Transcript Document
Demand Response Research and
Capabilities at LBNL
Chuck Goldman
[email protected]
Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
Midwest Demand Response Initiative
Steering Committee Kick-Off Meeting
Chicago, Illinois
February 9, 2007
Overview of DR Research at LBNL
Electricity Markets and Policy Group
Conducts research and provides technical assistance to policymakers on
demand response
– and utility system planning, energy efficiency, renewable energy,
power system reliability, and DG
Demand Response Research Center
LBNL manages a multi-institutional center for DR research, funded by
the California Energy Commission’s Public Interest Energy Research
Program
LBNL projects focus on developing technologies and protocols for
Automated Demand Response (Auto-DR) for C/I customers
DR Market Assessment & Valuation
Estimating Demand Response Potential Among Large
Commercial and Industrial Customers: A Scoping Study
Develops analytical techniques and identifies data sources for conducting
demand response market potential studies
Benefits of Demand Response in Electricity Markets and
Recommendations for Achieving Them
A DOE Report to U.S. Congress (Section 1252 of the Energy Policy Act
of 2005)
Framework for assessing DR Benefits (and costs); comparative review of
existing studies; high-level policy recommendations for developing DR
nation-wide
Tracking DR and RTP Program Experience
DR Program Activity and Impacts: Summer 2006
Interviewed ~30 ISO/utility program managers to assess DR program
experience; snapshot of “state of DR market”
Real-time Hourly Pricing as a Default Service Tariff
Conducted stakeholder interviews and in-depth review of regulatory
records in all five states where RTP hourly pricing had been adopted as
the default service for large customers (through Summer 2004)
Characterized experiences with, and potential for, this form of dynamic
pricing to serve as a source of demand response
Survey of Utility Experiences with RTP as an Optional Service
Conducted interviews with ~40 utilities offering optional RTP programs
to characterize their actual/potential role as a source of DR
DR and RTP Program Evaluation
Niagara Mohawk (National Grid) Day-Ahead RTP for Large
C&I Customers
Estimated price elasticities for 120 customers for five years; characterize
price responsiveness across customer market segments; and DR potential
In-depth customer interviews; assess factors affecting participation in
hourly pricing and price responsiveness
Evaluation of NYISO DR Programs (2001, 2002)
Customer survey: barriers, factors influencing decisions to participate,
curtail; role of enabling technologies
Estimated customer price elasticities and market benefits
DR Technical Assistance
Direct Technical Assistance
Technical Advisor to New-England Demand Response Initiative
(NEDRI)
IEA Demand Response Resource (DRR) Program and Market Analysis
project
ISO-NE DR Program Design
New Jersey Multi-year DR Strategic Plan
NYSERDA DR Programs
Measurement & Verification Methods
Developed M&V Protocol for New England ISO (and NYISO) DR
program for non-interval metered customers
LBNL Demand Response Research
Center Activities
Recent and Ongoing
Projects
New Projects
Project 1
Evaluation of RTP
for Large Users
Project 4
Industrial DR –
Strategies in Audits
Project 2
Demand Shifting
with Thermal Mass
Project 5
Industrial DR in Food
Processing
Project 3
Automated Demand
Response in Commercial
Buildings
Project 6
DR Behavior Solicitation (2-3
Projects Forthcoming)
Auto-DR System Overview
Price Server
System 2 Automation Server (DRAS)
Demand
Response
3
2
PG&E CPP Event
Utility
Initiation System
1
Polling Client &
Internet Relay
Software
components
Price Server
component
XML
Utility or IOU
Event Trigger
Internet
& private WANs
Internet
Relay
Internet
Gateway
Polling
Client
3
EMCS
Protocol
EMCS
Protocol
4
C
C
C
Electric Loads
3
Polling
Client
C
Client & Logic with
Integrated Relay (CLIR)
3
CLIR
Box
Internet
Relay
C
C
EMCS Protocol
EMCS Protocol
4
C
C
C
Electric Loads
4
4
C
C
C
Electric Loads
C
C
C
Electric Loads
Internet Relay
Test
Sites
C = EMCS Controllers
Auto-DR Results: Peak Demand Savings in
2006 CPP Program
Average Demand Saving [kW]
3pm - 6pm (High Price Period)
500
1200
15%
1150
450
1138 kW
1100
400
350
6%
300
250
200
150
100
21%
30%
23%
20%
23%
15%
19%
10%
50
4%
16% 6%
3%
• Average reduction was 14% during 3 hour peak period
• Technology performed well: continued use during heat wave
Aggregated
Average
Retail Store 2
Retail Store 1
Office 3
Lab Facility 2
Lab Facility 1
Office 2
Office 1
Detention Fac.
County Office 3
County Office 2
Museum
Office + DataCtr
County Office 1
0
For additional information...
Electricity Markets and Policy Group
http://eetd.lbl.gov/ea/emp
http://eetd.lbl.gov/ea/emp/drlm-pubs.html
Demand Response Research Center
http://drrc.lbl.gov