Transcript Slide 1
Indiana’s Major Moves Projects Asphalt Pavement Association of Indiana Michael B. Cline, P.E., PTOE Commissioner INDOT December 13, 2012 INDOT Profile Six district offices 3,630 employees 1,600 Highway Technicians 800 Managers/Supervisors 300 Engineers 785 2,845 CO $389 million/annual operating budget $1 billion/annual capital expenditures 28,400 total roadway lane miles 5,300 INDOT-owned bridges Districts Customer Satisfaction Survey Items that residents thought were critical for INDOT. Repairing and maintaining existing highways 74% Removing snow and ice from highways 69% Repairing and maintaining bridges 67% Water drains quickly from highway surfaces 29% Keeping highway shoulders in good condition 28% Ensuring roadway striping on highways is visible 27% Removing debris from highways 25% Minimizing congestion on highways 21% Adding lanes to existing highways 13% Building new highways Rated by percentage of respondents who rated the items as one of their top five choices. 8% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% Contractor Satisfaction Survey Satisfaction Levels with INDOT’s Performance Regarding Communication & Cooperation. 13% 31% 18% 38% Very Satisfied Satisfied Neutral Dissatisfied Rating of INDOT districts & CO Contractor Satisfaction Survey Satisfaction levels with INDOT’s performance regarding communication & cooperation. Your awareness of future INDOT plans 71% Your awareness of the status of imminent and current INDOT projects that affect you 70% INDOT is willing to consider your input on decisions Percentage of respondents Very Satisfied/Satisfied 44% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 2012 INDOT Awards Month Organization / Award Project/Program February AASHTO / Project of the Week Sherman Minton Bridge August New Management Philosophy & Strategy September ITE / Public Agency Achievement Award Council of State Community Development Agencies (COSCDA) / Presidential Award for Innovation October AASHTO / Performance Excellence Award DamageWise October AASHTO / Performance Excellence Award – Gold Award Propane Vehicle Program October Popular Science Magazine / 25th Annual Best of What’s New Construction Management Association of America (CMAA) / CMAA Award CG/LA / Strategic Project of the Year ACEC / Engineering Excellence Award Honor Award Milton-Madison Bridge Project October October November Stellar Communities Sherman Minton Bridge Ohio River Bridges - East End Crossing I-69 Sections 2-3 INDOT Investment FY 2006-15 Construction Investments $1,600 $1,400 Millions $1,200 $1,000 $800 $600 $400 $200 $0 FY 2006 TOTAL Construction $788 FY 2007 $945 FY 2008 $834 FY 2009 $1,379 FY 2010 $1,085 FY 2011 $1,472 Includes construction, utility relocations and railroad expenditures. * FY13, FY14 and FY15 include P3 Financing that have yet to reach financial closure FY 2012 FY 2013* FY 2014* FY 2015* $1,031 $1,212 $813 $846 Interstate Truck Trends Pavement & Bridge Preservation Pavement & Bridge Preservation Spending FY 2005-15 450 400 350 Millions 300 250 200 150 100 50 0 PAVEMENT BRIDGE TOTAL 2005 $210.4 $75.4 $285.8 2006 $288.4 $123.2 $411.6 2007 $327.2 $54.1 $381.3 2008 $384.0 $65.5 $449.5 2009 $313.0 $98.2 $411.2 2010 $208.4 $98.1 $306.5 Based on award amounts at time of letting. FY 2008-2009 include ARRA projects. 2013 thru 2015 are estimated as of Nov 2012 2011 $177.8 $96.0 $273.8 2012 $182.1 $91.1 $273.2 2013 $203.1 $119.0 $322.1 2014 $242.0 $146.0 $388.0 2015 $242.0 $184.0 $426.0 Major Moves Projects Project Miles % Miles Let Est. $ CN Cost (m) Final Letting Open to Traffic I-80/94 Interchange - 100 $197 2009 Aug. 2011 Accelerate 465 11 100 $423 2010 Dec. 2012 US 24 Fort to Port I-69 Evansville to Crane 11 67 100 100 $93 $620 2010 2011 Nov. 2012 Nov. 2012 Milton-Madison Bridge 1 100 $104 2010 April 2013 US 31 Kokomo 13 100 $155 May 2012 Dec. 2013 SR 25 Hoosier Heartland 36 100 $327 July 2012 Dec. 2013 US 31 Plymouth to South Bend I-69 Crane to Bloomington 20 27 92 79 $223 $400 April 2013 March 2013 Dec. 2014 Dec. 2014 US 31 Hamilton County 13 16 $320 Spring 2013 Dec. 2015 Total 199 $2.9B Major Moves – Ribbon Cutting Hoosier Heartland (SR 25) 36 miles Ribbon cuttings: Oct. 24, 2012: December 2013: 12 miles – I-65 to US 421 24 miles – US 421 to US 24 Open to traffic: Dec. 2013 CN Cost: $327 million Hoosier Heartland at Clymers, Cass County. Major Moves – Ribbon Cutting Fort to Port (US 24) 11 miles Open to traffic: Nov. 14, 2012 CN Cost: $93 million US 24/Fort to Port at Webster Road, Allen County. Major Moves – Ribbon Cutting Interstate 69 Sections 1-3: 67 miles Evansville to Crane Open to traffic: Nov. 19, 2012 CN Cost: $620 million I-69, Daviess County. Major Moves US 31 Hamilton County 13 miles 16% let Final letting: Spring 2013 Open to traffic: Dec. 2015 CN Cost: $320 million US 31 at SR 38, Hamilton County. Major Moves Interstate 69 Section 4: 27 miles Bid openings: Crane to Bloomington 79% let Segment 3: Dec. 12, 2012 Segment 2: March 2013 Open to traffic: Dec. 2014 Est. CN Cost: $400 million Major Moves Interstate 69 Section 5: 21 miles Bloomington to Martinsville DEIS published: Oct. 26, 2012 RFI issued: Dec. 4, 2012 Public hearing: Dec. 6, 2012 ROD anticipated: Spring 2013 Construction to start: FY 2014 Est. CN Cost: $350 million P3 Projects - Ohio River Bridges Total Cost: $2.6 billion Federal ROD approval: June 20, 2012 Kentucky: Downtown Crossing Indiana: East End Crossing East End Groundbreaking: Aug. 30, 2012 Public Hearing: Dec. 1, 2012 IFA Determination: Dec. 3, 2012 Open to Traffic: October 2016 P3 Projects - East End Crossing Indiana Sections P3 Projects - Illiana Corridor 48 miles from I-55 to I-65 Tolled expressway Environmental Impact Study Preferred Route B3 announced Oct. 18, 2012 Tier One ROD anticipated in January 2013 Tier Two ROD anticipated in July 2014 Pavement Conditions 100% Excellent/Good 90% Satisfactory 80% Fair/Poor 70% 60% 78% 50% 40% Projected 70% 75% 70% 30% 20% 10% 13% 11% 17% 12% 14% 11% 13% 16% 2011 2017 2022 Pavement Condition Ratings are measured by Road Roughness, using the International Roughness Index (IRI). 0% 2006 In 2011, 3,060 of INDOT’s Lane Miles were in Fair or Poor Condition. If Preservation Spending Levels Remain Constant, it is Estimated that 4,445 Lane Miles will be Rated Fair or Poor by 2022, an Increase of 1,385 Miles (45%). 16 Federal Highway Bill (MAP-21) Indiana Impact: FY 2013: $923M FY 2014: $931M Effective Date: October 1, 2012 Increased TIFIA program Increased tolling ability for new & added capacity projects New performance measures & asset management requirements Pavement Selection Process Based on appropriate pavement treatment design Existing pavement type, thickness & distress level Ability of possible solutions to address the problem, situation or pavement distresses present Near-term and long-term cost effectiveness Construction costs Least cost of ownership Right treatment, right time, right cost Engineering feasibility Business case suitability 1&1/2” resurface vs. 8” resurface vs. reconstruct, etc. Interstate vs. minor state highway Budgetary impacts acceptability Pavement Selection Process Considers not just HMA or PCCP, but also possible & feasible treatment levels of intensity Basic levels of intensity are: Routine or preventive maintenance Surface treatment Minor structural treatment 2-lift overlay Major structural treatment Chip-seal, PPI, mill-&-fill, etc. Rubberize, thick HMA or PCCP overlay Pavement construction or replacement Pavement Peer Group Pavement Steering Committee Successor District pavement engineers & pavement area engineers are pavement owners Everyone else works to support them Forum for broad discussion of pavement issues so pavement owners can make decisions To include agency, engineering consultants, construction industry, etc. Chapter 304 Revisions Incorporate new agency pavement organization, i.e., district pavement engineers, pavement area engineers, etc. Incorporate new Mechanistic-Empirical Pavement Design Guide (MEPDG) philosophy & methodology (Darwin M-E software) More clearly delineate pavement treatment, selection expectations for internal & external designers Reflect increase reliance on pavement design engineers’ professional judgment Alternate Bidding HMA & PCCP options considered Best results when alternate pavement type considerations determined early in project development 9% (+/-) construction savings typically No longer FHWA experiment, Pavement Selection Process Continued discussion on lower limit Future looking into alternate treatments at PPI level? Thank You