Transcript Slide 1
Ealing Children’s Trust: CYPP Priorities May 2010 Commissioning Support Programme • DH / DCSF programme for all Children’s Trusts in England: – To support a sustainable improvement in strategic commissioning, as well as building capacity within the system in order to improve outcomes for children and young people locally. – To work in partnership with the sector to bring about organisational change to improve effectiveness of commissioning. – To provide a vehicle to share good practice across Children’s Trusts. Purpose of this session • Recap on findings from previous work with the Board. • Review priorities and establish a clear vision for each outcome. • Identify measures of success, resources, issues which need to be addressed and any actions which need to be taken to start to develop the CYPP and deliver against key priorities. 3 But first… 4 National picture… there may be Trouble ahead… 10 years of increased spend Rising public expectation Increase in demand 10% to 30% budget cuts What does this mean? • Business as usual? • Some local authorities, PCTs etc have already begun to implement efficiency agendas. • Turbulent times will test partnership arrangements and agencies will need to ensure strong commitment to be able to deliver better outcomes for children and young people. • Developing better commissioning practice across Trusts can support agencies make some of the tough decisions ahead and enable them to still meet their priorities. What’s happening in Ealing? 6 Complicated by… • • • • • • • • • Leaders often set efficiency targets through input-based salami slicing rather than outcome-based commissioning approaches Reducing headcount in local services often paralyses an organisation Capacity and capability across central and local government to achieve efficiency savings at the same time as improving outcomes is limited Across government there is a lack of commercial skills, or these are not drawn into commissioning Small Children's Trusts must collaborate with others to manage the market and secure the best deals Non statutory services such as early intervention and prevention are often the first target for savings Children's Trust partners under financial pressure may become insular Efficiency savings through commissioning require a thorough understanding of resources, costs, needs and outcomes Providers are vulnerable to turbulent markets and reduced cash flow How can we make it work…? • Strengthen partnership arrangements. • Define principles on which arrangements will work, services will be commissioned etc. • Identify clear strategic priorities. • Establish frameworks which set out how services will be commissioned. • Understand levels of risk across agencies. • Look at ‘whole system’ resources and embed good practice across the Trust. 8 Commissioning Cycles How can Commissioning Help? ‘Commissioning is the process for deciding how to use the total resource available for children, young people and parents and carers in order to improve outcomes in the most efficient, effective, equitable and sustainable way.’ Future Efficiencies – Resources • • Understanding the resources available and disaggregating budgets Making best use of all resources including finance, workforce, providers and the market place, buildings, the community and co-production with families e.g. How many buildings are used to improve children’s outcomes – are these in the right configuration? • e.g. Parents deliver more outcomes than any other part of the system – do we have the right support to maximise this co-production? • Future Efficiencies – Targeting • • • Targeting the right point in a child or young person’s pathway to ensure that universal and specialist resource is used most efficiently and effectively, e.g. through early intervention Targeting the population that is most in need, narrowing the gap, and ensuring resources are not wasted on those that do not need help e.g. In one local area 70% of looked after children came from 26 families over a 10 year period – how could we target and use that resource better? Developing the CYPP Making it work in uncertain times 13 Sustainable Community Strategy Local Strategic Partnership Effective Children’s Trust Board leadership, governance, accountability and joint working to drive local CYP priorities JSNA aligned with SCS and feeding into CYPP needs assessment Children and Young People’s Plan Needs assessment using data in JSNA and engagement of children, young people and families to inform CYPP and the design, commissioning and delivery of services linking to partner plans and driving down to aligned operational plans developed within the Children’s Trust partnership Commissioning arrangements that build on the strengths of NHS, education and third sector commissioning and linking them to joint arrangements through the CYPP Service delivery through a workforce with the right skills and capacity, focused on prevention and early intervention to improve outcomes Inspection and assurance systems to help drive improvements in quality and outcomes Strategies and Plans What do you want to achieve in the whole local area, for the whole population? What do you want to achieve for Children, Young People and their Families? What are the priorities? What are the high-level resources? How are you going to run the commissioning function? What is the overall approach, rules of the game, process and principles? How are you going to meet the intentions and priorities set out in the Children and Young People’s Plan, using the Commissioning Framework? Children and Young People’s Plan • The Children and Young People’s Plan (CYPP) is the agreed joint strategy of partners in the Children’s Trust on how they will co-operate to improve children’s well-being. • The CYPP is the master plan for commissioners – it informs all commissioning strategies. • Although the scope of the new CYPP includes all services that affect children and young people’s well-being, it is not necessary or desirable for the Plan to include a list of everything each of the partners do. The CYPP More than just a document… • It should detail the level of resourcing available across partners to deliver the desired outcomes. • Should show how partners on the Board intend to increase the efficiency and effectiveness through better use of resources. • It should make clear the arrangements for safeguarding children and young people and early intervention and prevention. • It should include a workforce strategy, co-ordinating children and young people services with adult services, how the Board intends to reduce and mitigate the effects of child poverty and improve the behaviour and attendance at school. 17 Benefits to using the CYPP • Alignment of priorities with other partners through the planning process • Demonstrate contribution of wide ranging services across the local authority e.g. adults services, housing, community safety • Demonstrate contribution of wide ranging services across Children’s Trust partners • Supported by a strong governance framework it can help ensure partners are accountable • May help to identify efficiencies and encourage commitment to achieving better outcomes across diverse agencies Where we’ve got to and next steps… • Initial workshop (Jan 10) with key stakeholders to support the JSNA process and identify existing evidence, gaps in evidence and areas for further development. • Detailed session with Children’s Trust Board (Feb 10) to look at the priority areas which Ealing need to focus upon, identify which ones are most important and work through the implications for commissioning. • Today’s session designed to work up detail. 19 The vision: Outcomes and priorities • In groups, review each outcome: – 10 minutes presentation from ‘outcome-holder’ detailing vision for delivering the priorities. – 5 minutes for questions of clarity from the group. – Group discusses the outcome and vision and provides suggestions for taking this forward and confirming language. 20 Planning for success… • Consider: • What would success look like? How will you know you have achieved it? • What does current provision look like? What works well? What needs to change? • What resources do we have which could be allocated, reallocated or redesigned to deliver these outcomes? 21 Planning for success (2)… • What things are hindering us from addressing these priorities? • What can we do to address these? • Where can we achieve better value by working together? • Will focussing on this/these priorities mean we can achieve better value for money? • When do we need to achieve these changes by? 22 Next steps • Report to the CT Board. • Developing stronger commissioning arrangements. • Specific actions…? 23