Moving Towards a Regional Public Health System in NH
Download
Report
Transcript Moving Towards a Regional Public Health System in NH
A Regional Public Health
System in NH
What Do We Have Now?
Why Regionalize?
How Do We Make a Case for Regional
Public Health in a State Like NH?
What Would Change?
1
What Does Public Health Look
Like in NH Today?
Each of New Hampshire’s 234 cities and towns are required by
law to have a health officer
•
Only five New Hampshire communities maintain public health
departments of various size ; no county health departments
•
• At the State level, DHHS is the lead public health agency. The
Department of Environmental Services, Department of Education,
and Department of Safety also play key roles
• In almost all New Hampshire communities, non-governmental
organizations provide a significant sub-set of public health
services
2
2004 New Hampshire
Public Health Network
“Assuring the health and safety of all NH residents”
o
14 Coalitions
o
118 Towns
o
50% of NH towns
o
o
70% of the NH population
covered
5-11 communities per coalition
3
All Health Hazard Regions
Organized to plan for
and respond to public
health emergencies
19 Regions
4
And more maps for other services
Community health centers
Tobacco coalitions
WIC services
HIV prevention
Etc, etc, etc.
5
6
Why Regionalization?
7
Potential Benefits of
Regionalization
Study in the AJPH, March 2006 examined
performance of public health agencies, size and
resources
It noted that small public health agencies may
benefit by combining resources and operations
But gains may diminish with size – too big is not
good (but NH is small in both geography and
population)
Mays, G, McHugh, M et al. AJPH, March 2006 Vol. 96, No. 3
8
Regionalization Goal
Overall Goal – A performance-based public health
delivery system, which provides all 10 essential
public health services throughout New Hampshire
Provide high quality public health based on national
standards
9
Why do we need regional public health in
one of the healthiest states?
What is killing us and making us sick today are chronic
illnesses (heart disease, cancer, respiratory disease, injuries)
Many of the contributing factors to these are preventable –
tobacco, diet, physical activity, alcohol consumption
Well-run community based public health programs can
prevent these problems
Money can be saved
10
What is Public Health ?
The study and practice of managing threats to the health of
a community or population
The public health approach is applied to populations
ranging from a handful of people to the whole human
population
Priorities are to prevent (rather than treat) a disease or
injury through the study of cases; promoting healthy
behaviors; preventing the spread of disease; and addressing
policy issues.
11
How does public health differ
.
from health care?
Individual vs. Populations
12
Example- Smoking
Health care response
Public Health Response
Treat an individual for
smoking related health
problems – asthma,
pneumonia, heart disease,
cancer, etc.
Counsel to quit smoking
Provide nicotine replacement
therapy
Study the effects of tobacco
– Surgeon General’s report
Labeling of cigarettes
Public information
campaigns
Promote policies such as
non-smoking workplaces
Enforcement of laws such as
limiting tobacco sales to
minors
13
Public Health Goes to You
Unlike personal health care services, in many cases
the public does not have to travel to receive public
health services
Public health staff go out to do investigations
Public health staff analyze diseases by populations
Public health education campaigns are delivered where
people go or access information (radio,TV, billboards,
schools, workplaces, etc.)
So public health regions do not need to align exactly
with hospitals or doctors offices service areas
14
Public Health Saves Money
$10 per person per year in proven
community-based disease prevention
(improvements in physical activity, nutrition
and preventing smoking) could yield saving
of $2.8 billion in health care costs in 2 years
That’s $2 in return for every $1 invested in
the first 1-2 years
Prevention for a Healthier America:Investments in Disease Prevention Yield Significant Savings,
Stronger Communities. Trust for America’s Health July 2008 www.healthyamericans.org
15
Obesity for example
23.6 % population is obese, 61.8% are overweight
or obese – significant increase from 2005-2007
NH ranks 35th in the nation, despite having the
lowest poverty rate
Worst in New England ¹
For the first time in 2 centuries our children’s life
expectancy is potentially less than ours (2-5 years)
due to obesity and related factors (diabetes, heart disease,
kidney failure, cancer)
F as in Fat: How Obesity Policies are Failing in America 2008, Trust for America’s Health, August 2008
www.healthyamericans.org
16
Example - Obesity
Health Care Response
Treatment for
conditions such as heart
disease, high blood
pressure, diabetes,
cholesterol
Nutritional counseling
Bariatric surgery
Public Health Response
Working with schools to provide
healthy lunch menus
Working with community
coalitions to develop walkable
communities
Assist in developing policies for
physical activities in schools
17
The 10 Essential
Public Health Services
18
The Proposed Approach
The DPHS and Regionalization Initiative workgroup envision one
lead public health agency per region. It must be linked a governmental
entity that is responsible to coordinate or directly provide the 10
essential services. The lead agency may subcontract or create
memoranda of understanding for some essential services
Regions based on existing ones (many are quite similar) and take into
account geographic features, existing public health services and
population size
Two levels of public health (primary and comprehensive) that
acknowledge existing resources and capacity to carry out public health
services.
Comprehensive = Manchester and Nashua
Primary = everywhere else
19
Approach
Will be based on national standards for what a
public health agency should look like and how it
should perform
Will be an evolutionary process – some may not
meet all components of a primary agency from the
beginning but will move there in time.
Will require changes to state law.
20
The Role of Government in
Public Health
Assessment – Takes into account all relevant factors to the
extent possible, based on objective factors, without selfinterest
Policy Development – Takes place as a result of
interactions among public and private organizations
Assurance – Assures that necessary services are provided to
reach agreed upon goals by encouraging the private sector,
requiring it, or providing services directly
21
A Primary Regional Public
Health Agency
Staff, funding, and legal recognition to assure a fundamental
public health presence
Performs some level of the 10 essential services
Collaborates extensively with system partners in the region
to coordinate more comprehensive services
The NH DPHS continues to provide some core services (i.e..
lab, disease investigations) to these regions
Coordinates with local health officers or move towards
shared health officer among municipalities
22
Proposed Staffing
Every region would have:
Administrator
Health educator/marketing
staff
Nurse (?)
Environmental health
specialist
Support staff
Shared across regions:
Epidemiologist
Emergency preparedness
coordinator
Medical consultant
(Shared or in-kind)
Financial manager
IT support
23
How is this Different than the
Public Health Networks?
Proposal that there be a legally-recognized regional
public health council which…
Designates a lead public health entity that…
Is responsible to the council and regional public
health system partners for…
Implementing a coordinated approach to provide
public health services to the public
24
Next Steps-What Do We Have?
Assessments to Help Us Determine,
Resources, Costs, Needs and Approach
June 2008- February 2010
Financial analysis of all state/local/private public health funding with
consideration of efficiencies from regionalization – Patrick Bernet,
FAU
Assessment of local/regional public health system capacity to
deliver the 10 essential services- with a gaps analysis – Lea Lafave,
CHI
Assessment of what the link to government could look like Jennifer Wierwille Norton
25
Financial Assessment
To gain an understanding of current public health
expenditures in each region and for the state as a
whole
Will capture state, municipal and private-sector
funding
To try to understand the potential financial
implications of regionalizing select public health
services
26
Capacity Assessment
Purpose
To identify assess and gaps in the region and these that
may lend themselves to regionalization.
Process:
Framework of the National Association of City and
County Health Officials
Essential Service
Standard
Indicator
Revised Tool
Lead organization : Regional Partners : State
27
What is the Governance
Assessment?
Focuses on figuring out who’s responsible or held accountable;
not doing the work but overseeing it;
Who’s overseeing performance of the public health entities
who are partners.
Who’s assessing the degree to which the partners in the
region have the necessary authority, resources and policies
to provide essential public health services.
Assures that the infrastructure exists to protect and promote
health in the community.
28
Governance Assessment
in Two Parts
Part I: Examining Readiness to Serve in a Governance
Function:
The first part of the assessment provides a tool to measure
the region’s readiness to serve as governing body or Public
Health Council to oversee the delivery of services and
programs.
Part II: Examining Types of Lead Public Health Entities
Participants will use part II of the tool to hold a facilitated
discussion about the different options available for the
region’s Public Health Council to choose as a lead public
health entity (type of entity).
29
What Will Change?
Statewide, regional and more formalized
recognized system, in law that provides a more
even level of each essential service
Coordinates the current fragmented system that
delivers very different levels of service
More efficient use/better coordination of existing
resources
Based on national standards -PHAB
30
What Won’t Change?
Municipalities retain legal authority for enforcing
state laws and local ordinances
DPHS provides some core services such as lab and
disease control
Local agencies will still receive funds directly from
DPHS but will need to be part of the regional
system
31
And the benefits will be…
Higher quality services at the best possible
cost
Ability to measure ourselves against national
standards
Better positioning for increasingly
competitive federal funds
32
Questions?
Joan Ascheim
NH Dept of HHS, Division of Public Health
Services
[email protected]
1-800-852-3345 ext. 4110
Lea Lafave
Community Health Institute/JSI
603.573.3335
[email protected]
33