Transcript Document

Management of Health and Safety
Legal Perspective
Mark Tyler
CMS Cameron McKenna
Today’s Topics
Compensation Culture
Legislation as driver
HSE’s enforcement role
Directors’ responsibilities
H&S in Corporate Governance
Corporate Manslaughter
??***?? - p2
??***?? - p3
Compensation Culture
“The growing compensation culture in the UK is now
costing about £10bn a year – or 1% of GDP”
Institute of Actuaries, Dec 2002
“25% of employees find the
essential Employers Liability
Compulsory Insurance
difficult or impossible to
secure despite vigorous
attempts to find cover.’
Federation of Small
Business, May 2004
??***?? - p4
Growing
compensation
culture poses
major threat to
profitability and
jobs.
Aon, July 2004
Compensation Culture
 The culture is a myth
 The perception causes fear of
litigation and imposes burdens on
organisations
 Redress for genuine claimant is
hampered
www.brtf.gov.uk
Recommendations
Regulate claims Co’s
Raise small claims limit
Improve ombudsmen arrangements
More mediation
??***?? - p5
More rehabilitation
Investigate contingency fees
Promote occupational health
Lower insurance premiums
Compensation Culture




??***?? - p6
Conditional fee rules introduced, 1995
Legal aid restricted for personal injury, 2000
Solicitors’ advertising rules relaxed, 2001
Increasingly strict interpretation of regulations
and common law duties of care.
Number of Solicitors – England & Wales
100,000
90,000
80,000
70,000
60,000
50,000
40,000
30,000
20,000
10,000
0
1980 1982 1984 1986 1988 1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002
??***?? - p7
Legislation as a Driver
 HSWA
 100+ health and safety regulations
 Management of Health and Safety at Work
Regulations 1999
Corporate Manslaughter
“The Government is concerned both that there should not
be scope for avoidance measures by unscrupulous
companies or directors, and that enforcement action
should act as a real deterrent, even in large companies
and within groups of companies.”
??***?? - p8
Major Injuries - Construction Employees
5000
4500
4000
3500
3000
2500
2000
1500
1000
500
0
3
02/0
2
01/0
1
00/0
0
99/0
9
98/9
8
97/9
7
96/9
6
95/9
5
94/9
4
93/9
3
92/9
2
91/9
??***?? - p9
Major Injuries – Construction Employees
5000
4500
4000
3500
3000
2500
2000
1500
1000
500
0
91/9
92/9
93/9
94/9
95/9
96/9
97/9
98/9
99/0
00/0
01/0
02/0
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
0
1
2
3
??***?? - p10
CDM
Legislation as a Driver




??***?? - p11
}
Southall rail crash
Ladbroke Grove rail crash
Hatfield
Transco/Larkhall
Safety Case
holders
Legislation as a Driver
Among the specific proposals which the Health
and Safety Commission will consider are:
Fines linked to the turnover or profit of a
company;
Prohibition of Director bonuses for a fixed period;
Suspension of managers without pay;
Suspended sentences pending remedial action
Compulsory health and safety training
Fixed penalty notices for specific offences
Deferred prohibition notices on welfare issues
??***?? - p12
HSE Enforcement Role
"The evidence supports the view that it is inspection,
backed by enforcement, that is most effective in
motivating duty holders to comply with their
responsibilities under health and safety law. We
therefore recommend that the HSE should not
proceed with the proposal to shift resources from
inspection and enforcement to fund an increase in
education, information and advice".
House of Commons Work and Pensions Committee, July 2004
??***?? - p13
Average Fines for Health and Safety Offences
1990/91-2002/03
£12,000.00
£10,000.00
£8,000.00
£6,000.00
£4,000.00
£2,000.00
19
90
/1
19 991
91
/1
19 992
92
/1
19 99
93 3
/1
19 994
94
/1
19 995
95
/1
19 996
96
/1
19 997
97
/1
19 998
98
/1
19 999
99
/2
20 00
00 0
/2
20 001
01
/2
20 002
02
/2
00
3
£0.00
??***?? - p14
Prosecutions 1990-2003
3000
2000
1000
0
90/91 91/92 92/93 93/94 94/95 95/96 96/97 97/98 98/99 99/00 00/01 01/02 02/03
Convictions
??***?? - p15
Prosecutions
Enforcing authorities should identify
and prosecute or recommend
prosecution of individuals if they
consider that a prosecution is
warranted. In particular, they should
consider the management chain and
the role played by individual directors
and managers, and should take
action against them where the
inspection or investigation reveals
that the offence was committed with
their consent or connivance or to
have been attributable to neglect on
their part.
??***?? - p16
??***?? - p17
19
98
/9
19
99
/20
00
20
00
/01
20
01
/02
20
02
/03
19
97
/8
19
96
/7
19
95
/6
19
94
/5
19
93
/4
19
92
/3
D & O HSE Prosecutions
40
35
30
25
20
15
10
5
0
H&S in Corporate Governance
2003 survey of directors
“Rewards are not at the top of
directors’ agendas. The area
directors are most concerned about
is the risk from health and safety
and product liability laws.”
??***?? - p18
Action Point 5
"The board needs to ensure that
it is kept informed of, and alert
to, relevant health and safety
risk management issues. The
Health and Safety Commission
recommends that boards
appoint one of their number to
be the 'health and safety
director'".
Percentage of organisations that have allocated health
and safety responsibility to a board level director [Source:
HSE Research Report 135]
H&S in Corporate Governance
 Combined Code – internal control guidance
 HSC/DETR’s ‘Revitalising Health and Safety’
strategy
 HSC’s ‘Health and Safety in Annual Reports’
guidance
 DTI’s draft OFR and Directors Reports
Regulations
??***?? - p20
Top UK Companies’ H&S Information in
Annual Reports
49%
1995 (FTSE100)
??***?? - p21
47%
2001 (FTSE350)
80%
2003 (FTSE350)
H&S in Corporate Governance
 Combined Code – internal control guidance
 HSC/DETR’s ‘Revitalising Health and Safety’
strategy
 HSC’s ‘Health and Safety in Annual Reports’
guidance
 DTI’s draft OFR and Directors Reports
Regulations
??***?? - p22
Corporate Manslaughter
Developments
Proposals in
October?
Great
Western
Trains
Acquitted
OLL Ltd
Convicted
P&O
Acquitted
Case
dismissed
Law
Commission
Proposals
Reform
Proposals
1990
??***?? - p23
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
2000
01
02
03
04
Experience with prosecutions in England




‘Work-Related Deaths’ Protocol
253 cases referred to CPS since 1992
69 prosecutions
18 convictions
 Only 6 Corporate prosecutions have succeeded
??***?? - p24
Manslaughter Indictment
“A, on the...day of...1996, unlawfully killed B”
??***?? - p25
Corporate Manslaughter – doctrine of
identification
“…where a corporation through the controlling
mind of its agents, does an act which fulfils the
pre-requisites of the crime of manslaughter…it,
as well as its controlling mind or minds, is
properly indictable for the crime of
manslaughter”
??***?? - p26
Current law of gross negligence
manslaughter
“...The jury must go on to consider whether that
breach of duty should be characterised as gross
negligence and therefore as a crime. This will
depend on the seriousness of the breach of
duty committed by the defendant in all the
circumstances in which the defendant was
placed when it occurred. The jury will have to
consider whether the extent to which the
defendant’s conduct departed from the
proper standard of care incumbent upon
him... such that it be judged criminal.”
??***?? - p27
Unsuccessful attempts to prosecute





??***?? - p28
Zeebrugge
Southall rail crash
Ladbroke Grove rail crash
Simon Jones
Hatfield (Railtrack)
The need for reform
 Accountability
 The doctrine of ‘identification’ is discredited
 The common law of manslaughter is
unsatisfactory
??***?? - p29
Home Office Proposals, May 2000
Introduction of a specific “Corporate Killing”
offence for ‘undertaking’ with three key elements
1.A ‘management failure’.
2.It is ‘the cause or a cause of death
3.The failure constitutes ‘conduct falling far
below what can reasonably be expected...’
“There is a management failure if the way in which activities
are managed or organised fails to ensure the health and
safety of persons employed or affected by those activities”
??***?? - p30
Final Thoughts









??***?? - p31
Revitalising targets not being met
Problems with an enforcement approach
Prosecutorial selection of cases
No sentencing tariffs
Little evidence for deterrent effect of the current
models
Economically inefficient
No alignment with business objectives
Conflicts with other policy objectives
Separate the enforcement and advisory
functions?