Transcript Document
FACTORS INFLUENCE HOUSEHOLD TO USE AND MAINTAIN LATRINES AFTER OPEN DEFECATION FREE DECLARATION IN ERMERA DISTRICT, TIMOR-LESTE 09 May 2013 Prepared by: Ivo Guterres ID. 5578834953 1 Background & Rational Region Access to improve sanitation facility (%) Not access to improve sanitation facility (%) Sources World’s population 62% 38% WHO, 2008 Developed region 99% 1% African Region 60% 40% (Anteneh & Kumie, 2010) Southern Asia 33% 67% (Frumkin 2010). Oceania 52% 48% (Frumkin 2010). Developing country (Rural area) 20% 80% (Anteneh Kumie, 2010) 2 Cont. background Timor-Leste accessibility to Improve Sanitation Area Current sanitation situation (2010) To achieved MDG 2015 Sources Access (%) Not (%) Urban 65% 14% 80% TL DHS, 2010 & Rural 34% 45% 55% TL National Basic Sanitation Policy, 2012 Total 41% 37% 3 Background & Rational • Respiratory and diarrheal diseases the top two causes of infant and child mortality in Timor-Leste, both of which are strongly linked to inadequate sanitation and hygiene. Diarrhoea alone is responsible for more than 380 child deaths per year in Timor-Leste. • CLTS-based approaches have been adopted by the Government of Timor-Leste as a National Sanitation policy. 4 Research Objectives General Objective: To find out the relationship between latrine use and Socio Demographic, traditional believe, attitude, socioeconomic status and environmental factors. To identify key information related to Environmental Health Department for scaling up community led total sanitation (CLTS) program. Specific objective: To find out how many percentage of household are using and maintains the latrines and how many are stopped after open defecation free declaration (ODF declaration) in Ermera District. Use the information provided by a household representative find out the continued use or cessation of the latrines. 5 Conceptual framework Independent variable Dependent variable Socio Demographic: Age Gender Marital status Religion Traditional practice belief and attitude Knowledge on latrines and associated diseases Socioeconomic status of household: Latrine use and maintenance Level of Education Household Income Family size Latrine condition Environmental factor: Neighborhood Water sources 6 Study Area District profile Capital TL 58 km Located West – Central TL 7 Cont. Literature review Number of population:117,064 peoples Number of household: 19,280 household, across in 5 Sub district (Atsabe, Ermera, Hatulia, Letefoho and Railaco) and 52 villages. The majority of the population has Catholic religion. Official language Tetum and Portuguese. Mambae as local dialect. The majority of community income, coffee plantation. 8 Research Methodology Research design Cross-sectional study Was used quantitative data design to access information from the subject. Study Area The study was implemented in Haupu village (6 sub villages), Letefoho Sub District, Ermera District, Timor-Leste. Study Population The study population were 19.280 households in Ermera District with total population 117.064 peoples. (Source: Census Timor-Leste, 2010) 9 Cont. Research Methodology Sample Technique • The study were covered for 19.280 households in Ermera district. The sample size in this research was calculated by Taro Yamanae’s formula (Yamane, 1973). n = N/ (1+Ne2) n= Sample size, N= Population and e= Error of the sampling (0. 05) • The sample size for this study was calculated as follows: n = 19,280 / (1+19,280(0.05)2 = 391 + 10% = 430 households 10 PURPOSIVE Flow chart sampling technique 1st stage ERMERA DISTRICT IDENTIFY 1 AMONG 3 DISTRICTS IMPLEMENTED CLTS LETEFOHO SUB DISTRICT IDENTIFY 1AMONG 3 FROM 5 SUB DISTRICTS IMPLEMENTED CLTS BY USING SIMPLE RANDOM SAMPLING 2nd stage 3rd stage 2 VILLAGES (DUCURAI AND HAUPU 2 VILLAGES IMPLEMENTED CLTS APPROACH BY USING SIMPLE RANDOM SAMPLING HAUPU VILLAGE 4th SELECT VILLAGE THAT COMPLETELY DECLARED ODF BY USING SIMPLE RANDOM SAMPLING stage 5th stage SELECT 6 FROM 12 SUB VILLAGES BY USING SIMPLE RANDOM SAMPLING SUB VILLAGE 6th stage 430 HH HOUSE TO HOUSE SURVEY FOR ALL HOUSEHOLD IN 6 SUB VILLAGES BY USED RANDOM SAMPLING TO SELECT FIRST HOUSEHOLD TO START SURVEY IN EACH OF THE SUB VILLAGE. 11 Cont. Research Methodology Data collection Data was collected by house to house survey. 5 interviewers with background education from senior high school were had been attended training on data survey and has experienced in many survey and 1 supervisor had background from public health degree and had experience many years in public health area, were recruited and two days trained by the principle researcher. Field supervisions and daily meetings during data collection were intense to ensure the quality of data collection. 12 Cont. Research Methodology Data Analysis (statistics) After complete all questionnaires, recheck, coded and entre into computer by researcher. Data was used Statistical Package for Social Science (program SPSS 17.0.) and Excel Program for data entry and analysis. Data was analysis with Chi square to determine relationship between independent and dependent variables. 13 Finding Latrine use % Continue use 47.2 Stopped 52.8 Majority of them, 49% has been used pit without slap/earth. 14 Finding Independent variables which association with latrine use and maintenance No Variable Descriptive p -value 1. Gender M=57.6% F=42.4% 0.002 2. Level of Education 54% had no education <0.001 3. Occupation 34.1% farm 4. Income 59.2% < U$100/month <0.001 5. Family size 49.2% ranged among 6-10 peoples/household <0.001 0.01 Finding No Variable Descriptive Significant association p-value 6. Neighbor influence 36.8% respondents influenced by neighbor to build and use latrine There was a strong significant association between influences neighbor with latrine < .001 7. Knowledge 86%-93% has positive knowledge to use latrine. Moderate knowledge more likely to use and maintain latrine compared to those who had high and low knowledge (14-19) scores 0.002 8. Attitude 24%-59% has positive attitude moderate attitude more use and maintain latrine compared to those who living in high and low attitude (36-46) scores <0.001 9. Practice 18.7% use latrine every day to defecated The respondents who had moderate practice more likely to use and maintain latrine compared to those were low and high practice (13-18) scores <0.001 Finding Independent variables which no association with latrine use and maintenance No Variable Descriptive p -value 1. Age Respondent age was 27.1% among 40 - 49 years old, 0.095 2. Marital Status 72.7% was married. 0.204 3. Water source 54.9% : spring water 0.959 29.5% with distance ≤ 10 Cont. Research Methodology Limitation The study was conducted in one village within the district, so cannot generalize to all population. Lack of information and data from researcher regarding to the CLTS approach in Haupu village. Behavior aspects of the community cannot be understood in short time. Luck of information about the reason why respondent want to continue or stopped use and maintain latrine. Limited of time for search information more deeply. 18 Recommendation Providing awareness activities through health education and promoting latrine use and maintenance on regular basis Improve knowledge, attitudes and practices, of use and maintain latrine, advise household members include to use and maintain latrine. Increase health promotion and education due to water sanitation and hygiene program at the rural area. 19 Cont. Recommendation Strengthening collaboration within relevant ministries, institution and partners are the key important role to monitoring and supervise sustainability of latrine use and maintenance in the future. For further research could be conducted to determine factors about household continue and stopped to use latrine and Factor determinant latrine use for children under five years old. 20 21