Transcript Slide 1
The evolution and current status of Feed-in Tariffs and Small Power Producer Regulations in Thailand and Tanzania REEEP/SERN Regional Workshop on “Policies for the Massive Diffusion of Renewable Energy Technologies in Africa - The Design of adapted Feed-in tariff for African countries” Johannesburg, South Africa 16 November 2010 Chris Greacen [email protected] Thailand Can’t we hook it up and sell power back? $ $ Technical regulations: • Allowable voltage, frequency, THD variations • Protective relays – 1-line diagrams for all cases: • • • • • Induction Synchronous Inverters Single/multiple Connecting at different voltage levels (LV or MV) • Communication channels Commercial regulations: • Definitions of renewable energy, and efficient cogeneration • Cost allocation • Principle of standardized tariff determination • Invoicing and payment arrangements • Arbitration + Standardized Power Purchase Agreement (PPA) Evolution of Thai VSPP regulations • 2002 – VSPP regulations drafted, approved by Cabinet – Up to 1 MW export, renewables only – Tariffs set at utility’s avoided cost Reduces air and water pollution Biogas from Pig Farms Produces fertilizer Produces electricity 8 x 70 kW generator Ratchaburi Biogas from Pig Farms Micro hydropower •40 kW •Mae Kam Pong, Chiang Mai, Thailand Korat Waste to Energy – biogas … an early Thai VSPP project • Uses waste water from cassava to make methane • Produces gas for all factory heat (30 MW thermal) + 3 MW of electricity • 3 x 1 MW gas generators Evolution of Thai VSPP regulations • 2002 – VSPP regulations drafted, approved by Cabinet – Up to 1 MW export, renewables only – Tariffs set at avoided cost (bulk supply tariff + FT) • 2006 – Up to 10 MW export, renewables + cogeneration – Feed-in tariff “adder” (premium payment) • Paid by ratepayers – If > 1 MW then utility only pays for 98% of energy (utility incentive to facilitate VSPPs) Rice husk-fired power plant • 9.8 MW • Roi Et, Thailand Bangkok Solar 1 MW PV • Project size: 1 MW • Uses self-manufactured a-Si Evolution of Thai VSPP regulations • 2002 – VSPP regulations drafted, approved by Cabinet – Up to 1 MW export, renewables only – Tariffs set at avoided cost (bulk supply tariff + FT) • 2006 – Up to 10 MW export, renewables + cogeneration – Feed-in tariff “adder” – If > 1 MW then utility only pays for 98% of energy • 2009 – Tariff adder increase, more for projects that offset diesel http://www.eppo.go.th/power/vspp-eng/ for English version of regulations, and model PPA Thai VSPP feed-in tariffs Fuel Adder Additional for Additional for Years effective diesel offsetting 3 southern areas provinces Biomass Capacity <= 1 MW $ 0.015 $ 0.030 $ 0.030 Capacity > 1 MW $ 0.009 $ 0.030 $ 0.030 Biogas <= 1 MW $ 0.015 $ 0.030 $ 0.030 > 1 MW $ 0.009 $ 0.030 $ 0.030 Waste (community waste, non-hazardous industrial and not organic matter) Fermentation Thermal process Wind <= 50 kW > 50 kW Micro-hydro 50 kW - <200 kW <50 kW Solar 7 7 7 7 $ 0.074 $ 0.104 $ $ 0.030 0.030 $ $ 0.030 0.030 7 7 $ 0.134 $ 0.104 $ $ 0.045 0.045 $ $ 0.045 0.045 10 10 $ 0.024 $ 0.045 $ 0.238 $ $ $ 0.030 0.030 0.045 $ $ $ 0.030 0.030 0.045 7 7 10 Assumes exchange rate 1 Thai baht = 0.029762 U.S. dollars Tariff = Biomass tariff = adder(s) + bulk supply tariff + FT charge $0.009 + $0.049 + $0.027 = $0.085/kWh Generating Capacity supply to Grid from 2006 - August 2009 การไฟฟ้ าส่ วนภูมภิ าค PROVINCIAL ELECTRICITY AUTHORITY MW (31 August 2009) Wind 350 Hydro MSW 300 Solar Cogeneration www.pea.co.th call center 1129 250 Biogas Biomass 200 รวม 150 100 50 Year 0 2006 การไฟฟ้าส่วนภูมภิ าค 2007 2008 17 2009 VSPP project pipeline as recorded in EPPO data Application under consideration Permission received, awaiting PPA PPA signed Leakage (Project abandoned) Generating & selling electricity Jun 2009 2000 1800 1600 1400 1200 1000 800 Biomass Solar Wind Garbage 600 400 Biogas 200 Coal cogen Natural gas cogen 0 Application pending Received PPA signed permission, awaiting PPA Microhydro Generating electricity Thailand VSPP Status Dec 2009 2000 1800 1600 1400 1200 1000 800 Biomass Solar Wind Garbage 600 400 Biogas 200 Coal cogen Natural gas cogen 0 Application pending Received PPA signed permission, awaiting PPA Microhydro Generating electricity Thailand VSPP Status Mar 2010 2000 1800 1600 1400 1200 1000 800 Biomass Solar Wind Garbage 600 400 Biogas 200 Coal cogen Natural gas cogen 0 Application pending Received PPA signed permission, awaiting PPA Microhydro Generating electricity Thailand VSPP Status July 2010 PPAs signed for additional 4283 MW 2000 1800 1600 1400 847 MW online 1200 1000 800 Biomass Solar Wind Garbage 600 400 Biogas 200 Coal cogen Natural gas cogen 0 Application pending Received PPA signed permission, awaiting PPA Microhydro Generating electricity Thailand VSPP Status Thailand VSPP program features (slide 1 of 2) Design issue Options Low-risk option Eligibility All generator types eligible Eligibility restricted to specific technologies, sizes, ownership types, etc. N/A Interconnection and purchase requirements Guaranteed interconnection Priority interconnection Guaranteed purchase Priority dispatch All, where applicable Contracts No contracts Standard contracts Contracts negotiated on a case-by-case basis Standard contracts Contract length Short-term (1-7yrs) (1-yr automatic renewal) Medium-term (8-14yrs) Long-term (15-20yrs) Long-term, matched to service life to extent possible Rate setting basis Generation cost-based Value-based (e.g. avoided costs) Generation cost based Payment structure Fixed price schedule Premium payment Spot market gap payment Fixed price schedule Tariff differentiation Differentiated Undifferentiated N/A Source: MCG Research, 2010 Thailand VSPP program features (slide 2 of 2) Design issue Options Low-risk option Purchasing entity Utility Transmission system operator Government entity Creditworthy counterparty Commodities purchased Electricity RECs Emissions credits Capacity Commodities bundled and purchased for a reasonable rate of return Amount purchased 100% (solar only) Partial purchase (e.g. only net excess) 100% Adjusting the payment Periodic review Automatic adjustment after set period of time Automatic adjustment triggered by capacity Adjustment based on prior market performance Transparent, scheduled, and clearly defined adjustment mechanism No Cap Cap on capacity Cap on generation Cap on ratepayer impact No cap preferable. If cap in place, it should be transparent, clearly defined, and stable, with clear queuing procedures Caps and queuing Source: MCG Research, 2010 Tanzania Evolution of Tanzania SPP regulations • Approved by regulator August 2009 • Up to 10 MW export, renewables & cogeneration • SPP Tariffs at average of long run marginal costs (LRMC) and short run (SRMC) • Grid-connected SPP tariff (2010): 110.3 TZS ($0.074)/kWh – 132.36 TZS ($0.088)/kWh dry-season Aug-Nov – 99.27 TZS ($0.0663)/kWh wet-season Jan-Jul, December • In rural mini-grid areas offsetting diesel (2010): 368.87 TZS ($0.246)/kWh • 4 PPAs signed by November 2010 www.ewura.go.tz/sppselectricity.html for English versions of regulations, and model PPAs Pilot Sisal Biogas Plant 150 kW– HALE -TANGA - TANZANIA Processing of Sisal Leaves Fibre 4% Sisal waste 96% Production of 1 ton of dry fibre generates about 24 tons of sisal waste Tanzania SPP program features (slide 1 of 2) Design issue Options Low-risk option Eligibility All generator types eligible Eligibility restricted to specific technologies, sizes, ownership types, etc. N/A Interconnection and purchase requirements Guaranteed interconnection Priority interconnection Guaranteed purchase Priority dispatch All, where applicable Contracts No contracts Standard contracts Contracts negotiated on a case-by-case basis Standard contracts Contract length Short-term (1-7yrs) (1-yr automatic renewal) Medium-term (8-14yrs) Long-term (15-20yrs) Long-term, matched to service life to extent possible Rate setting basis Generation cost-based Value-based (e.g. avoided costs) Generation cost based Payment structure Fixed price schedule Premium payment Spot market gap payment Fixed price schedule Tariff differentiation Differentiated Undifferentiated N/A Source: MCG Research, 2010 Tanzania SPP program features (slide 2 of 2) Design issue Options Low-risk option Purchasing entity Utility Transmission system operator Government entity Creditworthy counterparty Commodities purchased Electricity RECs Emissions credits Capacity Commodities bundled and purchased for a reasonable rate of return Amount purchased 100% Partial purchase (e.g. only net excess) 100% Adjusting the payment Periodic review Automatic adjustment after set period of time Automatic adjustment triggered by capacity Adjustment based on prior market performance Transparent, scheduled, and clearly defined adjustment mechanism No Cap Cap on capacity Cap on generation Cap on ratepayer impact No cap preferable. If cap in place, it should be transparent, clearly defined, and stable, with clear queuing procedures Caps and queuing Source: MCG Research, 2010 South-south policy/technology transfer: Technical Visit of the Delegation from the United Republic of Tanzania to Thailand regarding Thailand’s Very Small Power Producer (VSPP) program 13-20 March 2010 LESSONS FROM THAI VSPP & TANZANIAN SPP • Thailand’s path to full generation-cost FIT started successfully with tariffs based on avoided cost starting in 2002… • Initial trickle of applications gave utility time to build capacity to implement program through comfortable ‘learning by doing’ approach • ... added FIT in 2006 very successful in attracting projects • Incentivize utility • Tanzania’s regulations are just recently approved, but first PPAs already signed • Peer-to-peer exchange • Build mid-level relationships across bureaucracies • Utility folks like to listen to other utility folks Thank you [email protected] This presentation available at: www.palangthai.org/docs VSPP regulations available at: http://www.eppo.go.th/power/vspp-eng/ And www.ewura.go.tz/sppselectricity.html Table of Tanzania SPP documents Main grid Process Guidelines (roadmap) Process rules Interconnection Guidelines Interconnection rules Mini-grid Guidelines for Developers of Small Power Projects (SPP) in Tanzania In draft form, under consultation Guidelines for Grid Interconnection of Small Power Projects in Tanzania (Parts A, B, C) (under consultation) In draft form, under consultation Standardized PPA Standardized Power Purchase Agreement for Purchase of Grid-Connected Capacity and Associated Electric Energy Between Buyer and a Small Power Project Standardized Power Purchase Agreement for Purchase of Off-Grid Capacity and Associated Electric Energy Between Buyer and a Small Power Project Tariff methodology Standardized Tariff Methodology for the sale of Electricity to the Main Grid in Tanzania Under the Standardized Small Power Purchase Agreements. Standardized Tariff Methodology for the Sale of Electricity to the Mini-grids Under the Standardized Small Power Purchase Agreements Tariff calculations for year 2009 Detailed Tariff Calculations under the SPPA for the Main Grid for year 2009 Detailed Tariff Calculations under the SPPA for the Mini-grids for year 2009 = “Approved”. Approved and proposed SPP documents will be made available at: www.ewura.go.tz/sppselectricity.html 40 Tariffs determined by SPP type Connected to main grid Connected to isolated mini-grid Selling wholesale (to TANESCO) Case 1 Case 2 Selling retail (directly to final customers) Case 3 Case 4 * DNO: Distribution Network Operator (currently TANESCO) 41 Tariff Case 1: selling wholesale to main grid Clrmc Csrmc Ccase1 2 Where Clrmc is the long run marginal cost as defined by Tanesco’s long-term power plan; and Csrmc is the budgeted cost of thermal generation in the next year. Note: the actual calculations are somewhat more complicated, taking into account: • Transmission losses • Seasonality •Price floor & cap They are available in: Standardized Tariff Methodology Under the Standardized Small Power Purchase Agreements available from EWURA. Order 08-015 on Dec 30.2008 Tariff – case 1 (2010) Tariff (TZS/kWh) Tariff (US$/kWh) Annual Average 110.3 $0.074 Dry season (Aug – Nov) 102.58 $0.088 Wet season (Jan-Jul and Dec) 75.94 $0.0663 42 Tariff Case 2: selling wholesale to a minigrid CLmrcGrid C AveMini Ccase 2 2 Mini-grid SPP receives the average of Tanesco’s main grid and mini-grid avoided costs. CLmrcGrid = long run marginal cost for grid-power (adjusted for losses) CAveMini = average incremental cost of mini-grid power (levelized cost of electricity from a new mini-grid diesel generator). Tariff – case 2 (2009) Tariff (TZS/kWh) Tariff (US$/kWh) Tariff (no seasonal variations) 368.87 $0.246 43 Tariff Cases 3 (isolated) and 4 (main grid): selling at retail to end use customers • Tariff is proposed by SPP generator, subject to EWURA review – Less oversight demanded in cases in which community is in agreement with proposed tariff – Where possible, EWURA draws on financial analysis submitted to REA for rural electrification subsidy 44 Who have involved in PEA ? การไฟฟ้ าส่ วนภูมภิ าค PROVINCIAL ELECTRICITY AUTHORITY System Operation Div. Research Div. •First synch. test •PQ test •Identify circuit connection •Control & Operation •Communication Relay Div. call center 1129 •Switchgear & Relay test Meter Div. DG office • Technical & System Analysis • Document • Coordinator •Meter installation Area Office 1-12 & Local Office •Line connecting construction •Meter reading Legal Div. www.pea.co.th •PPA check Tariff Div. •Billing Finance Dep. •Settlement การไฟฟ้าส่วนภูมภิ าค System Operation Area Office 1-12 45