Transcript Slide 1

Place-based Education &
Academic Achievement
Prepared by:
Michael Duffin, PEER Associates, Inc.
Prepared for:
the Place-based Education Evaluation Collaborative (PEEC)
November 16, 2005
Suggested citation:
Duffin, M., Chawla, L., Sobel, D., & PEER Associates (2005). Place-based education and academic achievement.
Retrieved November 14, 2005 from http://www.peecworks.org/PEEC/PEEC_Research/S0032637E
Place-based or environment-based education uses the
environment as an integrating context (EIC) across
disciplines. It is characterized by interdisciplinary learning,
team teaching, hands-on learning experiences that often
center on problem-solving projects, learner-centered
education that adapts to students’ individual skills and
abilities, and the exploration of the local community and
natural surroundings. The following studies show that this
approach not only increases students’ environmental
literacy, but delivers other important benefits as well.
A Review of Research and Evaluation on
Impacts of Place-based Education on
Student Academic Achievement
Part 1: Ten studies from across the United States
– Collectively cover 16 states, 265 schools
– Recent (1998-2005)
– Various combinations of standardized test scores,
interviews, observations, demographics, documents
Part 2: Results from the Place-based Education
Evaluation Collaborative (PEEC) and CO-SEED
– Basic theory of change
– Dose-response measurement strategy
– Direct measures of student achievement
Ten Student Achievement Studies
from across the United States
Environmental Education:
Improving Student Achievement
(Bartosh, 2004, Washington State)
Design:
Statistically compared 77 pairs
of demographically equivalent
schools (fully implementing EE
for at least 3 years v. schools
w/o or just starting EE program)
Standardized tests (Washington
Assessment of Student Learning,
and Iowa Test of Basic Skills)
Electronic survey to evaluate the
teaching & learning environment
Gilford Elementary School, Gilford, NH
Environmental Education:
Improving Student Achievement
(Bartosh, 2004, Washington State)
Findings:
Schools with systematic EE
programs showed higher,
statistically significant, test
scores on standardized tests in
math, reading, writing, and
listening
Pattern of EE school students
having higher scores persisted
for all five years of data
investigated (1997-2002)
Gilford Elementary School, Gilford, NH
EE schools used natural areas
more, had more EE prof. devel.,
and more support from parents,
community, and administration
Closing the Achievement Gap:
Using the Environment as an Integrating Context for Learning
(Lieberman & Hoody, 1998, national scope)
Design:
EIC programs in 40 schools in
12 states (California, Colorado,
Florida, Iowa, Kentucky, Maryland,
Minnesota, New Jersey, Ohio,
Pennsylvania, Texas, Washington)
Interviews with over 250
teachers and principals and over
400 students
Four surveys about site
characteristics
14 comparisons between EIC
and traditional programs
Gilford Elementary School, Gilford, NH
Closing the Achievement Gap:
Using the Environment as an Integrating Context for Learning
(Lieberman & Hoody, 1998, national scope)
Higher scores on standardized
measures of academic achievement
(reading, writing, math, science,
social studies, GPA)
Findings:
In the 14 schools that compared
EIC v. traditional programs, 36 out
of 39 measures showed better
performance by EIC students
Reduced discipline, classroom
management problems; Increased
engagement and enthusiasm for
learning; Greater pride, ownership
in their accomplishments.
Gilford Elementary School, Gilford, NH
California Student Assessment Project: The Effects of
Environment-based Education on Student Achievement
(SEER, 2000, California)
Design:
8 paired sets of students: one
class exposed to EIC programs
and the other without (twice
from same school, six times
from different, neighboring
schools matched by
demographics/SES)
Evidence came from
standardized test scores, site
visits, and teacher surveys and
interviews
Haley School, Roslindale, MA
California Student Assessment Project: The Effects of
Environment-based Education on Student Achievement
(SEER, 2000, California)
Findings:
Substantiates and builds upon
findings from the Closing the
Achievement Gap study
.
Haley School, Roslindale, MA
The Effects of Environment-based Education on
Students’ Achievement Motivation
&
The Effect of Environment-based Education on Student’ Critical
Thinking Skills and Disposition Toward Critical Thinking
(Athman (Ernst) & Monroe, 2004, Florida)
Design:
Norm-referenced tests
(Achievement Motivation
Inventory, Cornell Critical
Thinking Test, California Measure of Mental Motivation)
and interviews with selected students
Studies published in two separate peer-reviewed articles
(Journal of Interpretation Research, and Environmental
Education Research)
Haley School, Roslindale, MA
400 students, grades 9 & 12
in 11 Florida high schools
The Effects of Environment-based Education on
Students’ Achievement Motivation
&
The Effect of Environment-based Education on Student’ Critical
Thinking Skills and Disposition Toward Critical Thinking
(Athman (Ernst) & Monroe, 2004, Florida)
Controlling for GPA, gender
and ethnicity, EIC programs
significantly raised scores
on all three tests
Critical thinking attributed to
environmental themes, open-ended research projects, student
voice and empowerment, connection to community
Motivation attributed to learning experiences tailored to students’
interests/strengths, and applied to real-life issues/problems
Haley School, Roslindale, MA
Findings:
Environment-based Education:
Creating High Performance Schools and Students
(NEETF, 2000, national scope)
Design:
Case studies of schools with
environment-based programs (five
individual schools, a model school
program involving five schools,
and a statewide program)
Compared scores on statewide
standardized tests between
students from environment-based
programs and various comparison
groups such as district or state
Hinsdale School, Hinsdale, NH
Augmented with qualitative data,
presumably from interviews,
observations and/or documents
Environment-based Education:
Creating High Performance Schools and Students
(NEETF, 2000, national scope)
Findings:
Hinsdale School, Hinsdale, NH
All 3rd graders at Hawley Environmental
Elementary School in Milwaukee, WI
passed the Wisconsin Reading
Comprehension Test (as compared with
only 25% of the total Milwaukee public
school population).
At Isaac Dickson Elementary School in
Asheville, NC, 4th grade students
achieved a 31 percentage point increase
in math achievement in just one year.
Scores on college admission ACT test
were higher for students from the School
for Environmental Studies in Apple
Valley, MN, than their peers in the
district, the state, and the nation.
At Condit Elementary School in
Bellaire, TX, 3rd grade students who
took part in the research-based
environment program demonstrated
higher-level thinking skills according to
locally developed instruments.
Environment-based Education:
Creating High Performance Schools and Students
(NEETF, 2000, national scope)
Findings:
First graders in the EIC classroom at
Kruse Elementary in Pasadena, TX,
performed higher on the Iowa Test of
Basic Skills in all categories.
Since incorporating environmental
issues into the curriculum,
Tompkinsville Elementary (and other
Kentucky schools) have increased their
achievement in science, reading, and
social studies on statewide tests.
All five schools in Florida’s Model
Schools in EE program showed steady
increases over five years on Florida
Writes and FCAT tests.
Hinsdale School, Hinsdale, NH
Effects of Outdoor Education Programs
for Children in California
(American Institutes of Research, 2005, California)
At-risk 6th grade students, 4
schools, 3 hands-on, ecologyoriented outdoor programs
Design:
Delayed treatment design
(119 students in treatment group,
control group of 106 students
participated later in the year)
Student, teacher, and parent surveys
(pre-, post-, 6-10 weeks post), plus
site visits and interviews
Measured social/personal skills,
stewardship of the environment,
knowledge/understanding of
science, and benefits for English
Language Learners
Beebe School, Malden, MA
Effects of Outdoor Education Programs
for Children in California
(American Institutes of Research, 2005, California)
Findings:
Science scores on post-tests
higher for treatment group
Teachers reported increases in
self-esteem, conflict resolution,
relationship with peers, problem
solving, motivation to learn, and
behavior in class
No significant change in
environmental stewardship
scores
Beebe School, Malden, MA
An Evaluation of the National Wildlife Federation’s®
Schoolyard Habitat Program®
in the Houston Independent School District
(Danforth, 2005, Texas)
Design:
Compared 3 pairs of Houston
schools, matched based on
demographics
Treatment group included 306 4th
graders in schools implementing
SYH, control group included 182
4th graders not doing SYH
Dearborn Middle School, Roxbury, MA
Measures include tests scores
(Texas Assessment of Skills and
Knowledge- Reading, Math, not
Writing), attendance, and
demographics
3rd grade as pre-, 4th grade as post-
An Evaluation of the National Wildlife Federation’s®
Schoolyard Habitat Program®
in the Houston Independent School District
(Danforth, 2005, Texas)
Findings:
SYH participation correlated
positively and fairly strongly with
increased math scores (.30)
SYH participation correlated
negatively and more weakly with
improved reading scores (-.15)
Author argued that the SYH
curriculum did not address
reading as directly as math
Dearborn Middle School, Roxbury, MA
Overall, non-whites and/or
African Americans showed more
improvement; Attendance results
were mixed; Free lunch status
correlations were not significant
They Remember What They Touch:
The Impact of Place-based Learning in East Feliciana Parish
(Emekauwa, 2004, Louisiana)
In 1999-2000, began Project
Connect, a district wide place-based
math and science initiative
Design:
5 elementary/middle schools, over
2000 students, 80% African
American, 85% free lunch
52 teachers participated in 1 or more
of 3 consecutive summer trainings
Investigated 4th grade ELA, Math,
Science, Social Studies scores on
Louisiana Educational Assessment
Program (LEAP 21), 1998-2002
Compared district to state for % of
students at “unsatisfactory” level
Haley School, Roslindale, MA
They Remember What They Touch:
The Impact of Place-based Learning in East Feliciana Parish
(Emekauwa, 2004, Louisiana)
Performance gap between district
and state decreased for all areas
Findings:
Greatest individual school success
occurred at Slaughter Elementary
where three of the district’s placebased leadership team teach
Haley School, Roslindale, MA
A Study to Keep Your Eye On
(Falco, 2004, South Carolina EIC School Network)
10 middle schools participated
in EIC implementation in
South Carolina
In the first year all of the
schools showed some degree
of improved attendance,
behavior, and academic
achievement
Watch to see if future reports
from this group continue to
build on their growing body of
evidence and also provide
more details about the method
and data for their
investigations
Woodsville Elementary School, Woodsville, NH
Student Achievement Investigations
from PEEC and CO-SEED
Basic Theory of Change for
Student Academic Achievement
Changes in
educator
practice
Placebased
Education
Program
in a school
(e.g. increased
collaboration,
interdisciplinary
integration, use of
local resources,
professional growth
& engagement etc.)
Increased
student
engagement
& enthusiasm
Improved
student
academic
achievement
Changes in
school culture
Marzano claims that that number is
actually closer to 20%, with 13%
deriving from teacher-level factors, and
7% attributable to school-level factors
Higher
Lower
Coleman report claimed that schooling
accounted for only 10% of the variance
in student achievement (or rR2 = .10)
(Measures of Intended Outcome)
If participants with less dose have
lower outcomes, and those with more
dose have higher outcomes, then the
program is likely to be an active
ingredient
Program “Response”
PEEC’s Dose-Response
Measurement Strategy
Less
More
Program “Dose”
(Exposure + Implementation)
Weight status predicts 17-19% of cost
for treating cardiovascular disease
Link A in the Logic Chain
Changes in
educator
practice
Placebased
Education
Program
in a school
(e.g. increased
collaboration,
interdisciplinary
integration, use of
local resources,
professional growth
& engagement etc.)
Very diverse sample
(4 programs in 55 schools; Whole school
change & Prof. development models;
Urban, rural, suburban; Grades K-12)
Averages from an aggregate of
12 survey items show PEEC dose
accounts for 19% of variance in
Overall Educator Practice
Figure S4. Teacher Practice (overall module)
Scale: Strongly Disagree = 1, to Strongly Agree = 4
Scale: Twice per year or less = 1, to Once a week or more = 4
338 educator surveys
Average scores for items about teacher collaboration, meeting of
curriculum goals, confidence, energy, growth as a teacher, and
use of local people and places for teaching(teapracmea)
PEEC Cross-Program Survey Results 2003-04
Changes in Educator Practice (Link A)
From PEEC educators surveys, 20 03-04
4.0




3.0




2.0




1.0






























































  


 





  

   






 
 


 

  




 
 









  



  

  







 




 



 








 




 


 











0.0






 






  



 




  





 




 


The best fit multiple regression
line above shows that 19% of the
variability in survey response is
predicted by dose of a PEEC program.
The result is statistically significant.
rR2= .19, p = .000, n = 342.


1.0




2.0




3.0



4.0
Dosage composite
Scale: No exposure to a PEEC program = 0,
Very high PEEC program exposure and implementation = 4
Link B in the Logic Chain
Changes in
educator
practice
(e.g. increased
collaboration,
interdisciplinary
integration, use of
local resources,
professional growth
& engagement etc.)
Increased
student
engagement
& enthusiasm
PEEC and CO-SEED Survey Results 2003-04
Increase in Student Engagement (Link B)
(rR2
Same effect size
= .16) for
PEEC cross-program
From CO-SEED educator surveys, 2003-04
Scale: Strongly Disagree = 1, to Strongly Agree = 4
Averages from an aggregate of 3
survey items show CO-SEED dose
accounts for 16% of variance in
(adult reports of) Student
Engagement in Learning
Figure S3. Student Engagement in Learning (index)
Average scores for index consisting of three
items about the enthusiasm, preferences for
traditional style learnin g activities, and selfdirecte dness in their CO-SEE D projects (xsel)
338 educator surveys for PEEC,
245 educator surveys for CO-SEED

4.0
 







3.0


 





   


  
  
   
  





  

  



   
    
  







 








 
 
 





2.0
 

The best fit multiple regression
line above shows that 16% of
the variability in survey response
is predicted by dose of CO-SEED.
The result is statistically significant.
rR2= .16, p = .000, n = 245.




1.0


0.0




1.0




2.0




3.0



4.0
Dosage composite
Similar results for (adult reports of)
Student Civic Engagement
Scale: No exposure to CO-SEED = 0,
Very high CO-SEED exposure and implementation = 4
Link C in the Logic Chain
Increased
student
engagement
& enthusiasm
Improved
student
academic
achievement
PEEC and CO-SEED Lit Review 2003-04
Improved Student Academic Achievement (Link C)
Citing over 40 research studies, Marzano states
(2003, p. 144) …
“The link between student motivation and
achievement is straightforward. If students are
motivated to learn the content in a given
subject, their achievement in that subject will
most likely be good.”
PEEC and CO-SEED Survey Results 2003-04
Improved Student Academic Achievement (Link C)
Similar effect sizes for student
reports of Enthusiasm for Learning,
both for CO-SEED and PEEC
Effect sizes get smaller (for
students) as one gets further from
the intervention (directed first at
educators)…the closer you are to
the fire, the more heat you feel
From CO-SEED student surveys, 2003-04
Scale: Strongly Disagree = 1, to Strongly Agree = 4
Raw scores from a single survey
item shows CO-SEED dose
accounts for 5% of variance in
(student reports of) “CO-SEED
helps me get better grades”
Figure S10. Helps with Grades and Tests (item)
Raw scores for item "CO-S EED helps me do
better on tests and get better grades" (x10)
721 student surveys for PEEC,
680 student surveys for CO-SEED
4




















3





2




1

The best fit multiple regression line abov e shows
that 5% of the variability in survey respo nse is
predicted by dose of CO-SEED. The result is
statistically significant.r R2= .05, p = .000, n = 680.


0.0




1.0









2.0

3.0




4.0
Dosage composite
Scale: No exposure to CO-SEED = 0,
Very high CO-SEED exposure and implementation = 4
Efforts to directly measure
student academic achievement at
CO-SEED sites
Interesting but Inconclusive Investigation of
Writing Scores on Statewide Standardized Tests
(Beebe and Gilford Schools, 2003)
Previous evaluations had generated
(unsolicited) assertions from
interviewees at all sites that COSEED improved student writing
At the Beebe school in Malden,
MA, MCAS writing scores had
increased in the three years since
CO-SEED arrived, but roughly
similar trends were found across
the district
Young Achievers School, Jamaica Plain, MA
In Gilford, NH, 3rd grade NHEIAP
writing scores showed some but
not a very strong correlation with
level of CO-SEED involvement,
though all Gilford students
outperformed the state avg.
Extremely Strong Pattern in NHEIAP Test Scores
but Inconclusively Linked to CO-SEED
(Gorham Schools, 2005)
Interviewee claimed that COSEED helped Gorham students
become top performers in the
state on NHEIAP tests, so we
looked at scores from 1997-2004
100
90
80
Cohort 1
70
Percentile rank
For the last several years,
Gorham 3rd graders score/rank
very low, but by 6th grade the
scores/ranks are very high
Changes in Gorham State Rank: Math
Cohort 2
60
Cohort 3
50
Cohort 4
40
Cohort 5
30
Cohort 6
Cohort 7
20
Scores/ranks drop off a bit by
10th grade, but still high and there
was no where to go but down
10
0
Grade 3
Grade 6
Grade 10
Grade level
Gorham Middle School, Gorham, NH
Similar patterns for Math,
Language Arts, Science, but
pattern may pre-date CO-SEED
First Grade Academic Achievement
as a Function of CO-SEED/ Community-Based Units
(Young Achievers School, 2005)
Design:
Principal says “One thing we know is that
kids’ writing is much more interesting,
complex, and detailed if they’ve had rich
experience…The current first grade has
about a third of the kids who didn’t have
Kindergarten here and in general it is
breathtaking the difference in the
academic achievement. Our Kindergarten
has the strongest place-based education in
the school, especially with language
development.” First grade is also strong.
3 measures (Direct Reading Assessment,
TERC Math, YA Writing Assessment)
tracked in YA’s assessment database
Young Achievers School, Jamaica Plain, MA
Compared 1st graders with one v. two
years of exposure to strong PBE teachers
First Grade Academic Achievement
as a Function of CO-SEED/ Community-Based Units
(Young Achievers School, 2005)
Findings:
1st graders w/ more place-based education
outperformed peers on all measures
Writing
TERC
Math:
Assessment:
1 year
vs.
1 year
2 vs.
year
vs.
tenure
2 year
tenure
at Y.A.
Y.A.
DRA
Assessment:
1 year
2 year
tenure
at at
Y.A.
100.00%
2.5
36
90.00%
32
2.25
80.00%
Mean Score
Mean
Mean Score
score
28
70.00%
2
24
60.00%
Grades K-1
68.60%
20
50.00%
1.75
1.7
1.68
Grade
1.65 1 only
60.71%
1.63
16
40.00%
1.61
1.64
1.61
1.55
1.5
12
30.00%
Grade
only
Grade
1 only
Grade
11only
(N=14)
(N=14)
(N=14)
1.54
1.44
Grades K-1
13.2
8
20.00%
1.25
Grade 1 only
9.57
4
10.00%
0.00%
0 1
Writing-Content
Writing-Organization
Writing-Language
TERC
DRAMath
Assessm
Assessm
ent
ent
Assessm
ent
Young Achievers School, Jamaica Plain, MA
Writing-Mechanics
Writing-Overall
Grades
K-1
Grades
K-1
Grades
K-1
(N=25)
(N=25)
(N=25)
Effects of CO-SEED on
Standardized Test Scores (MCAS) at the
Beebe Health & Environmental Magnet School
(Beebe School, 2005, Massachusetts)
CO-SEED worked with Beebe 19992003, helped secure CSR funding to
continue work 2002-2005
Design:
Several lines of evidence suggest that
the environmental theme has become
embedded in the school culture
Before analyzing MCAS scores, we
predicted that Beebe would deviate
from the typical pattern and increase
performance relative to district and/or
state in the following content areas:
–
–
–
–
Math (mostly near 3rd and 4th grade)
English Language Arts – Writing
Life Science
Earth Science
Beebe School, Malden, MA
Effects of CO-SEED on
Standardized Test Scores (MCAS) at the
Beebe Health & Environmental Magnet School
(Beebe School, 2005, Massachusetts)
Findings:
Typical pattern: State performs highest,
then Beebe, then district
% correct
MCAS - Grade 5 Earth Science
80
75
70
65
60
55
50
45
40
35
30
Beebe
District
State
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005
year
Beebe School, Malden, MA
Effects of CO-SEED on
Standardized Test Scores (MCAS) at the
Beebe Health & Environmental Magnet School
(Beebe School, 2005, Massachusetts)
Findings:
Only a few deviations from the typical
pattern (6th & 8th grade Math, 8th grade
Life & Earth science)
correct
%%
correct
Gr. 8 Life
Science
MCAS -MCAS
Gr. 8- Math,
Open
Response
80
75
70
70
65
65
60
60
55
50
55
45
50
40
45
35
40
30
35
30
Beebe
Beebe
District
District
State
State
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005
year2003 2004 2005
2000 2001 2002
Beebe School, Malden, MA
Effects of CO-SEED on
Standardized Test Scores (MCAS) at the
Beebe Health & Environmental Magnet School
(Beebe School, 2005, Massachusetts)
Analysis mildly supported the prediction
for two areas (Math & Earth Science)
Findings:
Analysis strongly supported the
prediction in one area (Life Science)
Analysis did not support the prediction in
one area (Writing, the typical pattern persisted in
both grades 4 and 7)
Future prediction: Strongest results will
continue to show up in the upper grades
(i.e. where students have the highest
cumulative dose of the environmental/
place-based theme integration)
Beebe School, Malden, MA
References
American Institutes of Research. (2005). Effects of Outdoor Education Programs for Children in California.
Sacramento. Retrieved March 15, 2005 from
http://www.sierraclub.org/insidetheoutdoors/downloads/outdoorschool_finalreport.pdf
Athman, Julie & Monroe, Martha. (2004). The effects of environment-based education on students’ achievement
motivation. Journal of Interpretation Research, 9(1): 9-25.
Bartosh, O. (2004). Environmental education: Improving student achievement. Unpublished master's thesis, The
Evergreen State College, Olympia, Washington.
Coleman, J. S., Campbell, E. Q., Hobson, C. J., McPartland, J., Mood, A. M., Weinfield, F. D., & York, R. L. (1966).
Equality of educational opportunity. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC.
Danforth, P. (2005). An evaluation of the National Wildlife Federation’s Schoolyard Habitat Program in the Houston
Independent School District. Unpublished master’s thesis, Texas State University, San Marcos, TX.
Duffin, Michael, Powers, Amy, Tremblay, George, & PEER Associates. (2004). Place-based Education Evaluation
Collaborative: Report on cross-program research and other program evaluation activities, 2003-2004. Retrieved
October 6, 2004 from http://www.peecworks.org/PEEC/PEEC_Reports/S0019440A.
Emekauwa, E. (2004). They remember what they touch: The impact of place-based learning in East Feliciana parish.
Rural School and Community Trust. Retrieved November 16, 2005 from
http://www.peecworks.org/PEEC/PEEC_Research/0009D4FB-007EA7AB.0/Emekauwa%20East%20Feliciana%202004.pdf
Ernst, Julie Athman & Monroe, Martha. (2004). The effect of environment-based education on student’ critical
thinking skills and disposition toward critical thinking. Environmental Education Research, 10(4): 507-522.
Liebermann, J., & Hoody, L. (1998). Closing the achievement gap: Using the environment as an integrating context
for learning. State Education and Environment Roundtable, San Diego, CA.
Marzano, R. J. (2003). What works in schools: Translating research into action. Association for Supervision and
Curriculum Development, Alexandria, VA.
National Environmental Education Training Foundation (NEETF). (2000). Environment-based education: Creating
high performance schools and students. Retrieved October 1, 2004 from http://neetf.org/pubs/NEETF8400.pdf
State Education and Environment Roundtable (SEER). (2000). California Student Assessment Project: The Effects of
Environment-based Education on Student Achievement. Retrieved July 14, 2005 from
http://www.seer.org/pages/csap.pdf
Wang, G., Zheng, Z., Heath, G., Macera, C., Pratt, M., & Buchner, D. (2002). Economic burden of cardiovascular
disease associated with excess body weight in U.S. adults. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 23 (1), 1-6.
Place-based Education &
Academic Achievement
Prepared by:
Michael Duffin, PEER Associates, Inc.
Prepared for:
the Place-based Education Evaluation Collaborative (PEEC)
November 16, 2005
Suggested citation:
Duffin, M., Chawla, L., Sobel, D., & PEER Associates (2005). Place-based education and academic achievement.
Retrieved November 14, 2005 from http://www.peecworks.org/PEEC/PEEC_Research/S0032637E