Evaluation Seminar Czech Republic CSF and OP Managing

Download Report

Transcript Evaluation Seminar Czech Republic CSF and OP Managing

Evaluation Seminar
Czech Republic CSF and OP
Managing Authorities
Session 2: Ongoing Evaluation
Presentation Structure


The Evaluation Cycle
Ongoing/Interim Evaluation




Why do it?
Link with ex-ante and mid-term evaluation
Evaluation Focus
Organisational Issues


Work programme
Steering committees
Evaluation Cycle

Regulatory requirements (1260/1999)





Ex-Ante
Mid-Term
Final
Ex-Post
Interim or ongoing evaluation is in-between


Ex-ante and mid-term
Mid-term and final
Evaluation Cycle and Focus
Evaluation
question
Rationale
ExAnte
***
Ongoing/Mi Post midd-Term
term
*
*
Relevance
**
***
*
Effectiveness *
***
**
Efficiency
**
***
*
***
Impact
*
Why do ongoing evaluation?

Ex-ante and mid-term are OP wide




Have to cover all measures
And a wide range of issues
Doesn’t enable detailed analysis
Ongoing evaluation



Permits in-depth analysis
Of measures or themes
Problem areas can be explored
Ex-Ante and Mid-Term Links


A “bridge” between ex-ante and mid-term
Ex-Ante



Ongoing evaluations can revisit ex-ante
issues
Pursue issues in light of implementation
experience
Mid-Term

Ongoing evaluations act as inputs
Evaluation Focus

Key evaluation issues pre mid-term


Relevance, effectiveness, efficiency (see session 1)
Evaluation questions at this stage





Are programes delivering?
Constraints or problems affecting progress
Targeting
Cost developments and project management
Indicators, project selection
Organisational Issues


Evaluation Unit responsible for ongoing
evaluation
Prepares work programme




Taking account of ex-ante
And consulations with managing authorities
for approval of TA MC
Work programme includes outline TOR
Steering Committees

Composition



Functions





Chaired by managing authority
Includes other MAs, implementing ministries,
Commission, independent expert, Evaluation Unit
Approve TOR
Select evaluator
Quality control
4/5 meetings per evaluation project
Utilisation/Follow-Up (see session 1)