Transcript Slide 1

ELL Considerations for Evaluators
December 2, 2013
Facilitator: Tanya Rosado-Barringer, Mid-State RBERN Coordinator
Reflection of a Phrase
2
 What does “ELL considerations” mean to you as an
evaluator?”
 Think of a word of a phrase that best encompasses
what “ELL considerations” means to you?
PURPOSE
3
Transform the service-delivery model for English
Language Learners to encourage successful transition
to English in accord with the research on second
language acquisition.
Compliance
4
 C R Part 117
 C R Part 154
 Title III
 Title VI, Civil Rights Act of 1964
Units of Study
5
6
Defining ESL Instruction
 There is no single method or single
Definition of ESL
Instruction
combination of methods that can
successfully support language
development for all students.
Therefore, teachers must have a
strong knowledge of multiple methods
for teaching ELLs and a strong
knowledge of the children in their care
so they can create the appropriate
balance and methods needed for the
children they teach.”
Taking the Temperature
7
Student Achievement Gap persists in ELA between English
Language Learners and English Proficient by 9 percentage points.
8
ELA Achievement Gap ELL and English Proficient 2005 Standards (old) compared to
Common Core Standard (New)
27.1
English Proficient Students
25.0
Common Core
Standards
Limited English Proficient
Students
9.7
3.9
3.7
1.2
2011
2012
2013
Graduating College and
Career Ready
9
New York's 4-year high school graduation rate is 74% for All Students.
However, the percent graduating college and career ready is significantly lower.
June 2012 Four-Year Graduation Rate (2008 Cohort)
Graduation under Current Requirements
Calculated College and Career Ready*
% Graduating
% Graduating
All Students
74.0
All Students
35.3
American Indian
58.5
American Indian
18.8
Asian/Pacific Islander
81.6
Asian/Pacific Islander
56.5
Black
58.1
Black
12.5
Hispanic
57.8
Hispanic
15.7
White
85.7
White
48.5
English Language Learners
34.3
English Language Learners
7.3
Students with Disabilities
44.7
Students with Disabilities
4.9
*Students graduating with at least a score of 75 on Regents English and 80 on a Math Regents, which
correlates with success in first-year college courses.
Source: NYSED Office of Information and Reporting Services
EngageNY.org
9
Evolving Roles-Where we need to be
10
 School leaders must thoughtfully deploy their ESL
educators to work closely with content teachers to
provide supports to ELLs
 Teaching literacy and supporting English-language
acquisition will no longer be the responsibility of the
ESL teacher alone.
Where Do We Begin?
11
Language learning in an academic context is not solely about mastery over grammatical structures or
isolated vocabulary but also about the development of competency in the language specific to each
academic discipline.
Students must participate in a language socialization process that includes both explicit and
implicit guidance by mentors who are more proficient in the language of the academic discipline
(Duffy, 2010) as well as an engagement with the ways of thinking in each academic discipline through
exposure to content-specific texts (Snow, Griffin, and Burns, 2007).
What this means is that in a history class students are treated as historians and in science class
students are treated as scientists and are provided with both explicit and implicit guidance on the
language structures and practices associated with the discourse of the content-area being taught (Walqui
& Heritage, 2012).
Bilingual Common Core Initiative
12
 The New Language Arts Progressions are not
separate standards, but rather provide a roadmap for
teachers to ensure that students who are learning a
new language meet the Common Core standards.
Example of Performance Indicators in
New Language Arts Progressions
13
Shift in roles for teachers
14
 The New Language Arts Progressions are aligned with the
emerging research that has called for the integration of content
and language in new language development (Chamot, 2009;
Coyle, Hood, & Marsh, 2010; Echevarria, Vogt, & Short, 2012).
 The idea behind integrating content and language is that new
language development happens most successfully when learners
are engaged in authentic content-specific tasks from the very
beginning of their exposure to the new language. That is, when
provided appropriate scaffolding, language learners can start
developing language for academic purposes at the same time that
they are developing basic communication skills in their new
language (Walqui & Heritage, 2012).
Aligned to the Common Core
15
 The difference between the proficiency levels is not
with the complexity of the text or rigor of the
content, but instead with the amount of scaffolding
provided for students to access the grade level text
that all students work with.
Key Takeaways
16
Common –Core based instruction
o Differentiated using instruction aligned with progressions
o Ensuring understanding and essential vocabulary and highlight them in instruction
Deliver meaning based instruction “Authentic”
o Use text to represent ideas and concepts that students understand and can say
Physical environment prepared
o The physical room is used as a resource for students in their (independent) work
What am I looking for?
17
DIFFERENTIATION

Content

Student product

Learning time

Flexible grouping
What am I looking for?
18
DIRECT INSTRUCTION

Language and Content objectives

Modeling

Re-teaching

Scaffolding

Guided Practice

Checking for Understanding

Presentation

Visual Aids
What am I looking for?
19
RESEARCH BASED STRATEGIES

Content Based language development

Cooperative learning

Vocabulary development

Frontloading

Graphic organizers

Writing across the contents

Building background/accessing prior knowledge
Resources
20
 NYSED.gov
 Office of Bilingual Education
 Bilingual Common Core Initiatives – Engage NY
 Mid-State RBERN
315-433-2664
¿Preguntas?
21