Transcript Document

Health Science Students’
Perceptions of Online
Problem-Based Learning
Ruta Valaitis, School of Nursing, McMaster University
Wendy Sword, School of Nursing, McMaster University
Bob Jones, Visualization Design Institute, Sheridan College
Andrea Hodges, Social and Public Health Services, and
McMaster University
McMaster Nursing Academic Seminars
Nov 2002
Research Partnership
Visualization Design Institute
Agenda

Brief glance at the literature
 Brief demo of some of the tools developed
and used for the project
 Report on the research findings to date
 Discussion
Online PBL Literature Review
Type of Student
Frequency
Undergraduate
 Graduate
 Prof Development
 Continuing Education
Total
9
5
4
1
17









Discipline
Frequency
Medicine
Education
Nursing
Nurse-midwifery
Sociology
Business
Computer science
Social Economy
Total
6
5
2
1
1
1
1
1
17






Research Method
Frequency
Case study
Cohort
Action research
Qualitative evaluation
Qualitative pilot
RCT
Total
11
2
1
1
1
1
17
Findings
Methods poorly described
 Analysis rarely described
 Interpretation and application of PBL
rarely consistent with McMaster
approach

Ronteltap & Eurelings (2001)
University of Maastricht undergraduate
medical students (n=9) and law students
(n=7)
 used CMC for discussions over a 6-8 week
block in between face-to-face PBL sessions
Authors concluded that:
 writing in an asynchronous communication
system may lead students to a deeper level of
information processing
 participants need time to get used to
communicating online

Witucki, Hodson & Malm (1996)
2 groups of nursing students (n= 98) in a
course aimed to improve critical thinking
using online communication to solve clinical
problems
 Student satisfaction survey conducted at the
end of the experience

– 80% felt that the conference was effective in thinking
critically about client situations
– Majority enjoyed the collaborative aspect of the online
assignment and felt that they could express themselves
more easily online than in a face-to-face discussion
Bjorck, 2001
2 distance education courses in social
economy in Sweden
 What do students do in dPBL?
Findings showed
 Messages are more frequent and detailed as
students gain more experience
 Decreased need to scaffolding by the
facilitator as students get used to dPBL
 Commenting on other’s comments builds
community, fosters reciprocity and
engagement

Orrill, 2001
Two graduate classes in Education in US
 Content analysis
Findings showed that
 Threaded discussions support divergent and
convergent thinking
 Threads were overwhelming for many
 Synchronous communication was needed
 Lack of visual / auditory feedback makes it
difficult to discern whether points made are
clear

Applied Research Project
• How to extend PBL online while maintaining
unique qualities
• Using existing ICTs
• Broaden access to information resources
• Provide new learning objects
• Evaluate online PBL by experienced
• Students
• Tutors
Research Questions
To explore senior health sciences
students’ perceptions and experiences
of:
– learning in online PBL
– group process in online PBL
– the use of online consultations with Fetal
Alcohol Spectrum Disorder (FASD*) experts
CMC System Learnlink


Communication via:

Synchronous Chat

Asynchronous Conferences
Access to online resources
Scenario
 Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorder
 Brigitte Boire
 Pregnancy
 Newborn infant
 Young child
Presenting the Case

Text

Videos

Transcripts

Clinical Data
Brigitte Boire is 23 years old.
She has recently moved to
Hamilton from Timmins,
Ontario, to ….
Resources

Videos
 Links/ Forms
 Computer Animations
 Fetal Development
 People Resources
 Professionals
 Anna Guardian – Expert Community Member
Student Groups
• Level IV Midwifery
• Self-selected to participate in place of paper
• Level III Nursing
• Self-selected -1 dropped out
• Graduate Neonatal Nurse Practitioners
• Self-selected to participate in place of paper
Methods
Focus groups and interviews
 Online reflections (Brookfield, 1995)
 Tutor interviews
 Quantitative analysis of online notes

Reflections
At what moment in the online class this week
did you feel most engaged with what was
happening?
 At what moment in the online class this week
did you feel most distanced from what was
happening?
 What action that anyone (tutor or student)
took in the online class this week did you find
most affirming and helpful?

Reflections
What action that anyone (tutor or student)
took in the online class this week did you find
the most puzzling and confusing?
 What about the online class this week
surprised you the most?
 Is there anything else that you think we
should know about your experience in the
online class this week?

Focus Group Questions

Getting started and computer set up
 PBL and group process online
 Case and resources
 Design issues
Analysis

Level one coding for one focus group
conducted by four researchers
– Where coding differed, consensus was reached
– 176 codes identified

All remaining reflections and focus groups
coded by at least two researchers
– Agreement reached by consensus
– 11 trees and 487 codes
Quantitative Results
•
Group size: 5 to 10 students
•
Time online: 4 to 6 weeks
•
Postings: 107 to 444 notes
•
New Conferences: 6 to 12 folders
•
Chats: Up to 4 sessions
Findings
Learning
 Group process
 Use of online experts

Many enjoyed online learning
experience
I like having the opportunity to try something
different. I figure I’ve written enough and I
don’t love writing papers so it was a nice ... it
had its frustrating moments but I really
welcomed the opportunity of having a new
experience
 The novelty of it. I thought it was a cool way
of doing something different.
Overall I really enjoyed it.

Lack of in-depth discussion
I appreciate all the work that everyone is doing, but
the in-depth discussion/analysis seems to be lagging

I thought we had done some excellent work. But
where I felt that we were missing out was on the overall
synthesis of the material that we would ordinarily get out
of our verbal conversation. I think for me solidifying it
through that synthesis was missing.

.
. everybody was like barfing out their information on
the screen. I mean everybody, myself included, we were
just like, oh found this, found this, and there was no
integration. Like there was nobody commenting on other
people’s [notes].
Lack of stimulation online
• I have been finding this project tedious and time
consuming. Most of this relates to having everything on
screen, having to pull back bits of info from various
messages and having to read a lot of stuff that isn't always
relevant.
• I felt like I was a robot. I put down my stuff and that
was it. Like I didn’t feel stimulated in the same way.
• It felt like initially we made some objectives and then it
just felt like we were pulling teeth on this sort of forever
never ending thing. And I think that that could have been
dealt with better if there had been more layers to the
scenario.
Discussion threads hard to
follow
• . . . by the time you got to [the 19th note in the
thread], it didn’t really didn’t make sense with the
first. [It] wasn’t really a thread, know what I
mean?
• . . . talking with my classmates many of us have
felt that it is hard to follow the threads and
actually absorb any of the info posted, because it
feels like you are jumping all over the place...
Online learning workload heavy
Quantity and quality of notes as well
as frequency of login

• This is so time-consuming!!
Reading and responding to
everyone takes 10 X the amount
of time online than face-to-face.
Time pressures



More time than face-to-face
No end of the week
I’d rather do my work and
get it done and be able to do
Time not saved
other things, and this had
I never anticipated it to be so
just seemed like something
time-consuming. I thoughtthat’s
it
going to go on and on
was going to save me time and on, and I had to keep
because I commute here from
checking.
Toronto. And honestly at the
end I thought, …oh I’d rather
make the drive.
Depth / extensiveness of
information valued
I have to say that something I really actually liked about
LearnLink was the depth of the information that got posted.
If you’ve ever sat in one of our PBL classes on Friday we get
like next to nothing accomplished. I mean, in terms of the
actual academics, because we spend so much time talking
about our personal clinical experiences and births and that
kind of stuff. And …the academic stuff is actually there.
 [I felt most engaged] going through the tonnes of
information that has been posted. [It] has been very
informative and engaging this week

Enhanced ability to reflect and
synthesize
• . . . Compared to what we do when we come to class, … you
cram a lot in for that sort of one session and then we all sort of
go bananas. In order to process that… I guess I’m a slower
processor, I reflect, I go back and think, and then that makes me
go down another path. That’s what I really liked about the
PBL. . . It afforded itself the extra time to reflect.
Enhanced ability to reflect and
synthesize
• …you really had to synthesize it because you were
putting it down on paper and words.
• …We don’t write out typically points on the stuff that
we’ve read [in preparation for class] or critically think
about it, and analyse the resources. You really had to
do that when you were writing it out online,
which was much more time-consuming.
Flexibility of Time and Place
• I really liked that I could go in and do it any
time because that was convenient having kids at
home. I could go in when they’re asleep. . .
• I valued the ability to research and post material
at variable times. The process kept me "on task"
but still afforded independence.
Easy Access Valued
• The evolution of learnlink… to be able to
study cases in this manner … is amazing. I
think that this format has a lot of potential for
both teaching courses and to enhance print or
lecture based courses. I also enjoy the
convenience of being able to access the
information and contribute when I have time.
Learned about computers, web
resources and the Internet
I
decided it was an online case and we were
using computer technology, so I’ve used a lot
more Internet resource than normally I do in my
PBL, and took advantage of the time to really do
a lot of exploring around the literature that’s on
the Internet . . .
It’s increased my confidence in computers, and
now I know how to do e-mail by myself.

Findings Continued
Group Process
Decision-making frustrating
•In the chat group when we were trying to set
up the learning objectives. Talk about
coronaries …If you guys could see my face.
•I mean it took forever just to get our
objectives for that first layer. That would be so
difficult if we were trying to do that for four
layers.
Chats were valued to support
decision-making
• For me the chats at first they were overwhelming,
but it was the only time when the group would make
group decisions, and you wouldn’t take a week after
to decide where are we going now.
Potential to misinterpret notes
• . . . it has been a challenge to phrase and write
things, so as not to accidentally offend anyone.
• I guess people are less inhibited because it’s
online and there’s no face that you’re saying it to
and I found the language very offensive at times,
very abrupt and harsh to the point of being
offensive. And so I think that you have to make
the language more sensitive, because you’re
writing it and there’s no intonation or whatever.
Students felt pressure to show
knowledge
• I felt pressured, especially when there’s a lot of
students that are really giving a lot, I thought oh, I’m
not keeping up.
• And that was the thing that kept going on with me
was always, oh I have to get on there, I have to get
on there. And you’re thinking, there’s not going to be
anything left and what am I going to put on, and then
you’re looking for more information and thinking, well
maybe hopefully nobody has come up with this yet.
Repetitive information posted
 I find it frustrating when people post info.
that has already been touched upon or
presented....it's almost like people think they
just need to get something down so that they
can be graded....but it just makes it redundant
and boring.
Peer validation important
• It also helps when you go back and see that someone
has responded to what you have said, then you feel
more like, ok this is a group thing, it’s kind of like being
around a table and having a discussion. It’s not just,
you know, putting information out there that nobody
responded to.
• I really have enjoyed it when people copy parts of other
messages and then speak to that in the new info that
they have to offer. It makes it feel more conversation
like and less fragmented.
Quiet members participated more
• … Everyone was more equal, because in our group setting
there [are] always more quiet members. But there were no
quiet members, because everyone had to put their postings
on. So, it was very equal in some respects.
• I liked the fact that, I’m usually a quieter person but it’s
easier for me to sit and think about things and then post
them rather than if I’m face-to-face kind of like the group
keeps on going …
Chats helped some feel connected
• It was my routine. You log on and then I’d
check who’s online.
• … I enjoyed it just because I knew that the
people that I knew and interacted with were on
the other end.
Chats overwhelming & frustrating
– Everyone talking
– Fast paced
– Affected by typing skills
– Slow connection problematic
•The chat for me was frustrating because I would type
something in and three people have already said it. Or
I’d erase it and then I’d start over, and then somebody
else would say something and then somebody would
say, where is Mary? Well I’ve been trying to put
something on here for the last 5 minutes. Oh, Dave
just said that. Ok.
Findings Continued
Perceptions and Use of Experts
Using Online FASD Experts
Online Dialogue between
Anna Guardian and a student:
Student:
Any strategies that you have developed as their caregiver that you
have found really helpful?
Anna Guardian:
I have tried many differnt stratigies , one for her eatingproblems,
one for her behavior , one for sleeping . For her eating problems
we have tried giving her finger foods with different tectures , i
would try to give her a little bit of something new , but she
wasnot ready to eat , she would spit it uot after chewing it , i
tried giving her things she wanted to eat , like a sandwhich but
that did not work . I tried telling her that she can have the same
as granma but that did not work . I tried peer pressure with her
cousin who is 1 year younger , sometimes that worked and the
next time it didnot . she does eat better at school than at home
because of all the kids.
Advantages of Online Experts
• Provided authentic learning experience
Well just that it was a real person. It wasn’t a
thing that was cleanly made and polished and
whatever. It’s a real person reacting to your
question and reacting to their experience and
relating their experience to you.
Advantages of Online Experts
• Provided authentic learning experience
• Felt confidence to write to experts
It just gave me confidence that no matter
what I wrote or whatever question I wanted
to ask that it mattered and that I would get a
response and so it was a valuable part of the
experience.
Advantages of Online Experts
• Provided authentic learning experience
• Felt confidence to write to experts
• Experts invited dialogue
The [expert] also posted another message. I don’t know if
you guys saw, [he said] “and keep the questions coming,” .
. . which was really good. Because you think you don’t
want to kind of take up [the expert’s] time really, but that
was encouraging.
Advantages of Online Experts
•
•
•
•
Provided authentic learning experience
Felt confidence to write to experts
Experts invited dialogue
Experts provided detailed responses
That [expert] posted like a
huge response. Like, very,
very detailed.
Advantages of Online Experts
•
•
•
•
•
Provided authentic learning experience
Felt confidence to write to experts
Experts invited dialogue
Experts provided detailed responses
Experts were easy to access online
Like, we have people contacts but we rarely
use them. Just because we can post an e-mail
to them it was much easier to access those
resources.
Limitations of Online Experts
• Information not always relevant
So in that way it was useful but I found that
I skimmed through a lot that I really wasn’t
interested in or the question wasn’t quite
what I was looking for, so I just sort of
skimmed through that.
Limitations of Online Experts
• Information not always relevant
• Responses sometimes disappointing
I was disappointed in a response from [one of
the experts]. [The expert] really didn't answer
my question and it took a week for [the expert]
to respond.
Limitations of Online Experts
• Information not always relevant
• Responses sometimes disappointing
• Some forgot about experts online or
how to access them
Habits are hard to break. . . . there had been so many
other things that happened in that first week or so that
remembering about those other resources just fell off of
the neurons.
Perceptions likely influenced by:
• Short time spent online (4 – 6 weeks)
• Not true distance learners
• All had previous face-to-face experience with
study group members
• Students may have told researchers what
they thought we wanted to hear
Conclusions
Takes time to adapt to online PBL
 Not all students found it effective for
their learning style
 Time-consuming and heavy workload
 Peer validation important to keep flow
of discussion and increase
connectedness

Conclusions Continued
Mix of synchronous and asynchronous
methods helped group decision-making
 Increased flexibility valued
 Ease of access to online experts valued
 Potential for deep learning with
increased time for reflection and
synthesis

For More Information:
For our database of literature pertaining to
online collaborative learning, go to:
http://www.ltrc.mcmaster.ca/pblonline/