Transcript Slide 1

New Oakville Hospital
www.infrastructureontario.ca
1
Project Overview
Project Name:
New Oakville Hospital
Scope:
Project Includes:
New facility: Will accommodate diagnostic and treatment facilities, ambulatory care
facilities, rehabilitation and complex continuing care facilities as well as a variety of
support departments.
Location: Will be located on a 50 acre new hospital greenfield development at Dundas
Street and Third Line in Oakville, Ontario.
Total Beds: 457 bed facility that will evolve over time to accommodate 704 beds.
Parking: There will be surface parking as well as a covered parking structure to
accommodate visitor, staff, physician, volunteer, student and supplier/consultant
parking.
Building Type:
Main Building: 8-10 storey tower, and several 2-4 storey wings, Roof Top Mechanical
Penthouse one level below grade.
Parking Structure: 2 to 4 story, on grade concrete structure.
Project Type:
Greenfield
Sq. Ft.
Total Building approximately 1,629,695 Building Gross Floor Area.
www.infrastructureontario.ca
2
RFP Transaction Timeline
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
RFP Issued May 31, 2010
RFP Closed February 25, 2011
Credit Spread Lock In received on April 15, 2011.
Evaluation of RFP Submissions March 8 to April 29, 2011
Preferred Proponent Notification June 2, 2011
Commercial Close July 26, 2011
Financial Close July 29, 2011
Approval Obtained:
• IO Board approval May 19, 2011
• HHS Board approval June 10, 2011
• MOHLTC Funding Approval Letter issued July 15, 2011
www.infrastructureontario.ca
3
Proponents
•
Proposals were submitted in response to the RFP by three pre-qualified proponents.
Proposals were received from:
Consortium
Development
Design
Construction
FM Operations
Financial
Advisor
Hospital
Infrastructure
Partners
Carillion Canada
EllisDon Corp.
Fengate Capital
Parkin Architects
in Joint Venture
with Adamson
Ass. Architects
EllisDon Corp.
Carillion Canada
Honeywell Ltd.
Fengate Capital
Management
Ltd.
Community Health
Consortium
Lend Lease
Canada
Acciona
Aecon
Kasian
Architecture
Aecon Buidlings
Acciona
Lend Lease
Canada
Dalkia Canada
Investec North
America Ltd.
Plenary Health
Plenary Group,
Innisfree
B+H+STH, Joint
Venture
Architects
PCL
Construction
Canada
Johnson
Controls
RBC Capital
Markets
www.infrastructureontario.ca
4
Evaluation Reporting Structure
Project Sponsors
Project
Sponsors
Halton Healthcare
WCH
Services (HHS)
Infrastructure
Infrastructure
Ontario
Ontario
Subject Matter Experts
Evaluation
Committee
• Design Compliance Consultant
• Facilities Management Advisor
IO Project
Manager
• Legal Advisors
• Equipment Specialist
• Financial Advisors
• Transaction Process Advisor
Fairness
Monitor
Evaluation
Coordinators
• Insurance Advisor
• HHS Designated Advisors
Conflict Review
Team
• OHC Advisors
Completeness and Legal
Evaluation Team
Technical Evaluation
Team
Technical Construction
Sub group
www.infrastructureontario.ca
Design
Evaluation
Design
Evaluation
Team
Team
Financial
Evaluation
Financial
Evaluation
Team
Team
Technical Operations
Sub group
5
Evaluation Committee Structure
• The Evaluation Committee and Evaluation Teams were
composed of equal representatives from:
- Infrastructure Ontario (IO)
- Halton Healthcare Services (HHS)
• The Evaluation Teams were supported by various technical
advisors/subject matter experts:
• The Evaluation process was monitored by a Fairness Advisor
www.infrastructureontario.ca
6
Evaluation Scoring
Evaluation Categories
A. TECHNICAL SUBMISSION
Maximum
500
1.0 Project Management and Construction Plan
55
2.0 Works Schedule
15
3.0 Equipment Procurement and Coordination Plan
20
4.0 Transition and Commissioning Plan
25
5.0 Operations Plan
150
6.0 Design Submission
235
B. FINANCIAL SUBMISSION
500
1.0 Net Present Value
450
2.0 Quality of Proposed Financing Plan
50
SUSTAINABLE ENERGY INNOVATION (Bonus point)
Maximum Points Available
www.infrastructureontario.ca
30
1030
7
Design Submission Evaluation Criteria

Includes Evaluation of:
6.1 Project Vision and Guiding Principles and Objectives
6.2 Clinical Functionality, including Infection Prevention and Control
6.3 General Functionality, including Accessibility and Safety/Security
6.4 Design Quality, including Environmental of Wellness
6.5 Sustainability, including Flexibility / Adaptability / Expansion
6.6 Technical Building Quality
The quality of the design was important to HHS and this was demonstrated by the
high weighting the Design Submission had on the overall Technical Score. The high
weighting and the categories helped focused the team on delivering a high quality yet
affordable solution
www.infrastructureontario.ca
8
Proponent Design Submissions
www.infrastructureontario.ca
9
Illustrative Design
The Illustrative Design:
– Represented a compliant design with approved clinical functionality and program
layout. The design and layout was endorsed by Clinical and Management User
Groups of Halton Healthcare Services (HHS). It was however open to innovation
by Proponents.
www.infrastructureontario.ca
10
Innovation in DBFM projects
• Much time is spent discussing risk transfer in generating value for money.
• Less time, but of at least as much importance is the value of design innovation
in generating value for money and real savings.
• Under a stipulated sum or Build-Finance project, all proponents are bidding to
the same design so bid prices are not likely to vary greatly.
• Under a DBFM, three different designs can generate significantly different
construction prices.
• A Proponent who submits an efficient and optimized design can:
-significantly reduce their construction costs since they can efficiently utilize building
materials and labour.
- With a smaller BGSF there is less building to maintain and repair from a lifecycle
perspective.
- Also, a lower construction cost means a lower capital cost and consequently lower
financing costs.
www.infrastructureontario.ca
11