Transcript Slide 1

Optical Alignment
with
Computer Generated Holograms
James H. Burge, Rene Zehnder, Chunyu Zhao
College of Optical Sciences
Steward Observatory
University of Arizona
Computer Generated Holograms
• Use diffraction to create a desired wavefront
• Modern fabrication provides >100 mm patterns with
<0.1 µm pixels. That’s > 1012 pixels! Incredible
dynamic range
Accuracy and flexibility
• CGHs transform wavefronts with very high accuracy
Errors are typically < l/100
• Any wavefront shape can be created
No special solution for spheres
• Multiple wavefronts can be created from the same
CGH
• The registration between the different wavefronts is
also very accurate
CGH for interferometric
measurement of aspheric surfaces
• Interferometers use light to measure to ~1 nm surface
errors, for spherical or flat surfaces
• CGH can change spherical wavefronts to aspheric,
allowing the use of interferometers for measuring
aspheric surfaces
Spherical
wavefront
aspherical
wavefront
Interferometer
CGH
Aspheric surface to
be measured
Alignment of CGH
• Reflect wavefront back into the
interferometer
• Use this to align the CGH to
the wavefront
Spherical
wavefront
Interferometer
Reflection
CGH
CGH for aligning the
aspheric mirror
• Use numerous holograms on a single substrate to
provide both wavefront and alignment information.
• For alignment, the CGH can project bright crosshair
patterns
CGH for testing off axis parabola
A single substrate provides:
- reference for interferometer
- null lens for aspheric surface
- creates 5 reference marks, 4 around edge, 1 on optical axis
CGH alignment for testing off axis parabola
CGH alignment of a 24-in off axis parabola
(600-in ROC, 60 inches off axis)
Phase map
l/20 rms
CGH null lens incorporates alignment marks
Easily align axis to 0.020” by eye
Projection of fiducial marks
•
•
The positions of the crosshairs can be controlled to micron accuracy
The patterns are well defined and can be found using a CCD
•
Measured pattern at 15 meters from CGH. Central lobe is about 100
µm FWHM
Use of CGH for optical alignment
Aligning the test for a 1.7-m off axis parabola
50 cm spherical mirror
aligned within 7m
CGH
aligned within 7m
1.7m diameter OAP
Projecting alignment marks through
other optics
Aligning test for a 1.7-m off axis parabola
Tilted
spherical
mirror
CGH
Relay Lens
We need to place the OAP to the right place
• Projecting a mark onto the OAP gives lateral
position
• Need a second mark to get the clocking right
Clocking mark
Positioning mark
Creating desired alignment features
Aligning the OAP
Use of CGHs for optical alignment
Aligning the Sphere to within 7m
The position of the sphere is known
if 3 points on its surface are known
Use of CGHs for optical alignment
Aligning the Sphere to within 7m
Placing a ball concentric
to zero order gives a
very good reference
Distance between
balls can be measured
with metering rods
Lateral position of the ball
defined by light
Axial position defined by
metering rod
CGH
Attaching the mirror to three balls defines its position
The fourth ball gives redundant information
Alignment of tooling balls to light created by CGH
Beam with ball at focus well aligned
Use tooling balls because
they provide good
mechanical interface
Very sensitive to lateral
motion of the ball but not
for axial motion
Misaligned ball cases return beam to shift
Ball alignment tool
1. Align a tool to the projected beam
2. Use the tool to laterally align the ball
CCD
Sensitivity comes from the geometry
Ball Alignment Tool
CCD camera
Ball at mirror
Aperture
Beam splitter
Direction of
the reference
beam
~2 µm resolution
Use of CGHs for optical alignment
Metering rods in action
Multiple patterns
We use multiple patterns of the same substrate
• Divide the regions on the CGH. Each has a
single pattern
• Derive a single pattern the gives simultaneous
wavefronts
Single pattern, creating four 1st order
references
Pattern that projects spots to 4 different distances
Peak intensities along the z axis
Relative peak intensity at different propagation distances
100
90
Relative peak intensity [%]
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
a)
c) Peak at z=720mm
d) Peak at z=1080mm
0
500
1000
1500
Propagation distance [mm]
e) Peak at z=1440mm
2000
2500
b)
f) Peak at z=1790 mm
a) Binary Phase-only amplitude multiplexed CGH b) Relative peak intensities
at different propagation distances from the CGH. Relative to the maximum
peak intensity c),d)e)f) spot shapes at desired distances. All these are
simulated results.
Single CGH with multiple references
CGH creating multiple wavefronts
Position sensing
detector
Conclusion
• CGHs are probably the most accurate and
flexible things in optics
• Whatever your problem is, you can probably
solve it with a CGH.