Transcript Document

Alcohol Interlock
Curriculum:
Technology
Summary
Technology
 This section contains the following information:
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
How the alcohol interlock device works
Installation
Sensor technologies
Accuracy
Technical standards and certification
How mouth alcohol affects the interlock
Environmental influences
Features and programming capabilities
Tampering and circumvention
Running re-test
Emergency override options
Future technological advances
Conclusions
Introduction
 An alcohol interlock is a breathtesting device attached to a car’s
starter.
 It prevents the car from being
started when a pre-set level of
alcohol (usually .02) is detected
in the breath sample presumably
provided by the driver of the
vehicle.
Technology
How does it work?
 The breath testing device is attached to the vehicle starter, or other onboard computer system.
 The device “interrupts” the flow of power to the starter using an open
relay switch.
 If the level of alcohol detected in the breath sample is below a pre-set
limit (usually .02), the relay switch is closed allowing power to flow to
start the vehicle.
 Repeated breath tests are required while the vehicle is in use to ensure
the driver remains sober after starting the vehicle.
 The alcohol interlock is not connected to the engine and therefore,
cannot affect a running engine.
How does it work?
BAC = 0
BAC <= 0.02
Ignition
Warn
Running
Retest
BAC > 0.02
Interlock
Installation
 On average, the installation of the interlock device takes
approximately 45 minutes.
 It can take up to two hours depending on the experience
of the installer and sophistication of the vehicle
electronics.
 A wiring harness may be needed to facilitate installation
on high-end vehicles.
 During the installation the offender receives information
about the device and learns how to blow into it to provide
a breath sample.
 Offenders may also receive a certificate to submit to the
program authority as proof of installation.
Sensor technology
There are three different types of
sensors that may be used in alcohol
interlock devices:
• Semiconductor sensors
• Electrochemical sensors (fuel cells)
• Infrared sensors
Sensor technology
 Fuel cell sensors are most commonly used in
interlock devices.
 These sensors are ethyl alcohol-specific and require
less frequent calibration.
 Fuel cell technology is more accurate and reliable
than semiconductor technology.
 Many jurisdictions no longer permit the use of
semiconductor devices.
Accuracy
 Alcohol interlocks containing an electrochemical sensor are accurate in
detecting alcohol consumption 99% of the time.
 Alcohol that is detected can be in the form of beverage alcohol that is
consumed, or alcohol in medications or other ingested products (e.g.,
cough syrup, mouth wash).
 The NHTSA specifications state that the alcohol interlock device must
prevent the driver from starting the vehicle (even in extreme heat or
cold conditions) 98% of the time when the BrAC is .065 or greater
(Beirness 2001).
 The specifications emphasize prevention of circumvention and
tampering rather than the precise measurement of alcohol.
Technical standards
 Technical standards to specify the performance requirements of
interlock devices have been implemented in several countries (e.g.,
United States, Canada, European Union, and Australia).
 The goal of a technical standard is to ensure a uniform standard for
devices, consistent quality, and efficacy in these devices.
 Most jurisdictions have only one standard for offender-based
applications. A few jurisdictions have additional standards for other
classes of drivers (e.g., commercial drivers).
 The European standards are the most contemporary, comprehensive,
rigorous, and high-quality standard available at this time.
Certification of devices
 Many jurisdictions in the U.S. require that a device is certified by
the state to ensure that it meets necessary technical
requirements and is approved for use.
 Once the device/manufacturer has been certified by the state,
the device is ‘approved’ and can be made available for use.
 Certification tends to be inconsistent across jurisdictions as the
agencies doing the device testing and certification vary.
Mouth alcohol
 Mouth alcohol is residual alcohol that is present in the mouth or
throat immediately following the consumption of food, drink,
mouth spray, or medicine that contains alcohol.
 Mouth alcohol can register on an interlock device as an alcoholpositive breath sample and can prevent the engine of the
vehicle from starting.
 This is easily overcome by waiting a few minutes to allow
residual alcohol to dissipate, similar to an evidential breath test.
 Drivers are advised not to consume anything containing alcohol
for five minutes prior to the breath test.
Environmental influences
 Generally, extreme temperatures and altitude have nominal
effects on alcohol interlocks.
 Devices are designed to withstand adverse effects of
temperature and elevation similar to other common vehicle
design technologies.
 Most interlocks can withstand temperatures ranging from -49 to
+185 degrees Fahrenheit (-45 to +85 degrees Celsius) and
altitudes of up to 11,482 feet (3,500 meters) (Burger 2001 cited
in Bax et al. 2001).
 Extreme temperatures and altitude will not affect the functioning
of an interlock, with the exception of a five minute warm-up time.
Environmental influences
 The electrochemical sensor in an interlock device operates at a high
temperature.
 For this reason, a brief warm-up period before the device can analyze a
breath sample is essential (much like a photocopier).
 Warm-up time typically spans a few minutes and is influenced by
environmental and climatic variables. In extreme cold environments, a
longer period of up to five minutes may be required.
 Technological advances have significantly reduced the warm-up period.
These include:
• detachable handset
• wireless device
Device features
Language and visual display
BrAC threshold (pre-set limit)
Lock-out time
Stall protection time
Pull over notice
Recall notice
Breath volume
Device features
 New emerging features improve the ability of
authorities to monitor interlock offenders.
 These features include:
• GPS;
• Real-time reporting;
• Video streaming; and,
• 911 notification.
 They can be used as graduated sanctions for
offenders who are consistently non-compliant.
Programming the device
 In many states, the Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV)
is responsible for certifying the alcohol interlock and
ensuring that specific features have been programmed by
the manufacturer.
• Other departments that may be responsible for certification
are Department of Transportation and Department of
Corrections.
 In a few states, service providers are responsible for
programming. This can result in inconsistent programming
of features in some devices.
Tampering and circumvention
 There are several anti-circumvention features
available for alcohol interlocks including:
• Sealed wiring
• Connectors
• Temperature and pressure gauges
• Systems to reduce the likelihood of breath
samples from non-drivers
• These include – breath pulse code, hum-tone recognition, blow
and suck method, and photo recognition.
• Data recorder
Tampering and circumvention
 The data recorder captures the date and time of:
• All initial breath tests and running re-tests;
• Any attempts to start the vehicle; and,
• Any attempts to tamper with or circumvent the device.
 It also records the following:
• Breath sample violations;
• Lock-outs resulting from positive BrAC readings; and,
• Activation of the emergency override feature.
Running re-test
 The running re-test feature ensures that a driver remains
sober while driving.
 It requires random and repeated breath samples while the
vehicle is in use. The first re-test generally occurs within 515 minutes after the vehicle has been started.
 A breath sample above the pre-set limit will result in a
warning for the driver to pull over and stop driving.
 If drivers do not provide a sample or fail an alarm/horn will
sound and lights will flash.
Running re-test
 At no point will the interlock shut off the engine and create a
traffic hazard (2001).
 There has been some concern raised regarding the safety of
performing the re-test while the vehicle is in motion.
 Drivers have enough time to pull of the road or wait for a stop
sign or red light to provide the breath sample.
 Also, a study found that the mental workload associated with
texting while driving was greater than performing a running retest (Medeiros-Ward and Strayer 2011).
Emergency override
 The emergency override is a feature available on some alcohol
interlocks.
 It allows the driver to avoid providing a breath sample before
starting the vehicle one-time only.
 The availability of the override feature is contingent on approval
from the program administrator – i.e., some jurisdictions permit it
while others do not.
 There are ethical concerns associated with the non/use of this
feature as it has the potential to create liability if abused.
Future technological advances
 In the future, alcohol interlocks may be a
standard feature on all vehicles.
 In order to achieve general acceptance, this
technology must be fast, accurate, reliable, and
repeatable.
• It must also be functional across a wide range of
driving and environmental conditions, require little or
no maintenance, and be tamper/circumvention
resistant (DADSS 2012).
Future technological advances
 The following technologies are currently
being developed by the DADSS project:
• Infrared (tissue) spectroscopy
• Touch-based sensors
• Offset spectroscopy (vehicle-based impairment
detection)
• Breath-based sensors
 This technology is still several years away from being
fully developed.
Future technological advances
 There are also alternatives to the use of
alcohol detection devices in vehicles
including transdermal and in-home
monitoring.
 These can be applied as a graduated
sanction for consistently non-compliant
offenders.
Conclusions
 An alcohol interlock requires a driver to perform a breath test to
start a vehicle, and provide repeated breath samples while the
vehicle is in use.
 Advances in alcohol interlock technology have overcome many
of the limitations associated with earlier devices.
 Technical standards and certification requirements govern the
use of delivery of these devices across jurisdictions.
 Devices can withstand many environmental influences and have
a variety of programmable features.
Conclusions
 Devices possess a variety of features to prevent tampering and
circumvention.
 A data recording device records all relevant vehicle activity.
 The running re-test prevents drivers from consuming alcohol
once the vehicle is in motion.
 Use of the emergency override feature varies across
jurisdictions.
 Other alcohol detection technologies are being explored to
gauge their potential for use in all vehicles.
Nov. 28, 2012