Transcript Slide 1

Common Assessment Framework
The way things used to be:
Universal
Healthcare
PCT
CAMHS
YOT
Connexions
Social
Services
EWS
LEA special
educational
needs
Universal
Education
All Other
Agencies
Healthcare
Staff
Health
Visitor
Child
Psychologist
Youth
Offending
Team
Connexions
PA
Social
workers
Educ.
Welfare
Officers
SENCO &
Educational
psychologists
Education
Staff
All Other
Practitioners
Risks to
parents
Conduct
Disorder
ASSET
APIR
Children
in Need
At Risk
Register
Statement
of SEN
= agency
= practitioner
= assessment
Background to Integrated Working
Lord Laming’s enquiry in 2003 into the
tragic death of Victoria Climbié identified
fault lines in the system:
•
•
•
•
•
Interventions only when the family’s situation got critical
Support sequential & intermittent
Poor communication between agencies
Little integration of services
Weak supervision & accountability
The Vision
Children & Young People’s Board
Birmingham Children & Young People’s Plan
PCT &
Acute
Health
Housing
CAMHS
Healthcare
Staff
Local
services
CAMHS
MDT
Information Sharing
Guidance
Integrated
Front-Line
Service
Delivery
YOT /
YISP
Connexions
Specialist
services
Youth
Offending
Team
Connexions
PA
Social
workers
Common Assessment
Framework
Youth &
Play
Service
Youth &
Play
Workers
Lead Practitioner
Children’s
Centres
Extended
Schools
Integrated Youth
Support
Safeguarding
Children’s
NSF
Youth crime
Reduction
LEA
Inclusion
Services
Universal
Education
Voluntary
SENCO, Ed
psychologist
EWO’s etc
Education
Staff
All Other
Practitioners
Service Directory
Outcomes
for
children &
young
people
Orgs
Background of CAF
Published alongside the formal
Every Child Matters: Green paper, 2003
response to the report into the
death of Victoria Climbié, the
young girl who was horrifically
abused, tortured,
andChildren
eventually
Published;
then The
Act
Every Child Matters: The Next Steps
killed bypassed,
her greatproviding
aunt and the
2004
man
with whom
legislative
spinethey
forlived.
developing
more effective and accessible
services focused around the needs
Section 10: Duty to Co-operate to
The Children Act, 2004
of children, young people and
improve well-being
families.
Section 11: Safeguarding and
promoting welfare of children
National framework for local
Every Child Matters: Change for Children
change programmes… shifting the
focus from dealing with the
consequences of difficulties in
children(s)
to preventing
Birminghamlives
Children’s
Plan
Other Acts, Programmes, Policiesthings from going wrong in the
first place.
Aim of Every Child Matters
Every Child Matters is a new approach to the well-being of
children and young people from birth to age 19.
The Government's aim is for every child, whatever their
background or their circumstances, to have the support
they need to:
be healthy
Make
a
Contribution
Achieve
Economic
Well-Being
Enjoy
&Positive
Achieve
Be Healthy
Stay
Safe
stay
safe
Safe
from
neglect,
violence
&
sexual
exploitation;
Engage
inmaltreatment,
law-abiding
in
&& out
of school
 Ready
FE;
ready
forbehaviour
employment
for
school,
attend
& enjoy
school
Physically,
mentally,
emotionally
sexually
healthy
enjoy
achieve
accidental
injuryand
& death
Develop
positive
relationships
 Live
in decent
homes/sustainable
communities
Achieve
national
educational
standards
make
a
positive
contribution
 Safe
from bullying
& discrimination, crime & anti-social behaviour
Healthy
lifestyles
Develop
self confidence
&development
deal
with life &changes
 Live
in households
from
low-income
achieve
economic
well-being
Achieve
personal
&free
social
enjoy recreation
 Safe from crime & anti-social behaviour in & out of school
 Have security/stability & are cared for
Common Assessment Framework
Standard assessment can be used by all agencies
working with children/young people
CAF – Process
CAF – Assessment
 Integrated working
 Child/young person focused
 Engagement of parents
/young people
 -9mths to 19yrs (25yrs with
….disabilities or care leavers)
 Information Sharing
 Based on consent
 Transparent
 Holistic: multi-agency
…response
 Link to statutory assessments
Promoting
Children’s
Well-being
in
Birmingham
The CAF as part of a continuum
Common
Assessment
Framework
undertaken
Referral for
Statutory Assessment
Pre-CAF Checklist
&
consider CAF Assessment
CHILD
Safeguard
& Promoting
welfare
FAMILY & ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS
Go straight to level 4 as soon as risk of significant harm suspected
I = Identification and action
T = Transition
N = Needs met
CAF Stages
Pre Assessment Checklist
Identify need
CAF
Complete assessment with Child/Family
Gain consent for information sharing
Integrated Support Plan
Meeting with practitioners and family
Lead Practitioner allocated
Review
Meeting with practitioners and family
Review progress on ISP
Evaluation
Family and Lead Practitioner evaluations
CAF or Not to CAF
CAF can be used with any unborn baby, new baby, child or
young person who has additional, unmet needs
It does not need to be done with everyone
CAF is NOT child protection – where these concerns exist
BSCB procedures should be followed
Common assessment is likely to
be of help when:
•
•
Age appropriate progress is not
being made and causes are
unclear
The support of more than one
agency is needed
Common assessment need not
be done where:
•
Progress is satisfactorily
•
Needs are already identified
and are being met
•
Needs are clear and can be
met by the family or by the
assessing agency
CAF Case Study
Monica has recently arrived in Birmingham
from Southampton. She is a single mother
with four children; two boys of 13 and 3 yrs
and two girls of 14 and 18 months. The children
have no contact with their father who is currently
in Prison.
Monica is keen to start a new life in Birmingham but is concerned
that she has left behind her extended social support network.
Monica has been engaged in a substitute prescribing programme for
the past 15 years and Southampton CDT has made arrangement for
her treatment to be transferred to Aston CDT.
It is hoped that once settled she will be able to receive her
treatment through the GP that she has recently registered with as
they are part of the Shared Care Scheme.
CAF Case Study
As part of her transfer arrangements the Drug Worker at Aston CDT has
undertaken a reassessment and devised a care plan to support Monica’s
move to Birmingham. Monica is very proud of her children and is keen
to support them in settling in Birmingham.
She discloses to the Drug Worker that she
is worried that the 3 yr old boy is not
talking very well and relies on his older
brothers & sisters to communicate for him.
She also mentions that one of the reasons that
she has left Southampton is that her 13 yr old son was getting involved
with the ‘wrong crowd’ and that he has been very quiet since his Dad
went to prison. She is concerned because he has already had a fixed
term exclusion from school for ‘violent outbursts’.
What are the Drug Workers next steps………..
Adult Services & the
Common Assessment Framework
Concern about the child or young person
of an Parent/Carer engaging with an Adult Service
No
No further action, but
continue to
monitor situation
Yes
Child or Young Person
at risk of harm
Follow your
Agencies
safeguarding
procedures
Yes
No
Pre-assessment completed
by Adult Service & sent to
appropriate agency
Pre-assessment reviewed by Agency
Single agency
Response
Multi-agency
Response with CAF
Referral to Specialist Services
(Child Protection)
Felt to be
At risk
1st Integrated Support Plan Meeting.
Adult Service to attend to:
• Clarify role of Adult Service
• Establish client confidentiality
• Contribute to ISP
ISP Review Meetings.
Adult Service to submit report using
CAF documentation
If Parent withdraw from
Adult Service or treatment ends
ISP Review Meetings.
Child or
Young Person
at risk of harm
CAF Episode Ends
No
Yes
CAF Case Study: Action Plan
18 month & 3 year old
• Ineed2know.org.uk
search for local
Children’s Centre
13 year old boy
• Pre-assessment checklist:
•
•
•
•
•
•
Signpost Mum/phone call to
Centre
• Social network for Mum
• Mum’s & Toddlers Group
• Day nursery Provision
• 1st stage Speech & Language
(SLT)
Referral on to Specialist SLT
14 year old girl
Referral to Connexions
Anger management
Trauma of Dad’s arrest
Not settling to area
Behaviour at school
Social isolation
Potential pre-criminalised
Sent to School
Children’s Services next steps:
•
•
•
•
•
After school activities
Counselling
Anger Management
PAYP – YISP
Connexions
CAF Process