Transcript Folie 1 - TFEIP Secretariat

Status of emission reporting
Review of inventories
Katarina Mareckova, Robert Wankmueller,
Marion Pinterits, Melanie Tista
CEIP, ETC ACM
TFEIP, 11 May 2015, Milan
Content
•
•
•
•
Status of reporting
Review
Time Series Consistency
Data comparison
http://www.ceip.at/status_reporting/2015_submissions
Reporting under the CLRTAP in 2015
http://www.ceip.at/status_reporting/2015_submissions
Review results S1 & S2
http://www.ceip.at/review_results/review_results_2015
Completeness
Recalculations
Time Series Consistency
Key Category Analysis
Inventory Comparisons
(CLRTAP/NECD/UNFCCC)
• Comparability (emissions
per capita/per GDP)
•
•
•
•
•
Reporting under the CLRTAP in 2015
•
•
•
41 (80 %) submissions from 51 Parties, 30 Parties within deadline
10 are missing
31 IIRs, 32 Activity data
Status of reporting under NECD
• All 28 EU MS submitted
2012 and 2013 data
• 25 MS on time
• Italy, Hungary and
Greece after deadline
Time Series Consistency
• Check for dips and jumps (review 2014)
Time Series Consistency
• Consistency between PM2.5 and PM10 emissions
Reported PM2.5 emissions should not exceed PM10
emissions as they are a subset of PM10 emissions
Findings:
4 countries reported higher PM2.5 emissions than PM10
emissions:
Lithuania, Czech Republic, Malta, Ukraine
Black Carbon:
• First year of reporting
• 25 parties (49%) reported BC
Time Series Consistency
• Expert estimates for gapfilling of data
Expert
data
Sum of Sectors
Linear Interpolation
Copy of data
Linear Extrapolation
Other (e.g. GDP Trend,
data from IIASA, share
from reported years,…)
Submission of NH3-emissions 2015
Reported Data
NFR02/NFR09
Reported data NFR14
Time Series Consistency
About 40% of data reported
PM (PM2.5 + PM10 + PMcoarse): only 26% of data reported
Comparison with IIASA/GAINS
Comparison with IIASA/GAINS
Comparison with IIASA/GAINS
Comparison with IIASA/GAINS
Comparison with IIASA/GAINS
Comparison with IIASA/GAINS
Comparison with IIASA/GAINS
Adjustment applications 2015
• 7 countries: Belgium,
Denmark, Finland, France,
Germany, Luxembourg,
Spain
• Sectors: Energy , Transport,
Agriculture
• Pollutants: NOx, NMVOC,
NH3
• Why: New sources, revised
EFs (methods? )
http://www.ceip.at/adjustments_gp
Adjustment
applications 2014
• 6 countries
applied and
reviewed
• 2 approved
applications of
Germany and
Denmark
Review in 2015
Stage 3
10 countries / all sectors /
all pollutants
LRs: Anne Misra (UK) and Ole
Kenneth (DK)
Time schedule
• Data for reviewers – after TF
meeting; CEIP website +
wiki
• Initial questions to be sent
ASAP (mid June latest)
• Reports / chapters
o first draft mid July
o to be completed latest August/
Sept
Review of Adjustments
7 countries / 3 sectors/
NMVOC, NH3, NOx
ALR: Chris Dore (UK)
Time schedule
o Data posted on the CEIP
website in April
o Desk review May –June
o Consultations: online + meeting
CPH
o Summary for the status report
26 June
o Finalisation of review and
review reports by the end of
June (mid July?)
Roster of experts
 24 Parties to the Convention (out of 51) have
nominated experts
 the roster currently contains a total of 78 inventory
experts
http://www.ceip.at/review_process/stage3_review_ae
Awarded IIRs
2014
Norway
France
Denmark
Latvia
Belgium
Slovenia
UK
2013
Finland
Sweden
Croatia
Estonia
Poland
Spain