MORTALITY AUDIT

Download Report

Transcript MORTALITY AUDIT

MORTALITY AUDIT

Dr S Callin SpR Palliative Medicine Dr L Russon Consultant Palliative Medicine BRI Palliative Care Team

Background

 Sunday Times league table – hospitals judged by death rates  Mortality group (BRI):  Why are patients dying in hospital?

 Why are patients with terminal illnesses dying in hospital?  Are we planning appropriately for dying patients?

 Preferred place of care

Aims of the audit

 Identify reasons why patients with terminal illnesses die in hospital  Improve system to reduce numbers of patients with terminal illnesses dying inappropriately in hospital

Methods

    Patient sample:  patients referred to the hospital palliative care team   oncology ward Haematology ward 3/12 audit of all deaths Retrospective review of the notes within one week of death Interview with a member of the treating team within one week of death

Data Collection

     Duration of admission Palliative Care Team involvement Liverpool Care Pathway for the Dying Preferred place of care Reason for death       Unexpected death Deterioration before able to plan discharge Deterioration before planned discharge Clearly stated wish to remain in hospital Awaiting hospice bed Other

Results

 54 deaths  22 oncology  9 haematology  23 other wards  57% female  Median age 72 (Range 34-91)  6% non malignant

Results

 Duration of admission  Median 12 days (range 1-59)  PCT involvement  56% of all deaths audited  oncology ward (6/22)  haematology ward (1/9)  Duration of PCT involvement  Median 7 days (0-30)

Results

Reason for death in hospital 3 3 4 Deterioration before able to plan discharge Deterioration before planned discharge Unexpected death 5 32 7

Results

 Most common reason for death in hospital: ‘deterioration before able to plan discharge’ (n=32)  But 13/32 patients had been in hospital for more than two weeks  1 patient was an inpatient for 30 days, 1 for 50 days and 1 for 51 days

Liverpool Care Pathway (LCP)

 37% of all deaths audited on the LCP    oncology deaths (14/22) haematology deaths (3/9) other wards (3/23)  0% non malignant cases  13/32 patients where deterioration was perceived to be before able to plan discharge were on the LCP

Preferred place of care

 Documented preferred place of care  Not documented 37  Hospital 4  Home/hospice 13

Conclusions

 Almost 2/3 of cancer patients/patients referred to the PCT died in hospital because the treating team perceived they deteriorated before able to plan discharge  But over 1/3 of those patients were in hospital for >2weeks  Is the dying phase being recognised early enough?

 … and over 1/3 were on the LCP  Should preferred place of care be explored earlier with patients?

Conclusions

 Need to be more proactive in diagnosing and planning care for terminally ill patients

What happened next..............?