Transcript Document

WP6 Evaluation
EuroHealthNet
Cristina Chiotan
Public Health Coordinator
41 members and partners in 27 European countries
•
AUSTRIA:
Austrian Health Promotion Foundation
NORWAY:
Norwegian Directorate of Health
•
BELGIUM:
Flemish Institute for Health Promotion and Disease
Prevention
POLAND:
National Institute of Hygiene –
Public Health Research Institute
•
BULGARIA:
National Centre of Public Health Protection
ROMANIA:
Institute of Public Health Iasi
•
CROATIA:
National Institute of Public Health
SCOTLAND:
NHS Health Scotland
•
CZECH REPUBLIC:
National Institute of Public Health
SLOVAKIA:
•
DENMARK:
National Board of Health
Public Health Authority of the Slovak
Republic
•
UK:
• Department of Health
SLOVENIA:
• National Institute of Public Health
•
• Kent & Medway NHS
•
• North West Health Office
• Institute of Public Health Murska
Sobota
SPAIN:
• Ministerio de Sanidad y Consumo
•
ESTONIA:
National Institute for Health Development
•
FRANCE:
(INPES)
National Institute for Prevention and Health Education
•
FINLAND:
Finnish Centre for Health Promotion
SWEDEN:
Stockholm County Council
•
GERMANY:
Federal Centre for Health Education (BZgA)
SWITZERLAND:
Health Promotion Switzerland
•
GREECE:
Institute of Preventive Medicine, Environmental &
WALES:
Public Health Wales
IRELAND
Institute of Public Health
MONTENEGRO
Institute of Public Health
ROMANIA
National Institute of Public Health
SWEDEN
Swedish Association of Local
Authorities and Regions
•
•
Occupational Health Prolepsis
FINLAND:
•
•
National Institute for Health and Welfare
Finnish Society for Social and Health - SOSTE
HUNGARY:
• Hungarian National Institute for Health Development
(OEFI)
• University of Debrecen
•
•
ITALY:
•
LATVIA:
The Centre of Health Economics
•
NETHERLANDS:
• NIGZ: Netherlands Institute for Health Promotion
•
Veneto Region
• RIVM: Netherlands Institute Public Health and the
Environment
• Universidad de La Laguna
- Reducing Health Inequalities
- Combat NCDs
- Health Promotion for sustainable
health systems
Policy development
Project participation
Networking
Communication
Health Inequalities are persistent and increasing
EuroHealthNet
The European Partnership for
Improving Healthy Equity and
Wellbeing
PHASE
The European
Platform for Action
on Health & Social
Equity
HPE
Health Promotion
Europe
The European Network
for Health Promotion
CIRI
The European
Centre for
Innovation,
Research &
Implementation in
Health & Wellbeing
The EuroHealthNet Secretariat, Executive and General Councils
Evaluation
WHY?
• To support Consortium performance;
• To collectively identify and respond to problems;
• To maximise impact and ensure sustainability.
HOW?
Through project’s products, interviews and questionnaires
WHO?
All project partners
AHA.SI Evaluation
Draft Evaluation Framework
based on project’s work-plan, timeframe, deliverables
including process, output and outcome indicators
to be commented by WP leads and agreed by all
 Guiding Principles for Active Ageing and Solidarity between
Generations;
 The Active Ageing Index;
 Social Investment Package.
AHA.SI Evaluation
 Review processes: meetings, event reports;
questionnaires and interviews;
 Analyse outputs: schedule and content (3 external
experts);
 Assess outcomes: stakeholders views on impact
• 3 interim reports and one final report
Logic model:
Inputs
Activities
Management
structure
Networking
Internal/
External
expertise
Time
Funds
Conferences
Review of
best practices
Situation
analysis
..
Outputs
Networking
Awareness
campaign
Strategy
(3 position
papers)
Shortterm
outcomes
Long-term
outcomes
Higher
public
awareness
More seniors
employed
Feasibility of
Strategy
More active
and healthy
seniors
Cooperation
health and
social sectors
policy
More LTC
Examples
Specific objective:
Network of different sectors at different levels
• Process indicators: no. of meetings organised, reports,
etc.;
• Output indicators: satisfaction and impact; follow up
colaborations (questionnaires, interviews)
• Outcome indicators: the network allows better strategy
implementation (interviews)
Examples
Specific objective:
Greater public and target groups awareness
• Process indicators: campaign, communication (WP5
products)
• Output indicators: no. of people reached, materials
produced, no. of events dissemination etc.
• Outcome indicators: public awareness evaluation study
Short-term outcomes:public awareness
Components
Indicators
context
Aspects that may have an
influence on the campaign
Reach
% of population (subgroups?)
having heard of the campaign
Dose delivered
Number and type of
messages delivered
Dose received
% of population (subgroups?)
aware of …
Or agree with the new
strategy?
fidelity
Degree to which the
messages reflected well the
strategy
Method
Example: networking
Components
Indicators
Method
intention
Knowing counterpart
Trust
Q
Interview ***
activities
Exchange of newsletters
Cabinet committees
Joined budgeting
Delegated financing
Health conferences
(collaborative governance)
Industry engagement
Thank you!
Cristina Chiotan
[email protected]
Ingrid Stegeman
[email protected]
Cristina Chiotan
Public Health Coordinator