Transcript Document
FACTORS INFLUENCE HOUSEHOLD TO USE
AND MAINTAIN LATRINES AFTER
OPEN DEFECATION FREE DECLARATION
IN ERMERA DISTRICT, TIMOR-LESTE
09 May 2013
Prepared by: Ivo Guterres
ID. 5578834953
1
Background & Rational
Region
Access to improve
sanitation facility (%)
Not access to
improve sanitation
facility (%)
Sources
World’s population
62%
38%
WHO, 2008
Developed region
99%
1%
African Region
60%
40%
(Anteneh & Kumie,
2010)
Southern Asia
33%
67%
(Frumkin 2010).
Oceania
52%
48%
(Frumkin 2010).
Developing country
(Rural area)
20%
80%
(Anteneh Kumie,
2010)
2
Cont. background
Timor-Leste accessibility to Improve
Sanitation
Area
Current sanitation situation
(2010)
To achieved
MDG 2015
Sources
Access (%)
Not (%)
Urban
65%
14%
80%
TL DHS, 2010
&
Rural
34%
45%
55%
TL National
Basic
Sanitation
Policy, 2012
Total
41%
37%
3
Background & Rational
• Respiratory and diarrheal diseases the top two causes of
infant and child mortality in Timor-Leste, both of which are
strongly linked to inadequate sanitation and hygiene.
Diarrhoea alone is responsible for more than 380 child
deaths per year in Timor-Leste.
• CLTS-based approaches have been adopted by the
Government of Timor-Leste as a National Sanitation
policy.
4
Research Objectives
General Objective:
To find out the relationship between latrine use and Socio Demographic, traditional
believe, attitude, socioeconomic status and environmental factors.
To identify key information related to Environmental Health Department for scaling
up community led total sanitation (CLTS) program.
Specific objective:
To find out how many percentage of household are using and maintains the latrines
and how many are stopped after open defecation free declaration (ODF declaration)
in Ermera District.
Use the information provided by a household representative find out the continued
use or cessation of the latrines.
5
Conceptual framework
Independent variable
Dependent variable
Socio Demographic:
Age
Gender
Marital status
Religion
Traditional practice
belief and attitude
Knowledge on latrines
and associated diseases
Socioeconomic status of
household:
Latrine use and
maintenance
Level of Education
Household Income
Family size
Latrine condition
Environmental factor:
Neighborhood
Water sources
6
Study Area
District profile
Capital TL
58 km
Located West –
Central TL
7
Cont. Literature review
Number of population:117,064 peoples
Number of household: 19,280
household, across in 5 Sub district
(Atsabe, Ermera, Hatulia, Letefoho and
Railaco) and 52 villages.
The majority of the population has
Catholic religion.
Official language Tetum and
Portuguese. Mambae as local dialect.
The majority of community income,
coffee plantation.
8
Research Methodology
Research design
Cross-sectional study
Was used quantitative data design to access information from
the subject.
Study Area
The study was implemented in Haupu village (6 sub villages),
Letefoho Sub District, Ermera District, Timor-Leste.
Study Population
The study population were 19.280 households in Ermera
District with total population 117.064 peoples. (Source:
Census Timor-Leste, 2010)
9
Cont. Research Methodology
Sample Technique
• The study were covered for 19.280 households in Ermera district.
The sample size in this research was calculated by Taro Yamanae’s formula
(Yamane, 1973).
n = N/ (1+Ne2)
n= Sample size,
N= Population and
e= Error of the sampling (0. 05)
• The sample size for this study was calculated as follows:
n = 19,280 / (1+19,280(0.05)2
= 391
+ 10%
= 430 households
10
PURPOSIVE
Flow chart sampling technique
1st stage
ERMERA DISTRICT
IDENTIFY 1 AMONG 3
DISTRICTS IMPLEMENTED
CLTS
LETEFOHO
SUB DISTRICT
IDENTIFY 1AMONG 3 FROM 5
SUB DISTRICTS
IMPLEMENTED CLTS BY
USING SIMPLE RANDOM
SAMPLING
2nd stage
3rd stage
2 VILLAGES (DUCURAI
AND HAUPU
2 VILLAGES IMPLEMENTED
CLTS APPROACH BY USING
SIMPLE RANDOM SAMPLING
HAUPU VILLAGE
4th
SELECT VILLAGE THAT
COMPLETELY DECLARED ODF
BY USING SIMPLE RANDOM
SAMPLING
stage
5th stage
SELECT 6 FROM 12 SUB
VILLAGES BY USING SIMPLE
RANDOM SAMPLING
SUB VILLAGE
6th stage
430 HH
HOUSE TO HOUSE SURVEY FOR
ALL HOUSEHOLD IN 6 SUB
VILLAGES BY USED RANDOM
SAMPLING TO SELECT FIRST
HOUSEHOLD TO START SURVEY
IN EACH OF THE SUB VILLAGE.
11
Cont. Research Methodology
Data collection
Data was collected by house to house survey.
5 interviewers with background education from senior high school
were had been attended training on data survey and has experienced in
many survey and 1 supervisor had background from public health
degree and had experience many years in public health area, were
recruited and two days trained by the principle researcher.
Field supervisions and daily meetings during data collection were
intense to ensure the quality of data collection.
12
Cont. Research Methodology
Data Analysis (statistics)
After complete all questionnaires, recheck, coded and entre
into computer by researcher.
Data was used Statistical Package for Social Science
(program SPSS 17.0.) and Excel Program for data entry and
analysis.
Data was analysis with Chi square to determine relationship
between independent and dependent variables.
13
Finding
Latrine use
%
Continue use
47.2
Stopped
52.8
Majority of them, 49%
has been used pit without
slap/earth.
14
Finding
Independent variables which association with latrine use and maintenance
No
Variable
Descriptive
p -value
1.
Gender
M=57.6%
F=42.4%
0.002
2.
Level of Education
54% had no education
<0.001
3.
Occupation
34.1% farm
4.
Income
59.2% < U$100/month
<0.001
5.
Family size
49.2% ranged among 6-10
peoples/household
<0.001
0.01
Finding
No
Variable
Descriptive
Significant association
p-value
6.
Neighbor
influence
36.8% respondents
influenced by neighbor to
build and use latrine
There was a strong significant
association between influences
neighbor with latrine
< .001
7.
Knowledge
86%-93% has positive
knowledge to use latrine.
Moderate knowledge more likely to use
and maintain latrine compared to those
who had high and low knowledge (14-19)
scores
0.002
8.
Attitude
24%-59% has positive
attitude
moderate attitude more use and maintain
latrine compared to those who living in
high and low attitude (36-46) scores
<0.001
9.
Practice
18.7% use latrine every
day to defecated
The respondents who had moderate
practice more likely to use and
maintain latrine compared to those
were low and high practice (13-18)
scores
<0.001
Finding
Independent variables which no association with latrine use and maintenance
No
Variable
Descriptive
p -value
1.
Age
Respondent age was 27.1%
among 40 - 49 years old,
0.095
2.
Marital Status
72.7% was married.
0.204
3.
Water source
54.9% : spring water
0.959
29.5% with distance ≤ 10
Cont. Research Methodology
Limitation
The study was conducted in one village within the district, so cannot
generalize to all population.
Lack of information and data from researcher regarding to the CLTS
approach in Haupu village.
Behavior aspects of the community cannot be understood in short
time.
Luck of information about the reason why respondent want to
continue or stopped use and maintain latrine.
Limited of time for search information more deeply.
18
Recommendation
Providing awareness activities through health education
and promoting latrine use and maintenance on regular
basis
Improve knowledge, attitudes and practices, of use and
maintain latrine, advise household members include to
use and maintain latrine.
Increase health promotion and education due to
water sanitation and hygiene program at the rural
area.
19
Cont. Recommendation
Strengthening collaboration within relevant ministries,
institution and partners are the key important role to
monitoring and supervise sustainability of latrine use and
maintenance in the future.
For further research could be conducted to determine factors
about household continue and stopped to use latrine and
Factor determinant latrine use for children under five years
old.
20
21