Transcript Slide 1

Late Breaking Developments
Final IRC §§ 430 and 436 Regulations
Thomas G. Vicente, FSA, EA
November 19, 2009
1
Topics for Discussion
 Final §430/436 regulations
 Forthcoming IRS guidance
 Funding relief legislation
 Other issues
2
Final §430/436 Regulations
 Final regulations released October 7, 2009
 Published on October 15, 2009
 Effective for plan years beginning on or after January 1,
2010
3
Scope of Final §430 Regulations
 Address:
– Assets, Liabilities under PPA
– Carryover and Prefunding balances
 Do not address:
– Minimum Required Contributions (MRCs)
– Quarterly contributions
– Hybrid plans
4
Key Points in Final §430 Regs
 PFB additions
 Interest rate elections
 Asset method elections
 Standing elections permitted (but not for quarterlies)
 Revoking certain elections
 Allocation of benefits
 Reflect some 436 limits in valuation
 Mid Year Amendments
 UCEB’s
 At-Risk rules
5
Final §436 Regulations
 Key changes & clarifications from proposed regulations:
– Range certification extends deadline
– CBA status
– Restrictions on terminated plans
– ASD’s and options for participant elections
– 417(e) rules application to bifurcated benefits
– Presumptive AFTAP’s
– Changes to AFTAP’s (Material and Immaterial)
– Treatment of plan amendments
6
Final §430/436 Regulations
 Similar to proposed regulations in many areas, but some
surprises
– And still some ambiguity!
7
2008 & 2009 Reasonable Compliance
 IRS Notice 2008-21 “reasonable interpretation” of §430
or §436 – good for 2008!
 March 2009 Special Edition employee plans news –
good for 2009!
 So, 2008 and 2009 approaches can generally stay in
place until the beginning of the 2010 plan year
8
Final §430 Regulations
 Key changes from proposed regulations:
– Interest rate and asset method method elections
– Funding balance elections
– Allocation of benefits that are not a function of accrued benefit or
service
– Reflection of §436 benefit limitations
– Reflection of mid-year plan amendments
– Rules for at-risk plans
– Reflection of UCE benefits
9
Final §436 Regulations
 Key changes from proposed regulations:
– Range certification extends deadline of final cert.
– Exception for terminated plans
– Requirements on updating certifications
– ASDs and options for participant elections
– 417(e) rules application to bifurcated benefits
– Treatment of plan amendments
– CBA status
10
Automatic Approvals for Method Changes
 2008 FM changes automatically approved
 2010 FM changes (to comply with these final regs) are
automatically approved
– Alternatively, earlier automatic approval (2009 or even 2008 is still open)
– but then, automatic approval would not be available in 2010
 Two automatic approvals in three years
11
Interest Rate Elections
 Initial elections in 2008 do not require approval
 2009 and 2010 elections are automatically approved (so
your 2009 elections are not locked in)!
12
Interest Rate Elections (cont.)
 For 2010 forward
 Standard is segment rates with no lookback
– any alternate requires Plan Sponsor’s written election to EA
 Segment rates with lookback or yield curve are alternates
– segment rates allow up to a 4 month look back
 No lookback allowed with yield curve! (2010+).
– e.g. calendar year plan would use December yield curve data published in
January
 Can elect alternate without approval (e.g., can elect yield curve if
used segment rates in 2010)
– But changing back to segment rates again will require approval
13
Interest Change Examples
 Use full yield curve in 2009
 Use segment rates in 2010 with look-back
 2011 options
– Full yield curve – no approval needed
– Segment rates with different look-back – approval needed
14
Asset Method Elections
 Change in asset valuation method for 2008, 2009 or
2010 is automatically approved!
 The automatic approvals are only for the first plan year
beginning in each calendar year
15
Asset Method Elections
 Final regulations provide automatic approval for changes
in asset method for:
– First plan year beginning in 2009
– First plan year beginning in 2010
 Regulations also clarify treatment of spin-offs and
asset/liability transfers in calculating value of plan assets
– Treat as plan distribution or contribution
16
Changes to Target Normal Cost
 Plan-related expenses expected to be paid from the plan - include in
TNC
 Mandatory employee contributions that are expected to be made
during the year- reduce TNC
 No provision defining expenses for purposes of TNC
– Investment expenses?
– To be addressed by IRS in a future proposed regulation
– Consistent with Asset Smoothing approach?
 Effective for plan years beginning on or after December 31, 2008
 Elective for plan years beginning in 2008
17
Benefits Taken Into Account in FT and TNC
 Rules for allocating benefits to FT and TNC for benefits based on
either accrued benefits or service (or both)
– follows benefit formula
– unchanged from proposed regs
 Rules for benefits not based on accrued benefit or service
– proposed regs said to allocate over years to eligibility
– final regs - allocate over years to payable event given decrements (value x
service now/service at event)
– e.g., Temporary Social Security Supplement of $500 per month
 Certain plan formulas may be handled by a combination of the
above 2 rules
– e.g., Disability benefit based on projected service at NRD
18
Reflecting §436 Limitations in FT and TNC
 Proposed rules- could not reflect 436 issues in valuation
 Final rules
– UCEB’s - reflect iff due to event which occurred before the valuation
date
– Mid Year Plan Amendments -if an increase in TNC (due to amendment)
were included in FT would cause 436 restrictions to apply, then MUST
reflect amendment in FT and TNC for that year.
– Prohibited payments (i.e. restricted benefits)- take 436 benefit
restrictions into account iff annuity starting date (ASD) is on or before
valuation date
– Limitations on Benefit Accruals- FT must reflect any limitation on benefit
accruals under §436(e) applicable before the valuation date. Exception
for automatic restoration of benefit accruals. TNC must not take §436(e)
limits into account. Thus, do not reflect freeze unless plan is specifically
amended to cease accruals.
19
Reflecting Other Limitations in FT and TNC
 Iff occurred before valuation date:
– Liquidity Shortfalls (must take into account restrictions on payments for
periods preceding the valuation date)
– High-25 Restricted Employees (reflect restriction on payments iff ASD
prior to valuation date)
20
Change to FTAP
 For plans with no funding target
– If the Funding Target (FT) for a plan is zero, then the FTAP is equal to
100% of the plan
21
Range Certifications
 Due date for final AFTAP certification delayed to last day
of plan year if range certification provided on time
– Plan year certification still due by first day of 10th month of plan year
– If final not provided by the end of the year, AFTAP retroactively deemed
to be < 60% as of the first day of the 10th month of the plan year
 Additional “less than 60%” range certification added, so
4 ranges available
– Less than 60%
– 60% or higher (but less than 80%)
– 80% or higher
– 100% or higher
22
Presumed AFTAP: 10% Reduction
 Reduction made for all plans based on the prior year
AFTAP falling in the range of 80% to 90% or 60 to 70%
 Reduction applied to presumed AFTAP at the beginning
of the year
– AFTAP adjusted for automatic waiver of credit balance per Example 2 in
1.436-1(g)
• If bft restrictions could apply, automatic waiver applied if would avoid
restriction
• For collectively bargained plans, automatic waiver also applied if would allow
amendment, payment of UCEB’s, or continued accrual of benefits
– Reduction applied even though restrictions had been in place in the
prior year (per the example, but not per the presumption section)
23
Presumed AFTAP: Deemed Waivers
 Example for Calendar year plan with 77% AFTAP at 1/09
– 1/1/09 Assets = $3,110,000
– 1/1/09 COB = $110,000
– 1/1/09 FT = $3,896,104
 Presumed 1/1/10 AFTAP = 77%
– 1/1/10 Assets = $3,600,000
– 1/1/10 COB = $137,500 (based on 25% market return in 2009)
– 1/1/10 Presumed FT = $4,496,753 (($3,600,000 - $137,500)/.77)
– Deemed COB burn of $134,903 to get to 80% AFTAP
– 1/1/10 COB = $2,597
– AFTAP = 80% and no benefit restrictions apply at 1/1
24
Material Change to AFTAP
 A change in AFTAP for a plan year can be a “material
change” even if the only impact of the change occurs in
the following plan year under the presumed AFTAP
 No specific example of how this might apply
25
“Possible” Example?
 Calendar year plan year
 Events:
– 9/30/2009: 2009 certification issued at 85%
– 4/1/2009: 2010 AFTAP presumed to be 75%
– 5/1/2010: 2009 certification revised to 92%
 Results in a ‘material change’
26
“Immaterial Changes”
 Additional ctrb’s for prior plan year
 Election to reduce credit balance or apply credit balance
to offset prior plan year's MRC
 Change in funding method or actuarial assumptions, if it
required actual approval of the Commissioner (vs.
deemed approval)
 UCEB’s which are permitted to be paid because the
employer makes the associated §436 contribution
 UCEB’s which are permitted to be paid because the EA
determines that increase in FT attributable to occurrence
of the UCEB would not cause AFTAP to be < 60%
27
More “Immaterial Changes”
 Plan amendment which takes effect because the
employer makes the §436 contribution and the
amendment had not been taken into account in the
certification of the AFTAP
 Plan amendment which takes effect because
– EA determines that the increase in the FT attributable to amendment
would not cause the AFTAP to be < 80%, and
– Amendment had not been taken into account in the certification of the
AFTAP
 EA must timely recertify AFTAP after one of these events
occurs for change to be deemed immaterial
28
Reflecting Plan Amendments
 Extensive additions on how to handle plan amendments
that address
– Recertifying to reflect, and
– §436 contributions made to allow them
 Similar rules apply for UCEB’s and frozen accruals
 When is Amendment tested?
– Regulations do not refer to ‘effective’ date or ‘adoption’ date
– Plan operation is the apparent trigger
– ASPPA Q&A’s – Asked about corrective amendment such as cash
balance “jail” situation. Response = year adopted creates legal right.
29
Example: Inclusive Presumed AFTAP &
Plan Amendment
 Calendar year plan to be amended 5/1/2010 to increase benefits
 2009 AFTAP = 88%
 1/1/10 Assets = $2,000,000 and 1/1/10 AFT not yet calculated (2010
EIR also unknown)
 Presumed AFTAP at 4/1/10 = 78% (and presumptive AFT =
2,000,000/.78 = $2,564,103)
 Increase in AFT due to amendment = $400,000, so sponsor must
contribute this amount (adjusted for interest at highest segment rate,
since EIR unknown) as §436 contribution (not towards MRC)
 Inclusive Presumed AFTAP = 81% after ctrb made
 After EIR calculated, excess §436 ctrb due to interest converted to
§430 ctrb for CYR
30
New Certifications After Amendment
 Required if
– Starting from AFTAP 80% or more, or
– Would be material change if not for new exceptions
 Optional if
– Starting from an AFTAP < 80%, or
– Actuary determines AFTAP will not drop below 80% with amendment
taken into account
• However could have material change triggered in succeeding year if AFTAP
would drop from above 90% to below 90%
31
Timing of AFTAP Certifications
 Is it legitimate for plan administrator to ask EA not to
issue AFTAP certification until 10/1 so as to delay
implementation of benefit restrictions?
– Is this acceptable for the plan administrator?
– Should the actuary warn the plan administrator?
– Should the actuary comply with the plan administrator’s instructions?
32
Timing of AFTAP Certifications
 Requested delay is a possible violation of duty of impartiality
 Actuary is not a fiduciary but may be exercising fiduciary powers when
making discretionary decisions that affect payment of benefits
 PPA does not require that certifications be made by any specific time
 Deliberate delay may put PBGC at risk and potentially harms the
participants who do NOT take lump sums
– Issue will become live when underfunded plan terminates and PBGC refuses
to pay lump sums
33
Timing of AFTAP Certifications
 Academy’s Pension Committee issued guidance note in September 2009
 Final regulations do not address timing issues
– May be the subject of future proposed regulations
– IRS, Treasury and DOL will discuss whether issuing an AFTAP certification is
fiduciary act or strictly ministerial function
34
Contribution Deduction Timing
Can employer claim prior year tax deduction for grace-period contributions
reported on current year’s Schedule SB (tax year = plan year)?
–
–
–
Some authority for claiming deduction
•
Regs. §1.404(a)-14(d)(2)(ii) and §11.412(c)-12
•
Rev. Rul. 77-82
•
PLRs/TAMs 7945115, 8210014 (TAM 200604040 revoked for contributions for hours worked in
current tax year), 8714008
Current IRS ruling position apparently ties deduction to reporting on prior year Schedule
B/SB
•
Rev. Rul. 76-28 (plan must treat contribution as if actually received on last day of employer’s tax
year)
•
PLRs/TAMs 199935062, 200311036, 200523033, 200526022
How to apply when tax year ≠ plan year?
35
Contribution Deduction Timing
Pre-PPA – No Big Deal
–
Amend prior year’s Schedule B to report all
contributions deducted in prior year
–
Use resulting credit balance to cover
current year quarterlies
–
Negligible interest charges for late
quarterlies
Post-PPA – Big Deal!
– Denied deduction means taxes underpaid or
late quarterlies (if contributions moved to prior
year on amended Schedule SB)
– Credit balance complications
• Written elections with fixed deadlines
required to create or use
• Must be 80% funded to use
• Deemed waivers
– 5% additional interest
36
Pension Benefit Statements
 When do you need to have the pension benefit statements issued?
12/31/09? Sometime in 2010? When? Does it matter what the “as of” date
is?
– DOL notice indicates statements must be “for” 2009
– If statements are “as of” 12/31/08 or 1/1/09 it would not be reasonable to delay
issuance until 2010.
 Will there be a frozen plan waiver?
 What is expected in the description of permitted disparity.
37
Forthcoming IRS Guidance
IRS guidance is anticipated on a number of other
issues in the coming months:
– Final regulations on hybrid plans, with separate proposed regulations
on market rate of return rules
– Guidance on PPA §1107 amendment rules
• What §411(d)(6) relief will be available?
– Final regulations on determining MRC and quarterlies under PPA
38
Forthcoming IRS Guidance (cont’d)
IRS guidance is anticipated on a number of other
issues in the coming months:
– Proposed regulations on WRERA funding issues (e.g., asset
smoothing and plan-related expenses)
– Proposed regulations on mergers and spinoffs
– Guidance on §414(x) plans
39
Funding Relief Legislation
On June 24, 2009, the House Education and Labor
Committee approved the 401(k) Fair Disclosure and
Pension Security Act (H.R. 2989)
Includes certain DB funding provisions:
– Extended amortization period for funding shortfalls arising during 2008
and 2009
– Clarification of “plan-related expenses”
– Change to PBGC §4010 reporting threshold
40
Funding Relief Legislation
In August 2009, Rep. Earl Pomeroy also introduced
draft funding relief legislation
– Similar to H.R. 2989 in some ways, with some additional provisions
(e.g., temporary expansion of asset corridor)
Next step is likely a markup of H.R. 2989 by House
Ways and Means Committee
But outlook for funding relief is uncertain
– Congress is focused on health care reform
41
Other Issues
IRS guidance on 2010 retirement plan limits–no
reduction from 2009!
Academy practice notes on AFTAP certifications and
mortality assumptions
Joint Board proposed CE regulations
SEC decisions on IFRS convergence
IASB Exposure Draft on potential changes to IAS 19
42
Questions?
43