MANAGERIAL ECONOMICS An Analysis of Business Issues
Download
Report
Transcript MANAGERIAL ECONOMICS An Analysis of Business Issues
MANAGERIAL ECONOMICS
An Analysis of Business Issues
Howard Davies
and Pun-Lee Lam
Published by FT Prentice Hall
1
Chapter 12:
Risk and Uncertainty
Objectives: After studying this topic you should be
able to:
distinguish alternative states of information
distinguish alternative attitudes to risk
use expected values and expected utilities to
take decisions in a situation of risk
construct and use decision trees
use alternative criteria for decision-making
under uncertainty
2
Alternative States of Information
Certainty: we have perfect information
about future outcomes
Risk: we know what future outcomes
are possible and we can attach
probabilities to each outcome
Uncertainty: we do not know the precise
nature of the outcomes or their
probabilities
3
Expected Monetary Values
In a situation of RISK we could use
Expected Monetary Values (EMV) to
take a decision
EMV = SpiVi Where:
– pi = probability of the i’th outcome
– Vi = value of the i’th outcome
4
Expected Monetary Values
Weather
Probability
Takings
Sunny
0.2
$500
Cloudy
0.4
$300
Raining
0.4
$100
5
Limitations of EMV
Will you accept a 50/50 bet for $5?
Probably YES
Will you accept a 50/50 bet for $5m?
Probably NO
BUT BOTH HAVE AN EMV = 0!
In some way you ‘care’ more about
losing $5m than winning $5m
6
Limitations of EMV
Your house is worth $200,000
The probability of destruction by fire is
1/10,000
EMV of the loss = $20
So $20 is the most you will pay for insurance?
NO, YOU CARE MORE ABOUT THE
CHANCE OF LOSING YOUR HOUSE
7
How to Take This Into Account
Decision-makers have different
‘attitudes to risk’
RISK NEUTRAL - values gains and
losses equally
RISK AVERSE - values losses more
highly than gains
RISK LOVER - values gains more than
losses
8
How to Model This?
A Risk-Averse Person
Utility
Income
9
How to Model This?
A Risk-Neutral Person
Utility
Income
10
How to Model This?
A Risk-Lover
Utility
Income
11
Decision-makers Are Usually
Assumed to be Risk-averse
Instead of using EMV, use Expected
Utility (EU)
EU = SpiUi Where:
– pi = probability of the i’th outcome
– Ui = utility of the i’th outcome
12
How to Find Utility Values?
They depend on the individual or corporate decisionmakers ‘degree of risk aversion’
Standard gamble comparisons, e.g.
– $0 = 0 “utils”
– $100,000 = 1 “util”
What is the “util” value of $50,000?
Ask the decision-maker to choose between $50,000
for certain and a bet involving probability P of winning
$100,000. Start with low P and increase it until the
bet is just preferred. Then:(if P = .6)
U($50,000) = .6(U($100,000)) + .4(U($0)) = .6
13
Indifference Curves
The steeper the curves the greater the risk aversion
Return
Preferred
Direction
Risk
14
Decision trees
Market
Conditions?
See p.247
High price
EMV = $0.8m
EU = 0.45
Yes
Pr = 0.7
Is a New
Product
Found?
Yes
Spend $1m
on R&D?
No
Good
Pr=0.6
No
Pr = 0.3
Profit Utility
+$2m +1.41
Poor
Pr= 0.4
Good
High Price
Pr =0.6
or Low
Price?
Market
Conditions?
Low price
Poor
EMV =$0.1m
Pr = 0.4
EU=0.168
-$1m
-1
$1.5m 1.22
-$2m -1.41
-$1m -1
0 0
15
Alternative Types of Probability
Objective probability, which may be:
– a priori - calculated through prior
knowledge or theory. The probability of 6
on a dice is 1/6.
– a posteriori - known from a sample of past
events. The Pr (rain on any day in June) =
.6
Subjective probability - based on
judgment
16
The Expected Value of
Information
EVPI = difference between the
expected value of future actions, given
the information currently available, and
the expected value of future action, if
perfect advance state revelation were
available
See p.250 for a worked example
17
Techniques for Coping with
Uncertainty
If we do not know the possible
outcomes, there is little we can do
If we know the possible outcomes, but
not their probabilities, a number of
techniques are possible
18
Minimax Criterion: Select Action 3
Actions
States of Nature
A
B
C
1
20
40
180
2
-40
100
220
3
60
70
90
19
Minimax Regret Criterion: Select
Action 1
Actions
States of Nature
A
B
C
1
40
60
40
2
100
0
0
3
0
30
130
20
Maximax Criterion
An ‘optimistic’ criterion
Identify the best outcome for each
action
Select the action where the best
outcome is the best
21
Hurwicz ‘alpha’
Alpha = ali + (1-a)Li Where:
• a = optimism/pessimism index (0<a<1)
• li = lowest pay-off for action ‘i’
• Li = highest pay-off for action ‘i’
Estimate ‘a’ by using a standard gamble
type exercise (p.253)
22
The Broader Implications of Risk
and Uncertainty
Remember Chapter 3!
Bounded rationality is a key element in
transactions cost theory
If there were no uncertainty there would
be no firms!
Uncertainty is also central to the
concepts of entrepreneurship and
innovation
23