Transcript Document
JSNA JSNA Event 01.11.11 • Feedback from the event was very positive with delegates enjoying the day and finding it useful. •Wide variety of professionals in attendance from across the region (commissioners, intelligence, children's services). •3 workshops took place throughout the day which were based around the LGID paper ‘A Springboard for Action’ JSNA Event 01.11.11 Workshop 1: Learn from the past •Challenging Conversations •Introduction of power and politics •Lacking direction and steer •Added complexity of CCGs and their role •Authority of JSNA JSNA Event 01.11.11 •Partnerships •JSNA had generally strengthened partnerships •Some sectors difficult to engage (providers/ acute services, CCGs, elected members) JSNA Event 01.11.11 •Data •JSNA has lead to greater information sharing •Most moving toward a web based system or portal, that could be manipulated •All acknowledged the JSNA can’t be just data and that the interpretation and story telling was the key. •Gaps identified – financial data, wellbeing JSNA Event 01.11.11 •Identifying Need •JSNA leading to more in-depth HNA where needed. •Hard to engage with hard to reach groups •Commissioning •JSNA is not yet seen as THE process to inform commissioning, but evidence to suggest it was used by commissioners along side other tools and evidence JSNA Event 01.11.11 •Learning •Delegates felt that JSNA were improving year on year •Inequalities •Not really seen as the main focus of JSNA •Resources •Many areas felt that the JSNA process was not adequately resourced, both in time and financially JSNA Event 01.11.11 •Workshop 2: Match form to function General consensus of what a JSNA should have or involve; •Comparison (data and trends) •Benchmarking •Interpretation by someone who understands the ‘real picture’ •A narrative or translation •Local knowledge •Engagement with different demographic groups •Involvement of service providers •Links made between the data and services areas JSNA Event 01.11.11 •Evidence of what works in tackling the issues •Reference to the long term benefits of particular interventions •Case studies •A way of talking about the data, via presentations, workshops •A point of contact for JSNA related analysis and interpretation •Education •Storyboard to say whether a decision should be made or whether it should be a priority •An evidence base •Recommendations JSNA Event 01.11.11 •Workshop 3: EMPHO Support Generally felt that EMPHO should priorities communication activities, further events, tailored tools, training different audiences