ftp.so-ups.ru
Download
Report
Transcript ftp.so-ups.ru
Updated Transmission Line
Protection Communications
Roy Moxley, Ken Fodero, and Héctor J. Altuve
Schweitzer Engineering Laboratories, Inc.
Copyright © SEL 2008
Critical Clearing Times Never Seem to
Increase Because Generation Is
Remote From Loads
Reduce the Times You Control
Communications-Assisted Protection
Blocking Zone / Zone 3
Differential Zone
Zone 1
Relay 1
Zone 2
Relay 2
Communications
Scheme and Media Must Match
Transmit Permission
POTT Logic
Zone 2
Trip Permission
Received
AND
Zone 3 (Reverse)
DCB Logic
AND
Trip
Transmit Block
PU
Zone 2
DO
Block Received
AND
Trip
Can We Transmit Through a Fault?
Photo courtesy of Niagara Mohawk,
a National Grid Company
Signal attenuation
problems
Arc noise interference
Common mode failures
Power Line Carrier
Strengths
Protection owned
Single function
High signal-to-noise ratio
Weaknesses
Must transmit through fault
Only transmits single bit
Optical Fiber
Strengths
Unaffected by arcs or
ground potential rise
Wide bandwidth
Weaknesses – shared
resource
Spread-Spectrum Radio
Strengths
Weaknesses
Low cost
Line of sight required
No licensing required
Interference possible
Licensed Radio
Strengths
Exclusive ownership of frequency
Independent of line path
Weaknesses
License required
Line of sight required
Let’s Look at Relay Reports
POTT
Multiplexed fiber
Digital communication
Contact inputs
Spread-spectrum radio
DCB – power line carrier
Line current differential – licensed radio
Key to
Receive:
1.5 cycles
Contact input
over multiplexed
fiber with
DTT card
Key
Receive
Key to
Receive:
0.375 cycles
Receive
Key
Digital input over
multiplexed fiber
with low-speed
data card
Digital Is Faster Than Contact
1.5
cycles
0.375
cycles
Contact
Digital
Contact
Contact time
Input time
Debounce time
Digital
Integral error checking
Direct input to logic
POTT Over Spread-Spectrum Radio
CFE Mexico Experience
Transmission time: < 0.5 cycles
Correct trips: 12 of 12
Correct nontrips: 27 of 27
DCB Time
Coordination
Is Critical
Received
block just
in time
Received
block
too late
2.0 ms
between block
and unintended
operation
Get a Clock!!
Hours spent
correlating
event reports
Settings need to
be coordinated
with accuracy
Troubleshooting
improved after
questionable
operation
FAQ: Can We Put Line Current
Differential Over Radio?
Requires 56/64 Kbps channel
Needs to be secure and reliable
ISM Band
Tested Radio System
Licensed 900 MHz radios
Interleaving removed – much faster, no errors
Nonrecommended semiparabolic antenna
worked great
Radio and relay from different manufacturers
Choose Correct Antenna for Application
3 miles
Snowfall on June 10th
Good Test of Current Differential Over Radio
Licensed Radio Current Differential Test
Was a Big Success
No
failures
No lost
packets
2 ms
transmission
Conclusions
Fiber Is Great for Most Applications
Cost and availability is a drawback
Digital data is faster than contacts
Spread Spectrum Is Proven
Subcycle transmission times
Reliable and secure performance
Reasonable cost and installation
Licensed Radio Is Reliable and Fast for
Line Current Differential
License attainment is not difficult if frequency
is available
Transmission is fast (2 ms)
Protection is secure and reliable with care
Considerations
Ensure communication is appropriate to
scheme and vice versa
Test and monitor communications
Verify performance with clocks
Thank You!