Differentiating Instruction in the Secondary Science Classroom
Download
Report
Transcript Differentiating Instruction in the Secondary Science Classroom
Compacting Curriculum in
Pre-AP and
AP Social Studies
College Board Southwest Regional Forum
January 31, 2008
Ginny Garvic
Katy ISD Social Studies Curriculum Specialist
Cathy Wappler, Katy ISD GT/Advanced Academic
Studies Program Specialist
Secondary Social Studies in
Katy ISD
On-level courses, grades 6-12
Pre-AP courses: grades 6,7,8; World
Geography; World History
AP US History, Government, Economics,
European History
Open access to Pre-AP and AP
Pre-AP/GT; AP/GT
Secondary GT students served in the Pre-AP/AP
program, usually as a cluster
Some differentiation reflected in district
curriculum documents
Most differentiation occurs at the delivery level
Why differentiate in PreAP/AP/GT?
Wide range of student abilities in
Pre-AP/AP/GT classes
Desire to minimize repetition for those
students with prior knowledge of material
or the ability to quickly learn on their own
Obligation to provide opportunities for all
students to grow
Guiding Questions
What do we want students to know?
How will we know when they have learned?
What will we do when they haven’t learned?
What will we do when they already
know it?
Examples of
Differentiation Strategies
Flexible grouping
Learning centers
Product options
Independent study
Tiered instruction
Curriculum compacting
What is Curriculum Compacting?
One example of differentiation
An instructional pacing strategy
A strategy which eliminates instruction over
material already mastered
A means of providing advanced students with
opportunities to extend their learning
An opportunity to provide more individualized
instruction to students who need it
Components of Curriculum
Compacting
Preassessment
Documentation of mastery
Extension/Enrichment learning
experiences (Replacement activities)
Evidence of learning (Replacement
product)
Steps in the Process
Announce to students the opportunity to pre-test
over a particular unit of study
Suggest resources students may use to prepare
if they wish
Design a challenging pre-assessment which
tests for deep conceptual understanding of an
objective cluster
Steps, continued
Define a high mastery level (90%)
Administer and evaluate the preassessment
Identify students who demonstrate
mastery at the 90% level
Identify “non-negotiables” (“family time”)
Steps, continued
Students who demonstrate mastery
propose a plan for replacement learning
activities and a product
Replacement activities must be based on
same objectives
Students submit proposals for teacher
approval
Steps, continued
Students continue their learning independently
while teacher delivers traditional instruction to
remainder of class
Students submit daily learning logs
Students submit/share products at end of unit
Students complete a reflection piece on their
learning experiences
Keys to Success
Announce pretests in advance (2-3 days)
Set mastery level high (90%)
Give students responsibility for designing
replacement activities
Guide students in choosing appropriate
replacement activities and products
Keys to Success
Communicate behavioral expectations
clearly and enforce them
Require daily or bi-weekly learning logs
Remain within the cluster of objectives
Collaborate with other teachers
Grading Policy
Must be fair to students who test out of
traditional instruction
Should reflect mastery of required objectives
Unit grade may not be lower than pre-test grade
Unit grade may be higher than pre-test grade
Processing . . .
What squares with my thinking?
What is throwing me a curve?
Positive Side Effects
Higher post-assessment grades for all
students
More effective use of available
instructional time
High levels of teacher satisfaction
Increased interest in the discipline on the
part of highly able students
Resource for Compacting and Other
Differentiation Strategies
Differentiation: Simplified, Realistic,
and Effective by Bertie Kingore
Professional Associates Publishing
ISBN: 0-97-16233-3-3
Questions?
[email protected]
[email protected]