Transcript EBM 3 ~ Spring 2012 - Lock Haven University of Pennsylvania

Poster and Podium Presentations
Poster Completion:
 Week 1: incorporation of faculty review
recommendations
 Week 2: Poster figures, graphs, and text
 Final Poster version upload to the portal
Poster Presentations
 We’ll have your posters printed
 March 5th please review your printed posters stored in
the PD Lab
 EBM Event March 8th evening
 Mount and display posters
 Initiate discussion and Field questions
Podium Presentation:
 15-20 minutes split between 2 speakers
 Slides
 References
 then questions
Schedule of assignments
 Week 3:
 same or new partner?
 upload to the portal page one of rubric: self evaluation with PICO and partner at the bottom
 Week 4: look up references
 Week 5:
 upload to the portal page two of rubric: self evaluation of some of your references, with
references listed at the bottom
 Week 6: keep working on presentation, consider page three of the grading rubric
 Week 7: upload draft presentation to portal (faculty review thereof determines EBM event
speakers)
 Week 8: practice speaking . . .
***Due Sunday March 4th Final version of podium presentation, uploaded.***
Graded by
 faculty/preceptors using:
 EBM Project Evaluation Rubric
 Self assessments using
 page 1 due week 3 ~ Topic evaluation
 Page 3 due week 5 ~ Reference evaluation
EBM Project Evaluation Rubric
Relevance to Preceptorship
4
The topic is of interest to the medical community, relevant to the preceptorship
and the student will have the opportunity to see patients who exhibit the
condition.
3
The topic is of interest to the medical community, relevant to the preceptorship
but the student my not have the opportunity to see patients who exhibit the
condition.
2
The topic is of interest to the medical community but does not have direct
relevance to the preceptorship.
1
The topic is not of general interest to the medical community, is outdated and
does not have relevance to preceptorship.
EBM Project Evaluation Rubric
Patient(s) / Condition
4
The patient(s) population represents a well defined set of those who have the
condition.
3
The patient(s) population represents some of those who have the condition.
2
The patient(s) population is broadly defined but not specific to the condition .
1
The patient(s) population is not clearly defined.
EBM Project Evaluation Rubric
Intervention / Comparison
4
The intervention /comparison is a new and promising treatment of the condition.
3
The intervention / comparison is a needed review of current practice for the
treatment of the condition.
2
The intervention /comparison is a new drug or treatment not showing significant
promise over existing practice(s).
1
The intervention / comparison is outdated and is not relevant to existing practice.
EBM Project Evaluation Rubric
Outcome
4
The outcome for the patient is clearly defined and measurable with a clearly
defined prognosis.
3
The outcome for the patient is defined but not measurable.
2
The outcome for the patient is incompletely defined, thus making it difficult to
measure.
1
The outcome for the patient is not defined.
Reference Self Evaluation Week 5
 Quality of the references
 Methodology
 Outcomes
***Due Sunday March 4th Final version of podium
presentation, uploaded.***
Summatives Week- EBM Podium Presentation talks
throughout the week, schedule TBD.
EBM Event:
th
Thursday March 8 6:30pm-9pm
 at Durrwachter Alumni Conference Center
 Invitations to all of LHU!
 Guests encouraged
 Professional attire
 Schedule:
 6:30-7: poster reception
 7-8:15: Three podium talks
 8:15-9: Poster Session
 Light catering
EBM 3 Grade:
Semester
Participation
Poster
Podium Talk
Professionalism
Spring
20%
10%
60%
10%
Other things to consider
 Press Release to hometowns
 Copy of presentations to keep
Good Luck and Have Fun!