Transcript Document
Unclaimed Children Revisited
The Status of Children’s
Mental Health Policy:
Moving Forward
Janice Cooper Ph.D
Jane Knitzer EdD.
Georgetown University National Technical Assistance
Center for Children's Mental Health Call January 15th
1-2:30pm ET
About NCCP
Our Mission: To promote the security, health and well-being of
America’s low-income children and families.
Our Overall Foci: Improved family economic security; Healthy,
nurturing families; Children succeeding in School, especially young
children.
Our Mental Health Agenda: Unclaimed Children Revisited,
Adolescent Health Initiative, Project Launch, State Infant & Early
Childhood Mental Health Policies: A 50 State View, Assessment of
Child Abuse Prevention.
www.nccp.org
Overview of Talk
Setting the Context
The Core Questions
The Major Findings
Proposed Recommendations
www.nccp.org
Setting the Context
Since 1982, there has been an explosion of knowledge
about:
The roots and causes of mental illness
Effective prevention, early intervention and treatment strategies
But, no major policy study to see how this new knowledge has
been incorporated into service and practice
Reports continue to document unmet need
www.nccp.org
The Overall Goals
Help understand how states are working to:
Provide access to prevention, early intervention and
treatment for across age span for children
Infuse empirically supported practice in the service delivery
system
Implement intentional practices to improve family
responsiveness and culturally and linguistic competence
Spend smarter and more efficiently through infrastructure,
fiscal and accountability measures
www.nccp.org
The Overall Goals (con’td)
Seed a field conversation to outline a next
generation children’s mental health system
Strengthen the federal framework to move to a real
public health agenda for children’s mental health
that encompasses both children with mental health
conditions, those at risk and their families.
www.nccp.org
Unclaimed Children Revisited involves:
National Study: State Survey of Children’s MH
Directors (N=53)
4 sub-studies
California Case Study (N=725)
Michigan Case Study (N=111)
Survey on Cultural and Linguistic Competence (N=81)
MHA Survey (N=19)
www.nccp.org
The Core Questions
Overall, how well are states serving children and
youth with mental health conditions?
How are states moving toward a child mental health
system guided by a public health approach?
How are states addressing the age appropriate
needs of children and youth?
www.nccp.org
The Core Questions (con’td)
How are states improving systems and service delivery for
children and youth with serious emotional disorders and their
families?
How are mental health practices across the age span guided by
evidence of effectiveness?
How well are states meeting the need for:
Family and youth responsive services?
Culturally and linguistically competent services?
www.nccp.org
The Core Questions (con’td)
How do states improve service through:
Infrastructure related supports (e.g. IT)
Fiscal Policy
Accountability measures?
What policy opportunities and barriers do states
face as they try to improve their service systems?
www.nccp.org
The Core Findings : The Overall Picture
States are struggling mightily to respond to the
needs of children with mental health conditions.
41 states reported serving some children with serious
complex needs well, but 12 states said there were no
children they served well.
No state identified children and youth at risk as the ones
they served well or poorly.
www.nccp.org
The Core Findings : A Public Health Framework
States report they are moving toward a
developmentally appropriate public health
framework but progress is slow.
There is no clear shared vision from mental health
directors or the field about what a public health
framework means.
www.nccp.org
The Core Findings: Moving Toward a
Developmental Framework
States vary in their efforts to meet the mental health needs of
children in a developmentally, age appropriate manner.
Only seven states reported consistent support and
funding for young children, school aged children and
youth, that is, across the age-span.
The initiatives states report for different ages of children
are often geographically limited and NOT statewide.
www.nccp.org
The Core Findings: Early Childhood
44 states reported one or more early childhood
initiatives; 37 states CMHA funded early childhood
mental health services directly.
In only half of these states is at least one initiative
statewide.
Initiatives encompass early childhood specialists in
CMHC’s (N=21); ECE mental health consultation programs
(N=26); reimbursement for social & emotional screening
tools; working with adult mental health (N=15).
www.nccp.org
The Core Findings: School Aged
47 states reported one or more initiatives for school aged
children and youth.
Only half of these states have at least one initiative
statewide.
School-aged initiatives include: PBIS (N=23); school-based
mental health/health clinics (N=29); partnerships with
DOE (N=30); School wide efforts around social/emotional
(N=18); targeted supports for youth with SED (N=29).
www.nccp.org
The Core Findings: Youth
44 states reported initiatives for youth and young
adults.
60% of the states report one or more of these is
statewide.
Initiatives for youth include: health insurance or
other social supports (N=22); state guardianship
after 18 (N=21); partnerships for jobs (N=13); Work
on SSI provisions that discourage work (N=0).
www.nccp.org
The Core Findings : Serious mental health
conditions
All states report they have incorporated system of care
philosophy.
Only 18 states report various strategies to institutionalize
this philosophy (e.g. in legislation and regulation,
practice standards and strategic planning).
And state systems still show over-reliance on residential
care, while systems of care reach few children.
www.nccp.org
The Core Findings: Evidence-based practice
All states report promoting evidence-based practice.
Only 19 states report that they require, support or
promote specific evidence-based practices statewide.
12 states reported legislative or administrative mandates
to implement EBPs.
60% of state mental health advocates report knowledge
of their state efforts.
www.nccp.org
The Core Findings: Family Responsive
Services
Almost all states report efforts to strengthen the
family and youth voice in policy.
In 15 states, mental health advocates report being
dissatisfied with the depth of involvement.
States are increasingly supporting services delivered
by youth and families.
www.nccp.org
The Core Findings: Culturally and Linguistically
Responsive Services
27 states reported on policies that support
culturally and linguistically-competent services and
systems.
8 states have statewide strategic plans to assess and
improve CLC services.
Only 5 states reported a range of intentional steps.
www.nccp.org
The Core Findings: Infrastructure and
Accountability
States have mixed records in efforts to improve
service delivery through infrastructure related
supports and accountability supports.
Only two states report an advanced infrastructure to
support data driven service delivery
Attention to outcome driven practice is limited, and
described by 15 states as rudimentary
41 states report they share data for community planning,
but 10 state mental health advocates do not agree.
www.nccp.org
The Core Findings : Fiscal Issues
Only 27 states reported on their children’s mental health
budgets, and only 11 had data across systems.
Medicaid, through the rehab option offers opportunities,
for service expansion but Medicaid also creates barriers.
• Only 19 states reported using EPSDT for behavioral screening.
• Only 16 states reported that they permit reimbursement for young
children regardless of diagnosis.
• 10 states restrict Medicaid reimbursement for mental health
services delivered in non-office based settings (schools, child
care).
• States are using Medicaid to pay for family and youth guided
services.
www.nccp.org
The Core Findings: Fiscal Issues (con’td)
21 states make Medicaid decisions in consultation
with mental health.
12 states make Medicaid decisions w/o involving
mental health.
Only 4 states reported mental health makes
Medicaid decisions.
www.nccp.org
Proposed Recommendations for the Next Generation in
CMH Policy
Codify into statute a public health approach to cmh:
Incentives and support for mental health promotion,
prevention of mental health conditions, early intervention
and treatment
Prevention set-aside
Require public health, mental health, juvenile
justice, child welfare, child care and education to
develop comprehensive strategy with shared
outcomes
www.nccp.org
Support an age- and developmentally appropriate focus to serving
children and youth with mh conditions and those at risk
Provide incentives (fiscal, infrastructural and other) to
improve age-appropriate services
Support states and professional orgs in efforts to improve
competencies of all providers who interact with children and
youth
Young children: CMS strategy to establish payment mechanisms
School-age: SAMHSA, CMS, DOE comprehensive payment and service
delivery support
Transition-age: Eliminate prohibition against Medicaid to JJ; and,
support and make-available for Medicaid up to age 21 at state option
www.nccp.org
Carry out an comprehensive plan to finance the delivery of
research-informed practices
Support widespread adoption of empirically supportive
practices – organizing efforts to reduce the cost of proprietary
practices
Increase research on best practices models especially funding
efforts that focus on development and dissemination of
culturally-specific and culturally competent practices
Track implementation of and outcomes attributed to these
practices
Increase the knowledge of family members and youth service
users about empirically supported practices
www.nccp.org
Take bold action to reduce disparities in access and
outcomes based on race/ethnicity and language access
Require public reporting by states and the federal
government on racial/ethnic and English language
proficiency related disparities
Require public reporting by states and the federal
government on efforts to address disparities
Require annually reporting by state on national
benchmarks for addressing disparities
www.nccp.org
Place empirically-supported family-based treatment at
the center of financing
Remove barriers in Medicaid to reimbursement for
family treatment
Enforce parity for reimbursement for family treatment
in private insurance
Eliminate obstacles to treatment for parental mental
health conditions
Provide incentives for states to buttress and sustain
family and youth voice in policy
www.nccp.org
Enhance information systems to improve children’s
mental health service delivery
Assess and public report on the status of the
information technology infrastructure to support
children’s mental health
Invest in information technology infrastructure for
children’s mental health
Invest in and foster inter-operability between child
mental health and other child serving and health
and mental health information systems
www.nccp.org
Develop and implement a comprehensive financing
strategy to support
Require child mh content expertise in development state
Medicaid plan
Provide incentives for states to use Medicaid innovatively
Reward states that creatively improve mh for children and
youth through Medicaid
Review use of EPSDT for behavioral health and address
variation by states and establish benchmarks for behavioral
health screening
www.nccp.org
Require an outcome-focused approach to children’s
mental health service delivery
Provide incentives and support state to move
toward more outcomes focused management
Assist states link mental health policy and clinical
decision-making
www.nccp.org
State and territorial governments and DC
Document periodically and make publicly available
county-specific estimates of unmet needs and plans to
address these
Address disparities based on race/ethnicity and English
language proficiency
Annually report on disparities and plans to address them
Address fiscal accountability
Annually report children’s mental health budget
www.nccp.org
For More Information, Contact:
Janice Cooper
[email protected]
Jane Knitzer
[email protected]
Or Visit NCCP web site
www.nccp.org
SIGN UP FOR OUR UPDATES
www.nccp.org