슬라이드 제목 없음

Download Report

Transcript 슬라이드 제목 없음

TFT(Thin Film Transistor) LCD II
Hanyang University
Integrated Electronics Laboratory
O. K. Kwon Nov. 2000
Contents
• TFT-LCD Overview
– Structure of TFT-LCD Panel
(Back Light System, Polarizer, Color Filter)
– Pixel Structure
– TFT Fabrication
– TFT-LCD Driver (Data & Gate Driver) and Interface System
Hanyang University
Integrated Electronics Laboratory
O. K. Kwon Nov. 2000
• Issues and Technologies of TFT-LCD
–
–
–
–
–
High Gray Scale
Low Power Consumption
High Aperture Ratio
Wide Viewing Angle
Large Size Display
Gray Scale Generation
• Various gray scale generation Methods
– Decoder-Based DAC
– Resistor-String DAC
– Capacitor DAC
Hanyang University
Integrated Electronics Laboratory
O. K. Kwon Nov. 2000
• Weighted Capacitance Type DAC
• Split Weighted Capacitance Type DAC
• C-2C Type DAC
– Ramp Method
– Dithering Method
– FRC(Frame Rate Control)
– Shindou Method
Digital Data Driver _Decoder Based DAC
• DAC Using Decoder
• Pros
3bit data
V0
V2
V4
V6
– Clear and fast operation
– Relatively simple circuit
• Cons
Hanyang University
V1
V3
V5
V7
Integrated Electronics Laboratory
O. K. Kwon Nov. 2000
– As many external voltage
sources and analog switches
Pass
Decoder
gate
as gray scales
array
– Many voltage source
:
High system costs
– Many analog switches
: Large area
3-to-8 decoder based DAC
– Impractical for high gray scale
Digital Data Driver_Resistor String DAC
• 8 bit Resistor String DAC
VREF1
VREF2
– External voltage sources
– 8-resistor string between
neighboring voltage sources
• 256 analog voltage levels
D0 D1 D2 D3 D4 D5 D6 D7
VREF(N-1)
VREF(N)
Hanyang University
OUT
Integrated Electronics Laboratory
O. K. Kwon Nov. 2000
• Pros
– Less voltage sources than
decoder-only type
– More accurate than capacitor DAC
• Cons
– Static currents
– Difficult to implement accurate
resistance
– Area increase with gray scale
Reference
Generator
ROM Type Decoder
8-bit resistor string DAC
Digital Data Driver_Capacitor DAC
-
16/15C
+
C
Reset
C
2C
4C
C
8C
2C
4C
Vout
8C
VREF1
Hanyang University
Integrated Electronics Laboratory
O. K. Kwon Nov. 2000
VREF2
• Capacitor DAC
– Analog voltage generation controlling charge sharing between capacitors
– Binary weighted capacitor
• Pros
• Cons
– No static current
– Less external voltages (1 or 2)
– Easier to control thermal oxide
thickness  Uniform capacitors
– Large area : DAC unit at every line
– Variable data line capacitance
• When OP-AMP not used
– Less accurate than R-DAC
Digital Data Driver_C-2C DAC
Reference
voltages
2C 2C
—
D7
—
D6
—
D5
C
Hanyang University
C
C
C
D0
D1
D2
D3 D4
VO
C
Integrated Electronics Laboratory
Vr-
Reference voltage selector
(upper 3-bit decoder)
•
•
C
O. K. Kwon Nov. 2000
Vr+
•
2C 2C
VrVr+
5-bit C-2C DAC
8-bit D/A Converter with -correction
– Reference voltages can be adjusted to the LCD’s non-linear V-T
characteristics
Small area of DAC compared with weighted capacitor type
Power consumption is reduced
Digital Data Driver_Ramp method
•
•
•
DAC Using Ramp Signal : 6Bit
Structure
– Shift register, Input register, Storage
register, Counter, Analog switch
– Externally supplied ramp signal
Operation
– When a counter counts up to 111111,
it turns-off the analog switch.
– If an input data is 111111, the analog
switch is turned-off as soon as the
data is loaded
– If an input data is 000000, the analog
switch keeps being turned-on until
the counter counts from 000000 to
111111.
– The counter determines when to turnoff the switch
Hanyang University
Integrated Electronics Laboratory
Data
Input
register
Load
Clock
5-bit
counter
External
ramp
O. K. Kwon Nov. 2000
External
ramp
Counter
Output
DAC
Output
Data=
000010
Data=
111101
Digital Data Driver_Ramp method
• Cons
• Pros
– -correction by control of voltage
step V1, V2 , V3 (See below)
– No resistor, capacitor or amplifier
Better uniformity
T(%)
– Complex circuitry
( 6bit counter at every data line )
– Ramp signal distortion due to RC
delay and noise
Counter
Output 000
V7
Hanyang University
Integrated Electronics Laboratory
O. K. Kwon Nov. 2000
100
001
010
011
100
101
110
Time
V6
V1
80
V5
V2
V4
60
V3
V3
V3
V3
40
V2
V2
20
External
Ramp V1
V1
V0
0
1
2
3
4
V-T characteristics of LC
V(volt)
5
V-T nonlinearity compensation
using ramp signal
111
Digital Data Driver_Dither method
Brightness(gray scale)
Driving Voltage and Gray Scale
by 8-voltage levels
by Dither-method
Gray Scale Interpolation using Dither-Method
12
12
16
12
16
12
16
16
16
16
12
12
12
12
12
16
12
16
16
16
16th
12th
12th
•
V1
V2 V3 V4 V5 V6 V7
V8
Driving voltage
• Cons
– Reduced resolution
Hanyang University
Integrated Electronics Laboratory
O. K. Kwon Nov. 2000
13th
14th
15th
16th
Principles
– V4 represents 12th gray, V5 represents 16th
gray
– Group 4 pixels as a unit
– 4 pixels select 12th gray, 12th gray on average
– 3 pixels select 12th gray, 13th gray on average
– 2 pixels select 12th gray, 14th gray on average
– 1 pixel select 12th gray, 15th gray on average
– All pixels select 16th gray, 16th gray on average
Digital Data Driver_Frame Rate Control
Gray Scale Using FRC
High-Level
Gray-scale
1
2
3
4
V0
V0
V0
V0
V1
V0
V1
V0
Hanyang University
Integrated Electronics Laboratory
O. K. Kwon Nov. 2000
Low-Level
Gray-scale
V0
V2
V0
V2
Transmittance(arb.unit)
Frame
Gray-Scale
White
4-level V-T characteristics
10
a
b
1
2
2
2
V0 + V1
c 1
2
2
2
V0 + V2
1
d 2
2
2
V1 + V2
1
Black
V1
V2
V1
V2
V0
V1
V2
Voltage(rms)
•
•
Frame Rate Control - Temporal average
Cons
• Principle
1
rms

V 02 + V 12
– Should increase to prevent flicker
– V0, V1 alternation :
2
1
– High speed addressing required
– V0, V2 alternation : rms 
V 02 + V 22
2
unsuitable for high gray scale
Digital Data Driver_Shindou method[1/2]
• Principle
– Alternation of Vi, Vj of which duty ratio is m:n
m Vi + nVj
V

– Average voltage transferred to pixel
average
m+n
– Controlling m and n : interpolation between Vi and Vj
m
n
Vi
Hanyang University
Integrated Electronics Laboratory
O. K. Kwon Nov. 2000
Vj
• Theoretical Background
– An periodic function f(x) can be expressed in Fourier series
a0 
f (x) 
+  (an cos nx + bn sin nx )
2 n 1

1
1
an   f ( x ) cos nxdx,
(n  1,2,3, . . . .) bn   f ( x ) sin nxdx,
(n  1,2,3, . . . .)
 -
 -
– Data line and pixel act as a low pass filter
– Harmonics are suppressed and DC (average value) component are
transferred to pixel
TM4
TM3
TM2
TM1
TN0
V0
V32
V64
V128
V96
V160
V192
V224
V256
TM4
TM3
TM2
TM1
TN0
Digital Data Driver_Shindou method[2/2]
D0
S0
ASW0
D0
D0
D1
S32
ASW32
D1
D1
D2
S64
ASW64
D2
D2
D3
S96
ASW96
D3
D3
D4
S128
ASW128
D5
S160
ASW160
D6
S192
ASW192
D7
S224
ASW224
D8
S256
ASW256
SCC
Output Stage Using
Shindou Method
OUT
D4
D4
16T
TM4
T
IS
ISG
D5
D5
Hanyang University
S0
S0
S32
S32 TM3
S64
S64
S96
S96 TM2
S128
S128
S160
S160
S192
S192
S224
S224
S256
S256
Integrated Electronics Laboratory
O. K. Kwon Nov. 2000
D6
D6
D7
D7
8T
4T
2T
TM1
T
TM0
SC
Structure of SCC
Waveforms of TMs
• Operation
– SC selects neighboring two voltage sources according to higher 3bits D5,
D6, D7.
– ISG generates 32 kinds of pulse T whose duty ratios are 31:1~0:32 using
TMs according to lower 5bits D0, D1, D2, D3, D4, D5.
– The selected two voltage levels are interpolated by the generated pulse T
Issues and Technologies for High Gray Scale
• Issues
– Vp compensation
• Capacitor coupling structure
• Vp compensation structure
– Random offset of the output buffer
Hanyang University
Integrated Electronics Laboratory
O. K. Kwon Nov. 2000
• Offset compensation structure
– Area Increases of the DAC
• Compact DAC data driver (SID ’00)
• New Driving Method for 8bit gray scale is needed
Vp problems
• Vp problem(Gate Voltage Feedthrough)
VD
VGn
VGn-1
Hanyang University
Integrated Electronics Laboratory
O. K. Kwon Nov. 2000
CS
VD
CLC
VP
VP
VP
VP
CGD
VGn
VP 
VG  CGP
CGP + CS + CLC 
Vp problems
• What troubles in Vp ?
CGS 1  VG

V

P
Uneven parasitic capacitance in all pixels
CLC + CSTG + CGS 1
Asymmetric charging characteristic
Hanyang University
Integrated Electronics Laboratory
O. K. Kwon Nov. 2000
Uneven Vp in all pixels
Degradation of gray scale
• To reduce Vp
– Pixel design optimization
– Vp compensation circuit  too complex
– Novel methods are needed.
Vp Compensation Driving
• LC voltage at the end of selection
VLC  Vcol - Vg
CGS
CGS
CST
C
+ Vcomp
 Vcomp  Vg GS for compensation
+ CLC + CS
CGS + CLC + CST
CST
Vg,n
Column
Hanyang University
Integrated Electronics Laboratory
O. K. Kwon Nov. 2000
Row n
Vg,n
CGS
t
Vg,n-1
Tr
CLC
Row n-1
Vcomp
t
Vg,n-1
CST
Random offset of the output buffer
• Random Offset
Process variations between
channel-to-channel, chip-to-chip,
wafer-to-wafer
Hanyang University
Integrated Electronics Laboratory
O. K. Kwon Nov. 2000
Without Offset Cancellation Technique
Decrease of Yield
Difficult
With Offset Cancellation Technique
Random offset of the output buffer
• Why Difficult ?
– Different loads of OP-AMP
• Calibration mode < 1pF
• Driving mode > 100pF
Driver
Vin
– Difficult to design OP-AMP
Vos
Integrated Electronics Laboratory
O. K. Kwon Nov. 2000
• Solutions
– OP-AMP with internal offset
calibration
OP-AMP
SW2
Hanyang University
TFT-LCD Panel
Loads
C
SW1
SW3
loads < 1pF
loads > 100pF
– External offset calibration
technique
– Driving methods insensitive
to offset voltage
Common Offset Cancellation Circuit
Area Increases of the DAC
• DAC
– Resistor String DAC
– Capacitor DAC etc.
Resistor
String
V8
R255
Rom Type Decoder
doubled DAC
area (in resistor
1-bit
increase
string DAC)
V255
Hanyang University
Integrated Electronics Laboratory
O. K. Kwon Nov. 2000
V254
R254
V253
8-bit DAC
Area
R253
V252
R252
10-bit DAC
Area
V251
4 times larger
R04
V04
R03
V03
• Solutions
- New DAC schemes
R02
V02
R01
V01
R00
V0
V00
D0 D1 D2 D3 D4 D5 D6 D7
8-bit DAC
Vout
Digital Data Driver_Area-efficient driver [1/2]
Control Logic
36
Data
Vgamma
8
6-Bit
DAC
(6 Stage)
Analog
Sample
Circuit
Analog
Hold
Circuit
Buffer
Analog
Sample
Circuit
Analog
Sample
Circuit
Analog
Sample
Circuit
Analog
Sample
Circuit
Analog
Sample
Circuit
Analog
Sample
Circuit
Analog
Hold
Circuit
Analog
Hold
Circuit
Analog
Hold
Circuit
Analog
Hold
Circuit
Analog
Hold
Circuit
Analog
Hold
Circuit
Buffer
Buffer
Buffer
Buffer
Buffer
Buffer
DRV
OUT<1>
DRV
OUT<2>
DRV
OUT<3>
DRV
OUT<4>
Hanyang University
Integrated Electronics Laboratory
O. K. Kwon Nov. 2000
DRV
DRV
OUT<383> OUT<384>
Compact(Area Efficient) LCD Driver
• Operation
– Once the data are converted to parallel, they are fed into six DACs
– The result is six analog voltages, which are multiplexed onto sample and
hold cells, one for each output
Digital Data Driver_Area efficient driver [2/2]
• Pros
– Area-efficient
• 6bit * 384 DACs are needed for conventional data driver
• 6bit * 6 DACs + 384 sample and hold circuits for compact driver
– Low power consumption because of the reduced static currents of
DACs
Hanyang University
Integrated Electronics Laboratory
O. K. Kwon Nov. 2000
• Cons
– Sample and hold circuits errors are included
(inapplicable to high gray scale)
Low Power Consumption
• Overview
Reduction of panel load
driving power
Improvement of transmission
rate of panel
• Improvement of panel aperture ratio
• High transmission rate color filters,
polarizers
Backlight Unit
60%
Improvement of light
utilization rate
• Efficiency improvement of light
guides
• Improvement of light emission
efficiency of CCFT
• Panel load capacity reduction
• Energy recovery driving
• Reduced frame rate
Hanyang University
Integrated Electronics Laboratory
O. K. Kwon Nov. 2000
Circuit Unit
40%
Low voltage drive
circuits
• 5V  3.3V
Excellent-efficiency
power supply circuit
• Efficiency improvement of
DC/DC converter
Power Breakdown of Data Driver
Black and White
Vertical Stripe
Black
Polarity
Inversion
Analog DC
Power
(VDDa=10V)
Digital
Power
Line/Dot
Column
Line/Dot
Column
145mW
145mW
145mW
145mW
Hanyang University
Power Consumption
Panel AC Power
Integrated Electronics Laboratory
O. K. Kwon Nov. 2000
5mW
5mW
15mW
15mW
14mW
14mW
21mW
21mW
275mW
0.52mW
139mW
0.34mW
439mW
164mW
320mW
181mW
Analog DC Power
(VDDd=2.5V)
Interface
Bus Power
Panel AC
Power
Total
(12.1 inch SVGA ,SID ’97)
Interface Bus Power
Digital Power
Low Power Driving(AC Power Reduction)
• Equation of the Panel AC Power Consumption
PAC  VDD  I AVE
F


 VDD  NS  CL  VSWING  ROW 
2 

Hanyang University
Integrated Electronics Laboratory
O. K. Kwon Nov. 2000
• Two approaches to reduce AC power
Reduce FROW
•MFD(Multi-Field Driving)
Reduce VSWING
•Charge Sharing
•Triple Charge Sharing
•Stepwise Source Driving
•RLC Resonant Method
Low Power Driving - Multi-Field Driving [1/3]
• Background
– Total power consumption (TPC) = Static power consumption
(SPC)+Dynamic Power Consumption (DPC)
– DPC is 70% of TPC, so refresh rate must be slow down for TPC
reduction, because DPC is directly proportional to refresh rate
Hanyang University
Integrated Electronics Laboratory
O. K. Kwon Nov. 2000
– Slower refresh rate causes more visible flicker!  Multi-Field Driving
Field
7
6
3
2
1
1
2
3
4
5
• Multi-Field Driving Method
– Divide 1 frame into 3 sub-field
– The polarity of adjacent field is
opposite
– In spite of reduced refresh rate,
Flicker frequency remains at the same
level due to averaging effect
Low Power Driving - Multi-Field Driving [2/3]
i(t)
i(t)
VN
VP
ia(t)
Ts
VS
2
3
Ts
VS
VS
2nTs
(2n+1)Ts (2n+2)Ts
t
t
(b)
(a)
(a) Flicker for one line
Hanyang University
O. K. Kwon Nov. 2000
(b) Flicker for adjacent three lines
• Flicker Compensation
–
–
–
–
Integrated Electronics Laboratory
t
(c)
(C) Average flicker for
adjacent three lines
In the case that refresh rate is reduced from 60Hz to 20Hz
Flicker frequency for each line : 2TS (three times longer than original one)
Flickers for adjacent three lines occur at different phase
Average flicker frequency for three serial lines : 2/3 TS
In spite of reducing refresh rate into 1/3 of original one, flicker frequency
remains at the same level
Low Power Driving - Multi-Field Driving [3/3]
• Power Consumption Reduction
• Pros.
100
Dynamic Power Consumption
- power saving efficiency > 50%
Static Power Consumption
45
Hanyang University
Integrated Electronics Laboratory
Power(%)
O. K. Kwon Nov. 2000
50
15
• Cons.
55
7
5
5
- Inapplicable to moving image
19
18
16
- extra frame memory
13
- complex
34
1
3
5
11
Interlaced Subfield Images
Low Power Driving - Charge Sharing [1/2]
Waveform and timing diagram
Architecture
#M row line time
Charge
Sharing
time
Conventional Data Driver
#M+1 row line time
Charge
Sharing
Gray Scale
time
Decision time
Charge
Gray Scale
Sharing
Decision time time
VDD
AMP
CR
Positive
Video
Signals
Hanyang University
VH
1
V
2 swing
Integrated Electronics Laboratory
O. K. Kwon Nov. 2000
Panel
RL
CL
1
RL
RL
CL
2
CL
3
• Operation
RL
CL
4
RL
CL
N-1
RL
CL
N
Vcom
Negative
Video
Signals VL
GND
CR
– Now Mth row was driven and (M+1)th row is about to be driven
– Neighboring data lines store video signals of opposite polarities
– Shortly before driving Mth row, every switch is disconnected from output buffer and
connected to CL
– Every data line has medium voltage level due to charge sharing
– Signal CR controls the switches
Low Power Driving - Charge Sharing [2/2]
• Power Consumption
Analysis
Hanyang University
Integrated Electronics Laboratory
O. K. Kwon Nov. 2000
Power Saving Efficiency [%]
– Vpos voltage level of video signal
of positive polarity
– Vneg voltage level of video signal
of negative polarity
50
– Half of Vswing is supplied by
charge sharing and only the other
half comes from the external
source
PCh arg e -Sharing
40
30
0.1s
0.2s
0.3s
0.4s
0.5s
20
10
0
0.4
• Pros.
0.6
0.8
1.0
charge time [ s]
- applicable to moving image
- no degradation of image quality
FROW
 1
 VDD  [ N  CL   Vswing 
] - very simple
2
2
- power saving efficiency < 50%
1
•Cons.
 PAC
2
- power saving efficiency < 50%
Low Power Driving - Triple Charge Sharing [1/3]
Waveform and Timing Diagram
SEL1
AMP
SEL2
SEL3
Architecture
#M row line time
Triple
charge
sharing
CEXT
Conventional Data Driver
Gray Scale
Decision time
VDD
Hanyang University
Integrated Electronics Laboratory
O. K. Kwon Nov. 2000
Positive
Video
Signals
VH
Vcom
Negative
Video
Signals
VL
New Driver
GND
RL
RL
RL
RL
RL
CL
1
CL
2
CL
3
CL
N-1
CL
N
Panel
SEL1
SEL2
SEL3
1
V
3 swing
Vswing
#M+1 row line time
Triple
charge
sharing
Gray Scale
Decision time
Triple
charge
sharing
Low Power Driving - Triple Charge Sharing [2/3]
• Convergence of the voltage of CEXT
V DD
VH
Hanyang University
Integrated Electronics Laboratory
O. K. Kwon Nov. 2000
V SWING
after thousands of row
line time
V EXT
V SWING
3
VL
GND
500
If CEXT N  CL
1000
1500
2000
time [ X row line time ]
VEXT
1
 VL + VSWING
3
SEL1
AMP
SEL2
SEL3
Low Power Driving - Triple Charge Sharing [3/3]
#M row line time
Triple
charge
sharing
CEXT
Gray Scale
Decision time
Triple
charge
sharing
VDD
Conventional Data Driver
Positive
Video
Signals
VH
Vcom
Negative
Video
Signals
New Driver
Gray Scale
Decision time
#M+1 row line time
Triple
charge
sharing
Hanyang University
Integrated Electronics Laboratory
O. K. Kwon Nov. 2000
1
3Vswing
Vswing
VL
GND
SEL1
RL
RL
RL
RL
RL
CL
1
CL
2
CL
3
CL
N-1
CL
N
Panel
SEL2
SEL3
AMP
1
P

PAC
Power consumed in Gray Scale Decision Time : TRIPLE _ CHARGE _ SHARING
3
• Pros.
- applicable to moving image
- no degradation of image quality
- simple
- power saving efficiency < 66.6%
• Cons.
- row line time extension method
is needed
Low Power Driving - Stepwise Source Driving [1/3]
1H
2H
1H
3H
2H
3H
VDD (10V)
VDD (10V)
C
VH
positive video
B
VCOM (5V)
negative video
positive video
VCOM (5V)
5.5V
Hanyang University
D
Integrated Electronics Laboratory
O. K. Kwon Nov. 2000
VL
negative video
A
GND
GND
fully supplied by amplifier (VDD)
Conventional Source Driving
Power
supply
amplifier
Stepwise Source Driving
Voltage
A
B
C
D
swing
Power
Polarity
Polarity
amplifier amplifier
supply modulator VL modulator VH
Low Power Driving - Stepwise Source Driving [2/3]
• Schematic Diagram
SW5
7.75V VH
SW4
AMP_H
AMP_L
AMP_H
AMP_L
AMP_H
AMP_H
AMP_L
AMP_L
6.65V
CT4
SW3
Hanyang University
Integrated Electronics Laboratory
O. K. Kwon Nov. 2000
MUX_A
5.55V
CT3
MUX_A
MUX_A
MUX_A
MUX_A
MUX_A
MUX_A
EO
SW2
4.45V
CT2
CLOAD
PM
Odd
PM
Even
MUX_B
SW1
MUX_B
MUX_B
MUX_B
MUX_B
MUX_B MUX_B
CON
3.35V
CT1
SW0
PIXEL
Polarity Modulator
Architecture of Driver
2.25V VL
Low Power Driving - Stepwise Source Driving [3/3]
• Pros.
Waveform in All-Black image
1H
2H
VDD
black
VH
VL
black
black
Hanyang University
Integrated Electronics Laboratory
O. K. Kwon Nov. 2000
polaity
modulation
polaity
modulation
gray scale
decision
Waveform in All-White image
1H
white
gray scale
decision
• Cons.
2H
VH
white
VL
polaity
modulation
gray scale
decision
polaity
modulation
- applicable to moving
image
- no degradation of
image quality
- power saving
efficiency < 84.5%
white
gray scale
decision
- row line time
extension method
is needed
- voltage overcharging
Low Power Gate Driving_RLC Resonant Method [1/2]
• Operation
Hanyang University
Integrated Electronics Laboratory
O. K. Kwon Nov. 2000
+
-
– RLC resonant operation
whose oscillation is
interrupted after half
oscillation
– Oscillation sensing circuitry
sense the ON-resistance of
the switch
L
VS/2
CL
Simplified Structure
Schematic View of Driving Circuitry
Low Power Gate Driving_RLC Resonant Method [2/2]
• Operation time range
– Charging (discharging) time
is divided into two
oscillation time and two
charge sharing time
Hanyang University
Integrated Electronics Laboratory
O. K. Kwon Nov. 2000
• Power dissipation
VLOST 

4
VS
C pix
NL
tSWING   C pix LN
PrlcR  VSVLOST C pix fN
• Applicable to gate and
data driver of LCD
Timing diagram
Low Analog DC Power_Class-B Buffer
• Operation
– Nonlinear circuits are included
(inverter and comparator)
– Output NMOS and PMOS are
turned on by series-shunt
feedback of input/output
voltage
VDD
Vos1
Hanyang University
Integrated Electronics Laboratory
O. K. Kwon Nov. 2000
Cmp1
Vout
Vin
• Pros
– Low static current
Vos2
Cmp2
• Cons
– Sensitive to the offset voltage
of comparators
VSS
Block diagram of class-B output buffer
High Aperture Ratio
TFT
• Aperture ratio decreases as
pixel pitch shrinks
• Use of Black matrix
– Prevent light transmittance
through a pixel surrounding
area
Gate
Line
Black
matrix
Hanyang University
Integrated Electronics Laboratory
O. K. Kwon Nov. 2000
• High aperture ratio structure
Data
Line
Storage
Capacitance
– Shield CS(storage capacitor)
structure
Aperture
Area
– ITO Shield Plane structure
Aperture of a Single Pixel
High Aperture Ratio
• Shield-CS structure
– Shield-CS pattern(electro-static layer) functions as a common
electrode of a storage capacitance
– Coupling capacitance between the signal line and the pixel
electrode can be reduced
– This permits close layout between signal electrode and the pixel
electrode
Hanyang University
Integrated Electronics Laboratory
O. K. Kwon Nov. 2000
• ITO-shield plane structure
– Transparent electrode is placed between the signal line and the
pixel electrode
– This electrode works as a ground plane and shields capacitive
coupling
– Transverse electric field is reduced due to the same reason as the
shield CS
High Aperture Ratio
Aperture Area
Conventional
Structure
Alginment
margin
Signal
Line
Black Matrix
Aperture Area
Hanyang University
Integrated Electronics Laboratory
O. K. Kwon Nov. 2000
Shield -CS
Signal
Line
Alginment
margin
Shield Cs
ITO Shield
Plane
Liquid
Crystal
Signal
Line
No Black Matrix
Pixel
Electrode
Shield and storage
capacitance
electrode
Insulator
High Aperture Ratio
Black matrix
CS
Conventional Structure
50 ~ 70%
Aperture area
Hanyang University
Integrated Electronics Laboratory
O. K. Kwon Nov. 2000
Shield -CS
70 ~ 80%
ITO Shield Plane
80 ~ 90%
Wide Viewing Angle
• Conventional TN
Structure
– Anisotropic Structure of
LC molcule
– Imperfect light control
(Use of Polarizer)
– Viewing angle
dependence is intrinsic
problem of LCD
– Gray scale inversion
occurrs
Hanyang University
Integrated Electronics Laboratory
O. K. Kwon Nov. 2000
Viewing Angle
90°(H), 40°(V)
Aperture Ratio 50~70%
Wide Viewing Angle
• Vertical Alignment
Mode
• Advantages
– Wide viewing angle without
gray scale inversion
– High contrast ratio(~300:1)
– Fast response time(~25ms)
Hanyang University
Integrated Electronics Laboratory
O. K. Kwon Nov. 2000
• Disadvantages
– Material Limitation(LC)
– Use of compensation film
– Adoption of multi-domain
technology
– Complicate LC process
– Unstable alignment to
mechanical shock
Viewing Angle
140°(H), 120°(V)
Aperture Ratio > 80%
Wide Viewing Angle
• In-Plane Switchig
• Advantages
– Wide viewing angle
without gray scale
inversion
– Low flicker level(Unvisible)
– Low cost
Hanyang University
Integrated Electronics Laboratory
O. K. Kwon Nov. 2000
• Disadvantages
– Slow response
time(>45ms)
– Low transmittance(<4%)
– Crosstalk
– High driving voltage
Viewing Angle
160°(H), 160°(V)
Aperture Ratio< 40%
Large Panel Size and High-Resolution
• Issues
– Shortage of the Row Line Time
• Solutions
Hanyang University
Integrated Electronics Laboratory
O. K. Kwon Nov. 2000
– Dual Line Scanning
– Display Area Division Scanning
– LiTEX(Line Time Extension)
Row Line Time and Resolution
Large-Size
High -Resolution
Increase of
parasitic loads
Increase of
RC charging time
Decrease of
row line time
Deterioration of Image Quality
Row Line Time (sec)
35
XGA
SXGA
UXGA
QXGA
30
25
Hanyang University
Integrated Electronics Laboratory
O. K. Kwon Nov. 2000
20
15
10
5
Needs for Increase techniques
of row line time
0
50
55
60
65
70
Frame Rate(Hz)
75
80
Effective Mobility and Resolution
2.5
Effective mobility (Cm2/vs)
• Effective mobility :
minimum mobility
necessary to achieve
the maximum aperture
ratio
• Effective mobility is
increased as panel
size is larger
• Effective mobility is
increased as the
resolution of panel is
higher
XGA
SXGA
UXGA
QXGA
2.0
Hanyang University
Integrated Electronics Laboratory
O. K. Kwon Nov. 2000
1.5
1.0
0.5
0.0
150
200
250
Pixel Pitch (m)
300
Dual Line Scanning Method
• Dual Line Scanning Method
– Pros. : Doubled Row Line Time
– Cons. : Decrease of Vertical Resolution (1/2 of conventional)
1H
1H
1H
1H
Hanyang University
Integrated Electronics Laboratory
O. K. Kwon Nov. 2000
G1
G2
G3
G4
Driver LSIs
• Display-Area division scanning
– Pros. : Doubled Row Line Time
– Cons. : Cost Increase
(Doubled Driver LSIs)
TFT-LCD panel
Line Time Extension Method
• Primitive Scanning Waveforms
1H
Conventional
Scanning
G1
G2
G3
G4
1H
Hanyang University
1H
Integrated Electronics Laboratory
O. K. Kwon Nov. 2000
T1 Extended Line Time
LiTEX
Scanning
G1
G2
G3
G4
T2 Image Differentiation from G1
1H
Conclusions
• We have surveyed the driving methods and driver circuits.
• Reviewed issues and key Technologies
– High Gray Scale
• New Driving Method for 8bit gray scale
Hanyang University
Integrated Electronics Laboratory
O. K. Kwon Nov. 2000
– Low Power Consumptions
• Multi-Field Driving Method
• Charge Sharing, Triple Charge Sharing, Stepwise Driving, RLC resonant
• Low Analog DC Power : precharging method, Class-B buffer
– High Aperture Ratio : Shield-Cs, ITO Shield Plane
– Wide Viewing Angle : VA, IPS
– High-Resolution : Dual line scanning, LiTEX