Transcript Slide 1

KEY STRATEGIES OF IWMP
SLNA, Commissioner Rural Development
Govt. of Andhra Pradesh
NRM strategy in convergence with
MG-NREGS
 Segregation of NRM based Projects for implementation by
IWMP & MG-NREGS in IWMP villages
 12 Projects out of 22 Projects taken up by IWMP staff in IWMP
villages
 Sharing of funds between both the programmes based on the
type projects executed as well as for Human Resource
services
Ground Water Recharge, Drainage Line
Treatment, Afforestation, Common
Property resources Projects
Land Development &
Fodder Devt. Projects
Dry Land
Horticulture
Others – Flood
control, Roads
etc
Land Devt.
works
Watershed Computer
Centre
Mandal Computer
Centre
Watershed Computer
Centre
Mandal Computer
Centre
Fodder
NREGS FUNDS
IWMP FUNDS
NREGS Funds
NRM Shelf of works
With NREGS fund
With NREGS
With IWMP
Staff
staff
Land Development
& Soil Moisture
conservation
works
Jungle clearance ,
Boulders removal,
Stone bund,
Trench cum bund,
Terracing on hill
slopes, Silt
application,
Compost pit etc
IWMP Fund
With IWMP staff (Removed from software of
NREGS for IWMP villages to avoid duplication)
Staggered trenches, Water
Drainage Line
Absorption Trench, Live checks,
Treatment works, Sunken pits, Loose boulders, Rock
fill dams etc
Dry Land
Mini Percolation tanks, Percolation
Horticulture &
tanks, Check dams, Farm ponds,
Water Harvesting
Fodder
Gabions, Sub surface dams, Repairs
Structures
Development
to existing water harvesting
works like
structures etc
Fodder Plots,
Block plantation, Barren Hill
Fodder
Afforestation
Afforestation, Avenue, Bund
nurseries, Silo
works
plantation, Back yard plantation
pits, Raising of
Common
silvi pasture etc
Property
Seed dibbling, Trenches, Fire tracing,
Resource
Plantation, Cattle Proof trench etc
development
works
New Activities
Sl
No
II
Project
Land
Development
Projects
(I to VII)
Name of the work
1
a
b
c
d
2
III
IV
Drainage line
treatment
Project
Common
Property
Resource
Project
Dry land horticulture
Acid lime
Sapota
Ber
Guava
Boulder removal using machinery &
Stone bunding
1
Sand bag structures
1
Cattle troughs
Activities extended to other farmers with
Differential costs & WDF
Sl
N
o
Project
Name of the work
Benefici
Project
ary
Remar
Fund
ks
contribut
(%)
ion (%)
I With Differential costs: Through Beneficiary contribution
Block plantation in
1
Private lands
a Subabul
b Teak
Limited
Afforesta- c Tamarind
1
to 1 Ha
tion project d Casuarina
40%
60%
per
e Bamboo
farmer
f Simaroba
Live fencing with Agave
2
/ Henna
Activities extended to other farmers
with Differential costs & WDF
Sl
No
II
1
Benefici
ary
Project Rema
Project
Name of the work
contribut Fund (%) rks
ion (%)
With Differential costs: Through Beneficiary contribution
Dry land
1
horticulture
a Cashew
b Custard Apple
c Mango
d Jamun
Land
limited
e Ber
Development
to 1 Ha
40%
60%
f
Guava
Projects
per
(I to VII)
g Sapota
farmer
h Acid lime
2 Tank silt application
Boulder removal
3 using machinery &
Stone bunding
Activities extended to other farmers with
Differential costs & WDF
Sl
Project
No
Name of the work
Beneficiary
Project Rema
contribution
Fund (%) rks
(%)
III Without Differential costs: Through collection of WDF amount
Farm pond
Dug out pond
1
Ground
Water
Recharge
Project
10% of amount shall be
collected as WDF
Mini Percolation Tank
Percolation Tank
Check wall
Check Dam
20% of amount shall be
collected as WDF
Convergence strategy with
Forest
Forest Dept.
Dept
• Mapping of actual catchment areas falling under Reserve
Forest areas using GIS
• Treatment of Reserve Forest Area falling in IWMP project
area through Forest Dept.
• Funds for treatment of Forest Areas shall be allocated from
MG-NRES
• Convergence meetings arranged at district level for
delineation of areas and action plan preparation
• Capacity Building to VSS members on IWMP
• Tie up with AH interventions
• Avenue, Barren Hill Afforestation, Block Plantation &
CCT/WAT are major interventions proposed
Production Systems Improvement
(Agricluture) with CMSA, SERP
•Objectives:
–To switch-over to organic agriculture in all Watershed villages
–To double the income of the farmers
•Coverage:
–1,100 villages in IWMP 2009-10 & 2010-11 WSs
–Balance 800 of 2009-10 & 2010-11 & 1,400 villages of 2011-12 will be
taken up in 2012-13
•Strategy: Implementation through Village organizations
•Interventions:
–Increasing productivity of Natural resources by addressing problems in
agriculture and allied subjects.
–Soil Fertility management , Integrated Crop Management
–Sustaining farming methods
–Convergence for best practices with CMSA, Agril , AH Depts, CRIDA,
ICRISAT, ANGRU etc
–Breed improvement, Fodder Development & Nutrition Management
etc.
PSIAnimal Husbandry strategy
Formulated to implement in convergence with Dept. of Animal
Husbandry
• To increase the productivity of the livestock in IWMP villages
through interventions in area of :
Intervention
Activities
Health coverage
Organizing Health camps Fertility camps Sheep health camps
in regular intervals of 3 months to protect the LS from
seasonal diseases and improve the fertility rate
Provide Mineral Mixture , Mineral Blocks on 50% to check
micro nutrient deficiency and improve the productivity
Nutritional Support
To provide feed on 50% cost to pregnant Milch animals and AI
born calves to improve calf development and milk yield.
Breed improvement Provide Rs 50 as inventive to Gopalamitra working in IWMP
villages for each true to type female calf born to encourage
timely result oriented door step service.
Encourage back yard poultry by supplying improved poultry
birds on 50% cost to SC,ST,and POP.
PSIAnimal Husbandry strategy
Intervention
Activities
AH
infrastructure Provide Trevices , Community based chaff cutters,
Development in the Castrators, other infrastructure needed for AH
IWMP villages
services in IWMP villages
Capacity building of the Orientation of farmers on clean milk production
LS owners
and best husbandry practices
Orient the sheep rearers on best sheep husbandry
practices
•
•
Creating forward linkage for milk market in convergence with
APDDCF Ltd by establishing AMCUs and upgrading the EMTs
under EPA
Discussions on PSI intervention in convergence with LPD unit of
SERP in State Milk mission villages falling in IWMP villages are
undertaken.
Livelihoods strategy
with SERP
Salient features:
• Identification of poorest of the poor households at village level
• Coverage of Poor & PoP under Self Help Groups (SHGs)
• Preparation of Livelihood Action Plans and approval by Village
Organization & Watershed Committee
• Financial assistance on credit basis to individuals through SHGs
• Customization and application of software based MIS of SERP
• Facilitation through Livelihood Activist (LA) positioned at
watershed level
• Organizing required training programmes
• Convergence with other schemes/ bilateral agencies through
SERP.
Status: An amount of Rs. 7904.14 lakhs is proposed for release
during 2012-13 against which already released Rs. 3067.89
lakhs.
IWMP - PoP Implementation Process in a
nutshell:
Step I
Step II
Step III
Step IV
Finalization of
IWMP villages
& VOs
Training CAs /
LAs on
Baseline
Survey
Training CAs /
LAs on HLP
Training of
Beneficiaries
Identification
of PoP HH
Collection of
Baseline
survey
Short listing of
HHs based on
Baseline
Implementatio
n of HLPs
Computerizing
baseline
Preparation &
computerizati
on of HLPs
Collection &
computerizati
on of UCs
Selection of
PoP CA / LA
Computerizing
identified PoP
HH
Process Flow
VO (Preparation of LAP)
MMS
PO-WS
PD-DWMA
PD – DRDA
Collector (For Admin Sanction)
VO
Role of PD - DWMA
1. Scrutinize and consolidate village wise LAP and forward to PD – DRDA
with his/ her recommendations.
2. Monitor placement of Livelihood Activists (LA) in non PoP villages.
3. Ensure that funds are not transferred to the villages where IWMP
activities are not grounded.
4. Finalize the list of Villages / VOs to whom the funds have to be transferred
in consultation with DRDA. Non performing and dysfunctional VOs should
not be allotted funds for LH component under IWMP.
5. Facilitate convergence meetings with line departments/ agencies at
district level.
6. Arrange training programmes for IWMP staff at D/ CLRC and facilitate PD,
DRDA to conduct the same out of I&CB funds of IWMP.
7. Regular reviews with IWMP and SERP field staff for implementation of the
programme.
8. Overall monitoring of the implementation in the district and giving the
feedback to SLNA for the same.
Entry Point Activities
Non Negotiables :
•It should benefit to a group / larger community for creating
common assets / providing common benefits
•Individual benefits are not permitted.
•Civil works and cement structures are not permitted.
•Duplication of work/ services is not permitted.
•EPA shall be grounded in the first one /two years of project
period..
Entry Point Activities – Focus areas
• Water treatment plants/ RO plants should be taken up in limited
number as a pilot basis in the districts with minimum of 20%
contribution from the community.
• The sanction of EPA activities in IWMP 2009-10 projects should
be completed before 31st July 12. It will not be allowed after 1st
August 2012.
• The EPA activities in IWMP 2011-12 projects shall be taken up
simultaneously along with DPR preparation without waiting for
finalization of DPRs
• If EPA activities are not grounded in any of the projects, the EPA
amount shall be diverted into NRM component.
Institution & Capacity Building
 Three Tier Capacity Building Strategy for strengthening Field level
Functionaries:
State reviews for CB team
Mana TV programs
WSAs trainings
through ROs
 Development of I&CB software for conduct of trainings/exposures
under IWMP.
 Development of IEC material – Annual calendars, Posters, short films,
etc.
 Preparation of Annual calendars by all districts for 2012-13 fin. year
Monitoring & Evaluation
 Customization of transaction based software model for
IWMP in coordination with TCS
• Fund flow mechanism through
Management System (eFMS)
Electronic
Fund
• Software based execution of IWMP interventions
• Web based Management Information Systems (MIS)
 Centralized data entry of DOLR MIS
 Adoption of Social Audit process for IWMP watersheds
 Guidelines for Quality Control of IWMP works have
been issued
 Third Party evaluations for declaration of Preparatory
Phase of IWMP Batch I have commenced
Integrated Participatory approach in establishing
Hydrological Monitoring Network in Model Watersheds
Inception of idea
Step-1
Step-2
Step-3
Stakeholder
identification
Input from
experts and
Key
Stakeholder
Defining the scope of
the network
Installation
Step-4
Monitoring
Step-5
End User
Step-6
Feedback to
Key Stakeholder
Initiatives to be taken up in
Model Watersheds
 Establishment of Hydrological Gauging Stations and
Weather Stations
 Participatory Research & Development (PR&D).
 Selection of Crops and Cultivars
 PR&D INM & IPM Trials
 Rehabilitation of Waste Lands
 Scientific Impact Assessment & Evaluation Studies
 Partnership with Technical Support Institutions
 Forage Production
 Live-Stock based activities
 Participatory Evaluation & Monitoring (PE& M).
 Strategic Research
List of Model Watersheds proposed in
IWMP Districts
Sl.No
Name of the
District
Name of the
Mandal
Name of the
Project
Batch
Project Area
proposed for
Treatment
(Area in ha.)
1
2
3
4
Muttala
5
6
2009-10
2,535
1
Ananthapur
Atmakur
2
Chittoor
Yerravaripalem Yellamanda
2009-10
3,668
3
Medak
Kondapur
Mallepally
2009-10
5,300
4
Kurnool
Orvakallu
Somarajulapally
2009-10
5,510
5
Prakasam
Mundlamuru
Polavaram
2009-10
4,600
6
Mahaboobnagar Koilkonda
Parepally
2009-10
3,800
7
8
9
YSR-Kadapa
Nalgonda
Srikakulam
Veeraballe
Munugode
Laveru
Veeraballe
Pulipalpula
Laveru
2009-10
2010-11
2009-10
4,000
4,324
4,476
10
Rangareddy
Yacharam
Nandiwana parthy
2009-10
4,024
11
Adilabad
Tamsi
Dhanora
2009-10
4,691
12
Khammam
Mulkalapally
Chaparalla pally
2009-10
5,100
PROGRESS OF NRM WORKS UNDER IWMP
2009-10 UP TO 30TH APRIL 2012
Progress
Sl
No
District
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
Anantapur
Chittoor
Kadapa
Khammam
Prakasam
Srikakulam
Adilabad
Nalgonda
Medak
10
Mahabubnagar
11
12
Ranga Reddy
Kurnool
Total
Target
No of
% of
Admin
Sanctions
Expenditure
(Rs in
zero
progr
Lakhs) Phy Fin (Rs in Phy (No Fin (Rs
IWMP
ess
of
(15%) (No of Lakhs)
Projects
in Lakhs)
works)
works)
1065.69 4634 8229.74
1549
0
860.93 80.79
684.45 3307 2019.17
1190
0
386.83 56.52
504.00
0
832
705.08
449
203.09 40.30
180.00
510
391.90
316
0
69.95 38.86
1216.80 1841 1668.32
0
777
400.17 32.89
351.14
0
990
413.89
482
96.11 27.37
648.00 1938
964.37
983
0
156.52 24.15
621.00 1298
0
721.43
566
147.27 23.71
455.40
0
474
3490.45
320
94.44 20.74
1154.70 2421 1359.34
1
1495
232.89 20.17
506.57 2184
0
805.53
541
65.88 13.01
1134.18 2553 1321.71
785
0
139.76 12.32
8521.94 22982 22090.93 9453 2853.84 33.49
1
No of
Zero
Micro
WSs
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
7
0
0
7
PROGRESS OF NRM WORKS UNDER IWMP
2010-11 UP TO 30TH APRIL 2012
Progress
Sl
No
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
District
Srikakulam
Anantapur
Nalgonda
Kadapa
Chittoor
Adilabad
Kurnool
Prakasam
Medak
Khammam
Mahabubnagar
Ranga Reddy
Total
Target for
NRM (Rs in
Lakhs) (7%)
177.3492
896.2506
456.0948
520.4472
647.892
416.9424
586.4712
686.0196
389.5248
153.132
799.4784
521.6652
6251.2674
No of
Admin Sanctions Expenditure % of zero
progr IWMP
Phy (
Phy (No
Fin (Rs ess Projec
Fin (Rs in No of
of
in
ts
Lakhs) works
works)
Lakhs)
)
271
233.38
49
16.07 9.06
0
2159
3034.97 336 58.48 6.52
3
1247
642.66
214 29.06 6.37
2
640
380.16
126 31.26 6.01
2
1530
898.18
138 34.88 5.38
5
1494
687.05
152 12.99 3.12
2
3045
908.95
183 12.99 2.21
2
207
319.50
30
12.69 1.85
13
223
470.16
25
6.58
1.69
4
248
97.13
16
0.82
0.54
1
278
128.30
14
3.16
0.40
20
365
282.04
4
0.6
0.12
4
11707
8082.47
1287 219.58
3.51
57
No of
Zero
Micro
WSs
0
11
16
9
36
10
6
70
30
6
129
36
353
PROGRESS OF NRM WORKS -2009-10
FROM 25TH APRIL TO 15TH JUNE 2012
Progess
(Rs in
Lakhs)
No of No of
% of
zero
Zero
progress IWMP Micro
Projects WSs
24.39
2
15
18.46
1
5
15.80
2
12
SL
No
District
Financial Target
for NRM (Rs in
Lakhs)
1
2
3
Anantapur
Kurnool
Chittoor
288.26
118.88
147.38
70.32
21.95
23.28
4
Mahabub nagar
75.25
9.98
13.26
5
32
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
Adilabad
Prakasam
Kadapa
Nalgonda
Ranga Reddy
Srikakulam
Khammam
Medak
Total
172.62
279.19
156.62
156.95
106.23
158.23
40.19
338.56
2038.35
22.03
28.36
15.66
12.59
7.83
5.97
1.25
4.71
223.93
12.76
10.16
10.00
8.02
7.37
3.77
3.11
1.39
10.99
1
4
0
1
1
0
0
0
17
4
22
0
6
5
0
0
0
101
PROGRESS OF NRM WORKS -2010-11
FROM 25TH APRIL TO 15TH JUNE 2012
No of No of
Progess
% of
zero
Zero
(Rs in
progress IWMP Micro
Lakhs)
Projects WSs
31.7
9.65
5
20
22.41
8.78
5
36
11.41
7.53
4
31
10.78
3.59
3
15
9.02
3.01
16
89
5.72
4.55
2
10
5.08
4.20
7
35
4.74
4.10
0
0
4.4
1.57
6
43
SL
No
District
Target for
NRM (Rs in
Lakhs)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
Anantapur
Chittoor
Nalgonda
Kadapa
Prakasam
Adilabad
Kurnool
Srikakulam
Medak
328.55
255.26
151.54
299.94
299.39
125.77
121.10
115.61
279.53
10
Mahabub nagar
115.46
2.01
1.74
20
129
11
12
Ranga Reddy
Khammam
Total
171.26
51.39
2314.79
0.72
0.65
108.64
0.42
1.26
4.69
10
1
79
76
6
490
NRM - Focus Areas
For effective grounding of works, the following are the
initiatives to be taken up
•Continuous estimates generation as per the annual
action plan by POs
•Timely accord of administrative sanctions for the works
proposed
•Grounding of machinery works along with already
sanctioned works with out delay.
•Regular field visit to WCCs,Watersheds
•Review of progress
communicated by SLNA
against
plans
&
targets
PROGRESS IN
DRY LAND HORTICULTURE
Batch
2009-10
Sanctioned
Executed
Sl
No
District
Targe
t in Area
in
Ha
(HA)
1
2
3
4
5
6
Adilabad
Anantapur
Chittoor
Kadapa
Khammam
Kurnool
500
93
3000 8547
2500 2639
500
54
400 660
1500 352
3
6709
711
15
162
91
80
2718
1621
26
296
83
1
612
182
4
24
6
1000
5000
4000
1500
600
1500
7 Mahabubnagar 1500 1624
Medak
500 159
8
Nalgonda
500 491
9
Prakasam
1000 89
10
373
41
131
24
428
70
178
0
31
4
9
0
2000
11 Ranga Reddy 500 1140
300 549
12 Srikakulam
Total
12700 16396
164
88
8512
16
314
5829
1
11
885
1000
Estt
Expen Target
Area
Cost
diture in Ha
in
(Rs in
(Rs in
(HA)
Lakhs)
Lakhs)
800
1000
1500
2010-11
Sanctioned Executed
Expen
Estt
Area
Area diture
Cost
in
in (Rs in
(Rs in
(HA)
(HA) Lakhs
Lakhs)
)
0
0
0
0
2958 2477 471
49
631
156
52
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
44
0
17
0
12
0
4
0
0
0
400
0
0
20300 3651 2649
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
523
0
0
50
PROGRESS OF BLOCK & BUND PLANTATION
(2009-10 Batch)
Block Plantation
Sanctioned
Executed
Sl
No
District
Adilabad
2
Anantapur
3
Chittoor
4
Kadapa
5
Khammam
6
Kurnool
7 Mahabubnagar
8
Medak
9
Nalgonda
10
Prakasam
11
Ranga Reddy
12
Srikakulam
1
Estt
Area in
Cost(Rs in
(HA)
Lakhs)
11
6.5
0
1
0
10
0
16
0
0
15
0
2.16
346.23
32.79
126.9
0
192.5
0
2.13
0
17.91
21.09
0
Area Expenditu
in
re (Rs in
(HA)
Lakhs)
1
23
2
14
0
11
0
0
0
1
4
0
0.07
38.3
0.98
13.78
0
11.18
0
0
0
0.42
0.55
0
Bund Plantation
Sanctioned
Executed
Estimate
Expenditu
Area in
d Cost Area in
re (Rs in
(HA)
(Rs in
(HA)
Lakhs)
Lakhs)
7
0
663.39
81.34
0
0
0
0
0
0
62.22
23.16
0.91
0
24.54
1.84
0
0
0
0
0
0
16.24
4.83
0
0
48.83
9.5
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
23.16
0
0
0.38
0.16
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.28
Progress of BHA & Avenue Plantation
(2009-10 IWMP Batch)
BHA
Avenue plantation
Estt
Expendi
Cost
Phy
Physical ture (Rs
(Rs in
(No)
(No)
in
Lakhs
Lakhs)
)
1
0.63
1
0.04
14 82.98
7
6.77
14 56.85
1
0.19
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
7
21.46
2
0.49
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Sl
No
District
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Adilabad
Anantapur
Chittoor
Kadapa
Khammam
Kurnool
Mahabubnagar
Medak
Nalgonda
Prakasam
11
Ranga Reddy
3
2.97
0
12
Srikakulam
0
0
0
Phy
(No)
Estt
Cost (Rs
in
Lakhs)
Phy
(No)
Expendi
ture (Rs
in
Lakhs)
4
18
8
22
0
35
0
3
32
15
57.14
160.4
61.25
139.7
0
269.24
0
21.11
277.06
81.09
1
5
3
19
0
14
0
1
19
8
0.71
2.67
0.97
16.19
0
5.05
0
0.23
10.96
1.73
0
14
115.22
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Plantation - Focus Areas
•
•
•
•
•
The survival of all the plantation taken up should be
ensured.
The targets communicated by SLNA should be
achieved
The plantation activities in community lands and
private lands should be taken up on top priority.
The estimates should be generated for the identified
plantation activities , get admn sanctions and
preparatory activities should be taken up immediately
before onset of monsoon
Plantation should be taken up with 1st showers to
ensure good survival of plantation.
District wise Action Plan & Progress of
Fodder Plantation
2009-10
Sanctioned
Executed
SL
No
District
Adilabad
1
2 Anantapur
Chittoor
3
Kadapa
4
5 Khammam
Kurnool
6
7 Mahabubnagar
Medak
8
9 Nalgonda
10 Prakasam
11 Ranga Reddy
12 Srikakulam
Total
13
2010-11
Sanctioned
Executed
Expendi
Expendi
Estt Cost
Estimated
Area in
Area in ture (Rs Area in
Area in ture(Rs
(Rs in
Cost(Rs in
(HA)
(HA)
in
(HA)
(HA)
in
Lakhs)
Lakhs)
Lakhs)
Lakhs)
68
383.17
367.28
210.355
50.5
271.88
354.95
25
834.78
409.55
541.695
270.52
3787.68
17.03
1
0.06
96.88
24.5
0.96
93.58 133.64 6.82
51.68 79.09 4.17
12.83
6
0.11
68.3
76.06 3.09
88.87 41.95 1.95
6.35
0
0
133.3
71
1.64
103.61 24.83 0.56
132.42 209.05 5.93
72.76 55.43 0.43
877.62 722.55 25.73
4
254.81
278.65
1
0
0
3.3
0
467
0
46.45
270.85
1326.06
1.02
64.75
65.54
0.25
0
0
0.84
0
61.41
0
11.8
74.95
280.55
0
27.6
79.35
1
0
0
0
0
72
0
1.5
88.5
269.95
0
1.43
4.31
0.07
0
0
0
0
2.09
0
0.01
1.46
33
9.38
AFFORESTATION – Nursery
Raising
• Finalization of nursery and plantation works.
• Instructions were given to asses the requirement of
seedlings for taking up plantation activities in 1st &
2nd batch watershed areas during 2012 rainy season
• Explore the possibilities for getting the various
species from the existing MGVN nurseries for
meeting the plants requirement for taking up various
plantations.
• Assess Teak seedlings for block & bund
plantation, and on the bunds of other farmers.
• Species having local demand which are not
available in MGVN nurseries
AFFORESTATION
• Selection of DWMA, MGVN and Govt., Nursery
sites for raising of teak & locally demanded
seedlings
• Decided to raise 20,000 Teak seedlings per IWMP
project.
• Based on the requirement the tentative targets were
assessed.
• The targets assessed earlier are not tallying with
present targets furnished.
• Action Plan for Afforestation works - requirement of
seedlings in IWMP 1st & 2nd batch Projects – 21
column proforma communicated on 29.02.2012.
District wise proposed Teak Seedlings
Sl No
Name of the
District
No. of
projects
Targets (in
lakhs)
Locations Achieveme
nt (in lakhs)
1
Adilabad
21
4.20
12
2.20
2
Anantapur
41
8.20
29
3.50
3
Chittoor
27
5.40
10
4.10
4
Kadapa
21
4.20
0
2.00
5
Khammam
6
1.20
0
1.20
6
Kurnool
29
5.80
6
2.00
7
Mahaboobnagar
38
7.60
10
7.60
8
Medak
15
3.0
10
3.00
9
Nalgonda
22
4.40
0
2.50
10
Prakasam
32
6.40
0
6.40
11
Rangareddy
20
4.00
6
2.50
12
Srikakulam
9
1.80
0
1.00
281
56.20
83
38.00
Total:
Time Line for Nursery &
Planting Activities
S.No
Activity
Time line
1
Tying up MGVN Nurseries
20.05.2012
2
Tagging of Watershed villages with planting activity to
Tech.Officers & Watershed Assistants
20.05.2012
3
Selection of tall plants for Avenue & non Teak species
for other plantations
31.05.2012
4
Pitting in farmers’ land & CPR lands for raising Avenue,
Bund & Block plantations
31.05.2012
5
Segregation of seedlings & hardening
10.06.2012
6
Transportation of plants to farmers fields and to
plantation sites (where ever water facility is available)
15.06.2012
7
Planting activity on the onset of Monsoon
1.7.2012 to
15.07.2012
8
Casualty replacement
15 days after
planting
PSI – CMSA Progress
The CMSA activities should be grounded immediately in all
CMSA villages in convergence with CMSA staff
The monthly convergence & review meeting at district level with
PD, DRDA , cluster level convergence meetings with CMSAIWMP staff should be conducted regularly
The CMSA activities in all non CMSA villages should be initiated
with IWMP staff using technical help of SERP.
Soil profile of the IWMP project should be prepared and the
results should be shared with the farmers and the community.
Necessary tie up with line dept like Horticulture etc should be
made for supply of mini kits where ever possible
Progress of Production systems improvement
No of Villages
No of VO accounts
to be opened
No VO Accounts
opened
Amount Released
(Rs In Lakhs)
No of Villages
No of VO accounts
to be opened
No VO Accounts
opened
Amount Released
(Rs In Lakhs)
73
Amount Released
(Rs In Lakhs)
No of Villages
21
No VO Accounts
opened
No of Projects
Adilabad
NGO
No of VO accounts
to be opened
Name of the District
1
Non CMSA
No of Villages
Sl. No
CMSA
37
6
34
29.52
47
21
46
17
25
14
11
11.00
2 Anantapur
41
201
53
53
53
48
95
95
85
47.5
57
57
50
57.00
3
Chittoor
27
169
42
42
42
42
123
123
123
29.20
4
4
4
4.00
4
Kadapa
20
118
90
29
47
40
74
68
57
24
0
0
0
0.00
5 Khammam
6
130
55
42
42
16.00
75
38
22
0.00
0
0
0
0.00
6
Kurnool
Mahabub
nagar
29
132
51
0
51
51
67
0
67
0
14
0
14
0.00
38
328
85
85
60
57
219
219
65
30.25
24
24
9
9.00
8
Medak
15
15
115
41
41
41
41
74
74
0
0
0
0
0.00
9
Nalgonda
22
22
139
37
37
37
35
94
94
47
10
8
8
0.00
32
190
33
33
31
31
157
157
61
30.5
0
0
0
0.00
20
121
26
26
26
17
67
67
67
0
35
35
35
0.00
9
100
26
26
26
26
73
73
40
16
0
0
0
0.00
752
420
131
81.00
39
7
10 Prakasam
Ranga
11
Reddy
12 Srikakulam
Total
280 1599
490 435.5 1073 1029
801
241.5 169 142
CMSA Interventions
Name of work
NADEP Compost pits (@10
per village
Kitchen gardens
NPM shops
Custom hiring centres
No of units
identified
No of units
grounded
4856
1791
18951
465
334
6950
390
117
PSI-Animal Husbandry
PSI AH: 2009-10:
• Chittoor, Kurnool, Prakasam, Nalgonda only started
releasing funds to JD AHs under PSI AH. Remaining
PDs also shall release the funds immediately to
start grounding of activities immediately.
PSI AH 2010-11:
• Chittoor, Kurnool, only released funds to JDAHs
under PSI (AH). All the remaining PDs to release the
funds immediately.
Batch wise and district wise fund
releases particulars are given in Table
Action Points under
AH interventions
• Release of funds to JD AHs as per action plans under EPA
and PSI AH to start grounding of activities by AH
Department as season is approaching.
• Arrange meeting with AHD officials and prepare village wise
schedules for grounding of activities and submit the same to
SLNA for both batches under EPA and PSI AH.
• Monitor the progress every month and obtain UCs
quarterly.
• Start preparation of action plans under EPA for 2011-12
batch villages and submit to SLNA.
• Monthly monitoring formats will be communicated shortly.
• Web reports designing is in progress
Progress of EPA Works – 2009-10
Sl
No
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
Admin Sanctioned
District
Target in Rs
% of
in lakhs Phy (NO) Fin (Lakhs) Phy (NO) Fin (Lakhs) Progress
68.58
125.30
103.56
152.40
24.00
61.71
126.83
66.15
34.57
73.24
72.51
56.74
53.63
50.00
45.92
41.93
39.95
28.47
83.64
27.16
5
27.66
20.48
34
1436
32.82
907.22
10.11
39.92
93.64
172.80
182.52
284.18
48.00
134.40
302.45
165.60
121.44
135
253
740
858
84.77
144.42
177.13
190.56
24
92
261
775
280
33
80
157
111.17
16.33
78.89
67.14
222
13
7
3
307.92
354
161.98
11 Ranga Reddy
135.09
16
28.04
12
324.48
2272.52
64
2970
102.06
1162.48
10
Srikakulam
Adilabad
Chittoor
Anantapur
Khammam
Kadapa
Kurnool
Nalgonda
Medak
Mahabub
nagar
Grounded
Prakasam
Grand Total
Progress of EPA Works – 2010-11
Sl
No
District
Target in
Rs in
lakhs
1
Chittoor
370.22
2
Anantapur
512.14
3
Nalgonda
260.63
4 Ranga Reddy 298.09
5
Medak
222.59
6
Adilabad
238.25
7
Kurnool
335.13
8
Kadapa
297.40
9
Srikakulam
101.34
10
Khammam
87.50
Mahabub
11
456.84
nagar
12
Prakasam
392.01
Grand Total 3572.15
Admin
Sanctioned
Phy
Fin
(NO) (Lakhs)
654
108.8
1343
231.1
0
0
55
39.78
52
13.6
16
26.97
24
13.63
348
65.25
Grounded
Phy
Fin
(NO) (Lakhs)
134 109.38
1002 143.03
0
51.54
53
32.23
2
17.88
13
16.58
4
10.50
24
7.89
0.00
0
0.00
% of
Progress
29.54
27.93
19.78
10.81
8.03
6.96
3.13
2.65
0.00
0.00
0
0
0
0
9
11.07
0
0.00
0.00
5
2506
20.25
530.4
0
1232
0.00
389.03
0.00
10.89
EPA - Focus Areas
• Water treatment plants/ RO plants should be taken up
in limited number as a pilot basis in the districts with
minimum of 20% contribution from the community.
• The sanction of EPA activities in IWMP 2009-10 & 201011 projects should be completed before 31st July
2012. It will not be allowed after 1st August 2012.
• The EPA activities in IWMP 2011-12 projects shall be taken
up simultaneously along with DPR preparation without
waiting for finalization of DPRs by submitting the finalized
micro watershed villages to SLNA.
• If EPA activities are not grounded in any of the projects, the
EPA amount shall be diverted into NRM component
Entry Point Activity – AH
EPA 2009-10 Batch:
• Except Srikakulam and Prakasam districts remaining
10 districts identified activities of AH sector and
released Rs 552.58 Lakhs to respective JD AH under
EPA. District wise releases are given in table.
EPA 2010-11 batch:
• Ananthapur, Chittoor, Medak, Nalgonda and Ranga
Reddy districts identified activities in Animal
Husbandry sector and released Rs 283.86 Lakhs to
respective JD AHs. Remaining PDs are also to release
the funds immediately.
Institution & Capacity Building
 WCC Establishment:
 Ananthapur and Chittoor have to get internet connectivity to
newly established WCCs.
 Mahaboobnagar – pending procurement of computers and
furniture in 2 WCCs.
 Ranga Reddy & Khammam districts have to submit reportmapping of WCCs for tagging on 2012-13 projects.
 Maintenance of registers especially cash book is not being done
in most of the WCCs.
 Display material & Name boards have to be arranged in all the
WCCs.
 Regular review meetings at WCCs and attendance of the field
staff to WCC and field have to be seriously monitored from
district level.
 Head Quarters stay of all field staff has to be ensured.
WS Committee formation
 Problematic villages of IWMP-Batch I for sending proposals to SLNA for
exclusion of villages/ Projects:
Sno
1
2
3
4
5
Micro Watershed
Name
Varadayapalli
Chikkepalli
Ananthapur
Tadipatri
Peddapappur
Namanakkapalli
Talakondapalle
Veljala
Talakondapalle
Amangal(WOTR)
Veldanda
Kuppagandla
Kuppagandla
Mahabubnagar
Jadcherla
Koilkonda
Parpally
Manikonda
Kollapur
Kodair
Mailaram
Nagulapalle
Fathepoor
Kadpal
KALHER
Mardi
Kalher
Mahadev Pally
Narayankhed
Masan Pally
Medak
Banswada
Thurkawadagao
Bheemra
KANGTI
Damaragidda [Panch)
n
Kangti
Sadashivapet
KONDAPUR
Mallepally
Gollapally
Suryapet
Thunga Thurthi
Pasunur
Pasnur
Bandakotha Palle
Nalgonda
Gundala
T.Shapur
Valigonda
Pedda Padishala
Ramannapeta
Kakkireni
Iskilla
Darsi
Addanki
Chinakothapalli
Govada
Prakasam
Kanigiri
Hanumanthunipadu Ummanapalli
Ummanapalli
District
WCC Name
Mandal
Project Name
Remarks
Court Case
Court Case
Court Case
Court Case
WS Committee formation
Status of formation of Watershed Committees for IWMP 2010-11 & 2011-12
2010-11
S. No
District
2011-12
Total No. of
WSCs to be
No. of
formed for
WSCs
2011-12
formed
WSs
Total No. of
WSCs to be
formed for
2010-11 WSs
No. of
WSCs
forme
d
No. of WSCs
yet to be
formed
59
56
3
62
15
1
Adilabad
2
Ananthapur
119
70
49
124
25
3
Chittoor
4
Kadapa_YSR
113
98
105
85
8
13
96
36
43
17
5
Khammam
21
21
0
6
3
6
Kurnool
7
Mahaboobnagar
8
Medak
9
Nalgonda
10
Prakasam
63
142
67
88
98
63
118
47
70
79
0
24
20
18
19
77
181
84
81
77
10
14
0
0
10
11
Ranga Reddy
67
60
7
62
10
12
Srikakulam
51
51
0
21
0
986
825
161
907
147
TOTAL
Strengthening of User Groups
2009-10
S. No
District
2010-11
No of UGs
formed
No. of UGs
conducting
meetings
No. of
UGs
opened
Bank A/c
No. of UGs
started
savings
No. of UGs
formed
1
Adilabad
440
274
14
14
1464
2
Ananthapur
895
580
98
82
2785
3
Chittoor
4
Kadapa_YSR
626
747
526
238
162
11
162
2
2823
1026
5
Khammam
167
48
5
5
235
6
Kurnool
7
Mahaboobnagar
8
Medak
9
Nalgonda
10
Prakasam
516
558
234
230
1364
344
325
31
230
543
89
27
26
110
25
70
0
0
110
0
2374
1455
1293
1286
2458
11
Ranga Reddy
749
749
5
0
963
12
Srikakulam
341
61
17
17
542
6867
3949
589
462
18704
TOTAL
•Ananthapur, Chittoor & Nalgonda are showing better performance of
User groups in terms of meetings & promotion of savings. All other
districts have to give serious follow up on strengthening the User
Groups.
Positioning of Watershed Assistants
S. No.
District
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
TOTAL
Adilabad
Ananthapur
Chittoor
Kadapa_YSR
Kurnool
Mahaboobnagar
Medak
Nalgonda
Prakasam
Ranga Reddy
WAs for 2009-10 &2010-11
Total No. to be
Positioned
positioned
100
96
141
126
122
111
136
126
115
104
226
219
107
98
142
137
185
166
103
99
1377
1282
Yet to be
positioned
4
15
11
10
11
7
9
5
19
4
95
•Filling up the vacancies of WSAs of IWMP batch I & II & positioning of the
Watershed Assistants for IWMP batch III (2011-12) has to be immediately
done by all the districts.
Progress of Trainings during 2011-12
114
120
110
93
100
91
82
82
76
80
66
78
74
91
79
78
66
63
57
60
Physical Achievement
46 47
43
Fianancial Achivement
40
28
23
17
23
18
20
0
•
•
•
•
Progress of Adilabad, Kurnool, Nalgonda, Ranga Reddy & Srikakulam is below
average
AAPs for 2012-13 are prepared & are under admin. sanctions. Funds are to be
immediately released for initiating trainings under IWMP.
Ensure that all IWMP staff (GO & NGO PIAs) attend MANA TV Programmes
mandatorily.
Funds to Resource Organizations who have conducted trainings to Watershed
Assistants have to be released immediately.
Progress of Trainings during 2012-13
Annual Action Plan
for 2012-13
S.No District
1
Adilabad
2
3
Anantapur
4
5
6
YSR District
Kurnool
Khammam
Mahabubna
gar
Medak
Nalgonda
Prakasam
Ranga Reddy
Srikakulam
TOTAL
7
8
9
10
11
12
Chittoor
Estimates generation
for April & May,
2012
Admin. Sanctions
Progress during
April & May,12
If yes,
No. of Amoun
No. of Amount
Amount
Amount
No. of
Received/Not
trainings t spent
trainings (Rs. In
(Rs. In
released
trainings
received
conducte (Rs. In
planned Lakhs)
Lakhs)
(Rs. In
d
lakhs)
lakhs)
Under
678
267.78
20
6.00
27
2.27
process
773
327.87
127
13.27 Received
1.80
59
1.80
39
2.42
671
115.75
9
2.60 Received
1.50
6
1.53
826
208.93
8
3.18 Received
1.9
608
2.41
96
31.53 Received
15.26
35
8.76
57
52.65
19
3.83
0
0
2
0.32
166
216.90
39
762
1104
160
1173
74
7052
110.77
205.66
386.00
120.00
35.00
2049.72
12
47
93
10
2
482
7.95
No
NO
7.80 Received
1.82
9.79 Received
3.06
57.96 Not Received
Nil
4.72 Received
Not yet
0.99 Not received
0
149.62
25.33767
35
7.25
5
17
59
4
1
289
1.70
2.95
26.88
0.42
0.40
56.70
DPR Preparation – 2010-11
S.No.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
District
Anantapur
Kurnool
Medak
Mahbubnag
ar
Nalgonda
Prakasam
Ranga
Reddy
No.of
No. of
No. of
DPRs to
MW
Cluster
be
DPRs yet DPRs yet
submitted
to be
to be
in soft to
prepared prepared
SLNA
No.of DPRs
submitted in soft to
SLNA
No.of
Telugu
DPRs
prepared
0
0
0
0
0
1
145
81
77
141(Tadiptri
project proposed
for cancelled)
81
59
18
0
2
6
0
2
166
101
117
86
88
91
107
52
48
0
0
99
99
22
0
44
26
DPR Preparation – 2011-12
Status of completion of
Participatory Net
Planning
No.of
No of
No. of No.of MW
No of
No of
No of
No. of
No. of farmer
Projects GPs villag
HHs farmers
HHs to
HHs
farmers s PNP
es
SES
to be
be done complet
complet Data
data
done
SES
ed SES
ed PNP Entere
Entered PNP
d
Status of completion of
Socio Economic Survey
S.No.
District
1
2
3
4
5
6
Adilabad
Anantapur
Chittoor
Kadapa
Khammam
Kurnool
Mahabubn
agar
Medak
Nalgonda
Prakasam
Ranga
Reddy
Srikakulam
7
8
9
10
11
12
12
29
20
9
2
22
56
92
71
21
5
36
60
101
69
18
6
24
28807
71433
38817
13433
4650
66021
20991
46750
31146
9926
3400
18336
4947
14039
25744
434
328
1546
27
56
52
77505
8820
10
13
20
45
60
40
44
62
28
16390
28377
61764
7
16
11
2
6
8
No. of No. of
MWS Cluster
DPRs
DPR
prepa prepare
red
d
(8800) 2600
2
(3404) 1288 1513
31273 22572 11139
(8600) 2008
0
3600
400
0
49928 3418
11
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
954
90980
1445
0
0
0
8440
17527
25062
1712
4912
1151
34042
(0)
49996
75
0
9324
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
26910
2830
300
(0)
0
0
0
0
5400
3750
0
6580
200
0
0
0
Status of Fund release to NGO-PIAs of
IWMP Batch I&II for Fin. Yr Jan,2010-March,2012:
S. No
1
District
Adilabad
NGO-PIA
Project Name
Mandal & District
Batch
Total
funds to
be
released
under
Admin,
I&CB &
DPR
APMAS
Jatharla
Bazarhatnoor,
Adilabad
2009-10
7.26
5.48
1.78
APMAS
Ichoda
Echoda, Adilabad
2010-11
11.76
3.61
8.15
CPF
Knondow
2009-10
11.88
8.94
2.94
DHAN Foundation
Umri
2009-10
13.25
44.15
3.38
21.41
9.87
22.74
APMAS
Nallamada
2009-10
10.37
5.30
5.07
APMAS
Reddypalli
2010-11
10.41
5.92
4.49
BAIF-AP
Itikalapalli
2010-11
11.35
5.77
5.58
Accion Fraterna
Muttala
2009-10
6.70
3.42
3.28
Accion Fraterna
Bandameedipalli
Raptadu, Ananthapur 2010-11
13.92
7.08
6.84
MYRADA
Tavalam
2009-10
10.76
5.50
5.26
MYRADA
Gorantla
2009-10
13.17
16.53
-3.36
APPS
Ratnagiri
2009-10 13.5927
13.09
0.50
APPS
Puttaparthi
2009-10 11.4296
11.85
-0.42
APPS
Gugudu
2010-11 12.9927
14.96
-1.97
APPS
Kanaganipalli
Tanakal, Ananthapur
Gorantla,
Ananthapur
Rolla, Ananthapur
Puttaparthi,
Ananthapur
Narpala, Ananthapur
Kanaganapally,
Ananthapur
2010-11
7.6996
8.95
-1.25
122.39
98.37
24.02
Narnoor (M) of
Adilabad
Utnoor, Adilabad
Total
2
Ananthapur
Total
Nallamada,
Ananthapur
Nallamada,
Ananthapur
Ananthapur (M),
Ananthapur
Atmakur (M),
Ananthapur
Funds
released
under
Admin,
I&CB &
DPR
Balance Funds
to be released
under Admin,
I&CB & DPR
Submission of
UC to DWMA
(Date &
Amount)
26/03/12
Rs.1.86
26/03/12
Rs.2.36
31.01.12,
Rs.3.08 lakhs
19.03.2012
4.75 Date
15.09.11
5.84 Date
15.09.11
3.40 (30-092011)
Nov, 2011, 2.25
lakhs
Nov, 2011, 3.6
lakhs
30/9/2011 of
Rs 6.48
Status of Fund release to NGO-PIAs of
IWMP Batch I&II for Fin. Yr Jan,2010-March,2012:
S. No
3
District
Chittoor
NGO-PIA
Project Name
FES
Musalikunta
FES
Tettu
FES
Thamballapalli
DHAN
Foundation
DHAN
Foundation
M C Palle
Chandramakulapall
OUTREACH
Katiperi
OUTREACH
Cherlopalle
Mandal &
District
Peddamndyam,
Chittoor
Kurabalakota
Tambalapally,
Chittoor
Batch
2009-10
8.08
3.52
4.56
2.74
2010-11
10.08
1.50
8.58
1.50
2010-11
11.16
5.67
5.49
4.59
Punganur, Chittoor 2009-10
11.63
5.94
5.69
19.03.2012
2010-11
10.74
5.46
5.28
2009-10
5.54
9.87
-4.33
2009-10
6.54
11.39
-4.85
2010-11
63.77
12.48
43.34
6.35
20.43
6.13
LakkiReddypalli, YSR 2010-11
12.12
6.16
5.96
24.60
12.51
12.09
Punganur (M),
Chittoor
Chowdepalli,
Chittoor
Gurramkonda,
Chittoor
Total
4
YSR -Kadapa
MYRADA
Nooliveedu
MYRADA
Kurnoothala
Galiveedu, YSR
Total
5
Kurnool
Total
Total
funds to Funds
be
released Balance Funds Submission of
released under to be released UC to DWMA
under Admin, under Admin,
(Date &
Admin, I&CB & I&CB & DPR
Amount)
I&CB & DPR
DPR
3,55,760.00;
19.03.2012
30.09.11/
7,20,050/30.09.11/
7,34,665/31/12/2011 of
Rs 11.62
MYRADA
Chennampalli
Tuggali, Kurnool
2009-10
13.50
10.19
3.31
31/12/2011 of
Rs 6.90
WOTR
Indireswaram
Atmakur, Kurnool
2009-10
14.16
2.32
11.84
Not prepared
WOTR
Tangadancha
Jupadu Bunglow,
Kurnool
2009-10
13.61
2.24
11.37
Not
prepared
41.27
14.75
26.52
Status of Fund release to NGO-PIAs of
IWMP Batch I&II for Fin. Yr Jan,2010-March,2012:
S. No
6
District
NGO-PIA Project Name
BAIF-AP
Bhoothpur
BAIF-AP
Kankurthy
WOTR
Kuppagandla
WOTR
Veljal
Mahaboobnagar
Mandal & District
Bhoothpur (M),
Mahaboobnagar
Damaragidda,
Mahabbobnagar
Veldana,
Mahaboobnagar
Talakondapally,
Mahaboobnagar
Batch
7
Nalgonda
Surveil
Utukur
12.05
6.13
5.92
2009-10
9.53
4.87
4.66
2009-10
9.90
6.04
3.86
2009-10
10.30
6.81
3.49
41.78
23.85
17.93
7.93
4.04
3.89
08.03.2012
13.42
6.83
6.59
08.03.2012
21.35
10.87
10.48
2010-11
13.36
10.82
2.54
12.83
2010-11
13.72
11.12
2.60
13.37
2009-10
10.70
2.73
7.97
2010-11
11.93
6.06
5.87
49.71
409.03
30.73
255.83
Narayanpur, Nalgonda 2009-10
Shaligouraram (M),
Nalgonda
2010-11
Total
WASSAN
WASSAN
8
Ranga Reddy
BAIF-AP
BAIF-AP
Total
GRAND TOTAL
Parigi (M), Ranga
Narayanapur
Reddy
Doma (M), Ranga
Mothukur
Reddy
Gandid,
Ranga
Mukarlabad
Reddy
Basheerbad (M),
Manthatti
Ranga Reddy
2.41 (30-092011)
3.04 (30-092011)
21st Dec.2012
Rs.2.83
21st.Dec.2012
Rs. 2.96
2010-11
Total
DHAN
Foundation
DHAN
Foundation
Total
funds to Funds
be
released Balance Funds Submission of
released under to be released UC to DWMA
under Admin, under Admin,
(Date &
Admin, I&CB & I&CB & DPR
Amount)
I&CB &
DPR
DPR
18.98
153.20
3.94 (30-092011)
3.59 (30-092011)
IWMP 2012 -13 Projects identification,
delineation on integrated mandal base map & subsequent
PPRs Preparation
Status by District wise as on 11-05-2012
 Field re-conformation of the proposed project area by utilizing the
A3 size index maps prepared by SLNA.
 Obtaining the SLNA PPRs data.
 Completion of PPRs in all respects as per DoLR proforma.
Thank You