Creating a Culture of Safety - The Healthcare Association

Download Report

Transcript Creating a Culture of Safety - The Healthcare Association

Prevention of Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infections (CLABs)

Quality and Patient Safety Effectiveness and Outcomes Beth Israel Medical Center Petrie and Kings Highway Divisions

CLABs Myths

    Our infection rates are below national benchmarks - which is good enough.

CLABs are inevitable. It is the price we pay for sophisticated, complex care of severely ill patients.

CLABs are benign and readily treated with antibiotics.

CLABs are a common accompaniment of complex care and covered by outlier payments.

Lessons Learned

 

We can come surprisingly close to eliminating infections with hospital acquired determination opposed to resources as Our data must not only be reportable but actionable

   Save lives Reduce costs Reduce error and waste

How We Did It

   

Make data actionable Observe variations in work practices Real time problem solving of origins of CLABs Implement and test practice changes

Make Data Actionable

    Start small Use and monitoring of evidence based patient care practices or “bundles” with reporting back of data to end users Counter measures generated by the people who do the work    Process that generates sustainable fixes Avoid “workarounds” that are constantly repeated Set a time to achieve goal Plan-Do-Study Act (PDSA) methodology

Beth Israel Medical Center

  Petrie Division Kings Highway Division   94 ICU beds  3,000 discharges 824 non-ICU beds  43,000 discharges  1,200 central lines placed annually     40% of patients in ICU with central line Average length of stay for patients with central line = 5 days Average length of stay for patients with CLAB = 10 days CLABs rate of 9 per 1,000 device days or 3.8% in 2004

Beth Israel Medical Center CLABs Prevention

  June 2005   ICU MICU, SICU August 2005  CCU and CSICU  December 2005  Emergency Departments  January 2006  General Medical Surgical Units   April 2006  Operating Room August 2006  NICU and PICU

Multi-disciplinary CLABs Team Members

Physicians  Chief Medical Officer     Associate Chairman, Department of Medicine Director    ICU, MICU, SICU Emergency Room Medical and Emergency Department Residency Programs Intensivist Critical Care Fellow Infection Control  Hospital Epidemiologist   Manager Practitioner Patient Care Services  Vice President   Director Nurse Manager    ICU, MICU, SICU Emergency Room Nurse Education Manager Other  Director       Materials Management Housekeeping Respiratory Therapy Quality Improvement Pharmacist Dietician

Multi-disciplinary CLABs Team Principles

 It is not good enough that our infection rates are below national benchmarks.

 CLABs are preventable, they are not an inevitable consequence of sophisticated, complex care that we provide to our severely ill patients.

Multi-disciplinary CLABs Team Principles

  CLABs can be eliminated by determination as opposed to additional resources.

Strict adherence to evidence based patient care practices, called “bundles” that will improve patient safety and reduce adverse patient outcomes is required.

Multi-disciplinary CLABs Team Principles

 Patient hospital length of stay, morbidity and mortality can be reduced through prevention of CLABs.

 We can reduce the Medical Center’s costs incurred for the care of patients with CLABs.

CLABs

BIMC Patients in ICU with Central Line CLABs Rate 40% 3.8% Increase LOS 5 d USA 48% 4% 14 d    Mortality = 18% ICU risk 8x >non-ICU Additional $40,000 to hospital costs  Hospitals absorb the costs!

Nationally: 80,000 CLABs in ICUs per year 14,500 CLABs deaths

Costs Incurred For Care of Patients with CLABs

Discharges Per Year CLAB Patients Incremental Cost Per CLAB Patient $40,000 94 ICU Beds 824 Non-ICU Beds 3,000 43,000 24 22 $25,000 Total Incremental CLAB Costs Annual Incremental Costs $960,000 $550,000 $1,510,000

Used BI BSI information and discharge information from 2004

Multi-disciplinary CLABs Team Aims and Goals

     Process that generates sustainable fixes Avoid “workarounds” that are constantly repeated Collaborative process Knowledge gained from this process is shared with all Our data must not only be reportable but actionable

Beth Israel Medical Center CLABs Prevention

Physician and Nurse reeducation and recertification on central line insertion technique and maintenance practices

Standardization of practices to ensure

   Maximal barrier protection utilized Skin prep with chlorhexidine Preference for subclavian medically contraindicated site unless

Beth Israel Medical Center CLABs Prevention

Nursing practices

 

empowerment to monitor

Nursing permitted to ask and stop other persons who do not follow appropriate practices Hand hygiene compliance

Beth Israel Medical Center CLABs Prevention

Daily review of line necessity

Root cause analysis performed in real time for every CLAB

Development of a central line insertion kit

   Barrier precaution components Insertion components Maintenance components

Beth Israel Medical Center CLABs Prevention Education and Recertification Standardization of Practices and Documentation but also:  Hospital Specific  Department Specific  Unit Specific

2005 Infection Control Policy for Prevention of Intravascular Infection BETH ISRAEL MEDICAL CENTER INFECTION CONTROL POLICY SUBJECT: MANUAL CODE: Guidelines for Prevention of Intravascular Infection EFFECTIVE: DISTRIBUTION: February 2005 Nursing Units, Nursing Administration/Education Clinical Department Reviewed Revised I.

8/05 Handwashing A.

B.

starting the procedure. Wash hands with soap and water or use alcohol based hand rub solution prior to Verify the patient’s identity by name and birth, explain the procedure and obtain informed consent. II. Surveillance for Catheter-Related Infection A.

B.

Palpate the catheter insertion site for tenderness daily through the intact dressing. Visually inspect the catheter site if the patient develops tenderness at the insertion site, fever without obvious source, or symptoms of local or blood stream infection. III.

Barrier Precautions During Catheter Insertion & Care IV.

A.

Wear clean gloves when inserting a peripheral venous catheter and during catheter dressing site changes required by the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA). Bloodborn Pathogens standard. Sterile Gloves are not required. B.

Use sterile technique, including the use of a sterile gown and gloves, a mask, cap, and a large sterile drape (i.e., maximal barrier precautions) for the insertion of central venous lines including PICCs and guidewire exchanges. Use these precautions, even if the catheter is inserted in the operating room. C.

During central line catheter dressing site care, use a mask and sterile gloves. Selection of Catheter Insertion Site

DISTRIBUTION

All Manual Holders

PURPOSE

To provide the Registered Nurse with the guidelines for dressing and cap change on a central venous access device (includes single/double lumen catheters, implanted venous access ports, triple lumen catheters and PICC lines.)

POLICY

This procedure may be performed by a Registered Nurse whose competence has been demonstrated.

Central Venous Access Device dressings are changed at least every 7 days or if they become damp, soiled, loose or if inspection of the site or catheter change is necessary. In addition, dressings on implanted ports must be changed when the non-coring needle is changed once every five days. Caps must be changed whenever the integrity of the cap has been compromised but not less than once a week on Mondays.

EQUIPMENT

A Dressing Change Tray (sterile) containing: powder-free vinyl gloves (one pair) dressing ChloraPrep

Biopatch®

 One-Step chlorhexidine foam pad towel tape mask (optional) cotton tip applicator (optional) clean gloves (one pair) 1.

PROCEDURE

Verify the patient’s identity by name and date of birth. 2. Wash hands and don clean gloves.

KEY PONTS

3. Carefully remove the old dressing completely and discard. Touch only the outer layer of the dressing to avoid contamination 4. Inspect the insertion site for color, tenderness, swelling or any discharge. 5. Remove gloves and wash hands 6. Open the Dressing Change Tray and don the sterile gloves 7. Prep the skin with ChloraPrep  One Step a. Pinch the wings on the applicator to break the ampule and release the antiseptic Look for leakage, swelling. bruising, tenderness, redness and general skin condition. Notify physician of any changes. Strict aseptic technique is essential when carrying out any procedure involving central venous access catheter Do not touch the sponge

Beth Israel Medical Center CLABs Prevention Education and Recertification    Indications Anatomy Procedure  “Time Out”         Universal Protocol Patient Position Skin Preparation Maximal Barrier Precautions Anesthesia Approach Dressing Additional Expectations  Clean up  Monitor for complications

Procedure Competency Form

Procedure Competency Form: Central Line /Transvenous Pacemaker

Patient Addressograph

Resident: ____________________ Observing Faculty: _______________________ Date: _______________________ Procedure: Line Site:

Central Line

Transvenous Pacemaker IJ Subclavian Femoral

R L R L R L if femoral, reason for choice

_____________________

Indication: ____________________________ Time Out @ ___________AM/PM

Verified Correct (all must be verified):  Position  Patient

# or Attempts

 Supplies  _________  Procedure  Site/Side Equipment  _________________________ RN/MD ________________________RN/MD

Consent Signed and In Chart

Sterile Technique & Order of Procedure Operator / Sup Check 1. All equipment at bedside __________/______

2. Wash hands (before procedure) __________/______

3. Prep with Chlo-prep x 3 4. Gown 5. Gloves 6. Cap __________/______

__________/______

__________/______

__________/______

7. Drape 8. Time-out 9. Procedure with sterile technique 10. Place Bio-patch 11. Dressing with date 12. Dispose sharps 13. Wash hands (after procedure) __________/______

__________/______

__________/______

__________/______

__________/______

__________/______

__________/______

 ________________________________________________________________

Continued on Reverse Side Assessment of Procedure

______ Informs patient of procedure including risks and benefits and obtains consent (if appropriate for circumstances) ______ Observes universal precautions ______ Positions patient properly ______ Maintains proper sterile technique ______ Uses ultrasound appropriately to identify vessel/patency ______ Central line flushed if appropriate ______ Skin prep appropriate for procedure ______ Appropriate local anesthesia ______ Needle aimed at proper angle and direction ______ Resident able to analyze and correct potential reasons for unsuccessful procedure ______ Venous blood obtained ______ Wire introduced and syringe removed ______ Skin cut made prior to inserting catheter dilator ______ Wire withdrawn as catheter advanced ______ Confirmation of port function ______ Catheter secured in place ______ Patient cleaned up and proper dressing applied ( Bio-Patch placed ) ______ Sharps disposed of in appropriate container ______ Confirmatory x-ray ordered and reviewed as necessary

Assessment: Unsatisfactory Proficient Mastered

Comments: Faculty Signature:________________________ Resident Signature: _______________________ Date: __________________ Date: ____ ______________

Beth Israel Medical Center CLABs Prevention Education and Recertification Generated By:

Beth Israel GME & Residency Manager Procedure Report: Summary

05/03/06 05:40

Medical Resident KM Procedure Central Venous Line Placement - Femoral Line Insertion Central Venous Line Placement - Internal Jugular Insertion

Central Venous Line Placement - Subclavian Insertion

Review Status Medicine Logged Acc. Rej. Pend. No Rev. Req. Exp. Compliance 2 0 0 0 2 5 NC (40%) 1

6

0

6

0

0

0

0

1

6

5

5

NC (20%)

C (100%+)

Beth Israel Medical Center CLABs Prevention Standardization of Practices  Enforcement of Policy and Procedure  Procedure Note  Insertion Kit  Nursing Empowerment

BETH ISRAEL MEDICAL CENTER VASCULAR ACCESS PROCEDURE NOTE

Date: _________________ Time Out at _______ AM/PM Verified Correct (all must be verified):  Position  Supplies  Patient  Equipment  Procedure  Site/Side _________________________ RN/MD ________________________RN/MD

Central vein

:

Pulmonary artery: Transvenous pacemaker

 subclavian  internal jugular  R  R  R   L  L  L femoral (if femoral, reason for choice) ________________________________________________________________

Arterial:

 R  L  radial  femoral  other_______________ Indication(s): _________________________________________________________ Consent in chart  Operator(s): _______________________________________

Central Line Check List :

1  all equipments at bedside 8  Time-out 2  Wash hands 9  Mask 3  Chlor- prep 10  procedure with sterile technique 4  Gown 11  Bio-Patch 5  Gloves 12  Dressing with date 6  Cap 13  Dispose sharps 7  Drape 14  wash hands Anesthesia: _________________________________________________________ Technique: _________________________________________________________ Comments: ________________________________________________________ Complications: _____________________________________________________ _ __________________________________________________________________ Signature/Title Time:_______

Central Line Insertion Kit

Compliance - Central Line Bundle

Rate (%) 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Aug Oct Dec Feb Time Apr Jun Aug

Results Data from PDSA Cycles

2004 2005 2006 2007 Number of CLABS 46 18 7 2 Costs of CLABS $1,510,000 $705,000 $392,000 $112,000 Incremental cost per episode of CLAB ranges from $25,000 to $56,000 (CDC data: Burke 2003)

Results Data from PDSA Cycles

2004 2005 2006 2007 Number of CLABS 46 Attributable Morbidity and Mortality 9 18 7 2 4 2 0 Attributable morbidity and mortality: 12 – 25% (Wenzel 2001)

Results Data from PDSA Cycles

   Significant reduction in CLABs    95% reduction for institution Achievement of zero CLABs on a variety of units Reduction in morbidity and mortality Daily review of need for line necessity  20% decrease in central line days Reduction in costs incurred in caring for patients with CLABs    $1,500,000 costs avoided 90% reduction in costs from 2004 Costs to implement   Additional $15 per line inserted Total additional costs $30,000

Beth Israel Medical Center CLABs Prevention

CCU ICU ED SICU PICU non-ICU MICU CSICU Unit Longest Duration of Days Without CLAB 644 601 547 483 396 345 344 300

Beth Israel Medical Center CLABs Prevention ICUs

2 1 0 5 4 3 2004 2005 Rate per 1,000 Line Days 2006 2007 Rate per 100 Patients

BETH ISRAEL MEDICAL CENTER CLABs Prevention CCU

10 8 6 4 2 0 Q4 2005 Q1 2006 Q2 2006 CCU Q3 2006 Q4 2006 YEAR NHSN Q1 2007 Q2 2007 Q3 2007 NYS

Beth Israel Medical Center CLABs Prevention Root Cause Analyses  Within 24 hours of a CLAB  All involved patient care staff  4 – 12 persons  ED, ICU, non-ICU  20 – 45 minutes  Collaborative, non-punitive process

Beth Israel Medical Center CLABs Prevention Root Cause Analyses  Process that generates sustainable fixes  Avoid repeated “workarounds” that are constantly  Knowledge gained from this process is shared with all

Beth Israel Medical Center CLABs Prevention Root Cause Analysis – August 2005      84 year old female with a history of hypertension, CHF, cardiac arrhythmia with pacer, insulin dependent diabetes Admitted to ICU with CHF exacerbation, pleural effusion Developed acute renal failure requiring dialysis  Nephrologist places Shiley catheter    Groin site chosen Difficult procedure requiring multiple attempts Maximal barrier precautions not fully utilized Nursing staff attempt to assist  Call intensivist to place line Blood cultures positive for

C. albicans

48 hours later

Beth Israel Medical Center CLABs Prevention Root Cause Analysis – August 2005   Nephrologist conducts RCA  Credentialed     Central line indicated Urgent not emergent Supplies available and easily obtainable but not fully utilized for maximal barrier precautions Need to ask for assistance sooner rather than later Corrective Actions  Central line insertion kit   Nursing staff empowered and more comfortable with role Reeducation and recertification of nephrologist

Beth Israel Medical Center CLABs Prevention Root Cause Analyses

2005

 

Central Line Care

  Dressings Access

Insertion Practices

   Maximal barrier precautions Supplies never an issue Certification of physicians

Results - Data from PDSA Cycles ICU CLABs

10 8 6 4 2 0 2004 Q1 2005 Q2 2005 Q3 2005 YEAR ICU NHSN Q4 2005 Q1 2006

Beth Israel Medical Center CLABs Prevention Root Cause Analyses

2006

Central Line Care

  Dressings Access 

Maintaining the momentum

Results - Data from PDSA Cycles ICU CLABs

10 8 6 4 2 0 20 04 Q1 2 00 5 Q2 2 00 Q3 5 2 00 5 Q4 2 00 5 Q1 2 00 Q2 6 2 00 6 Q3 2 00 6 Q4 2 00 6 Q1 2 00 7 Q2 2 00 7 Q3 2 00 7 YEAR ICU NHSN

Beth Israel Medical Center CLABs Prevention

     Use and monitoring of evidence based patient care practices or “bundles” with reporting back of data to end users resulted in the rapid and sustained elimination or decreased incidence of CLABs on many units Limited additional resources were necessary for the success of this initiative Efforts were effective for all areas of the hospital where central lines are inserted As compliance of CLABs with insertion bundle improves, line maintenance has assumed a greater role in the prevention Culture change regarding goal of zero CLABs infections is applicable for all hospital acquired infections and patient safety issues

GNYHA/UHF CLABs Collaborative • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • Participating Hospitals Beth Israel Medical Center Bronx-Lebanon Hospital Center Brookdale Hospital Medical Center Cabrini Medical Center Good Samaritan Hospital Medical Center Interfaith Medical Center Kingsbrook Jewish Medical Center* Kingston Hospital* Lenox Hill Hospital Long Beach Medical Center Long Island College Hospital Lutheran Medical Center Montefiore Medical Center Mount Sinai Hospital • • • • North Shore-Long Island Jewish Health System, including: – Forest Hills Hospital – – – – – – – – – Franklin Hospital Glen Cove Hospital Huntington Hospital Long Island Jewish Medical Center North Shore University Hospital Plainview Hospital Southside Hospital Staten Island University Hospital Syosset Hospital Peninsula Hospital Center Richmond University Medical Center* Sound Shore Medical Center of Westchester Mount Sinai Hospital of Queens New York Downtown Hospital New York Hospital Queens* New York Methodist Hospital New York-Presbyterian Hospital New York University Medical Center North General Hospital Our Lady of Mercy Medical Center *Hospitals that joined the CLABs Collaborative in the second round of participation (i.e., in August/September 2006).

• • • • • • • • • • • St. Catherine of Siena Medical St. Charles Hospital St. Joseph’s Medical Center, Yonkers* St. Luke’s - Roosevelt Hospital Center St. Luke's Cornwall Hospital St. Vincent’s Medical Center, Manhattan* Stamford Hospital The Parkway Hospital* Trinitas Hospital Winthrop University Hospital* Wyckoff Heights Medical Center

GNYHA-UHF CLABs Collaborative Characteristics of Participating

Hospitals

• 38 hospitals participating, 56 ICUs*

At inception of Collaborative, hospital practice was widely variable across participants:

Area of Focus

Daily Goals Sheet Interdisciplinary Rounds Central Line Bundle Ventilator Bundle

Consistently Use

21 45 11 16

Inconsistently Use

7 9 27 30

Do Not Use

26 2 17 10

GREAT OPPORTUNITIES FOR IMPROVEMENT !

Responses obtained from ICUs within participating hospitals.

*Note that these were responses from the original group of 38 CLABs Collaborative participating hospitals.

GNYHA-UHF CLABs Collaborative Design • Systematic model for change that would – Meet needs of hospitals within the region – Use existing staffing and financial resources

• • • • • • • • • • •

GNYHA/UHF CLABs Collaborative Design

Hospital leadership involvement and commitment Interdisciplinary teams / Physician and Nurse champions Evidence-based interventions:

Implemented “Central Line Bundle”

3 learning sessions:

Reviewed key interventions for eliminating CLAB infections, guidelines for inserting central line, materials needed, maintaining central lines, hospital best practices, and approaches to sustaining improvements.

Bi-weekly conference calls:

Shared information / tools specific to reducing CLAB infections.

Collaborative web site for information-sharing:

http://jeny.ipro.org/clabs

“Expert on Call” clinical consultant Reinforcement of “zero tolerance” for CLAB infections Standardized Materials:

Teams developed and used standardized data collection and definitions

Root Cause Analysis (RCA)

: Real time RCAs encouraged to identify reasons for CLABs and develop solutions for prevention

Tracking Success:

Aggregate and hospital-specific results reported monthly and site visits made by Collaborative sponsors to identify areas in need of support Central Line Bundle: Hospital teams identified the “central line bundle” as a strategy to prevent infection during central line insertion. Components include: hand hygiene, use of maximal barrier precautions, chlorhexidine skin use, site of line placement, and review of line necessity. All necessary supplies should be available at the patient’s bedside when needed (creation of central line insertion kit).

CLABs Collaborative Website: http://jeny.ipro.org/clabs

Examples of Findings from Root Cause Analyses

Line Maintenance Technique not adequate Lack of Education and Staffing

Line not changed on timely basis Line in for too long Dressing not changed using aseptic techniques Not compliant with hand hygiene Line inserted w/o sterile technique IV tubing not labeled properly to change Line not manipulated appropriately Inadequate use of maximal barrier precautions Inadequate prep before insertion Femoral line subclavian Inexperienced residents and clinicians Clinicians not knowledgeable about Central Line Bundle chosen instead of Nurses do not properly know how to change dressings MD does not get someone to assist with line insertion Nurses too busy to check & change dressings

Central Line – Associated Bloodstream Infection

Barriers and Solutions

Barrier Lack of Compliance

MaintenanceTechnique

Lack of Education & Staffing Lack of Standardized Data Collection Solution Development of central line insertion & maintenance kits Creation of monitoring tools to assure compliance with bundle components Empowerment of nursing staff to stop procedure when bundle not followed Daily rounds to assess line necessity and assure appropriate maintenance Development of Department/Hospital-wide educational programs re: insertion and maintenance Reorganization of staffing to monitor and assure compliance Creation of protocols in which nursing signs off on dressing rounds Adoption of CDC’s NHSN definitions Monthly data fed back (CLAB infection rates) to participating hospitals and staff

GNYHA-UHF Collaborative 15-Month Data Results*

• • •

Bundle Implementation 1 :

88% reported full implementation; remaining 12% in process of fully implementing Mean pre-bundle implementation CLAB infection rate = 4.02 infections / 1,000 central line days Mean post-bundle implementation rate = 1.79 infections / 1,000 (p Value <0.0001) • • •

Overall Aggregate CLAB Infection Data:

Mean

baseline

rate = 4.86 infections / 1,000 central line days Mean fifteen-month

study period 2

infection rate = 2.38 infections / 1,000 51% overall decrease (p Value <0.0001) • • •

Comparison of CLAB Infection Data in 3-month Cohorts during 15 month Study Period 2 :

Mean

first three months

central line days (July through September 2005) = 3.10 infections / 1,000 Mean

last three months

(July through September 2006) = 1.76 infections / 1,000 43% decrease during the course of the study period (p Value = 0.015)

Maintaining Zero CLAB Infections during 15-month Study Period 2 :

• • 29 hospitals (81%) maintained zero for

at least 3 months

8 hospitals (22%) maintained zero

during the last 6 months

Notes: 1 Bundle implementation, reported by 34 of the 38 original participating hospitals through an

Interventions Survey

developed by Collaborative sponsors, April 2006.

2

Study Period

includes data collected by 36 of the 38 original participating hospitals from July 2005 through September 2006.

*Includes data from 36 of the 38 original participating hospitals

Monthly ICU Central Line Infection Rates for Hospitals Participating in the GNYHA/UHF CLABS Quality Improvement Collaborative Round 1 Hospitals

6.00

5.00

4.52

5.01

4.26

4.00

3.18

3.00

2.55

2.00

2.33

2.70

2.47

2.77

2.69

2.15

1.65

2.27

2.46

1.68

1.94

2.02

2.37

1.87

2.44

2.21

1.80

2.04

1.33

2.02

1.65

1.00

0.00

Baseline Jul-05 Sep-05 Nov-05 Jan-06 Mar-06 May-06 Jul-06 Sep-06 Nov-06 Jan-07 Mar-07 May-07

Monthly ICU Central Line Infection Rates for Hospitals Participating in GNYHA/UHF CLABS Quality Improvement Collaborative Round 2 Hospitals

6.00

5.13

5.00

4.75

4.00

3.31

3.00

2.62

1.88

2.00

2.45

1.73

0.88

1.00

0.68

0.81

0.00

Baseline Oct-06 Nov-06 Dec-06 Jan-07 Feb-07 Mar-07 Apr-07 May-07 Jun-07

Decreasing Incidence of MDROs!

BIMC Petrie KHD MRSA VRE MDR

Klebsiella

MDR

Acinetobacter C. difficile

65% 15% 15% 45% 10% 50% 25% 20% 50% 35% Costs avoided: $1.5 million

Thank You