National Electronic Injury Surveillance System (NEISS)

Download Report

Transcript National Electronic Injury Surveillance System (NEISS)

What Every Product Safety
Attorney Needs to Know
District of Columbia Bar CLE
April 11, 2005
Edward Heiden
Heiden Associates, Inc.
1
Major Topics Covered

Databases ( CPSC and other)
 Comparative Risk
 Product Recalls and Recall Effectiveness
 Case Studies
2
Data Bases Used by CPSC

NEISS (National Electronic Injury
Surveillance System)
 In-Depth Investigations (IDIs)
 Injury and Potential Incidents File
 Death Certificate File (DTHS)
 NFIRS
3
National Electronic Injury
Surveillance System (NEISS)

Statistically-weighted sample of 100
hospital emergency rooms
 National estimates of emergency room
visits for injuries associated with (not
caused) by consumer products/recreational
activities
 Available 1980-2005
 Major sample revisions in 1990,1997,1999
4
In-Depth Investigations (INDP)

Non-statistical reports on investigations of
incidents
 Individual case reports – no national
estimate
 Details of injury, demographics, extended
incident description
 Primary and secondary product involved
5
Injury and Potential Incidents
File (IPII)

News clips, complaints, MECAP reports,
referrals
 Non-statistical summaries
 New source of data: retailer reporting
(Walmart)
6
Death Certificate File (DTHS)

Info from medical examiners on fatalities
related to consumer products
 Overrated as a source
 Acknowledged to be incomplete
7
NFIRS

US Fire Administration
 National network of participating fire
departments
 Individual case records of fire incidents
8
Other Data Sources

National Vital Statistics System (NVSS)
 Occupational injuries and illnesses (BLS)
 Fatality Analysis Reporting System (FARS)
 NHTSA recalls
 Recreational Boating
9
Injury Estimates



Sample change effect in injury estimates
Time-trend conclusions: sample
differences affect what conclusions can be
drawn
Data analysis
Amusement Rides
ATVs
10
Comparative Risk
Sec 2 (b) of CPSA: “Purpose is to assist
consumers in evaluating the comparative
safety of products.”
 ATV memo: adjust for use patterns to get
more complete picture of “risk”.
 Importance of exposure to hazard
 Some samples of comparative risk data

11
Sample Consumer Notice
Not a “One-Notice Fits All”
 Identify program as a recall
 Incident and injury info
 State defect and hazard
 Toll-free number
 How to obtain remedy
 Convenience

12
Ruger “Blackhawk” Recall
Notice
Not a recall – “ a unique new improvement”
 No incident or injury information
 What is the defect ?
 Blames user for the problem
 No toll-free number
 Consumer has to pay shipping costs

13
Easy-Bake Mixes Recall
Notice

Found on Toys R Us website
 Manufacturers remedy information states
“should not be used if they have allergies.”
 FDA release states “run the risk of serious
or life-threatening allergic reaction”
14
Recall Effectiveness Studies

1978 CPSC Study
 1980 CPSC Study
 Murphy-Rubin Study “Determinants of
Recall Success Rates” (1983)
 Heiden Associates (2003)
15
2003 CPSC Study on Recall
Effectiveness

A large number of steps are required before
compliance with recall notice
 High degree of mobility of people and
products
 Overcoming “information overload”
16
2003 CPSC Study on Recall
Effectiveness

Role of color, lettering, signal words on
levels of perceived risk
 Inappropriate timing
 Selective screening and filtering
 Role of familiarity and experience
 What specific action is required ?
17
2003 CPSC Study on Recall
Effectiveness

Memory deterioration
 Traffic safety poster study
 Balancing of risks involved with product
 Risk perceptions precede the receipt of
recall message
 Hazard probability
18
2003 CPSC Study on Recall
Effectiveness
Adults overestimate children’s abilities and
underestimate risks to children in general
 Acceptable risk
 Consumers highly sensitive to costs of
participating in recall

19
Case Study: Ames True
Temper Wheelbarrow




647,000 units manufactured 1993-2000
Rims explode when tires inflated –severity
Recalled April 2002
Response limitations:




In use average 4 years
Small # incidents
Inconvenience of checking (outside)
Remedy: consumer has to request and install
20
Case Study: Ames True
Temper Wheelbarrow





More durable notices – expand store posters to
every retail outlet where sold. Publicize heavily at
store level
Personalized letters to gardening magazines and
gardening newspapers
Clickable banner ads
Incentive
Conclusion: Specialization increased returns
beyond expectations
21
Case Study: All Terrain
Vehicles

March 2005 Hearings on risks associated
with ATVs by children under 16.
 ATV injury and fatality risk stable on a pervehicle in use basis.
 ATV risks comparable to risks associated
with other recreational activities – look at
number of injuries per 100,000 participants
22
Case Study: All Terrain
Vehicles

CPSC data shows 92% ATV
accidents/fatalities involve at least one
warned against behavior
 Preliminary analysis suggests state laws can
have a meaningful effect in reducing ATV
injuries and fatalities involving children.
23