Transcript Document
TAXES AND THE ELECTION 2012 15 October 2012 Len Burman Syracuse University Policy Context • Expiration of Bush Tax Cuts and Temporary Stimulus Measures (The fiscal cliff) • Weak economy • Tax revenues at lowest level since Truman Administration • Tax code is complex, unfair, and inefficient • Corporate tax rates high and base is porous • Rising economic inequality • Existential threat created by the “lucky duckies” The Bush-Obama Tax Cuts • Rates cut: • top rate from 39.6% to 35%; new 10% bracket • Repealed PEP and Pease • Marriage penalty relief • $1,000 child credit/larger dependent credit • Estate tax repeal in 2010 • 15% rate on capital gains/dividends • Higher IRA/pension limits • Saver’s credit • Education incentives • AMT patches +Stimulus Tax Cuts • American Opportunity Tax Credit • Larger EITC for 3+ kids • Payroll tax cut • Temporary business tax breaks • [R&E credit and other “extenders”] It all turns back into a pumpkin at the end of 2012 Historical Outlays and Receipts 50 45 40 Outlays 35 30 25 20 15 10 Receipt 5 0 1930 1935 1940 1945 1950 1955 1960 1965 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 Source: Office of Management and Budget, Historical Tables, 2012. http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/budget/Historicals 2010 Deficit Projections, 2010-21, in $billions Including Effect of Budget Proposals 1,400 9.0% of GDP 8.8% Obama Budget Baseline 4.7% 1,200 4.6% 6.6% 4.5% 5.0% 1,000 4.5% 4.3% 2017 2018 4.7% 5.2% 4.4% 800 600 400 200 0 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Source: Office of Management and Budget, Midsession Review 2012. 2016 2019 2020 2021 9 Ratio of Workers to Retirees Primary Spending as % of GDP, with and without Excess Health Costs, 2062-2080 10 11 Combined Federal, State, and Local Corporate Tax Rate in OECD Countries, 2011 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 Source : 2011 OECD Tax Database Tax as Percent of GDP, OECD Countries, 2007 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Source: OECD, 2009, Revenue Statistics 13 What is the AMT? Value and Number of Tax Expenditures 10 250 8 200 7 6 150 5 4 100 3 2 50 1 0 0 Source: For tax expenditures as percent of GDP, GAO analysis of OMB, Analytical Perspectives, Budget of the United States Government, Fiscal Years 1985-2011; for count of provisions, Joint Committee on Taxation (annual tax expenditure compilations), and authors’ calculations. Number of Provisions (dashed) Value as Percent of GDP (solid) 9 10 Largest Tax Expenditures, FY2013 In Billions of Dollars Provision Amount 1 Exclusion for employer-sponsored health insurance 294.3 2 Mortgage interest deduction 100.9 3 401(k) plans 72.7 4 Lower rate on capital gains 62.0 5 EITC 55.7 6 Pensions 52.3 7 State and local tax deduction (excluding property tax) 46.3 8 Tax deferral for multi-nationals 41.8 9 Child tax credit 40.8 10 Charity deduction (other than education, health) 39.8 Source: US Budget, Analytical Perspectives, FY2013, and author’s calculations Note: Health insurance estimate includes $113.7 billion payroll tax expenditure; EITC and child tax credit include outlays of $52.6 and $22.4 billion, respectively 16 Inequality is Growing: Income Shares of Top 1% and Top 0.1%, 1913-2010 25 20 15 Top 1% 10 5 Top 0.1% 0 1910 1920 1930 1940 1950 1960 Source: Picketty and Saez, http://elsa.berkeley.edu/~saez/TabFig2010.xls. 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 Top Income Shares in Selected Countries, in Percent, 1949 vs. 2005 20 18 United States leads the pack in 2005 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 Around 1949 Around 2005 0 Tony Atkinson, Thomas Piketty, and Emmanuel Saez, "Top Incomes in the Long Run of History" , Journal of Economic Literature, 49(1), 2011, 3-71. 18 Taxes and the Safety Net • And the existential threat to our democracy created by the “lucky duckies” 19 Tax Credits Have Become an Important Part of the Social Safety Net Program Amount in 2009, $Billions Medicaid 392 SSI 47 TANF 29 SNAP 55 Housing 41 EITC 49 CTC 44 Source: Jim Ziliak, “Recent Developments in Antipoverty Policies in the United States,” IRP 1395-11, 2011; and Budget of the United States, Analytical Perspectives, FY2011. Note: Tax credits include effect on both outlays and receipts. Real Federal Spending on EITC, CTC and Welfare: 1975-2009 70 60 Earned Income Tax Credit 50 Billions of 2009 40 Child Tax Credit 30 AFDC/TANF 20 10 0 Source: Budget of the United States Government, Fiscal Year 2012 for AFDC/TANF; Internal Revenue Service Statistics of Income , various years for EITC and CTC; Bureau of Labour Statistics for CPI Deflator. Effect of Various Components on Poverty Rate For Kids and All Households, in Percent, 2010 4 3 Under 18 All 2 1 0 -1 -2 -3 -4 -5 EITC SNAP Housing subsidy School lunch WIC LIHEAP Source: Census Bureau Note: Poverty rate is the “supplemental poverty measure.” Child support Federal income tax FICA Work expense MOOP 22 Mitt Romney and the “47Percent” “There are 47 percent of the people who will vote for the president no matter what. All right, there are 47 percent who are with him, who are dependent upon government, who believe that they are victims, who believe the government has a responsibility to care for them, who believe that they are entitled to health care, to food, to housing, to you-name-it. That that's an entitlement. And the government should give it to them. And they will vote for this president no matter what…These are people who pay no income tax.” -- Mitt Romney, May 17, 2012, Boca Raton, FL WSJ: “Lucky Duckies” “Who are these lucky duckies? They are the beneficiaries of tax policies that have expanded the personal exemption and standard deduction and targeted certain voter groups by introducing a welter of tax credits for things like child care and education. When these escape hatches are figured against income, the result is either a zero liability or a liability that represents a tiny percentage of income. The 1986 tax reform, for example, with its giant increase in the personal exemption and standard deduction, took six to seven million people off the tax rolls. “This complicated system of progressivity and targeted rewards is creating a nation of two different tax-paying classes: those who pay a lot and those who pay very little. And as fewer and fewer people are responsible for paying more and more of all taxes, the constituency for tax cutting, much less for tax reform, is eroding. Workers who pay little or no taxes can hardly be expected to care about tax relief for everybody else. They are also that much more detached from recognizing the costs of government.” Source: “The Non-Taxpaying Class” (editorial), Wall Street Journal, November 20, 2002. Who are the Lucky Duckies? Households who don’t pay income tax, 2011 Others 1% 7% Nonelderly, Income < $20K Elderly 10% Don't Owe Income Tax Owe Income Tax 54% Owe Payroll Tax 28% Source: http://www.taxpolicycenter.org/taxtopics/federal-taxes-households.cfm. Some Statistics About Households that Pay Neither Income Nor Payroll Tax • More than half are elderly • Over one-third are nonelderly with income under $20,000 • Only about 1 in 20 is nonelderly with income over $20,000 Source: Tax Policy Center Income and Payroll Tax as Percent of Income by Income Group, 2011 25 20 15 10 5 Income Tax Payroll Tax 0 -5 -10 Lowest Second Middle Fourth Top Quintile Quintile Quintile Quintile Quintile Source: Tax Policy Center, table T11-0099 80-90 90-95 95-99 Top 1 Top 0.1 Percent Percent Percentage of Taxpayers Who Pay More Payroll Tax than Income Tax, by Income Group, 2011 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Lowest Second Middle Fourth Top Quintile Quintile Quintile Quintile Quintile 80-90 90-95 95-99 Top 1 Top 0.1 Percent Percent Source: Tax Policy Center, Table T11-0192. Note: Chart shows statistics for tax units that pay at least some income or payroll tax. Thus, it excludes most elderly households. Payroll tax includes only employee share. Solution • More tax cuts? • Especially for the rich? • Or… the “Buffett Rule?” • And new AMT for multinationals? • Welcome to campaign 2012! President Obama’s Tax Plan • Extend most Bush tax cuts • Top two rates revert to 36% and 39.6% • Restore PEP and Pease • Gains and dividends taxed at 20% • Limit the value of itemized deductions to 28% • Index the AMT • Tax carried interest • Buffett Rule Obama (continued) • Extend AOTC • Extend and increase CDCTC • Extend EITC increase for 3+ kids • Restore Estate and gift tax to 2009 levels Obama (continued) • Reduce the corporate income tax rate from 35% to 28% • 25% for Manufacturing • Eliminate tax loopholes and subsidies • Establish a new minimum tax on foreign earnings • Expand, simplify, and make permanent the R & E Tax Credit • Allow small businesses to expense up to $1 million in investments • Double the deduction for start-up costs Mitt Romney’s Tax Plan • Make permanent the 2001-03 tax cuts • Cut all individual income tax rates 20% • 35% becomes 28%; 10% becomes 8% • Repeal the estate tax and the AMT • Keep gift tax with a max rate of 35% • Eliminate investment income taxation for low- and middle- income taxpayers • Allow the 2009 stimulus act tax provisions to expire • Pay for by eliminating tax expenditures and economic growth Romney (continued) • Reduce top corporate income tax rate from 35% to 25% • Make the research and experimentation credit permanent • Extend expensing of capital expenditures for one year • Grant a “tax holiday” for repatriation of corporate profits of foreign subsidiaries • Implement a territorial system Average Tax Cut in 2015 From the Specified Parts of Gov. Romney's Tax Plan, by Income 300,000 250,000 200,000 150,000 100,000 50,000 0 Less than 10 10-20 20-30 30-40 40-50 50-75 75-100 Income in $1,000 Source: Tax Policy Center, table T12-0040. 100-200 200-500 500-1,000 More than 1,000 Average Tax Change in 2015 from Eliminating Unspecified Loopholes and Deductions, by Income ? 0 Less than 10 10-20 20-30 30-40 40-50 50-75 Income in $1,000 Source: Romney campaign 75-100 100-200 200-500 500-1,000 More than 1,000 Change in Tax by Income Group Under President Obama's Proposal, 2013 400,000 350,000 300,000 Dollars 250,000 200,000 150,000 100,000 50,000 0 Lowest Quintile Second Quintile Middle Quintile Fourth Quintile Source: Tax Policy Center, table T12-0152 Top Quintile 80-90 90-95 95-99 Top 1 Percent Top 0.1 Percent