Categorization - Laboratorio Multimediale

Download Report

Transcript Categorization - Laboratorio Multimediale

Università di Pisa
Perspectives on Language and
Intelligence
Giuseppe Attardi
Dipartimento di Informatica
Università di Pisa
Language and Intelligence
“Understanding cannot be measured by
external behavior; it is an internal metric
of how the brain remembers things and
uses its memories to make predictions”.
“The difference between the intelligence of
humans and other mammals is that we
have language”.
Jeff Hawkings, “On Intelligence”, 2004
Mountcastle observation
All the different regions of the neocortex
look pretty much exactly the same.
To understand spoken language, scientists
build algorithms based on rules of
grammar, syntax, and semantics.
But if Mountcastle is correct, the algorithm
of the cortex must be expressed
independently of any particular function or
sense.
The brain uses the same process to see as
to hear. The cortex does something
universal that can be applied to any type
of sensory or motor system.
Hawkins’ Memory-Prediction
framework

The brain uses vast amounts of
memory to create a model of the
world. Everything you know and
have learned is stored in this model.
The brain uses this memory-based
model to make continuous
predictions of future events. It is the
ability to make predictions about the
future that is the crux of intelligence.
In Summary






Prediction is the primary function of the
neocortex. All behavior is a byproduct of
prediction.
The neocortex is uniform.
The neocortex stores sequences of
patterns.
The patterns stored in the neocortex can
be recalled in an auto-associative way.
The patterns stored in the neocortex must
be stored using an invariant
representation.
Perceptual processing is hierarchical.
More …
“Spoken and written words are just patterns
in the world…
The syntax and semantics of language are
not different from the hierarchical
structure of everyday objects.
We associate spoken words with our
memory of their physical and semantic
counterparts.
Through language one human can invoke
memories and create next justapositions
of mental objects in another human.”
Themes
Vision

David Lowe: Local Invariant Feature
– http://www.cs.ubc.ca/spider/lowe/resear
ch.html
Music

Music Genoma Project
– http://www.pandora.com/mgp.shtml
Movement


Alain Berthoz. Sense du Movement
Perception and cognition are inherently
predictive, functioning to allow us to anticipate
the consequences of current or potential actions.
The brain acts like a simulator that is constantly
inventing models to project onto the changing
world, models that are corrected by steady,
minute feedback from the world. We move in the
direction we are looking, anticipate the trajectory
of a falling ball, recover when we stumble, and
continually update our own physical position, all
thanks to this sense of movement.
Language

Parser technologies
Ontologies

Omega Description Logic (1979)
– Assume that knowledge is represented in
conceptual taxonomies rather than flat
predicates as in FOL
– Single subsumption relation is:
• (a Man) is (a Mortal)
• Socrates is (a Man)
– Taxonomic reasoning

Evidence from psychometric studies
 Danny Hillis planned to use Omega on
Connection Machine
 Description Logics
Ontologies

Problem: how to build ontologies?
– Hand craft
– Acquire from learning

Semantic Web
– RDF: derived from description logics
– OWL (= DAML+OIL): Web Ontology
Language
Personal stance

Skeptical of Semantic Web approach,
for several reasons:
– People
– Goals
– impractical

Favor approaches based on learning
through large corpora and
continuous adaptation
Alternative View
Cognitive Web based on the MemoryPrediction Framework
1. invariant forms: documents
2. broad connectivity: the Net
3. nested feedback loops:aggregation
Knowledge Extraction
Text Analytics, Text Mining
 Relation Extraction from parse trees
 Semantic Role Labeling
 Intent, Opinion Mining
 Applications

Opinion Mining

Bibliography at:
– http://patty.isti.cnr.it/~esuli/research/sen
timent/
Cognition





Susan Blackmore: Meme Machine
Meme: units of cultural transmission
Role of imitation in humans
Explores the meme-gene parallels and derives an
interesting framework for explaining the unusual
size of the human brain and the origins of
consciousness, language, altruism, religion, and
orkut.
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail//019286212X/qid=1091859256/sr=81/ref=pd_ka_1/103-24774533275828?v=glance&s=books&n=507846
References
A. Berthoz. The brain's sense of
movement. Harvard University Press.
2000.
 J. Hawkins, S. Blakeslee. On
Intelligence. Times Books, 2004.
 S. Blackmore. Meme Machine.

Themes for discussion
Lenci: linguaggio e cognizione
 Esuli Sebastiani: opinion mining?
 Improvvisazione: Ciancia
 Neurofisiologia: Felicioli
 Semantic Web: Razvan Popescu
 Movement: Bonchi
 Vision: Scordino
 Memes: Passaro
 Language:

Mailing List

















[email protected] Felicioli Claudio
[email protected] Filippo Bonchi
[email protected] Vincenzo Ciancia
[email protected] Luca Veraldi
[email protected] Nicola Carmignani
[email protected] Valentino Fiorin
[email protected] Yan He
[email protected] Sara Corfini
[email protected] Razvan Popescu
[email protected] Claudio Scordino
[email protected] Francesco Nidito
[email protected] Alessandro Passaro
[email protected] Callieri Marco
[email protected] Flavio Baronti
[email protected] Salvatore Ruggieri
[email protected] Maria Simi
[email protected] Giuseppe Attardi