isamat) and teachers having class meetings to
address issues
 Daily recess – Teachers cannot take away recess as a
punishment
 School Health Team – Started meeting monthly in
December.
Goal 4 - 70% of the students K-3 will meet or exceed
their Target Growth Goal in Reading as measured by
TRC Reading Levels.
 Waiting for TRC testing results.
 67% of students at or above the Norm Grade Level Mean
RIT on MAP Reading assessment.
Goal 5 - 60% of the students K-5 will meet their
Target Growth Goal in Math as measured by the MAP
Assessment.
 McAlpine saw an increase in the percent of proficient
students from Fall to Winter in math.
 Fall: 41.82% proficient
 Winter: 63.66% proficient
 Increase: 21.85%. Top five in South Learning Community
Goal 6 – Meeting the needs of all
learners
 Teachers participating in boys adrift discussions to learn
about working with male students
 Ms. Young offering professional development on
differentiation
 Mrs. Davis training staff on using data to differentiate
lessons and activities for all students
Goal 7 – Mastery Grading
 Teachers providing reteaching and reassessment for
students who score below an 84% on benchmark
assessments
 Enrichment/remediation block allows for differentiated
support for students
 Hired two tutors to prepare students for EOG testing
 Working with the ASEP to hire two teachers to tutor
during the after-school program