Transcript Document

APA's Perspective on
Naughty Science
Gerald P. Koocher, PhD, ABPP
Dean, School of Health Sciences
Simmons College
www.ethicsresearch.com
August 8, 2008
American Psychological Association
Beyond FFP& DDD
•
•
•
•
•
•
Falsification
Fabrication
Plagiarism
Deception
Dehoaxing
Desensitization
American Psychological Association
FF&P:
• Fabrication/Falsification: Inventing data that
were never actually collected; altering data
that were collected; faking records;
unjustifiable data removal or treatment of
outlying data points.
• Plagiarism: The substantial copying of
another's work without appropriate
attribution; misappropriation of intellectual
property)
American Psychological Association
Stupidity & Bad habits
• Incompetence: Examples include: poor
research design, methodology, or
statistical procedure; inappropriate
selection or use of a study technique due
to insufficient skills or training.
• Careless work habits: Examples include:
sloppy record-keeping; haphazard data
collection; cutting corners; inadequate
monitoring of the project's progress.
American Psychological Association
• Intentional bias: Examples include:
rigging a sample to maximize support
for hypotheses; withholding
methodology details; deceptive or
misleading reporting of data or its
interpretation.
American Psychological Association
• Questionable publication
practices/authorship: Examples
include: publishing a paper or parts of
the same study in different publication
outlets without informing the readers;
undeserved "gift" authorships; coerced
authorship; omitting someone who
deserved an authorship or other form of
credit.
American Psychological Association
• Inadequate supervision of research
assistants. Examples include: giving
assistants more responsibility than
they are able or willing to handle,
insufficient supervision of assistants'
work.
American Psychological Association
• Failure to follow the regulations of
science. Examples include:
sidestepping or ignoring the IRB or its
directives; circumventing or ignoring
human participant requirements with
regarding informed consent,
confidentiality, or risk assessment;
inadequate care of research animals;
violating federal research policy.
American Psychological Association
• Contributing to difficult or stressful work
environments that could adversely
influence research process.
– Examples: mistreatment or disrespectful
treatment of subordinates; sexual
harassment or other form of exploitation;
playing favorites and other factors that
create poor morale or acting out by
subordinates; conflicts with the
administration or administrative policies.
American Psychological Association
• A dishonest act indirectly related to
researcher role. Examples include:
unreported conflicts, such as a
financial interest in the outcome of an
experiment; misuse or
misappropriation of grant funds;
inflating, distorting, or including bogus
accomplishments on a resume.
American Psychological Association
Ethical Principles of Psychologists and
Code of Conduct (Section 8.01-8.15)
1. Comply with local
approval.
2. Get informed
consent.
3. Get special
consent if
recording.
4. Take
responsibility for
participants’
welfare.
5. Dispense with
consent only under
special
circumstances.
6. Take care in using
inducements for
participation.
7. Using deception in
research requires
special
considerations.
American Psychological Association
Ethical Principles of Psychologists and
Code of Conduct (Section 8.01-8.15)
8. Provide opportunity
for debriefing, but
reduce or minimize
harm.
9. Treat animals
humanely
10. Reporting results:
–
–
Don’t Fabricate
Correct errors for the
public
11. Don’t Plagiarize
12. Assign publication credit
fairly and accurately
13. Do not publish duplicate
data without full
disclosure.
14. Share data for verification
under some
circumstances.
15. Respect confidentiality as
a reviewer
American Psychological Association
Thank You
Gerald P. Koocher, PhD, ABPP
Dean, School of Health Sciences
Simmons College
www.ethicsresearch.com
American Psychological Association