nrms.schoolwires.net

Download Report

Transcript nrms.schoolwires.net

ADMINISTRATIVE STAFF RETREAT

Dr. Anthony D. Jackson, Superintendent

OPENING SESSION

•

INTRODUCTIONS

– New Faces/ New Places •

Pursuing Deliberate Excellence - Leader 2.0

 Organizational Maturity Model  FOCUS FORWARD 2018 – Interim Strategic Plan  C.A.R.E. SUPPORT PLAN 2012  2013 Performance Goals and Targets   It Begins and Ends with LEADERSHIP IT’S POSSIBLE… •

SETTING THE STAGE

 Division Governance   Internal/ External Communications 2012 - 2013 Meeting Calendar/ Expectations

FOCUS FORWARD 2018

2018

Our Vision

Ensuring bright and prosperous

Focused on

continuous improvement

for every child, in every classroom, every day.

every day.

BELIEFS

      

Students come first.

Education is hope, providing choices and expanding horizons.

Education is a shared responsibility among schools, families, and communities.

Students need high expectations for success.

Students learn best in a safe, nurturing environment.

Diversity is valued when all people are treated with dignity.

Learning is a life-long journey for all.

FOCUS FORWARD 2018

Shared Agreements



High achievement by ALL students is the only acceptable outcome for our work.



Educational decisions MUST be supported with data (evidence).



Classrooms are dynamic, child centered environments driven by high expectations and rigorous instructional activities aligned standards, and individual student need.



Students must have deliberate opportunities to develop 21 st century skills



Digital Age Literacy



Inventive Thinking



Interactive Communication



Quality Results

FOCUS FORWARD 2018 Shared Agreements



Instructional resources must be evidenced-based and infused with current technological strategies and instructional tools

•

Meaningful relationships are essential to our success.



Every students will graduate college, career and life ready.

THE JOURNEY

STRATEGIC FOCUS AREAS



Objective 1: High Quality Instruction

 We

will

produce globally competitive students. 

Objective 2: High Quality Professionals

 We

will

be directed by 21st century professionals. 

Objective 3: Safe and Orderly Schools

 We

will

provide a safe environment and support healthy, responsible, and engaged positive relationships throughout the entire school district.   

Objective 4: Innovative and Cutting-Edge Technology

 We

will

use cutting-edge technology to enhance instruction and promote innovation.

Objective 5: Effective and Efficient Resource Management

 We

will

be governed and supported by 21st century systems and develop policies and procedures to ensure sound stewardship of all financial and human resources.

Objective 6: Family and Community Engagement

 We

will

engage families and the community to ensure open communication and opportunities for student success.

IN FIVE YEARS WHAT WILL OUR SCHOOL SYSTEM LOOK LIKE?

SMART GOALS



By September 2012

, clearly articulated curricula/ detailed pacing guides and scheduled district benchmarking process in place for all assessed content areas  By June

2013

the expectations outlined in the shared agreements outlined in the FOCUS FORWARD 2018 plan will be adopted and operational system-wide

  

SMART GOALS

During the 2012-13 school year, the district will develop not less than 5 opportunities to solicit two-way communication with internal and external stakeholders By June 2013, the district will conduct student, staff, and parent climate surveys throughout the school district. The results will be reported to the community and incorporated into the district strategic plan.

During the 2012-13 school year the public information office will produce the first Annual Report for the community, specifically outlining progress toward achieving the district’s goals. The report will be produced annually and distributed throughout the community.

SMART GOALS



By January 2013, the School Board will approve a new Student Assignment plan designed to utilize all district facilities in the most efficient manner possible.



By June 2013, each school and all district administrative offices will have fully functional and operational School Safety Plans developed.



By August 2013, the District will develop a new Strategic Plan to direct the work of the school district for the next 5 years.

  

SMART GOALS

By June 2013, Content-based Professional Learning Communities will be implemented and supported at each school and at the district level to support the professional development and growth of all staff.

By June 2013 classrooms and schools will be equipped with a standardized package of technological tools and devices

By June

2014

the CARE support framework will be completed and in place district-wide. Each school will have the support and resources needed to address unique challenges specific to their school communities.



SMART GOALS

 By June

2018

ALL

schools in the Nash-Rocky Mount Public School System will meet or exceed the expectations for growth established by the state accountability framework.

50%

of our schools will designated

Reward Schools. No Schools will be designated Focus or Priority Schools.

By June 2018, 95%

of our 3 rd Grade students will demonstrate proficiency on a state-wide assessments in reading and mathematics

SMART GOALS



By June 2018

, the on-time graduation rate will be at or above

95%

and the district level drop-out rate will be at or below

1%



By June 2018 The Average ACT score for students in the NRMS will be at or above the state average.



SMART GOALS

By the June 2018, Algebra I completion at the Middle School level will exceed 75% annually.

 By June

2018, each high school will offer a minimum if 10 advanced placement courses (face-to-face and virtual).

 By June

2018, 75% of the graduating class will complete at least 1 advanced placement course.

DELIBERATE and INTENTIONAL Actions to Improve Student Performance

C.A.R.E

NOW WHAT?

C.A.R.E.



RITICAL



CTIONS NEEDED TO



EACH



xpectations

DELIBERATE ACTIONS

(Leadership)

 During the 2012-2013 school year principals and assistant principals will be expected to

spend a minimum of 65% of their time in classrooms

performance.

, monitoring instruction, assessing student performance and providing specific feedback to teachers to improve their  During the 2012-2013 school year the district will develop and administer 3 common benchmarks assessments to students in grades 3-8 in math, reading and science. (Oct, Jan, April)

DELIBERATE ACTIONS

(Leadership)

 During the 2012-2013 school year principals and assistant principals will

meet

with grade level teams (teachers)

prior

to and

following

administration of district administered benchmarks

adjustments

to discuss student preparation and performance; and make

 During the 2012-2013 school year a district-wide

targeted intervention plan

the year. and process will be implemented to ensure a systematic way of identifying student deficits and the manner in which each school monitors student progress throughout

DELIBERATE ACTIONS

(Monitoring)

 During the 2012-2013 school year school-based intervention

activities will be monitored monthly

planned visits to schools.

by the Executive Directors of Elementary, Secondary Education and School Transformation through conversations with principals and  During the 2012-2013 school year a structured

district-wide enrichment plan

plans will be will be developed to ensure that extension activities are in place to support and challenge students prepared for more rigorous instructional opportunities. These

monitored monthly

by the Educational Specialist for AIG

DELIBERATE ACTIONS

(Monitoring)

 During the 2012-2013 school year district and school-based professional development plans will include embedded opportunities for teachers to improve areas identified as deficits based on student performance data.  During the 2012-2013 school year a district-wide process will be developed to assist principals with directing teachers toward individual and school-wide professional development activities to improve classroom performance student outcomes.

DELIBERATE ACTIONS

(Support)

 By August 2012, the C&I Dept. will

establish and communicate growth targets for each school to building principals and leadership teams

to ensure that all are aware of the growth expectations to achieve AYP.

 By August 2012, a central office Instructional Support Advisor will be assigned each school with reading proficiency below 50% and math proficiency below 60%.  Their role will be to support the principal and help him/her coordinate system-wide resources. The ISA will visit the school

weekly

to assess student and school progress.

DELIBERATE ACTIONS

(Support)

 During the 2012-2013 school year, school climate and parent satisfaction surveys will be administered at each school to assess parental engagement and teacher support of district initiatives focused on improving school and student performance.

 During the 2012-2013 school year, Educational Specialists –will

visit content classrooms

to conduct

fidelity checks

to assess school, class and provide support to teachers with implementation of the new content standards.

DELIBERATE ACTIONS

(Support)

 Throughout the 2012-13 school year, the Asst. Superintendent and Executive Directors will meet with principals and school teams after each administration of the system-wide benchmark to review performance data and to assist with modifications of school plans to ensure student readiness for spring assessments.

 Throughout the 2012-13 school year, the Assistant Superintendent will provide quarterly

reports

to the Superintendent

on each school’s performance

ELEMENTARY READING AND MATH TARGETS

Proficiency Targets - Reading

(Elementary)

School Bailey Baskerville Benvenue Cedar Grove Coopers DS Johnson Englewood MB Hubbard Middlesex Nashville OR Pope Spring Hope Swift Creek Williford NRMS 2011-12

BASELINE

70.3

72.7

69.1

73.7

77.1

44.8

67.6

57.7

58.8

82.6

50.7

59.9

71.2

35.4

65.8

2012-13 TARGET 75 77 74 78 82 60 72 62 63 87 60 65 76 60

70.7

2013-2014 TARGET 80 82 80 83 87 65 77 67 68 92 65 70 81 65

75.8

2014-2015 TARGET 85 87 85 88 92 70 82 72 73 95 70 75 86 70

80.7

2015-2016 2016-2017 TARGET 90 92 TARGET 95 97 90 93 95 77 95 98 98 82 87 77 78 97 77 80 91 77 92 82 83 98 82 85 96 82

85.7

90.3

Proficiency Targets - MATH

(Elementary)

School Bailey Baskerville Benvenue Cedar Grove Coopers DS Johnson Englewood MB Hubbard Middlesex Nashville OR Pope Spring Hope Swift Creek Williford NRMS 2011-12

BASELINE

86.0

81.3

77.9

82.8

86.3

64.5

74.2

74.4

74.7

94.0

61.2

71.8

87.7

45.8

77.7

2012-13 TARGET 90 85 81 86 90 68 78 78 78 96 70 75 91 60

80.4

2013-2014 TARGET 94 89 85 90 94 72 82 82 82 97 75 80 94 65

84.3

2014-2015 TARGET 95 93 90 94 95 77 86 86 86 97 80 84 95 70

87.7

2015-2016 2016-2017 TARGET 95 TARGET 98 95 95 98 98 95 95 80 90 90 98 98 85 95 95 90 97 85 88 95 95 98 90 93 98 80

90.7

94.5

MIDDLE SCHOOL READING AND MATH TARGETS

Total Proficiency TARGETS Reading -

Middle

School 2011-12

BASELINE

NCMS Edwards 60.0

59.4

Parker ROMS 62.4

73.0

SNMS Tar River Academy NRMS 70.8

TBD

66.3

2012-13 TARGET 2013-2014 TARGET 2014-2015 TARGET 2015-2016 TARGET 2016-2017 TARGET 65 65 68 78 75 70 70 74 83 80 75 75 80 88 85 80 80 85 93 90 85 85 90 95 95 TBD 70 TBD 75.4

TBD 80.6

TBD 85.6

TBD 90

Total Proficiency TARGETS MATH -

Middle

School NCMS Edwards Parker ROMS SNMS Tar River Academy NRMS 2011-12

BASELINE 68.9

66.2

72.8

85.4

81.7

TBD

76.3

2012-13 TARGET 2013-2014 TARGET 2014-2015 TARGET 2015-2016 TARGET 2016-2017 TARGET 73 71 77 90 86 78 76 82 95 91 83 81 87 96 96 88 86 92 97 97 93 91 97 98 98 79.4

84.4

88.6

92 95.4

Percent of 8

Graders Successfully Completing Algebra 1

2011-2012 BASELINE 2012-2013 BASELINE 2013-2014 TARGET 2014-2015 TARGET 2015-2016 TARGET 2016-2017 TARGET NCMS Edwards Parker

1.9% 2.4% 1.0%

ROMS

2.3%

SNMS Tar River Academy

5.0% 5.2

6.7

3.8

12.5

13.5

District

12.7% 41.7% 64%

10 11 8 17 18

12 13 10 19 20 74% 14 15 12 20 20 81% 16 17 15 20 20 88%

HIGH SCHOOL TARGETS

Proficiency Targets for English II (High School)

School

2011-12 Baseline 2012-13 TARGET 2013-14 TARGET 2014-15 TARGET 2015-16 TARGET 2016-17 TARGET

NCHS ECHS NNHS

78.0

97.7

79.9

80 98 81 83 98 84 86 98 87 89 98 90 92 98 93

RMHS

79.6

81 77 84 80 87 83 90 86 93 90

SNHS Tar River Academy NRMS

75.9

0.0

78.4

83.4

85.8

88.2

90.6

93.2

Proficiency Targets for Algebra 1 (High School)

School NCHS NRMEC NNHS RMHS SNHS

2011-12 Baseline

72.98

90.91

78.86

64.98

77.52

WLG*** NRMS

0.0

80.42

2012-13 TARGET 75 93 81 70 80

2013-14 TARGET 78 94 84 74 84

85.8

2014-15 TARGET 82 95 88 78 88

88.2

2015-16 TARGET 2016-17 TARGET 86 95 92 82 92 90 95 95 86 95

92.4

95.2

Proficiency Targets for Biology (High School)

School NCHS NRMEC NNHS RMHS

2011-12 Baseline

60.65

80.95

70.54

64.47

SNHS Tar River Academy NRMS 78.62

68.6

2012-13 TARGET 65 85 75 70 83

2013-14 TARGET 70 90 80 75 88 2014-15 TARGET 75 92 85 80 93 2015-16 TARGET 2016-17 TARGET 80 94 90 85 94 85 95 95 90 95

78 83 88 93

CENTRAL OFFICE SUPPORT

 During the 2012-2013 school year we will begin implementation of the FOCUS FORWARD 2018 plan to ensure high student performance across the system  Quarterly Data Reviews  Review Benchmark Assessments   Formative feedback to principals Departmental PLC’s  Monthly PLCs to Ensure Coordination of all initiatives  Technical support provided by content trained - Educational Specialists  Regular discussions about articulation of curriculum (vertical and horizontal)  Support plan for teachers not making progress on benchmarks and/or keeping up with pacing  Support with monitoring instruction  2 Walk through visits of every classroom in every school with structured written feedback provided to principals

MONITORING

 Educational Specialists  Math/ English/ Special Education Specialist to coordinate support for teachers to develop the necessary strategies to work with students in under-performing subgroups  Instruction (Rigor, Relevance, and Resources)  Differentiation   Instructional Centers Technology Integration   Professional Development High Student Engagement  Constructivist Instructional Strategies  Six Shifts    Hands-on Instructional Strategies Making the “see, hear, do” connection Rigor Relevance Framework  Content Integration/ Regular Discussions

DELIBERATE ACTIONS TO ENSURE ACADEMIC IMPROVEMENT

REMEMBER …. IT’S ABOUT OUR STUDENTS

STARTS WITH YOU…

HTTP://YOUTU.BE/YXVVJ25H7AU (48-702)

RIGOR AND RELEVANCE BEGINS and ENDS with LEADERSHIP

INSTRUCTIONAL EXPECTATIONS

 High levels of learning are attainable for ALL students.  People learn differently and at different rates.

 Motivated and engaged learners derive more from their learning than do passive learners.

 Students are more successful when they have a measure of owner ship in their learning.

 High-quality, job-embedded professional development for teachers and leaders supports the teaching learning process.

 The quality of teaching and leadership makes a significant impact on student learning.

INSTRUCTIONAL EXPECTATIONS

 Strong curriculum is broad, balanced, continually improved, rooted in the real world, and based on a common set of learning expectations.

 A system of balanced assessments is an integral component of effective teaching.

 Clear, high, and attainable learning expectations are essential for student success.

 The integration of technology into educational practices is essential for student engagement

Rigor

Resources

RESULTS

HIGH Student Achievement

Relevance Relationship

MEET DALTON…..

http://youtu.be/HAMLOnSNwzA

RIGOR AND RELEVANCE FRAMEWORK

THE LEADERSHIP CHALLENGE

• Instructional Expectations have changed • Monitoring Instruction • Instructional Delivery • Student Engagement • Intervention/ Enrichment • Critical Conversations • Behavior/ Beliefs about Teaching and Learning

TECHNOLOGY INTEGRATION

TOOLS TO ENHANCE RIGOR AND RELEVANCE

Deliberate and Intentional LEADERSHIP

ORGANIZATIONAL COMMUNICATION

INTERNAL COMMUNICATION

• School based and

Staff concerns

are shared and filtered through the building principal •

Parent concerns

are addressed at the school level and should be discussed with the building principal prior to moving to the Central Office for assistance.

Staff Central Office • Division initiatives and directives are communicated to schools, departments and the community via a centraliized process to ensure consistency of the message.

• The Superintendent is the chief executive and serves as the bridge between the school’s administration and the school board.

• Make recommendations to the school board to ensure the effecive and efficient operation of the school system School Board • Establish policies for the effective operation of the school division.

• Work cooperatively to ensure that the system has the appropriate resources to meet the needs of students.

Superintendent

ADVISORY STRUCTURE

• Cabinet • Senior Leadership • Administrative Staff • All Division Employees SUPERINTENDENT Division Advisory Committees • Teacher • Support Staff • Parent • Student • CTE • Gifted • Exceptional Children's • Title I • Technology Content Focused Advisory SCHOOL BOARD • Ad-hoc Committees as needed

INSTRUCTIONAL SUPPORT

English Language Arts K-5 - T. Barnes 6-12 – R. Alexander Mathematics K-5 – C. Bobbitt 6-12 – J. Curtis Literacy Coaches Math Coaches 27 - ELA Contacts 1 Content Lead from Each School 27 - Math Contacts 1 Content Lead from Each School

INSTRUCTIONAL SUPPORT

K-12 STEM Melissa Butts 27 - STEM 1 Content Lead from Each School K-12 Social Studies Chasity Lewis 27 – Social Studies Contacts 1 Content Lead from Each School

SCHOOL-BASED CURRICULUM CONTACT/ SUPPORT

Elementary Schools 16 - ELA 16 - Mathematics 16 - STEM 16 - Social Studies 16 - Resource (Music, PE, Art) 16 - EC 16 - Guidance 16 - Media Middle Schools 6 - Language Arts 6 - Mathematics 6 - STEM 6 - Social Studies 6 - Resource 6 - EC 6 - Guidance 6 Media High Schools 5 - English 5 - Mathematics 5 - STEM 5 - Social Studies 5 - Resource 5 - EC 5 Guidance 6 Media

EXPECTATIONS

8 - School-Based Content Subject Leads Each Paid a Stipend Selected By the Principal in consultation with the Educational Specialists for that area 10 Meetings 6 – School Based- (Sept/ Oct/ Dec/ Jan/ March/ April) 4 – County Meetings (August/ November/February/ May) Will serve as support team for Destination Innovation 2013 and Summer Curriculum Alignment

MEETING CALENDAR

EVENT School Board Meetings Aug 6 Sept 4 Oct 1 Nov 5 Dec 3 Jan 7 Feb 4 Mar April 4 1 May 6 June 3 School Board Work Sessions School Board Policy Committee Meetings (As needed) School Board Retreats 20 24 15 19 17 21 18 18 15 20 24 TBD TBD Executive Cabinet Meetings 8:30-10 6 13 20 10 17 24 1 8 15 22 29 15 5 12 19 26 3 17 7 14 28 4 11 18 25 4 11 18 25 1 8 15 22 29 15 6 13 20 27 District Leadership Team Meeting (Cabinet, Exec Dir, and Directors) 3 rd Monday 10:30 – 12:00 Administrative Staff Meetings*** TRC 20 1 & 2 Leadershi p Retreat 24 6 8:30 a.m.

4 8:30 a.m.

19 8 8:30 a.m.

17 7 8:30 a.m.

28 10 8:30 a.m.

18 7 8:30 a.m.

18 6 8:30 a.m.

17 8:30 a.m.

20 8 8:30 a.m.

Elementary Principal ‘s Roundtable Mtg w/ Exec Dir TRC Secondary Principal’s Roundtable Mtg w/ Exec Dir TRC New Principal PLC Instructional Staff Meetings ( Ed Spec/ Coaches) (Scheduled By Dr. Luper) Content Leaders Meeting w/ Ed Spec 6 1:00pm July 30 a.m.

4 8:30-10:30 TBD 20 6 1:00pm 4 1:00pm 4 1:00pm 19 TBD 8 1:00pm 8 1:00pm 7 1:00pm 10 1:00pm 7 1:00pm 10 1:00pm 23 7 1:00pm .

6 1:00pm 7 1:00pm 6 1:00pm 17 1:00pm 21 TBD 17 1:00pm .

8 1:00pm 8 8:30 a.m.

5 8:30 am

EVENT District Benchmarks Benchmark Data Reviews with CO Staff Mid-Year School Visits (See groupings on P4) Convocation*** Rocky Mount High Teacher Advisory Committee (Thurs After School Brd Mtg) Parent Advisory Committee Student Advisory Committee Principal Evaluation Goal Setting/Mid Year/Summative Probationary Teacher Evaluation Aug am 21 8:30 TBD Sept 13 13 26 11 a.m.

TBD Oct TBD Group 1 Group 2 4 Nov TBD 8 8 Continuing Contract Teacher Evaluation Dec Group 3 6 15

Formal Observations/Mi d-year Evaluation Report to HR

Mid-Year Formal Observations/Mi d-year Evaluation Report for teachers in need of improvement to HR

Classified Staff Evaluation Jan TBD 10 10 23 11 a.m.

TBD Feb TBD Group 1 7 TBD 15

Final Evaluation Report to HR

Mar Group 2 7 7 April TBD Group 3 4 23 11 a.m.

May TBD 9 9 14

Final Evaluation Report Due to HR

Dismissals Supporting

Summative Evaluation

June TBD

EVENT Evening of Academic Excellence *** Retirement Program *** Luncheon Teacher of the Year / Principal of the Year Presentation *** Rose Hill Conference Center Support Staff Recognition Picnic Aug Sept Oct Nov

pm 20 5:30

Volunteer Recognition*** Destination Innovation MANDATORY – ALL STAFF Commencement Programs*** (Elementary/Middle school principals should attend commencement at the feeder high school) Dec 2012-2013 Administrative Retreat *** Jan Feb Mar April May 30 6:30 June

14 Noon TBD

TBD 10-12 Commencement ECHS TRA JUNE 8 9:00 - RMHS 11:00 - NNHS 2:00 - NCHS 4:00 - SNHS 26-27

SCHOOL VISIT GROUPINGS

SCHOOL VISIT GROUPINGS

Group 1 October/ February Group 2 November /March Group 3 December/ April

Cedar Grove D.S. Johnson Spring Hope Swift Creek /Red Oak Williford Nash Central HS Parker MS Red Oak MS Benvenue Hubbard Middlesex Pope Winstead Ave Englewood Edwards MS Nash Central MS Rocky Mount HS Tar River Academy Bailey Baskerville Coopers Nashville N Nash HS S Nash Middle S Nash HS