Evaluation Seminar Czech Republic CSF and OP Managing
Download
Report
Transcript Evaluation Seminar Czech Republic CSF and OP Managing
Evaluation Seminar
Czech Republic CSF and OP
Managing Authorities
Session 2: Ongoing Evaluation
Presentation Structure
The Evaluation Cycle
Ongoing/Interim Evaluation
Why do it?
Link with ex-ante and mid-term evaluation
Evaluation Focus
Organisational Issues
Work programme
Steering committees
Evaluation Cycle
Regulatory requirements (1260/1999)
Ex-Ante
Mid-Term
Final
Ex-Post
Interim or ongoing evaluation is in-between
Ex-ante and mid-term
Mid-term and final
Evaluation Cycle and Focus
Evaluation
question
Rationale
ExAnte
***
Ongoing/Mi Post midd-Term
term
*
*
Relevance
**
***
*
Effectiveness *
***
**
Efficiency
**
***
*
***
Impact
*
Why do ongoing evaluation?
Ex-ante and mid-term are OP wide
Have to cover all measures
And a wide range of issues
Doesn’t enable detailed analysis
Ongoing evaluation
Permits in-depth analysis
Of measures or themes
Problem areas can be explored
Ex-Ante and Mid-Term Links
A “bridge” between ex-ante and mid-term
Ex-Ante
Ongoing evaluations can revisit ex-ante
issues
Pursue issues in light of implementation
experience
Mid-Term
Ongoing evaluations act as inputs
Evaluation Focus
Key evaluation issues pre mid-term
Relevance, effectiveness, efficiency (see session 1)
Evaluation questions at this stage
Are programes delivering?
Constraints or problems affecting progress
Targeting
Cost developments and project management
Indicators, project selection
Organisational Issues
Evaluation Unit responsible for ongoing
evaluation
Prepares work programme
Taking account of ex-ante
And consulations with managing authorities
for approval of TA MC
Work programme includes outline TOR
Steering Committees
Composition
Functions
Chaired by managing authority
Includes other MAs, implementing ministries,
Commission, independent expert, Evaluation Unit
Approve TOR
Select evaluator
Quality control
4/5 meetings per evaluation project
Utilisation/Follow-Up (see session 1)