Transcript Folie 1
A synthesis of six related TEACCH-based outcome studies for Autism Spectrum Disorders (ASD) Paul Probst, Department of Psychology, University of Hamburg Symposium paper presented at the XXX International Congress of Psychology, Capetown, South-Africa, 22-27 July, 2012 update: 25.07.2012, Author's note: Due to severe family health problems, this presentation is going to be completed not before the middle of August, 2012; [email protected] , Homepage: http://www1.uni-hamburg.de/Paul.Probst/ THEORETICAL BACKGROUND 1. State-of-the-art autism concept Autism-Spectrum Disorders (DSM 5/ ICD-11-Draft, 2010) Deficits in Social Communication and Interaction Restricted Patterns of Behavior, Interests, and Activities Onset in early childhood (1-3 yr.) Etiology: Neurodevelopmental disorder with strong genetic influencing early brain development; component Prevalence: total: 0.4 % [conservative estimation] Tertiary prevention: i. e. preventing disability progression and associated suffering by alleviating behavioral symptoms and strengthening compensatory abilities; 2. Caregiver-Stress-Coping- Tertiary Prevention Model (adapted from Pakenham et al., 2005; Antonovsky, 1993: "Sense of Coherence"/ SOC) INDIVIDUAL with ASD: TERTIARY INTERVENTION: * Enhancing abilities Individual (ASD)-Focused (Need for SOC) * Reducing obstruct. deficits Caregiver-Focused (Need for SOC ) DEMANDS & STRESSORS Caregiver Adaptive RESSOURCES APPRAISAL of Stressors Caregiver COPING: Problem-/ EmotionFocused Family/ Classroom/ Group home/ Workshop/ FUNCTIONING 3. CONCEPT of TEACCH Structured Teaching, & Educational Guiding Visually structuring (e. g. visual schedules, choice boards) Clear verbal and nonverbal directions/ instructions Prompting and behavior shaping Consequence-based interventions (natural reinforcements, mild punishments, such as strict "No") Social-communicative, self-management and daily living skills training Professional-Caregiver Cooperation International Program Dissemination professional training; AIMS OF THE SYNOPSIS STUDY: Can key components of the TEACCH program be generalized to Germanspeaking countries in terms of effectiveness and social acceptance METHODS Participants: children and adults with ASD; parents; teachers and educators Instruments: behavioral observation, questionnaires, interviews Data analysis : quantitative and qualitative procedures Selective outcomes of four autism intervention studies are reported RESULTS: Study 1 - Topic - Design Single subject social communication training study in a residential home. - Pre (baseline)-Post-design, Participants - 7-yr-old girl (L) with ASD and severe intellectual disability, averbal, self-injuring behaviors (PICA); - TEACCH-trained therapist (master's student) (1) Enhancement of social communication; (2) Reduction of challenging behavior; (3) teaching a valid autism disability concept to caregivers (1) 12-session-communication training using structured teaching methods (schedule, choice-board management; (2) oral discussions with caregivers (1) video-based systematic behavior observation; (2) Behavior Problems Inventory (BPI); (3) qualitative interview data analysis Aims of intervention Intervention methods Outcome measurement Study 1-Figure 1 Pictorial Schedule for L 1= Foto & Name-Card for L 2= Go-to-your-WorkPlace-Card 3= Recreation-Card= "Go to your Choice-Board!" Study 1-Figure 2 Two ElementPictorial Schedule for L [see bottom line] * Listening-to-Favourite-Music-Card; * Flapping-Glove-Card (favourite activity) RESULTS: Study 1-continued: OUTCOMES Communication training Improved autonomous and spontaneous management of picture schedule and choiceboard, compared with baseline Challenging behaviors (PrePost) (1) Reduced problems in BPI-Full-Scale (2) Reduction in BPI-item "Pica" from "daily" to " monthly "; (3) Reduction in BPI-Item "Biting/ Cruel" from "weekly" to "monthly" Positive evaluation of the 12-session training intervention as helpful and relieving: (a) child less aggressive, more predictable and communicative; (b) better understanding of functional aspects of challenging behaviors Social acceptance by caregivers RESULTS: Study 2 -Topic - Design Participants Aims of intervention Intervention methods Outcome measurement Outcomes of a 3 -year TEACCH-based intervention in a residentialvocational setting Pre-Post [retrospective]-design - Three male adults with ADS and intellectual disability; - TEACCH-trained staff supervisor and educators (1) Reduction of disruptive behaviors and enhancement of social communication abilities; (2); social acceptance of the TEACCH approach by residential-vocational staff (1) Implementation of TEACCH components (e. g. schedules, work systems) for individals with ASD; (2) Education, training & supervision of staff members (1) Matson Evaluation of Social Skills [...] (MESSIER) (2) Developmental Behaviour Checklist f. Adults (DBC-A (3) BPI, (4) TEACCH evaluation caregiver interview Study 2: Figure 1: Individualized Work system for person T: T follows a Left-to-Right Routine: (1) Taking working materials from the shell on the left (organized in a TopDown-Order); (2) carrying out the task (e. g. matching picture cards) on the desk; (3) putting the completed task to the box to his right Study 2: Figure 2: Typical matching task for T RESULTS: Study 2-continued: OUTCOMES Disruptive and Challenging behaviors (PrePost) (1) DBC-A-Disruptive: significant decrease for all three individuals: M-RCI (Reliable Change Index) = 2.43; (p <0.05) Evaluation by caregivers Overall, positive evaluation: (a) report enhanced communication between caregivers and clients with ASD; (b) more independence and autonomy of clients; (c) less aggressive beahviors in T. (d) criticism: possibility of reduced flexibility (2) DBC-A-Total-Problem-Behavior: significant decrease (MRCI= 2,55); RESULTS: Study 3 - Topic - Design Outcomes of education and skills group parent training for ASD Pre-3-mo-Follow-up-design Participants (1) 24 parents (83% mothers) of 23 children with ASD (M-age= 8.9); trainer and assistant trainer with TEACCH /ABA expertise Aims of intervention (1) Teaching an adequate concept of ASD ; (2) Enhancing parents' emotional and social experiences by parent-to-parent communication; (3) Teaching structured educational strategies & skills Intervention methods (1) 3-session small group training (in total 24 h); teaching methods included lectures, group discussion, video and in-vivo modelling; role play, assignment of homework; Outcome measures (1) 23-item-Parent Evaluation Questionnaire; (2) Home Diary Experience Questionnaire RESULTS: Study 3-continued: OUTCOMES Parent Evaluation Questionnaire Parents report (1) "improved parental skills in daily family life" (86%) , (2) "improved mental health" (76%), (3) "positive effects of exchanging experiences with other parents" (100%); Home Diary Experience Questionnaire 12 of 16 responding parents (75%) reported one or more implementation of structured teaching methods ( picture schedules, physical structure, task organization) RESULTS: Study 4 - Topic - Design - Outcomes of a TEACCH-based child-parent in-home training - Descriptive Pre-Post-Follow-up single subject study Participants 5-yr-old boy with ASD, averbal, normal visuospatial intelligence Aims of intervention (1) Enhancement of functional communication; (2) Reduction of challenging behavior (aggression, temper tantrums; (3) Promotion of elementary verbal skills (naming); (4) parent education & training; (5) teacher support; (5) broad-spectrum parent support (1) 20 in-home child and parent sessions (à 3h= 60h) over 22 mo; (2) Broad-spectrum parent counselling (10h); (3) classroom visits (15h); (4) interactions with community agencies (10h, e. g. therapist expert reports); Video-based Behavioral observations; behavioral observation inventories, questionnaires, standardized tests (Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test) Multimodal interventions Outcome measurement RESULTS: Study 4-continued: OUTCOMES Child Parent Teacher (1) Improved functional communication (nonverbal and verbal, e.g. requesting, rejecting); (2) acquisition of low-level verbal abilities (e. g. naming, expression of 2-3-word phrases, enhanced verbal comprehension); (3) improved behavioral functioning (less aggressive, less vocal stereotypies, more on-task behavior in preacademic and play activities); (4) successful transition from preschool to primary school, attending an inclusive class with full-time aide; (1) Implementation of structured teaching in daily life; (2) enhanced quality of parent autism concept; (3) positive evaluation of in-home training (1) Implementation of structured teaching in classroom; (2) enhanced teacher autism concept Community (1) Provision of social support (e. g. social welfare benefits); (2) assisting parents in school placement and transition issues; (3) allocation of classroom aide ; CONCLUSIONS Overall, the results of all four small-scale studies indicate evidence for positive outcomes of TEACCH-based interventions across multiple individuals, ages, settings and outcome measures Limitations: (1) threats to internal validity (sample size, control groups); (2) threats to external validity (selective samples, single-study) Cautiously viewed, TEACCH-based interventions: (1) lead to clinically and educationally relevant effects across different settings; (2) show sufficient social validity across different caregivers; (3) support the assumption that they are also practicable in German-speaking countries, and compatible with local tertiary health care interventions Further research is urgently needed, in particular for controlled replication studies Thank you for your attention! Acknowledgement to Collaborators: Tobias Leppert, Ph.D Florian Jung, M.S. Jan Micheel, M.S. Iain Glen, M.S Petia Gewohn, M.S, Christoph Faecks, M.S, Stefanie Brakemeier, M.S, Marzena Radzij, MS, Julia Spreitz; Petra Steinborn, M.Ed Parents, Teachers, and Educators Children, adolescents and adults with ASD Email: [email protected] Probst, Jung, Micheel & Glen (in print). Tertiary prevention [...]. Life Span and Disability, xx, Probst & Leppert (2008): Brief report: Outcomes of a teacher training program [...]. Journal of Autism & Dev.elopmental Disorders, 38, 1791-1796