Family Resource Centres Seminar F2 Centre 4th February 2011
Download
Report
Transcript Family Resource Centres Seminar F2 Centre 4th February 2011
Family Resource Centres
Seminar F2 Centre
4th February 2011
Aiden Lloyd
Content
1. New realities
• Background context – economic, political, social
• Operational context – programmes, impact, limits
2. Responses
• Analyses - variety of schools of understanding
• Community sector resistance – power differential
• Realisation of limits of representative democracy - formation of social movement
3. Options
• Vacuum – community development and the democratic deficit
• FRC role – needs clarity - don’t wait to be asked !
• Positioning – possibilities to be proactive
Background/backdrop
• Economic – relearning economics – classic bubble –
investment driven – mix of sovereign debt and banks
debt - public finances out of kilter with tax take
• Political – fundamental weaknesses –post-colonial
issues, populist politics, weak local government, over
use of social partnership
• Social – did not use growth to address inequalities –
income differentials, health etc – rising poverty levels,
indebtedness - consistent poverty 5.5% (4.2% 2008): at
risk (median income)14.1% (2010 EUSILC)
Operational context
Programmes
• LCDP – incorporated CDPs, reduced social inclusion potential –
hovering close to local authorities
• FRC – shifted to CEGA - FSA survived ‘bonfire of the quangos’ – FRC
strategic role?
• National organisations – 21% cut – re-application under new
funding line
Impacts
• Capacity issues - SI weakened, participation diminished, will effect
status of target groups
Limits
• Overly directive, attempts to redefine community development as
services, focus on coalface. Positive is assembly of social justice
brief within single department
Analyses (back to the macro)
• ‘Flawed state’ – post colonial residue, centralised,
clientalism, corruption, disengagement of citizens
– at odds with republic – active citizen
• ‘Post independence pattern’ – nation building,
corruption, normalisation
• ‘Ultra capitalist’ – laissez faire – primacy of
market forces, deregulation at economic,
political, planning levels
• ‘Corporatist’ - social partnership, rule of elites,
carve up of benefits
Community sector responses
• Community development benefited from EU – growth,
alternative sources of funding and participative
mechanisms, new structures – EA, HRC, NCCRI, ADM
(Pobal) - inevitable conflict with centralised state
• Intermediaries collapsed, reduced, controlled
• Community sector vulnerable - greater funding
dependence
• CDPs etc unable to fight back (mechanisms were
crude). Now playing out with national organisations.
• Outcome is that independent sector barely exists
Rediscovery of civil society
• Became obvious that sector was powerless and
vulnerable – unable to resist or negotiate state
intentions – plus diminishing community
infrastructure
• Wider parallel concerns about government failure
to prioritise/maintain the needs of citizens or
create ‘the good society’
• Needed new organising concept, a set of values
and principles – civil society, equality & inclusion,
active participation
Is Feidir Linn
• 2007 small group - discuss lack of impact on equality differentials &
concerns that com sector being denied their advocacy role
• April 2008 – conference on funding and the strings attached –
deeper concerns emerged about type of society, lack of
participation and need for sector to get organised & be effective
• Organising group widened out, renamed and vision developed
• June 2009 conference – vision presented for comment/approval –
mandate to develop vision into priorities and to build alliances - a
social movement
• October 2010 Claiming our Future RDS. Organised in conjunction
with TUs, environmental pillar, TASC etc – agreement on policy
priorities – less clarity on way forward – some local activity
• Is Feidir Linn continues as think tank – developing positions on
various issues (see website)
Options
• There is a democratic deficit in the state – this has
become apparent - civil society helps fill that gap
• Vulnerability of sector - need to institutionalise
participation of civil society – community
development, NGOs, carers – needs to be inclusive of
advocacy role
• In Ireland community development approaches
historically rooted – CD: different roles at different
times
• There is a vacuum from the demise of the CDP and the
restructuring of Partnerships – many looking to FRC to
fill this function
Family Resource Centre Programme
• Clarity – services or social change role ? Are they
mutually exclusive?
• Service role – delivers where state cannot reach, may
be more efficient, more effective
• Community development role is mobilising people
towards social change – prompts societal change
• Service role also about identifying new needs and
carrying lessons into policy arena (e.g. of MABS)
• Positioning – possibilities to be proactive – lots of
policy gaps or opportunities in prospective government
programme
• Don’t wait to be asked !
Lessons from the CDP
• Lack of strategic direction – funding programme,
divested by CPA (no standards imposed, no conduit for
policy), role assumed by bureaucrats,
dispersed/incoherent management - Dept, NAC,
support agencies (e.g. policy role)
• Weaknesses of VBM – excluded statutory and others
(partnerships, etc)
• Skills deficits – no principles/standards imposed or
developed (shared with social inclusion programme)
• Governance issues – accountability to target groups, to
department (unfair since no real accountability
imposed – then used against them following a review)
Conclusions
• Profound and potentially catalytic moment in
development of state
• Many institutions subject to profound change – social
partnership, public service, role of community sector
etc
• Building a coherent civil society voice is fundamental
lesson from last few years
• Important that effective voice for excluded is
constructed out of deluge of cuts – direct funding
dependency is problematic – FSA as intermediary is key
• FRC role at strategic and local level needs teasing out
• Clarity will only come out of discussion !