ELT Testing and Assessment
Download
Report
Transcript ELT Testing and Assessment
ELT Testing and Assessment
HUE COLLEGE OF FOREIGN LANGUAGES
29 SEPTEMBER – 8 OCTOBER
7:30 AM – 11:15 AM
INSTRUCTOR: MS. TONI HULL
[email protected]
CELL PHONE: 0123 592 42 33
Course Objectives:
By the end of this course, students should:
comprehend, feel comfortable with, and be able to put to use the terminology and
fundamental concepts of language testing,
be aware of various test formats in order to select the items, tasks, and test types
that are appropriate for a given situation,
be able to construct tests for the assessment of linguistic competence
(grammar and vocabulary) and language skills (reading, writing, speaking, and
listening),
understand language proficiency testing and have an awareness of some of the
standardized tests for assessment of proficiency and program placement,
be able to use alternative forms of assessment in their classroom, in addition
to (or in place of) traditional achievement tests.
Teaching and Learning Strategy
Lectures will present overviews of key concepts in
the field
Seminar/workshop discussion will relate these to a
number of directed readings, from which students
will develop their own practical approaches.
Course Evaluation
Attendance and in-class participation:
Assignments:
10%
30%
Facilitating one reading discussion 5%
Mid-session test on terminology 10%
Poster presentation 15%
Final exam:
60%
Syllabus and Readings:
Session 1
Monday
29 September
Course overview and
guidelines. Teachers and
Learners: Issues in T&A.
Introduction to basic
concepts, principles and
terminology in language
testing and assessment.
Session 2
Tuesday
30 September
Theoretical foundations of testing.
Types of tests and assessments.
Article: Beghetto, R. (2004) Toward a More
Complete Picture of Student Learning: Assessing
Students’ Motivational Beliefs
Facilitators: 1. 2. 3. 4.
Textbook: Heaton, Writing English Language
Tests, Chapter 10
Assignments:
Facilitating one reading
discussion (5%)
Mid-session test on
terminology (10%)
Poster presentation (15%)
Facilitating one reading discussion (5%)
Every day, 3-4 students will be assigned to lead small group
discussions on the day’s assigned article reading.
Facilitators should come prepared with discussion questions and a
thorough analysis of the reading in order to facilitate discussion.
Minimally, the discussion should answer these questions: Why was
this article assigned? What is its relevance in the Vietnamese ELT
context?
After small group discussion, the facilitators will report on key
discussion points to the full class.
Mid-session quiz on terminology (10%)
On Monday, 6 October (Session 6), a short quiz will be
administered on key terminology and concepts.
A review of possible items will be conducted on Friday,
October 5.
Poster Presentation (15%)
Every student will do a Poster Presentation, which will
be displayed in class on the final day of the course
(Wednesday, October 6). Students will take turns
describing the key elements of their presentation and
responding to questions from fellow students.
The Presentation will be about a test they have
designed (it can be a test used prior to this course or
a test designed for this presentation).
Final Exam:
Exam Date: 17 December 2008
Content:
Discussing key issues in Testing and Assessment with a focus on
practical classroom application
Analyzing different test samples
Today’s Class:
Getting to know you
2. Attitudes to Testing and Assessment
3. Key concepts and terminology
4. Discussion
1.
Getting to know you:
Name
Is he/she teaching now?
If so, where?
If not, what is he/she doing?
Something personal to help Ms. Hull remember
him/her (but not too personal!)
Attitudes to Testing and Assessment
What do teachers think about
testing and assessment?
What do students think about
testing and assessment?
Assessment:
Assessment: any evaluation of a student’s work
All tests are assessments – but not all assessments
are tests
Test:
Takes place at identifiable times, under time constraints
Uses prepared administrative procedures
Must be able to be measured and evaluated and reported
A definition: a method of measuring a person’s ability,
knowledge, or performance in a given domain
Method
Measure
Individual
Performance
Domain
More about non-test Assessment:
Gives feedback to help students increase competence
Is an ongoing process
Informal: e.g. impromptu feedback, marginal comments on
drafts
Does not make fixed judgment or record results
Formal: e.g. review of journal writing or student’s portfolio
May result in a recorded score, but it cannot be called a test since
it typically encompasses a wide, open domain and takes place over
an extended period of time
Formative vs. Summative
Formative assessment aims to evaluate students in
the process of “forming” their competencies and
skills with the goal of helping them to continue that
growth process.
Summative assessment aims to measure, or
summarize, what a student has grasped, and
typically occurs at the end of a course or unit of
instruction.
Norm-referenced vs. Criterion-Referenced Tests
Norm-referenced: each score interpreted in relation
to a mean (average score), median (middle score),
standard deviation (extent of variance in scores),
and/or percentile rank
Especially Standardized Tests, e.g. TOEFL
Criterion-referenced: designed to give test-takers
feedback, on specific course or lesson objectives
Especially classroom based tests
A pitch for Formative Assessment
A video about the Formative Assessment Classroom
in Secondary Education
TASK: Watch and think about ways that the principles
discussed are applicable in the ELT classroom.
A Brief History of Testing
Hot debate in 1970s and 1980s
Starting point: discrete-point tests
Assumption: language can be broken down into component parts
and tests (skills (e.g. reading) and units (e.g. morphology,
phonology, discourse)
Oller (1979) argued that language is a unified set of
interacting abilities that cannot be separated
Goal should be integrative test: e.g. cloze test and dictation
Cloze test – a sample:
The recognition that one’s feelings of (1) ____ and
unhappiness can coexist much like (2) ____ and
hate in a close relationship (3) _____ offer valuable
clues on how to (4) ____ a happier life. It suggests,
for (5) _____, that changing or avoiding things that
(6) _____ you miserable may well make you (7)
____ miserable but probably no happier.
The Communicative Language Model
Canale & Swain (1980s) and Bachman & Palmer (1990s):
Grammatical or formal competence (knowledge of
grammar, lexis, phonology)
2. Sociolinguistic competence (knowledge of rules of
language use, i.e. what is appropriate depending on
speakers, settings, topics)
3. Strategic competence (ability to compensate for
imperfect linguistic resources in 2nd language)
4. Discourse competence (ability to deal with
extended use in context)
1.
New Goal
Communicative Language Testing should
correspond to
non-test situations
(that is, the target criterion or domain of behavior)
Moving toward
Performance-Based Assessment
More student centered
Less paper-and pencil / multiple-choice
More productive
More authentic
More open-ended responses
More integrated tasks and procedures
New Views on Intelligence
Gardner:
Multiple Intelligences: linguistic; logical-mathematical;
spatial; musical; bodily-kinesthetic; interpersonal;
intrapersonal
Sternberg: recognized creative thinking and manipulative
strategies as part of intelligence
Goleman: “EQ” – importance of emotions
Traditional
Alternative
One-shot, standardized
Continuous long-term
Timed, multiple choice
Untimed, free-response
Decontextualized
Contextualized
Scores only
Individualized feedback
Norm-referenced
Criterion-referenced
Focus on “right” answer
Open-ended, creative
Summative
Formative
Oriented to product
Oriented to process
Non-interactive
Interactive performance
Fosters extrinsic
Fosters intrinsic
motivation
motivation
Computer-Based Testing
Standardized testing
Classroom testing
Self-testing
Practice for test-taking
Some individualization (through CAT)
Discussion #1:
Teaching
Assess
ment
Tests
Discussion #2:
Imagine the following scenarios (100 is a perfect
score):
a. You give a test and everyone scores 90-100.
b. You give a test and everyone scores below 50.
c. You give a test and the spread is: 25% above 85;
60% 70-84; 15% below 69.
Discuss among yourselves: What kind of tests do you
think generate these sorts of scores? Is it good or
bad? Why?
Discussion #3:
Your group will be assigned one of Gardner’s seven
intelligences. Brainstorm some teaching activities
that foster that type of intelligence. Then,
brainstorm some assessment.
The seven intelligences are: linguistic; logicalmathematical; spatial; musical; bodily-kinesthetic;
interpersonal; intrapersonal
Placement tests
Whole class discussion
Discussion
#4:
Diagnostic tests
Revising writing
Periodic achievement
tests
Informal
Speeches
Student oral response
to teacher questions
after video
Journals
Short pop quizzes
Oral presentations
Portfolios
Final exams
Formal
Formative
Summative
Discussion #5: Review the advantages and
disadvantages of both approaches to assessment.
Alternative
Traditional
One-shot, standardized
Timed, multiple choice
Decontextualized
Scores only
Norm-referenced
Focus on “right” answer
Summative
Oriented to product
Non-interactive
Fosters extrinsic
motivation
Continuous long-term
Untimed, free-response
Contextualized
Individualized feedback
Criterion-referenced
Open-ended, creative
Formative
Oriented to process
Interactive performance
Fosters intrinsic
motivation
Upcoming assignments:
For Tuesday, September 30:
Article: Beghetto, R. (2004) Toward a More Complete
Picture of Student Learning: Assessing Students’
Motivational Beliefs at www.italldepends.pbwiki.com
Facilitators: 1. 2. 3. 4.
Textbook: Heaton, Writing English Language Tests,
Chapter 10
For Wednesday, October 1:
Article: Kwok, L. (2008) Students’ Perceptions of
Peer Evaluation and Teachers’ Role in Seminar
Discussions at www.italldepends.pbwiki.com
Facilitators: 5. 6. 7. 8.
Textbook: McNamara, Language Testing, Chapters
1, 2, 3