ARL - North Carolina State University

Download Report

Transcript ARL - North Carolina State University

National Digital Information
Infrastructure and Preservation
Program (NDIIPP)
CNI Project Briefing
December 5, 2005
NDIIPP Elements
Preservation
Partners
Technical
Architecture
Research
www.digitalpreservation.gov
2
Lead Institutions for the 8 Partnerships
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
California Digital Library: Web political content
Emory University: MetaArchive of Southern digital culture
UC Santa Barbara: NGDA Geospatial Data
NC State University: Geospatial Data
U of Maryland: Dot.com business records
U of Michigan: DataPASS--Social science data
U of Illinois, OCLC, State & academic libraries, NCSA: State
government publications, among other content
• WNET/PBS: Digital television
(red=represented in today’s panel)
www.digitalpreservation.gov
3
Goals for the Partnerships
• Identify/select/collect content;
communicate strategies for doing so
• Probe intellectual property issues
• Collaborate broadly in developing a shared
technical architecture
• Study economic sustainability
• Identify and share best practices
• Learn how to build and incrementally
improve a preservation network
www.digitalpreservation.gov
4
Network of Networks
• LC pleased to see interconnections between
partners, other networks
• Some examples:
–
–
–
–
Association of Research Libraries
Digital Library Federation
Coalition for Networked Information
UK Joint Information Systems Committee
www.digitalpreservation.gov
5
Broad Categories of Challenges
• Technical
• Legal
• Social
• Economic
www.digitalpreservation.gov
6
MetaArchive Project
Emory Univ. & partners
• Distributed preservation network of six institutions
now deployed and functioning
• Conspectus database (based on UKOLN RSLP and
DCC) of all collections archived in the network of
nodes
• Now working on developing a long-term Cooperative
to support our network
• Negotiating many issues about organizational roles
and responsibilities in such a Cooperative
• Examining various organizational structures for the
Cooperative, including unincorporated association
for interim period of 1-2 years, and 501(c)(3) for
subsequent long term; now drafting interinstitutional contracts
www.digitalpreservation.gov
7
North Carolina Geospatial Data
Archiving Project
Project Goals
• Preservation of state and local geospatial data resources
• Engaging existing spatial data infrastructure
Emerging Challenges
• Rethinking content: not just data--also cartographic
representation and geospatial documents
• Technical challenges: handling complex objects in a
repository; spatial databases
• Engaging the industry: making the case for historic and
temporal data--gathering use cases
www.digitalpreservation.gov
8
UCSB—Geospatial Data: NGDA Overview
http://www.ngda.org
UCSB NGDA: FIRST YEAR PROGRESS
AND ISSUES
 Designed NGDA architecture; combination of new and available:
 Storage subsystem (Isilon, Archivas)
 Server to connect components and manage ingest
 Existing ADL as interface for access and federation
 Major challenge: Developing Geospatial Format Registry
 Collections issues in archiving geospatial imagery:
 Developing collection policies and provider contracts
 Definition of “at-risk” digital information
 Identifying good collections to test/prototype system:
• UCSB: 3 TB CaSIL data; Stanford: .5 TB, Rumsey Collection
 Major challenge: Multi-layered data environment and poorly
documented formats
 Team building challenges:
 People who understand mission and have technical skills
 Developing a common vocabulary
 Year Two goals:
 Web-accessible prototype for demonstration
 Economic sustainability models
 Collections (MODIS, Landsat, Shapefiles, DOQQ)
www.digitalpreservation.gov
10
ECHODepository: Illinois, OCLC,
State & Academic Libraries, NCSA
• Year 1 Accomplishments:
–
–
–
–
Selection rationale (Arizona Model)
OCLC Web Archiving Workbench Tools
Repository evaluation
Repository interoperability: Hub & spoke
model
– Partnership building: NCSA, CDL, others
• Challenges:
– Scalability & flexibility of software & storage
architectures
– Import/export commonalities: METS
www.digitalpreservation.gov
11
CDL:
Web
at
Risk
A Distributed Approach to Preserving our Nation’s Heritage
• Project Goal: develop a web-archiving service to
enable institutions to continue their historic
collection, management, and preservation roles.
• Collection Challenges: web-based events (Katrina)
– The nature of events on the web
– Technical and social issues
– Selection, collection & classification
– Balancing rights and acquisition needs
– Understanding information retrieval
www.digitalpreservation.gov
12
Michigan: Data Preservation Alliance
for the Social Sciences (DataPASS)
• Goals:
– Build Partnership to Identify and preserve
at-risk digital social science content
– Successful creation of a database of
content
• What have we learned?
– Identification/selection daunting
– Technology challenging
– Aided by social science metadata
standards
– Building a partnership very useful
www.digitalpreservation.gov
13
Emerging Issues
• Natural tension between collaboration and
tradition of institution-specific approaches
• Much interest in joint infrastructure, but
developing shared services will take time
• Existing preservation methods are being
stretched
• Balancing a focus on project goals while also
considering lots of interesting ideas
www.digitalpreservation.gov
14
Learning and Incremental Development
• We need to get broad feedback and
continue learning
• Still no “silver bullet” solution to digital
preservation
• NDIIPP considering all viable approaches,
working toward gradual development of
decentralized, interoperable architecture
• Our partners are modeling this approach
www.digitalpreservation.gov
15
Contact Information:
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
LOC: William Lefurgy
CDL: Patricia Cruse
Emory: Martin Halbert
Illinois: Beth Sandore
Michigan: Myron Gutmann
NC State: Steven Morris
UCSB: Sarah Pritchard
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
www.digitalpreservation.gov
16