Transcript Slide 1

2003 – 2008 Analysis of
TAKS Results
Data by Student Groups
1
2008 Accountability Ratings for NEISD
RATING
HIGH
MIDDLE
ELEM.
TOTAL
EXEMPLARY
1
3
15
19
31%
RECOGNIZED
1
4
23
28
45%
ACCEPTABLE
5
6
4
15
24%
ACADEMICALLY
UNACCEPTABLE
0
0
0
0
0%
7
13
42
62
100%
28.6%
53.8%
90.5%
75.8%
TOTAL
EXEMPLARY/RECOGNIZED
2
Major Highlights
75% of all NEISD Campuses rated
Exemplary or Recognized
More than 90% of Elementary Campuses
are rated Exemplary or Recognized
27% Increase in Exemplary campuses
Once again, NEISD has more Exemplary
campuses than any other district in Bexar
County
3
Major Highlights
2008 TAKS passing rates increased in
every subject for every student group
Marked improvement in Science for
African Americans (+13%),
Hispanic(+11%), and Economic
Disadvantaged (13%)
4
Are There Gaps in Student
Achievement?
5
Equity and Excellence for
All Students
NO GAPS
All Hispanic
All White
All African American
All Economically Disadvantaged
All Special Education Students
All Limited English Proficient (LEP)
6
Core Beliefs
– All children are capable of high levels of
academic success;
– Academic success equitably includes all
student groups;
– Adults in schools are primarily
responsible;
– Traditional school practices result in
inequity and must be changed.
7
Process of Finding the Gaps
• Look at current year results and compare them
to prior years
– Disaggregate by student groups
– Close attention to ethnic groups and special
populations
– Use a variety of tabular and graphic formats
• Look at our progress in closing gaps over time
• Examine within and across ethnic groups and
special populations to determine the extent of
gaps
8
2008 District Accountability Rating
9
10
% = % Pass
All = Total
W=White
H =Hispanic
AA = Afr. American
ED=Eco. Disadvantaged
High Schools
What are educationally important differences - District ± 3%
11
TAKS Reading/ELA
Achievement GAPS:2003 - 2008
100
90
80
African American
Hispanic
White
Eco. Disadvantaged
District
70
60
50
40
African American
Hispanic
White
Eco. Disadvantaged
District % Pass
2003
-11
-7
6
-12
83
2004
-9
-5
6
-9
87
2005
-5
-4
5
-8
89
2006
-4
-3
4
-6
93
2007
-4
-3
3
-6
94
2008
-3
-2
3
-4
95
30
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
12
TAKS Writing
Achievement Gaps: 2003 - 2008
100
90
80
African American
Hispanic
White
Eco. Disadvantaged
District
70
60
50
40
African American
Hispanic
White
Eco. Disadvantaged
District % Pass
2003
-8
-5
6
-11
86
2004
-6
-2
2
-4
93
2005
-5
-2
2
-4
94
2006
-3
-2
2
-4
96
2007
-4
-1
2
-3
95
2008
-2
-2
1
-4
97
13
30
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
TAKS Social Studies
Achievement GAPS: 2003 - 2008
100
90
80
African American
Hispanic
White
Eco. Disadvantage
District
70
60
50
40
African American
Hispanic
White
Eco. Disadvantaged
District % Pass
2003
-8
-7
5
-10
86
2004
-7
-5
4
-10
92
2005
-5
-4
4
-8
92
2006
-5
-3
4
-6
94
2007
-2
-2
3
-5
95
2008
-3
-1
3
-4
96
14
30
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
TAKS Science
Achievement Gaps: 2003 - 2008
100
90
80
African American
Hispanic
White
Eco. Disadvantage
District
70
60
50
40
African American
Hispanic
White
Eco. Disadvantaged
District % Pass
2003
-19
-14
12
-20
55
2004
-16
-12
11
-19
72
2005
-17
-11
11
-18
76
2006
-8
-9
9
-13
84
2007
-12
-9
9
-14
83
2008
-11
-7
8
-12
85
15
30
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
TAKS Math
Achievement Gaps: 2003 - 2008
100
90
80
African American
Hispanic
White
Eco. Disadvantaged
District
70
60
50
40
30
African American
Hispanic
White
Eco. Disadvantaged
District % Pass
2003
2004
2003
-18
-10
10
-14
68
2004
-16
-8
9
-13
75
2005
2005
-15
-7
9
-12
79
2006
2006
-13
-6
7
-10
84
2007
2007
-12
-6
8
-10
84
2008
-11
-5
6
-9
87
2008
16
2008 TAKS MATH GAP ANALYSIS
BY ETHNICITY AND ECONOMIC DISADVANTAGED
100%
95%
90%
MET STANDARD
11
85%
14
11
80%
75%
ECO DIS
NOT ECO
DISTRICT
13
70%
65%
60%
AFR. AMER.
HISPANIC
WHITE
MATH
TOTAL
17
2008 TAKS MATH GAP ANALYSIS
BY ETHNICITY AND ECONOMIC DISADVANTAGED
100%
95%
4
90%
MET STANDARD
-4
-10
85%
ECO DIS
80%
NOT ECO
DISTRICT
75%
70%
65%
60%
AFR. AMER.
HISPANIC
WHITE
TOTAL
MATH
18
2008 TAKS MATH GAP ANALYSIS
BY ETHNICITY AND ECONOMIC DISADVANTAGED
100%
95%
MET STANDARD
90%
85%
ECO DIS
80%
NOT ECO
7
DISTRICT
-1
75%
-9
70%
65%
60%
AFR. AMER.
HISPANIC
WHITE
TOTAL
MATH
19
2008 TAKS MATHEMATICS GAP ANALYSIS
BY SCHOOL TYPE BY ETHNICITY AND ECONOMIC DISADVANTAGE
100%
95%
90%
80%
ECO DIS
NOT ECO
DISTRICT
75%
70%
65%
60%
ES
MS
TOTAL
WHITE
HISPANIC
AFR.
AMER.
TOTAL
WHITE
HISPANIC
AFR.
AMER.
TOTAL
WHITE
HISPANIC
55%
AFR.
AMER.
MET STANDARD
85%
HS
MATHEMATICS
20
Bottom Line
• It is not about the gaps. Our goal is to
make certain each and every child
receives a quality education and is
prepared for college and workforce
readiness.
NEISD
Where Every Child Is Prepared for the Future
21
The End
22
HARDY
OAK
ROAN
FOREST
#
#
#
WILDERNESS
OAK
CANYON
RIDGE
# #
STONE
OAK
#
HUEBNER
OAK#
MEADOW
#
HARMONY
HILLS
LARKSPUR
#
#
COKER
WEST OLMOS
AVENUE
BULVERDE
CREEK
1604
#
#
WOODSTONE
EL #
DORADO
OAK
ROYAL
GROVE
CLEAR
# RIDGE
# SPRING
#
RIDGEVIEW
#
#
NORTHERN
#
#
WETMORE HILLS
#
CASTLE
HILLS
COLONIAL #
JACKSON
HILLS #
KELLER
#
DELLVIEW#
#
ENCINO
PARK
STEUBING
THOUSAND
RANCH
#
OAKS
#
LONGS
REDLAND
#
#
# OAKS
CREEK
FOX
#
STAHL RUN
HIDDEN
FOREST
#
Preliminary 2008 AEIS
Accountability Ratings:
Elementary School
REGENCY # SERNA
PLACE
#
#
NORTHWOOD
WILSHIRE #
WINDCREST
#
#
CAMELOT
WALZEM
#
E TERRELL
HILLS
#
MONTGOMERY
#
Exemplary
Recognized
23
Acceptable
Preliminary 2008 AEIS
Accountability Ratings:
Middle School
LOPEZ
#
#
#
TEJEDA
BUSH
1604
#
#
HARRIS
BRADLEY
#
#
DRISCOLL
WOOD
EISENHOWER
#
KRUEGER
JACKSON
GARNER
#
#
NIMITZ
#
#
#
WHITE
Exemplary
Recognized
24
Acceptable
Preliminary 2008 AEIS
Accountability Ratings:
High School
MAC TEMP 2
#
MAC TEMP 1
REAGAN
#
1604
#
MADISON
CHURCHILL
#
#
MACARTHUR
ROOSEVELT
#
LEE
#
Exemplary
Recognized
Note: ISA is Exemplary
25
Acceptable