Transcript Document
Education at a Glance 2014 Belgium / Flanders 1 % China South Africa Indonesia Brazil Turkey Italy Chile Mexico Portugal Slovak Republic Czech Republic Colombia Austria Hungary Poland Slovenia Greece Germany Latvia EU21 average France Spain OECD average Netherlands Denmark Iceland Belgium Sweden Switzerland Estonia Norway Luxembourg Finland Ireland New Zealand United Kingdom Australia Korea United States Israel Japan Canada Russian Federation In 2012 around 35% of the adult population in B held a tertiary qualification 2000 Chart A1.1 Percentage of tertiary-educated adults in 2000 and 2012 2012 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Fl has a wide distribution of literacy proficiency across education levels… Chart A1.4 Mean literacy score, by educational attainment (2012) Below upper secondary education Upper secondary or post-secondary non-tertiary education Tertiary education 320 300 280 260 240 220 Russian Federation Italy Spain Estonia Canada Korea Ireland Denmark Germany France Slovak Republic England/N. Ireland (UK) Austria Poland Average United States Norway Flanders (Belgium) Czech Republic Australia Sweden Finland Netherlands Japan 200 …but the low- and mid-educated do rather poorly Chart A1.5 Percentage of adults scoring at literacy proficiency Level 4/5, by educational attainment (2012) Below upper secondary education % Upper secondary or post-secondary non-tertiary education Tertiary education 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 Italy Spain Russian Federation Korea Slovak Republic Estonia Denmark France Ireland Germany Austria Canada Poland Average Czech Republic United States England/N. Ireland (UK) Flanders (Belgium) Norway Australia Sweden Netherlands Finland Japan 0 Younger adults perform better in literacy proficiency than older adults Chart A1.6 Percentage of younger and older adults scoring at literacy proficiency Level 4 or 5 in the Survey of Adult Skills (PIAAC) (2012) 25-34 year-olds % 40 55-64 year-olds 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 Italy Spain Slovak Republic Russian Federation Ireland Austria France Korea Poland Czech Republic United States Germany Estonia Denmark England/N. Ireland (UK) Average Canada Australia Norway Flanders (Belgium) Sweden Netherlands Japan Finland 0 In Fl only 71% completes upper sec education within the theoretical duration, an extra 16% within two extra years Chart A2.4 Successful completion of upper secondary programmes (N: theoretical duration of the programmes) % Completion after N years Completion after N+2 years 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 Luxembourg Iceland Norway France Denmark Spain Netherlands Mexico Chile Italy United Kingdom New Zealand Finland Belgium (Fl.) Austria OECD average Turkey Sweden Canada Slovenia Poland Estonia Hungary Greece United States Israel Slovak Republic Ireland Japan Korea 0 The successful upper secondary completion rate of boys in Fl is only 65%, below OECD average (girls 77%) Chart A2.5 Successful completion of upper secondary programmes, by gender (N: theoretical duration of the programmes) % Girls completion after N years Boys completion after N years 100 80 60 40 20 Luxembourg Iceland Spain France Denmark Mexico Norway Netherlands Chile United Kingdom Finland New Zealand Italy Sweden OECD average Austria Slovenia Canada Belgium (Fl.) Turkey Estonia Poland Hungary Greece United States Slovak Republic Ireland Israel Japan Korea 0 In B the median age of finishing university is 22, the lowest age across OECD countries Chart A3.1 Average age of graduates at ISCED 5A level and age distribution (2012) 20% of first degree graduates are below… Tertiary-type A programmes (first degree) 80% of first degree graduates are below… 38 36 34 32 30 28 26 24 22 Belgium United Kingdom Indonesia Netherlands Mexico Luxembourg Germany Korea Ireland Canada Estonia Greece Turkey Poland Slovak Republic Switzerland EU 21 average Slovenia Italy Portugal Hungary Australia OECD average Latvia Austria New Zealand Spain Czech Republic Norway Denmark Chile Finland Israel Sweden Brazil Iceland 20 In Fl 45% of adults have the same education as their parents… Chart A4.3 - SQ Percentage of 25-64 year-old non-students whose educational attainment is the same as (status quo) that of their parents Status quo: Tertiary education Status quo: Upper secondary or post-secondary non-tertiary education % 70 Status quo: Below upper secondary education 60 50 40 30 20 10 Finland Russian Federation Korea Sweden Estonia Flanders (Belgium) Australia Canada Netherlands France Ireland Norway England/N. Ireland (UK) Japan Denmark Average Poland United States Spain Austria Germany Slovak Republic Italy Czech Republic 0 …while 47% are more educated than their parents, a comparatively high figure Chart A4.3 - Mob Percentage of 25-64 year-old non-students whose educational attainment is higher than (upward mobility) or lower than (downward mobility) that of their parents % Downward mobility Upward mobility 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 Russian Federation Korea Finland Flanders (Belgium) France Ireland Poland Netherlands Canada Estonia Sweden Japan Australia Average Spain England/N. Ireland (UK) Denmark Norway Italy Slovak Republic United States Austria Germany Czech Republic 0 Only 5.75% of tertiary education students come from loweducated families (which count for 18% of population) Proportion of young students (20-34 year-olds) in tertiary education whose parents have below upper secondary education % Proportion of parents with below upper secondary education in the total parent population 60 50 40 30 20 10 Spain Italy Ireland Netherlands Australia Korea France Average Flanders (Belgium) Denmark England/N. Ireland (UK) Sweden Austria Slovak Republic Finland Russian Federation* United States Norway Canada Poland Estonia Germany Japan Czech Republic 0 Fl belongs to countries with relatively less equitable access to tertiary education and around average mobility Mobility Odds A4 Relationship between the share of upward mobility among 25-34 year-olds and the relative likelihood among 20-34 year-olds of participating in tertiary education by parents’ educational attainment (values in reverse order) Upward mobility 70 less equitable access high educational mobility more equitable access high educational mobility Korea 60 50 Italy Ireland France 40 Poland Netherlands Australia Flanders England/N. Ireland Average 30 Denmark Japan US 20 Germany Austria Canada Sweden Estonia less equitable access low educational mobility 10 10 9 Finland Spain Norway more equitable access low educational mobility 8 7 6 5 Odds ratio 4 3 2 1 Greece Turkey Korea Spain Italy Hungary Upper secondary or post-secondary non-tertiary education Japan Ireland Slovak Republic United States Mexico Canada Portugal Estonia Russian Federation EU 21 average OECD average Czech Republic New Zealand United Kingdom Chile Finland France Australia Belgium Below upper secondary education Poland Luxembourg Israel Slovenia Brazil Latvia Denmark Austria Netherlands Germany Sweden Switzerland % Norway Iceland In B the employment penalty for the low-educated is high (<50% employment rate)… Chart A5.1 Employment rates among 25-64 year-olds, by educational attainment (2012) Tertiary education 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 0 Slovak Republic Spain Czech Republic Greece Ireland Latvia Hungary Estonia Poland EU21 average Portugal United States Slovenia 2005 France OECD average Germany Sweden Italy Russian Federation 2012 Belgium Finland Canada United Kingdom Israel Denmark % Turkey Switzerland Austria Iceland Netherlands New Zealand Luxembourg Australia Chile Norway Brazil Mexico Korea …but their unemployment rate has been remarkably stable during the crisis Chart A5.2 - BS Unemployment rates among 25-64 year-olds, by educational attainment (2005, 2010 and 2012) Below upper secondary education 2010 50 40 30 20 10 Greece Spain Portugal Turkey Ireland Italy Latvia Estonia Slovak Republic Slovenia EU21 average France OECD average Canada 2005 Poland Denmark United States Mexico Chile Israel 2012 New Zealand Sweden Hungary Finland United Kingdom Belgium % 20 Luxembourg Japan Netherlands Iceland Brazil Korea Australia Russian Federation Switzerland Czech Republic Germany Austria Norway Unemployment rate for tertiary educated is relatively low in B and decreasing Chart A5.2 -T Unemployment rates among 25-64 year-olds, by educational attainment (2005, 2010 and 2012) Tertiary education 2010 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0 The net public return on investment for a man in tertiary education in B is higher (174 000 USD) than the net private return (123 000 USD) Chart A7.1 Net private and public returns associated with a man attaining tertiary education (2010) Private net returns Public net returns 500 000 450 000 350 000 300 000 250 000 200 000 150 000 100 000 50 000 Turkey Denmark Spain Estonia Sweden New Zealand Greece Korea Japan Canada Slovak Republic Poland Norway Israel Czech Republic France Australia Finland OECD average Portugal EU21 average Austria United Kingdom Netherlands Italy Belgium Slovenia Germany United States Hungary 0 Ireland Equivalent USD 400 000 The public benefit for a woman attaining tertiary education in B is the highest of all OECD countries Chart A7.3 Public costs and benefits for a woman attaining tertiary education (2010) Direct cost Foregone taxes on earnings Grants effect Income tax effect Social contribution effect Transfers effect Costs Unemployment effect Benefits 250 000 200 000 100 000 50 000 0 -50 000 -100 000 -150 000 Belgium Ireland Slovenia United Kingdom Hungary United States Austria Netherlands Portugal Australia Italy Greece Germany OECD average EU21 average France Poland Czech Republic Canada Spain Slovak Republic Norway Finland Estonia Turkey Israel Japan Korea New Zealand Sweden -200 000 Denmark Equivalent USD 150 000 The more schooling an individual has, the more likely (s)he is to do volunteering in the community Chart A8.3 - VA Proportion of adults reporting that they volunteer at least once a month, by educational attainment Below upper secondary education % Upper secondary or post-secondary non-tertiary education Tertiary Education 40 30 20 10 Japan Estonia Korea Poland Czech Republic Slovak Republic Spain Italy Sweden Average England/N. Ireland (UK) Ireland Australia Flanders (Belgium) Finland Denmark Germany Austria Canada Netherlands Norway United States 0 Tertiary education has a high impact on interpersonal trust, but upper secondary education not Chart A8.4 - TA Proportion of adults reporting that they trust others, by educational attainment Below upper secondary education % Upper secondary or post-secondary non-tertiary education Tertiary Education 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 Slovak Republic Estonia Italy Czech Republic France Korea Germany Japan Ireland Poland England/N. Ireland (UK) Average Flanders (Belgium) Canada Spain Austria United States Australia Finland Netherlands Sweden Norway Denmark 0 Private costs are slightly higher than public costs for tertiary education in B, but are comparatively low Chart A7.4 Public versus private costs for a man attaining tertiary education (2010) Public costs Private costs Direct private costs Foregone earnings Direct public costs Foregone taxes on earnings Grants effect 200 000 150 000 Equivalent USD 100 000 50 000 0 -50 000 -100 000 Denmark Netherlands United States Austria Finland Germany Sweden Norway France EU 21 average OECD average Spain Ireland Belgium Japan Italy Canada Slovenia New Zealand Poland Greece Czech Republic Australia Hungary Israel Slovak Republic Estonia United Kingdom Turkey Portugal Korea -150 000 An individual with a higher level of education is more likely to believe they have a say in government Chart A8.5 - GA Proportion of adults reporting that they believe they have a say in government, by educational attainment Below upper secondary education Upper secondary or post-secondary non-tertiary education Tertiary Education % 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 Czech Republic Italy Spain Estonia Germany Japan Slovak Republic Ireland Canada Korea England/N. Ireland (UK) Austria Average Flanders (Belgium) Australia United States Netherlands Sweden Denmark Finland Norway 0 Total per student spending on education in B is relatively high Chart B1.1 Annual expenditure per student by educational institutions, by type of service (2011) Core services Ancillary services (transport, meals, housing provided by institutions) and R&D Total In equivalent USD converted using PPPs 18 000 16 000 14 000 12 000 10 000 8 000 6 000 4 000 2 000 United States Austria Netherlands Belgium Ireland Sweden Germany Australia United Kingdom Finland France Slovenia Spain EU21 average OECD average Italy Korea Portugal Israel Poland Czech Republic Chile Slovak Republic Hungary Mexico Brazil Switzerland Norway Denmark Japan Iceland New Zealand Estonia Latvia Russian Federation Turkey Indonesia 0 Annual spending per primary student is USD 8 296, on average Chart B1.2a -P Annual expenditure per student by educational institutions for all services, by level of education (2011), primary education Primary education Expenditure per student (equivalent USD converted using PPPs) 24 000 22 000 20 000 18 000 16 000 14 000 OECD average 12 000 10 000 8 000 6 000 4 000 2 000 Indonesia Colombia Argentina Turkey Mexico Brazil Chile Hungary Czech Republic Latvia Estonia Slovak Republic Portugal Poland Israel France Korea Spain Germany Netherlands New Zealand Finland Japan Italy EU21 average Ireland Australia Slovenia Belgium Denmark United Kingdom Sweden Iceland Austria United States Norway Switzerland Luxembourg 0 Annual spending per secondary student ranges from USD 522 to USD 16 182 Chart B1.2a -S Annual expenditure per student by educational institutions for all services, by level of education (2011) Secondary education Secondary education Expenditure per student (equivalent USD converted using PPPs) 18 000 16 000 14 000 OECD average 12 000 10 000 8 000 6 000 4 000 2 000 Luxembourg Switzerland Norway Austria United States Netherlands Belgium Ireland France Sweden Denmark EU21 average Australia Germany Japan Finland United Kingdom Spain New Zealand Portugal Italy Slovenia Iceland Korea Czech Republic Estonia Poland Israel Latvia Slovak Republic Hungary Chile Argentina Mexico Turkey Brazil Colombia Indonesia 0 Annual spending per tertiary student ranges from USD 1173 to USD 26000 Chart B1.2a -T Annual expenditure per student by educational institutions for all services, by level of education (2011) Tertiary education Tertiary education Expenditure per student (equivalent USD converted using PPPs) 28 000 26 000 24 000 22 000 20 000 18 000 16 000 14 000 12 000 10 000 8 000 6 000 4 000 2 000 0 Indonesia Latvia Estonia Mexico Slovak Republic Turkey Chile Iceland EU21 average Hungary Czech Republic Portugal Poland Korea Italy Slovenia New Zealand Brazil Israel Spain United Kingdom Austria France Belgium Ireland Australia Japan Germany Netherlands Finland Norway Sweden Denmark Switzerland United States OECD average Expenditure per primary, secondary and post-secondary nontertiary student increased by 21% since 2005 in B Chart B1.5 - PS Relationship between annual expenditure per student in 2011 and change in expenditure per student between 2005 and 2011 Primary, secondary, and post-secondary non-tertiary Annual expenditure per student (2011, USD) 20 000 19 000 18 000 17 000 16 000 15 000 14 000 13 000 12 000 11 000 10 000 Denmark Iceland 9 000 Italy 8 000 7 000 6 000 5 000 4 000 Hungary 3 000 2 000 1 000 0 -20 -10 OECD average Switzerland Norway Austria United States Sweden Netherlands United Kingdom France Japan Belgium Canada Germany Ireland Australia OECD average Finland New Zealand Spain Korea Portugal Israel Czech Republic Estonia Poland Slovak Republic R² = 0.2707 Chile Mexico 0 Brazil 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Change in expenditure per student between 2005 and 2011 (%) But only by 6.8% in tertiary education (below OECD average) Chart B1.5 -T Relationship between annual expenditure per student in 2011 and change in expenditure per student between 2005 and 2011 Tertiary education Annual expenditure per student (2011, USD) 27 000 26 000 25 000 24 000 23 000 Switzerland 22 000 21 000 20 000 19 000 18 000 17 000 16 000 15 000 14 000 13 000 12 000 11 000 10 000 9 000 8 000 7 000 6 000 5 000 -30 OECD average United States Denmark Sweden Norway Finland Netherlands Slovenia Germany Japan Ireland Belgium Austria France OECD average United Kingdom Spain Israel Brazil New Zealand Portugal Chile Iceland Russian Federation -20 -10 Korea R² = 0.079 Hungary Mexico 0 Czech Republic Italy Poland Estonia Slovak Republic 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 Change in expenditure per student between 2005 and 2011 (%) As enrolment increased faster than expenditure, spending per tertiary student decreased with 6.4% in B since 2008 Chart B1.6 -T Change in expenditure per student by educational institutions, by level of education (2008, 2011) Tertiary education Change in expenditure Change in the number of students (in full-time equivalents) Change in expenditure per student Index of change (2008=100) 150 140 130 120 110 100 90 Iceland Ireland United States Austria Portugal Belgium Mexico Norway Spain Brazil Australia Germany Sweden France Switzerland Netherlands EU21 average OECD average Poland Italy United Kingdom Japan Israel Russian Federation Denmark Slovenia Finland Czech Republic Korea Hungary Chile Slovak Republic Estonia 80 Also as % of GDP Belgium is among countries with higher than average expenditure in school education… Chart B2.2 - PS Expenditure on educational institutions as a percentage of GDP (2011). From public and private sources, by level of education and source of funds Primary, secondary and post-secondary non-tertiary education Public expenditure on education institutions % of GDP Private expenditure on education institutions 5.5 5 OECD average (total expenditure) 4.5 4 3.5 3 2.5 2 1.5 1 0.5 Brazil Norway Russian Federation Slovak Republic Czech Republic Japan Latvia Italy Germany Spain Luxembourg Estonia Poland EU 21 average Austria Portugal Chile United States Slovenia Sweden France Mexico Canada Netherlands Switzerland Finland Australia Korea Colombia Israel Belgium Denmark Ireland United Kingdom Iceland Argentina New Zealand 0 But not in tertiary education (because of low private expenditure) Chart B2.2 -T Expenditure on educational institutions as a percentage of GDP (2011). From public and private sources, by level of education and source of funds Tertiary education Public expenditure on education institutions % of GDP 3 Private expenditure on education institutions OECD average (total expenditure) 2.5 2 1.5 1 0.5 Japan Australia Korea Italy Chile Slovak Republic Colombia Russian Federation United Kingdom Mexico Israel Brazil United States Hungary Portugal Latvia New Zealand Poland Spain Iceland Germany Slovenia Czech Republic Ireland Argentina EU21 average France Netherlands Belgium Switzerland Austria Estonia Sweden Canada Norway Denmark Finland 0 During the crisis public expenditure public expenditure on educational institutions remained constant in B Chart B2.3 -T Impact of the economic crisis on public expenditure on education Change in public expenditure on educational institutions Change in Gross Domestic Product Change in expenditure on education institutions as a percentage of GDP Index of change (2008=100) 130 125 120 115 110 105 100 95 90 85 Hungary Italy Estonia Poland Russian Federation United States Iceland Israel Sweden France Belgium Norway EU21 average Spain Austria OECD average Korea Mexico Portugal Canada Chile Slovenia Germany Switzerland Japan Netherlands Ireland Australia Finland Brazil Slovak Republic Denmark New Zealand Czech Republic United Kingdom 80 Luxembourg Switzerland Turkey Norway Finland Denmark Iceland Belgium Sweden Austria Slovenia Primary, secondary and post-secondary non-tertiary education Germany Czech Republic France Ireland Estonia EU21 average Spain Argentina Slovak Republic Poland Netherlands Indonesia OECD average Portugal Mexico Italy New Zealand Russian Federation Latvia Canada Israel Australia Colombia United States Japan United Kingdom Korea Chile Only 10% % of spending on tertiary education comes from private sources in B (31% on average) Chart B3.1 Share of private expenditure on educational institutions (2011) Tertiary education % 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Norway Finland Denmark Iceland Belgium Sweden Austria 2008 Slovenia Germany Czech Republic France Ireland Estonia EU21 average Spain 2011 Slovak Republic Poland Netherlands OECD average Portugal Mexico Italy Russian Federation Canada Israel Australia United States Japan United Kingdom Korea Chile And private expenditure in tertiary education did not increase Chart B3.3 -T Share of private expenditure on tertiary educational institutions (2000, 2008 and 2011) 2000 % 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 In some countries where students pay high tuition fees they also benefit from financial support Chart B5.1 Relationship between average tuition fees charged by public institutions and proportion of students who benefit from public loans and/or scholarships/grants in tertiary-type A education (2011) Average tuition fees charged by public institutions, first degrees programmes, in USD 7 500 6 000 Chile4 United States1 Japan 3 United Kingdom 4 500 Australia New Zealand 3 000 Netherlands 1 500 Switzerland Austria Italy France2 Belgium (Fl.) Belgium (Fr.) 0 0 Mexico 25 Turkey Finland Ireland 50 Denmark 75 Norway Sweden 100 % of students who benefit from public loans AND/OR scholarships/grants In B a high % of current expenditure goes to compensating education staff Chart B6.1 Distribution of current expenditure by educational institutions for primary, secondary and post-secondary non-tertiary education (2011) Compensation of all staff Other current expenditure % of current expenditure 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% Czech Republic Finland Slovak Republic Sweden Denmark Korea Hungary Indonesia EU21 average Latvia Iceland Austria Australia Brazil Canada Slovenia OECD average Norway France United States Germany Italy Ireland Spain Netherlands United Kingdom Switzerland Israel Luxembourg Japan Turkey Belgium Colombia Portugal Argentina Mexico 0% In B teachers’ salaries have a high impact on salary cost per student Chart B7.4 Contribution of various factors to salary cost of teachers per student, in upper secondary education (2012) in USD Contribution of teachers' salary Contribution of instruction time Contribution of estimated class size difference with OECD average Contribution of teaching time USD 4 000 3 000 2 000 1 000 0 -1 000 -2 000 Slovak Republic Estonia Chile Hungary United States England Czech Republic Norway Israel Finland Netherlands Slovenia Italy Ireland Australia Poland Canada France Turkey Austria Korea Germany Luxembourg Belgium (Fl.) Spain -3 000 Belgium Latvia Ireland Netherlands Hungary Poland Slovenia Czech Republic Germany Iceland EU21 average Denmark Korea Norway Australia Portugal Spain Estonia Finland Sweden Slovak Republic Greece Saudi Arabia Switzerland France OECD average Russian Federation New Zealand Canada United States Italy Austria Luxembourg United Kingdom Brazil South Africa Luxembourg Chile Argentina Indonesia Israel Turkey Mexico Colombia China B has the highest participation rate in education among 15-19 year-olds 2012 2005 2000 Chart C1.2 Enrolment rates of 15-19 year-olds for full-time and part-time students in public and private institutions (1995, 2000, 2005 and 2012) 1995 % 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 0 Switzerland Turkey Indonesia Colombia Australia Brazil Argentina United States Mexico Ireland Chile Finland Poland Czech Republic Slovak Republic Austria 2012 Russian Federation OECD average Luxembourg Hungary Japan % 100 Portugal EU21 average Latvia Netherlands Slovenia Korea Israel New Zealand Estonia Germany Italy Sweden United Kingdom Norway Spain Iceland Denmark France Belgium B also has the highest enrollment rate in early childhood education Chart C2.1 Enrolment rates at age 3 in early childhood education (2005 and 2012) 2005 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 But expenditure on early childhood education is just slightly above the average of 0.6% of GDP Chart C2.3 Expenditure on early childhood educational institutions (2011) as a percentage of GDP, by funding source Private expenditure on educational institutions in percentage of GDP Public expenditure on educational institutions in percentage of GDP Total % of GDP 1.4 1.2 1 0.8 0.6 0.4 Switzerland Portugal Brazil Hungary Australia Japan Korea United Kingdom Estonia Netherlands Finland United States Slovak Republic Italy Colombia Czech Republic Norway OECD average EU21 average Germany Austria New Zealand Mexico Belgium Argentina Israel France Poland Sweden Chile Luxembourg Slovenia Russian Federation Latvia Spain Iceland 0 Denmark 0.2 Iceland Sweden New Zealand Estonia Slovenia Finland Hungary Luxembourg Italy United States Germany Slovak Republic Spain EU21 average Czech Republic Austria OECD average Japan Netherlands Korea Portugal Belgium Poland Brazil United Kingdom Turkey France Chile Mexico Indonesia Israel And an average student/teacher ratio Chart C2.4 Ratio of pupils to teaching staff in early childhood education (2012). Public and private institutions, calculation based on full-time equivalents Student to teaching staff ratio 28 26 24 22 20 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0 % 100 Australia Latvia Iceland Poland New Zealand Norway Slovenia Denmark United States Russian Federation Korea United Kingdom Finland Netherlands Portugal Slovak Republic Sweden Israel Czech Republic Argentina Saudi Arabia OECD average EU21 average Ireland Hungary Germany Austria Spain Japan Chile Italy Switzerland Estonia France Turkey Greece Mexico Belgium Luxembourg Indonesia China Based on current patterns only 33.5% of young adults are expected to enter university programmes in B, against 60% on average All students Chart C3.1 Entry rates into tertiary-type A education (2012) Excluding international students 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Turkey Spain Italy Chile Mexico Ireland Brazil Hungary Slovak Republic Korea Portugal France United Kingdom Poland Estonia Israel United States OECD average Belgium EU21 average New Zealand Greece Czech Republic Canada Denmark Finland Australia Slovenia Germany Austria Sweden Switzerland Iceland Norway Luxembourg Netherlands In 2012, 15% of 15-19 year-olds in B were neither employed nor in education or training (same as average) Chart C5.1 NEET population among 15-29 year-olds (2012) and change between 2011 and 2012 % 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 Less than 50% of adults participate in formal and/or non-formal education in a given year in Fl Chart C6.1 Adult participation in formal and/or non-formal education (2012) % 100 90 80 70 66 66 66 64 64 59 60 58 56 56 53 53 51 51 50 50 50 49 48 47 42 36 40 35 33 25 30 20 20 10 Russian Federation Italy Slovak Republic Poland France Japan Spain Austria Flanders (Belgium) Czech Republic Korea Ireland Average Estonia Germany Australia England/N. Ireland (UK) Canada United States Netherlands Norway Sweden Denmark Finland 0 Between 2005 and 2012, teachers did not see an increase in their salaries in real terms in Fl Chart D3.3 Change in lower secondary teachers’ salaries (2000, 2005, 2012). Index of change between 2000 and 2012 (2005 = 100, constant prices), for teachers with 15 years of experience and minimum training Index of change 2005 = 100 2012 In most countries, salaries increased less since 2005 than between 2000 and 2005 2000 140 130 120 110 100 90 80 70 60 Hungary Greece Portugal Japan Scotland England Spain France Korea Italy Iceland United States Finland OECD average Switzerland Belgium (Fl.) Austria Czech Republic Belgium (Fr.) Sweden Slovenia Australia New Zealand Mexico Norway Luxembourg Ireland Denmark Israel Poland Estonia 50