Transcript Slide 1
Writing the Literature Review
Lourdes Villarreal, Ph.D.
Writing Center Claremont Graduate University
Presentation Outline
Questions to Consider Resources Professor/Department /School Resources Expert librarians/library materials Writing Center Handbooks Strategies Reading Critically Taking Notes Sample of Published Literature Review Article Guiding questions and paragraph samples Lourdes Villarreal
2
Questions to Consider
Professor’s Guidelines given?
Method selected to take notes of readings?
Understanding of empirical studies?
Understanding of format and data to include in review?
Understanding of summarization, analysis, and evaluation skills needed?
Lourdes Villarreal
3
Resources Professor’s Guidelines
Your professor is the best resource. See the next slide for an example from Professor’s Smith’s Edu 462 at Claremont Graduate University (taken many years ago; numbering and color emphasis mine). Lourdes Villarreal
4
Example of Professor’s Guidelines
1.
The review should include the identification of central works, 2. the overall contribution of this issue …, 3. strengths and weaknesses of the literature in the area, and 4. practical implications to be drawn. Note: The focus should be on reviewing the literature as opposed to simply a paper on the topic.
Lourdes Villarreal
5
Literature Review, not a Research Paper
What is a literature review?
A critical examination of the research that has been done in a particular field or on a particular subject
Using Professor Smith’s guidelines, a critical examination includes
identification of central works, the
overall contribution, strengths and weaknesses, and practical implications.
Lourdes Villarreal
6
Resources School/Department
Still not sure how to write the review?
See the School of Educational Studies’ video entitled Literature Review Workshop with Professor Daryl Smith or go to http://web.cgu.edu/media/ed/DarylSmithNov 08.mp4
Lourdes Villarreal
7
Resources
Need more help?
Library
Get to know the librarians (the people with expertise in your field/discipline). From the Honnold Mudd Library homepage, under contact a librarian, you’ll find http://libguides.libraries.claremont.edu/kimberlyfranklin Locate sources available through the library. From Contact us, under Directory of Specialists, choose “Education” and then “Articles.” You will find a section entitled “Literature Reviews.” http://libguides.libraries.claremont.edu/content.php?pid= 54808&sid=401373 Lourdes Villarreal
8
Resources CGU Writing Center
Resources listed on Webpage http://www.cgu.edu/pages/726.asp
Other literature review materials http://www.cgu.edu/pages/775.asp
Appointments for individual assistance Lourdes Villarreal
9
Resources Handbooks
Need step-by-step guidance?
Feak, C. B. & Swales, J. M. (2009).
Telling a research story: Writing a literature review
. University of Michigan: The University of Michigan Press.
Galvan, J. L. (2006).
Writing literature reviews: A guide for students of the social and behavioral sciences
(3 rd .). Glendale, CA: Pyrczak.
Pan, M.L., & Lopez, M. (2004).
Preparing literature reviews: Qualitative and quantitative approaches
(2 nd ed.). Glendale, CA: Pvrczak Pub.
Lourdes Villarreal
10
Strategizing Reading with a Purpose
Among the purposes of writing a literature review one is to test your abilities as a researcher. In other words, as you read, you, the scholar, will A. Become well versed in the research conducted in the field and / or your subject B. Be able to recognize the work of others Know who’s who in the field C. Be selective of the sources used Scholarly & Peer-reviewed
Lourdes Villarreal
11
Strategizing Reading Critically
Reading critically means being engaged with the text: Preview: What information does the abstract provide? How it is organized? What are the different sections in an empirical study? What’s the purpose of the introduction?
Read Actively: Annotate, highlight Develop a note-taking system (note cards; charts; Excel sheets) Take notes as you read or after you read Know when to stop reading and begin writing your review
12
Lourdes Villarreal
Researchers R Q
Note-taking Sample
Purpose Sample Method Findings Other
Boylan, H.R.
Boylan, H. R. & Saxon, D. P.
Higbee, J. L.
McCabe, R. H.
Villarreal, M.L .
Lourdes Villarreal
13
Strategizing Reading
Read as many literature reviews as you can looking for patterns (note how they are written in your field); note the expressions and terminology used
Look for other terms used to mean “literature review,” like past or previous research
Lourdes Villarreal
14
Critical Thinking Skills
A critical examination involves summarization as well as analysis and evaluation.
Summary: Restating key ideas: What is the issue or problem? What is the research question and purpose? Who did what (methodology)? What was the sample? What were the major findings? Analysis: Examining the parts of the whole: How can the data be classified/sorted/categorized? What are the trends? Similarities/differences in results, variables examined?
Evaluation: Making judgments: What does it all mean? What is missing? What was not considered? Limitations? Contributions?
Lourdes Villarreal
15
Summary, Analysis, & Evaluation
Summary and Analysis (sorting and comparing) X, Y, and Z scholars found that … Summary and Analysis (sorting and comparing) Most studies on developmental education are quantitative.
Critique (evaluation of what you found): More qualitative studies are needed to understand students’ perspectives.
16
Lourdes Villarreal
Literature Sample: Asian Pacific Students
Lew, J. W., Chang, J. C., & Wang, W. W. (2005). UCLA community college review: The overlooked minority: Asian Pacific American Students at community colleges.
Community College Review,33 (2), 64-82.
Note: Dr. Jonathan Lew is a graduate of CGU! I use the article as an example of how to set up the introduction of a literature review. I use guiding questions to point out the key aspects.
Lourdes Villarreal
17
Guiding Questions: Lew, Chang, & Wang (2005)
What information do the authors give you in the first three paragraphs?
What population are they examining?
Why this population?
What do the researchers propose to do? How is the review organized? What are the themes?
Why is their work significant/important?
18
Lourdes Villarreal
What the Title Tells Us
Title:
UCLA community college review: The overlooked minority: Asian Pacific American Students at community colleges.
What is the purpose of title?
What is the topic/issue to be reviewed?
What is the argument?
Lourdes Villarreal
19
Guiding Questions: 1
st
Paragraph of Introduction (next slide)
What is the topic/issued to be reviewed?
Why is past and current research on the topic/issue presented?
What is the argument that the authors present?
Why do the authors conclude the paragraph wih the percentage of Asian Pacific American students at community colleges?
20
Lourdes Villarreal
First Paragraph Over the last several decades ,
Asian Pacific American (APA) students
have captured
public
and
scholarly attention
for their increasingly visible presence in the halls of
academia
.
Most
of that attention has been focused on either
supporting or debunking the widespread portrayal
of Asian Pacific Americans as a
model minority-hard-working
and academically successful students who attend the most selective colleges and universities in the country.
However,
in the news media and in
higher education research
, a significant subset of the APA student population
has largely been overlooked
: APA students at the nation's community colleges.
Over 40%
of all APA students enrolled in higher education in the United States attend community colleges, and in 2000-2001, Asian Pacific Americans made up
15%
of all students enrolled in two-year institutions (Harvey, 2003).
Lourdes Villarreal
21
Review of 1
st
Paragraph
First Paragraph Presents General topic /issue to be reviewed Past and current research on the topic Gap in the literature Specific population to be examined Rationale for focus on specific population Lourdes Villarreal
22
Guiding Questions: 2 nd Paragraph (next slide)
Why do the authors present the enrollment patterns and degree completion of APA students at community colleges? How do the data help support their argument?
Lourdes Villarreal
23
Second Paragraph The
community college APA student population is a sizable force nationally and continues to grow
. From 1980 to 2000,
APA enrollment
at
two-year institutions
nationwide
increased 224%,
from approximately 124,000 to 402,000 students (Harvey, 2003). This
mirrored trends
in APA student enrollment in higher education overall, which
more than tripled
in the same time period. The number of
associate degrees
conferred upon APAs grew
229%
in those two decades, a larger increase than for any other racial group. In California, which has the largest APA population of any state, the proportion of APA students in community colleges
more than doubled
between the years of 1980 and 2000 (Wassmer, Moore, & Shulock, 2003).
Lourdes Villarreal
24
Review of 2
nd
Paragraph
Second Paragraph Presents Authors’ assertion (argument, claim) Data (statistics) to support their argument Lourdes Villarreal
25
Guiding Questions: 3rd Paragraph (next slide)
What is the focus of the review?
What is the order in which the review will be presented?
What is the scope of the review (narrow or broad) and why?
How will the review conclude?
Lourdes Villarreal
26
Third Paragraph
As these figures indicate , APA students
at
community colleges are a growing population that can no longer be ignored .
Therefore
,
this review will examine the characteristics and experiences of APA students at two year institutions, highlighting the heterogeneity of the population in relation to such factors as ethnicity, socioeconomic status, and immigrant background.
We
first describe
in more detail the demographics and diversity of this group. We
then identify and summarize
the research that specifically
focuses on APA students at community colleges
.
However, due to the scarcity of this scholarship
, we must look to the
broader literature
on
APA students education
in
higher
in order to highlight the various challenges that
APA students
face, although we point out the unique characteristics that
differentiate APA students at two-year colleges from those at four-year institutions
. In order to
address the needs of this overlooked minority
, this
article concludes
with implications for practice and recommendations for future research.
Lourdes Villarreal
27
Review of 3rd Paragraph
Third Paragraph Presents Restatement of assertion (argument, claim) Purpose of the review Identification of the themes/findings of the review Organization of the sections (see slides 28 & 29) Scope of the review (narrow & broad) and rationale Lourdes Villarreal
28
Deciding How to Organize the Review
Historical Analysis (how the subject has been written about in the literature)how a subject was being written about in the 50s may be very different than how it is written about in the 60s, 70s, 80s, etc.
Themes (variables, findings, sample, controversies, theories)
Methodology (research design: quantitative, qualitative, action research)
Lourdes Villarreal
29
Body of Lew, Chang, and Wang (2005) Review: Road map of
how paper was organized by themes
Demographics and Diversity of APA Students Studies on APA Students at Community Colleges
(scholars explain that the following section draws from a broader body of literature from 4-yr institutions)
Background Characteristics and Influences on Academic Achievement Immigrant Status and English Language Fluency Family Influence and Expectations Socioeconomic Status Model Minority Stereotype Identity Development Lourdes Villarreal
30
Conclusions and Recommendations of Lew, Chang, and Wang (2005) Review
Restates assertion (argument, claim) Highlights need for further research of undergraduate students Provides recommendations for community colleges Presents implications for future research and rationale of why research is important Lourdes Villarreal
31
Review & Final Remarks
Follow professor’s guidelines
Select a note-taking method
Understand how to read empirical studies
Know what data to include in review
Include summarization, analysis, and evaluation
Decide on an organizational structure
Lourdes Villarreal
32