Transcript Slide 1

POMORSKIE
PROCES PRZEDSIĘBIORCZEGO ODKRYWANIA
ENTREPRENEURIAL DISCOVERY PROCESS
14 May 2014, European Commission,
Marek Przeor, DG REGIONAL AND URBAN POLICY
Competence Centre Smart and Sustainable Growth
Cohesion
Policy
Cele Polityki Spójności
Art. 176 Traktatu o Funkcjonowaniu Unii Europejskiej:
"Europejski Fundusz Rozwoju Regionalnego ma na celu przyczynianie się do
korygowania podstawowych dysproporcji regionalnych w Unii poprzez udział
w rozwoju i dostosowaniu strukturalnym regionów opóźnionych w
rozwoju oraz w przekształcaniu upadających regionów
przemysłowych."
•Art. 2 Rozporządzenia o Europejskim Funduszu Rozwoju Regionalnego:
• "EFRR przyczynia się do finansowania wsparcia mającego na celu
zwiększenie spójności gospodarczej, społecznej i terytorialnej poprzez
niwelowanie głównych dysproporcji regionalnych w Unii poprzez
zrównoważony rozwój oraz dostosowanie strukturalne regionalnych
gospodarek, w tym przekształceniu upadających regionów
przemysłowych i regionów opóźnionych w rozwoju. "
3
Billion
EUR
Less developed regions
182.2
Transition regions
35.4
More developed regions
54,4
Cohesion Fund
63.4
European territorial cooperation
10.1
Of which
Cross border cooperation
7.5
Transnational cooperation
2.0
Interregional cooperation
0.6
Outermost regions and
northern sparsely populated
regions
1.6
Youth Employment initiative
3.2
TOTAL
* This figure does not include EUR 1.5b
350.3*
of Urban Innov. Actions and EC technical assistance
4
Regional
Policy
Thematic concentration of the ERDF
* At least two of four
themes must be selected
Research and Innovation
Access and use of ICTs
SMEs competitiveness
Energy efficiency and renewable energy (compulsory)
38% *
45% *
60% *
20%
15%
Developed regions: 80%
Transition regions: 60%
Regional
Policy
12%
Less developed regions: 50%
(and all island regions in Cohesion MS)
Innovation Policy
to stimulate growth
How to increase aggregate demand for long term growth in the liquidity trap … Innovation Policy?
Y=C +
I+ G + (X-M)
A virtuous cycle: by increasing targeted government expenditure G (in innovation eco-systems and human
capital skills) that leverages private co-funding I (on innovation: often intangible, long-term, risky
investments) which enhances their capacity to compete in global markets (raising exports X), output grows
driven by sustainable jobs, …thus public sector is only "advancing" money that could be (partially) clawed
back later through increased tax revenue and savings on unemployment benefits, without burdening further
public deficit in the long term… if this innovation policy works!
"I have argued against short term stimulus packages…believing that instead we need a consistent, planned, decade long boost in public investments in people,
technology and infrastructure…it requires careful government programs, working alongside the private sector, and good coordination with state and local
government… J. Sachs, 3/9/13' in "Professor Krugman and crude keynesianism" HUFF Post"
Regional
Policy
Political endorsement to RIS³
Conclusions of the EU Competitiveness Council, 20-21 February 2014
‘The development of strategies for smart specialisation was cited as a fundamental
source of progress in innovation, particularly by linking national and regional priorities with EU policy
objectives. Member States… highlighted the important contribution of smart specialisation in enhancing
the specific innovation-related growth potential of the European regions.’
Conclusions of the European Council, 20-21 March 2014
‘…smart specialisation should be promoted at all levels, including through the efficient use of
public investment in research. This will facilitate contacts between firms and clusters and improve
access to innovative technologies.’
Herman Van Rompuy, President of the European Council, March 2014
A vital part of innovation is the concept of ‘smart specialisation’ – supporting strategic growth agendas,
focusing on the microeconomics of competitiveness, and mobilising the innovation and entrepreneurial
opportunities in each region. Smart specialisation supports innovation and gives it a strong and stable
foundation. An active smart specialisation policy will enable firms, regions, and countries to build
sustainable competitive positions in world markets and to participate in global value chains. In order to
achieve this goal, we need to set up what I could call a ‘collaborative model’: a model bringing all
stakeholders together.
Co to jest inteligentna specjalizacja (IS)?
• „strategia inteligentnej specjalizacji” oznacza krajowe lub
regionalne strategie innowacyjne:
• ustanawiające priorytety w celu uzyskania przewagi
konkurencyjnej poprzez
• rozwijanie i łączenie swoich mocnych stron w zakresie
badań naukowych i innowacji z potrzebami biznesowymi
w celu
• wykorzystywania
pojawiających
się
możliwości
i
rozwoju rynku w sposób spójny przy jednoczesnym unikaniu
dublowania i fragmentacji wysiłków; strategia inteligentnej
specjalizacji może funkcjonować jako krajowe lub regionalne
ramy strategiczne polityki w dziedzinie badań naukowych i
innowacji lub być w nich zawarta.
8
•
(Art.2(3) CPR Regulation)
Governance – Quadruple helix – Rhône-Alpes
Source: Rhône-Alpes presentation, Peer review workshop, Faro
Jak IS powinna być przygotowana?
Strategie
inteligentnej
specjalizacji
są
opracowywane przy zaangażowaniu w proces
„przedsiębiorczych odkryć” krajowych i regionalnych
instytucji zarządzających oraz zainteresowanych
podmiotów, takich jak uniwersytety, inne instytucje
szkolnictwa wyższego, przedstawiciele przemysłu i
partnerzy społeczni.
(Annex I, 4.3 (1) ER)
10
RIS3 is a process …
of «entrepreneurial discovery»
What do
enterprises need?
Clients
Markets
Cooperation
Money
(value chains)
Enterprises
Enterprises
Enterprises
Research
Knowledge
Technologies
Creativity
Talents
Services
With whom to
cooperate?
Who are your
customers /
competitors?
Is there critical
mass /
excellence?
Smart Specialisation is not a planning
doctrine
• S3 involves a self-discovery that reveals what a country or
region does best in terms of R&D and innovation.
Priorities will be identified where and when
opportunities are discovered by entrepreneurs.
• Priorities is not longer the role of the omniscent
planner but involves an interactive process, in which the
private sector is discovering and producing information
about new activities, and the government assesses
potential and then empowers those actors more capable of
realizing the potential
Collège du Management de la Technologie – CDM
Chaire en Economie et Management de l'Innovation – CEMI
Structural changes (taxonomy)
• The outcome of entrepreneurial discoveries is not
simple innovation. It is about structural changes
and related diversification:
• Modernisation (Finish pulp industry and nanotechnology)
• Transition (Austria: transition from mechanical engineering to
medical technologies)
• True diversification (France: aeronautics specialisation enabled
enterpreneurial activities in GPS technologies)
• Radical foundation (Grafen?, blue laser?)
Collège du Management de la Technologie – CDM
Chaire en Economie et Management de l'Innovation – CEMI
SOCIETAL
CHALLENGES
EUROPEAN
COMPARATIVE
ANALYSIS
EUROPEAN
BENCHMARKS
KETS
January – April 2013
Source: Rhône-Alpes presentation, Peer review workshop, Faro
ENTREPRENARIAL DISCOVERY
1st
seminars
PRIORISATION
2nd
seminars
Qualitative and
quantitative analysis
REGIONAL DIAGNOSIS
May – June
2013
Final
TSI
21
July 2013
TECHNOLOGIES / MARKETS MATRIX
7C ANALYSIS & PRIORISATION
Regional
Diagnosis
1st seminars
Societal
challenges
Priorisation
and scenario
KETS
Technologies
Marchés
applicatifs
Usine du futur: architecture industrielle,
conception design de procédés
Atouts
Thématiques
Innovation
technologique


Rhône-Alpes parmi les régions
européennes leaders en innovation
(Regional Innovation Scoreboard
2012)
ème
Rhône-Alpes à la 5
place
européenne pour l’activité
scientifique & technologique



Financement de
l’innovation


Opportunités
Faiblesses
De nombreux dispositifs de
financement en région
Des réseaux de business angels qui
se structurent progressivement sur
plusieurs territoires régionaux
(Rhône, Isère, Savoie…)


ème
Rhône-Alpes située à la 10
place européenne pour les
dépôts de brevets
D’autres régions européennes
présentent une plus forte
concentration de densité
technologique (Eindhoven,
Karlsruhe, Munich, Stockholm,
Helsinki…)
Seulement 6% des fonds de
capital risque et 8.4% des fonds
de capital investissement au
plan national
Les fonds privés peu nombreux
(fonds patrimoniaux et
corporate) et des fonds publics
et privés trop modestes pour le
tissu régional (tickets
insuffisants)







Création et
croissance
d’entreprises
innovantes


Rhône-Alpes en seconde position
nationale pour les CEI (12% entre
1998 et 2007) et les JEI (12%)
Des belles réussites
entrepreneuriales régionales et des
sociétés présentes à l’export

50% des entreprises innovantes
régionales ne dépassent pas le
statut de TPE après 8 années
d’activité.

Menaces
6 Mds€ prévus sur les KETs par
l’UE
Un écosystème d’innovation très
marqué par l’innovation
technologique et les KET en
particulier sur les
nanotechnologies, la nano &
microélectronique
Des compétences régionales
majeures en ingénierie des
procédés, mécanique et
traitement de surfaces

La mise en œuvre des opérations
du programme investissements
d’avenir
La création de la BPI et la volonté
de rationalisation des
financements
L’Acte 3 de la Décentralisation et
le rôle croissant des régions sur
l’innovation et l’appui aux
entreprises
Label EIP des pôles de
compétitivité

Identification de leviers pour la
croissance des entreprises issues
de la recherche (réédition du
parcours de Soitec)

SWOT
synthesis
European
comparative
analysis
DSI DEFINITION
Des régions européennes mieux
structurées en matière
d’innovation technologique et de
transfert aux PME/ETI
(Allemagne et Scandinavie)
Eco-conception
d’unités de
production
Efficacité
énergétique des
procédés
Procédés et
équipements
catalytiques et
séparatifs à faible
empreinte
énergétique
Valorisation du CO2
(captage –
valorisation)
Micro ou mini usines
chimiques :
production
délocalisée pour une
production à forte VA

Clusters
Roadmaps
+ TKM
Une fiscalité nationale peu
favorable aux investissements
dans les entreprises innovantes
(cf. rapport Tambourin)
Un accompagnement qui fait
souvent défaut en complément
de l’offre de financement pour
appuyer l’entreprise dans la
durée
Un contexte économique
européen peu propice aux
investissements et à la
croissance
Markets and Key
technologies
Technologies /
markets Matrix
Instrumentation
environnementale de
l’industrie
Bio carburants
(lignocellulosique)
Procédés
d’extraction végétale
Bioénergies 2G 3G
et recyclage des
déchets
PAC
Biosécurité et
instrumentation
Biotechs (Procédés
enzymatiques )
Gestion et traitement
des effluents
Métrologie / Instrumentation /
Evaluation environnementale
Analyse intégrée de
plusieurs sites de
production et
consommation
d’énergie
Bioindustries
Outils pour contrôle
en ligne des
procédés (in line
monitoring)
Imagerie
médicale
Matériaux
avancés
Procédés
avancés
-Traitement de surfaces
- Nanomatériaux
Micro drug
delivery
Numérique
E
santé
Implants
Matériaux et produits
biosourcés : bio
polymères,
biosolvants)
Biotechs
- blanches
- rouges
Diagnost
ic
Ecotoxicologie
Environnement
Méthanisation : co
digestion par voie
sèche de bio
déchets agricoles,
industriels et
municipaux
Énergies
Micro
capteurs
Membranes
Compteurs
intelligents
Photovoltaïque
Mobilité
Electrification
Véhicule
intelligent
Allégement
Création et gestion de
contenus - Applications
numériques
Composant
s avancés
Concentration des
procédés
Préservation des
matières
premières
Modélisation
Smart
grids
Biomasse
Process intégrés de recyclage : tri,
collecte, traitement & revalorisation
Valorisation des déchets
textiles / DEEE /
plastiques
Matériaux et métaux
stratégiques (terres rares…)
Gestion des eaux pluviales
et usées
Outils d’évaluation
environnementale :
capteurs de mesure,
logiciels…
Micro & Nano
électronique
Santé & nutrition
Développement de
matériaux de
construction innovants
intégrant des MPS
(matières premières
secondaires de
recyclage)
TSI consolidation
scenarios
Prise en compte des
phases de
déconstruction /
séparation
(véhicules,
bâtiments)
Target
applications
2nd seminars
Sport, Loisirs,
Tourisme
Smart
mobility
Interfaces
machines
computing,
serveurs,
logiciels,
serious game
TUT &
composites
DSI definition
Regional
seminar
European
Benchmarks
Final
TSI
European Data Bases
European benchmarks
Regional Diagnosis (100 interviews)
6 European benchmarks, included 6 in situ
TKM analysis
(patents &
publications)
7C
analysis
21
Asset /
attraction
Matrix
6 Thematic working groups (275
participants)
78 TSI including 26 TSI with a high
potential
January – April 2013
Source: Rhône-Alpes presentation, Peer review workshop, Faro
May – June
2013
8th of July – RhoneAlpes Region
Website contributions
12 TSI consolidation scenarios
7 to 8 DSI (Smart Specialisation
Domains)
July 2013
Innovation strategy for
Andalucía 2014-2020
GOVERNANCE
POLICIES
DESIGN &
EVALUATION
SYSTEM
SRI
ANALYSIS OF
THE INNOVATION
SYSTEM
ENTREPRENEURIAL
DISCOVERY
PROCESS
PRIORITIZATION
VISION
April 11th, 2013
PANEL EXPERTS RIS3 ANDALUCÍA QUESTIONNAIRE:
FIRST APPROACH TO ENTREPRENEURIAL DISCOVERY PROCESS
Entrepreneurial
Discovery Process
Workshops
MOBILITY INDUSTRIES
SUSTAINABILITY INDUSTRIES
ICT FOR SMART SPECIALIZATION
HEALTHY ANDALUCÍA
TALENT MANAGEMENT. INNOVATION IN THE
SCIENCE TECHNOLOGY BUSINESS SYSTEM
NEW RURALITY
Specialization opportunities
MOBILITY INDUSTRIES (Aeropolis, Seville – June 26th)
1. TRANSPORT
Speaker: Jaime Beltran. IAT
Narrator: Onofre Sánchez. Red Logistica And.
Motivator: Zacarias de la Hera.
• Logistics
• Smart Mobility
2. AERONAUTICS / AEROSPACE
Speaker: Simón Vazquez. IDEA.
Narrator: Manuel Arroyo. IDEA.
Motivator: Juan D. Duran.
•
•
•
Cross sector synergies
Advanced materials
Systems
Specialization opportunities
SUSTAINABILITY INDUSTRIES (Rabanales 21, Cordoba – July 2nd)
1. ENERGY
3. SUSTAINABLE BUILDING
Speaker: Jorge Juan Jiménez Luna.
Energy Agency of Andalucía.
Narrator: Monica Sánchez Astillero.
Energy Agency of Andalucía.
Motivator: Javier Ramos .
•
•
•
•
Renewable energies and network
connection.
Distributed generation, energy storage &
SmartGrid.
Energy efficiency.
New techs, new materials & hydrogen
economy.
Speaker: Javier Terrados.
Architecture College (U.of Seville)
Narrator: Francisco Bas.
Energy Agency of Andalucía.
Motivator: Juan D. Duran.
2. EFFICIENCY IN RESOURCES
MANAGEMENT
Speaker: Manuel Jose Garcia Gomez.
AGQ Mining & Bioenergy.
Speaker: Miguel Ferrer.
CSIC.
Narrator: Inmaculada Bueno.
GD Industry, Energy & Mining.
Motivator: Zacarias de la Hera.
•
•
•
Mining.
Environment.
Water.
•
•
•
Efficient new materials.
Sustainable building sites.
Industrialized building low ecologic
print.
Opportunity description card
Specialization Opportunity (Speaker)
Workshop
Description (Speaker)
Market Trend
Opportunity Area
Justification (Speaker)
Regional Context (Competition/Alliances)
Barriers
Global competition
Solutions
Statistical Sources and Data (Speakers)
Links with R&D&i
Links with ICT
Links with KET
Nota: Statistical data supporting consistency of identified opportunity to be obtained from public and official statistics,
identification process will be always supported by the corresponding expert.
21
CO DECISION MEETING
PRIORITIES APPROVAL
Seville, March 5th 2014
PRIORITIES
DIMENSIONS
FOSTERING & DEVELOPING MOBILITY &
LOGISTICS
COMPETITIVE AND EFFICIENT
INDUSTRY
TRANSPORT RELATED ADVANCED
INDUSTRY STRENGTHENING
SUSTAINABLE EXPLOITATION OF
ENDOGENOUS RESOURCES ON
TERRITORIAL BASIS
PROMOTING ANDALUCÍA AS A LEISURE AND
CULTURE DESTINATION
ESSENTIAL FACILITATING
TECHNOLOGIES
FOSTERING PUBLIC HEALTH AND WELFARE
SYSTEMS
EDUCATION, TALENT AND CREATIVE
ENVIRONMENTS. KNOWLEDGE AS A
PRODUCTIVE FACTOR.
RESEARCH & INNOVATION ON AGRO FOOD
INDUSTRY AND HEALTHY DIET HABITS
PROMOTION OF RENEWABLE ENERGIES,
ENERGY EFFICIENCY AND SUSTAINABLE
BUILDING
FOSTERING ICT AND DIGITAL ECONOMY
SMEs INNOVATING AND GENERATING
EMPLOYMENT
INTERNATIONALIZATION PROMOTION
SOCIAL INNOVATION
NETWORKING
INFRASTRUCTURES FOR
COMPETITIVENESS AND EXCELLENCE
Limburg
Limburg
Limburg
Principles for selection criteria for priorities in RIS3
1. Proximity to market: the centre of gravity of S3 is business and the
development of commercial applications; so this first criterion is
proposed to avoid projects that would only emphasize fundamental
research and/or research infrastructure.
2.Does the activity open a new domain potentially rich in innovation
and spillovers? This is the essence of discoveries (versus
innovation): opening a new domain in which several innovations will
occur.
3.What is the degree of collaboration, the number of partners
involved? The project needs to involve a sufficiently large number of
actors. Each new activity set as a priority is a collective experiment.
4. Is public funding needed? Projects that are so promising (in terms
of expected private profitability) that they will be undertaken in any
case should be rejected.
Source: S3 Policy Brief 02/2013, p. 6.
Principles for selection criteria for priorities in RIS3
5.What is the significance of the activity for the regional economy?
Some excellent projects might be too narrow in terms of their
significance for the regional economy (in terms of job, number of firms,
etc.). To misquote Nobel Prize winner Robert Solow: we want to see the
effect of S3 in the statistics!
6.What is the capacity of the region to keep the successful activity
on its space, so as to avoid the innovation here benefits elsewhere
syndrome? In general new successful activities which are related to
(and built on) the local innovation ecosystem are easier to keep in the
region.
7.Can this activity realistically drive the region towards a leadership
position in the selected niche?
8.What is the degree of connectedness of the activity vis-à-vis the
rest of the regional economy? R&D domains with a greater degree of
connectedness create more opportunities for structural transformations
and evolution than a more isolated domain.
Source: S3 Policy Brief 02/2013, p. 6.
Enterpreneurial Discovery Process should
lead to identification of vertical priorities
Hypothetical
example
RIS3
Bio-Economy:
New use of
cellulose
Renewable
energy:
bio-mass
Engineering
in medicine
Nanotechnology in pulp
Horizontal priorities:
Clustering, Technological transfer, research
infrastructures improvement
(Well performing) Innovation System
Emerging fields of Smart Specialisation
Mapping of regions' and MS intentions in terms of smart
specialisation fields has started (around 44% of the expected 160ish RIS3):
Service
Supply
manag
ement
Production
Cohesion
Policy
Rout to
market
After
sales
Consu
mption
/Dispo
sal
See: http://s3platform.jrc.ec.europa.eu/map45
R&D
Produc
t
Example of entrepreneurial discovery
process
Regional
Policy
Dziękuję!
34
Regional
Policy
EU Innovation Policy Components
Finance
Market
RTD&I state aid
framework
Internal Market
rules
(finance, products,
services …)
EIB i2i
Financial
instruments
ERDF,
COSME, Horizon2020,
Linking up
CreativeEurope
innovation actors
3%
objective
Infrastructure
ERDF,
Horizon2020,
CEF digital
Research
funding
Horizon2020 (focus
on fundamental
research, but also
applied & innovation)
ESIF
SET, nano-tech…
PPPs
EGTC
EcoAP
Eco-innov.
Art 185,
JTI
Improve R&I
Knowledge
policies &
management
RIS3, ETPs, EIPs
"synchronisation"
INTERREG
ERA
5th freedom
Horizon2020,
ESIF
Market
replication
projects Horizon
SME instrument
Challenge driven
innovation
Horizon, ESIF, LIFE
User-driven
innovation
LivingLabs
(ERDF)
Support services
COSME: EEN, IPR helpdesk,
Horizon Participants portal
ESIF
EURAXESS
EITKICs
researchindustryeducation
Innovation policy
analysis (IUS, RIS,
RIM, RIO, Cluster
Regional
Observatory,
…)
Policy
Health &
safety & eco
regulations
PCP & PPI
IPR &
Communit
y Patent
pool / share
knowledge, capacities
& practice
Sector / technology
initiatives
Pooling
public funds
ERA-Nets, Art 185, JPIs,
EIPs, EUREKA
ESFRI
ERIC
Access to
global markets,
trade
Modernising
universities;
qualification
standards
Public
procurement
Directive
Usercentred
innovation
: design
initiative
Standardisation
Social innovation
ESF, EaSI, ERDF,
Horizon2020
Mobility
Skills
ERASMUS+
Horizon: Marie Curie
ESF
ESF
ERASMUS+
CreativeEurope
Human Capital
Legend:
Policy
initiative /
legislation
Action with
funding
Emerging fields of Smart Specialisation
Mapping of regions' and MS intentions in terms of smart specialisation fields has started (around 44%
of the expected 160ish RIS3):
• Electronic components & system; Clean Sky; Fuel Cells &
JTIs Hydrogen; Bio-based Industries; Innovative Medicines
• Factories of the Future; Energy efficient Buildings; Green
PPP vehicles; Future Internet; Sustainable Process Industry;
s
Robotics; Photonics; High Performance Computing
•Healthy Ageing; Water, Smart Cities ; Sustainable
EIPs Agriculture; Raw materials
Art. •Eurostars; Ambient assisted living, …
185
JPIs
•Clik’EU; FACCE; Urban Europe; Water; More years…; Healthy
diet…etc.
• Human brain, Graphene, + (Future ICT Knowledge Accelerator and
Crisis-Relief System: Guardian Angels for a Smarter Life:IT Future
of
Cohesion
Regional
FETs Medicine: and Robot Companions for Citizens)
Policy
Policy
See: http://s3platform.jrc.ec.europa.eu/map
•Climate KIC; Inno-Energy; ICT Labs
EIT/ • New KICs - health, raw materials, food…
KICs
• Biotech, nanotech, ICT, photonics, advanced manufacturing,
KETs advanced materials