Transcript PDRI for Building Projects - Construction Industry Institute

PDRI:
Project Definition Rating Index
Building Projects
Research Team
Jim Broaddus
Dennis Bayon
Edd Gibson
Mark Hanchar
Tom Hodges
Schiller Liao
Tom Lyons
Walter Morton
Jerry Pitzrick
Gary Steinmetz
UT System, Chairman
NASA
UT Austin
ADP Marshall
US Department of State
UT System
H. B. Zachry
Metric Constructors
M. A. Mortenson
GM
Invited Contributors BECK Group
3D/ International
Why PDRI for Buildings?
• Industrial PDRI is NOT
suitable .
• Predict project success.
• Optimize cost & schedule.
• Focus on scope deficiencies.
• Reduce risk during execution.
• Meet customer expectations.
Other Benefits
• Improve team alignment and
communication.
• Enhance design-build and construction
management performance.
• Increase profile of building
projects within CII.
• Support CII Benchmarking & Metrics.
Industrial PDRI Results
• Proven process = It works !!!!!
• Wide acceptance
• Project management tool
• Increases predictability
– Budget: 19 percent
– Schedule: 13 percent
– Scope changes
reduced 6 percent
PDRI
INDUSTRIAL
PROJECTS
CII 113-2
What is PDRI for Buildings?
• Not re-inventing the
wheel.
• Modifying Industrial
PDRI with building
sector’s input.
• Quantitative, easy to
measure level of scope
definition.
• Comprehensive checklist.
With some
Intelligence,
this wheel (PDRI)
will work for me
perfectly!
PDRI for Buildings Score Sheet
Dgn
Deliverables
parameters
Eqpt.
Execution
plan
Bldg
program
Site Project
info. control
Business
strategy
Org.
philosophy
Proj.
requirements
Procure
strategies
Scope Elements
PDRI for Buildings
Project Definition Rating Index for Buildings
Project Score Sheet
SECTION I - BASIS OF PROJECT DECISION
Definition Level
CATEGORY
Element
0
1
2
3
4
5
Score
A. BUSINESS STRATEGY
A1. Building Use
A2. Business Justification
A3. Business Plan
A4. Life Cycle Analysis
A5. Facility Requirements
A6. Future Expansion/Alteration Considerations
A7. Site Selection Considerations
A8. Project Objectives Statement
CATEGORY A TOTAL
B. ORGANIZATION PHILOSOPHIES
B1. Reliability Philosophy
B2. Maintenance Philosophy
B3. Operating Philosophy
B4. Design Philosophy
CATEGORY B TOTAL
RT155
Owners, Architects,
Engineers,
Constructors
C. PROJECT REQUIREMENTS
C1. Value-Analysis Process
C2. Project Design Criteria
C3. Evaluation of Existing Facilities vs. Req’mts
C4. Scope of Work Statement
C5. Project Schedule
C6. Preliminary Project Cost
CATEGORY C TOTAL
SECTION I TOTAL
Definition Levels
0 = Not Applicable
1 = Complete Definition
Definition
2 = Minor Deficiencies
3 = Some Deficiencies
4 = Major Deficiencies
5 = Incomplete or Poor
Sections of PDRI
Total PDRI Score:
1000 Points
The lower the score, the more
well-defined the project.
Section I: Basis of Project Decision
Section II: Basis of Design
Section III: Execution Approach
Section I:
Basis of Project
Decision
Focuses on the “Right Project”
A. Business Strategy (8)
B. Owner Philosophies (4)
C. Project Requirements (6)
Section II:
Basis of
Design
Focuses on the “Right Product”
D. Site Information (8)
E. Building Programming (13)
F. Building/Project Design
Parameters (8)
G. Equipment (3)
Section III:
Execution Approach
Focuses on the “Right Way”
H. Procurement Strategy (2)
I. Deliverables (2)
J. Project Control (5)
K. Project Execution Plan (5)
Definition Levels in PDRI
Levels of Element Scope Definition
1 = Complete Definition
2 = Minor Deficiencies
3 = Some Deficiencies
4 = Major Deficiencies
5 = Incomplete / Poor Definition
How to Use PDRI?
• Choose the level of scope definition.
• Circle the weighted score.
• Add all the weighted scores.
• Assess results.
Example:
CATEGORY & Elements
0
1
2
3
4
5 SCORE
B. OWNER PHILOSOPHIES
B1. Reliability Philosophy
0 1 9 16 24 32
B2. Maintenance Philosophy
0 1 7 12 18 24
B3. Operating Philosophy
0 1 6 10 14 18
B4. Design Philosophy
0 1 8 15 24 28
Total
CATEGORY TOTAL
32
18
6
15
71
What PDRI Output Tells Us
• Overall Index Score =
Scope Completeness
(less than 200 =
well-defined project)
Project
Success?
• Identifies critical scope
elements for improvement
• Helps improve project
communication
Project Teams Need PDRI
Project
Executive
Bldgs PDRI
0
1
2
3
B. OWNER PHILOSOPHIES
B1. Reliability Philosophy
0
B2. Maintenance Philosophy
0
CATEGORY & Elements
1
1
9
7
16 24 32
12 18 24
B3. Operating Philosophy
0
1
6
10 14 18
6
B4. Design Philosophy
0
1
8
15 24 28
15
Total
4
5 SCORE
CATEGORY TOTAL
Investment
Mgmt Team
Owner’s
Proj. Mgr.
32
18
71
Project
Team
Designer Mgmt
User/
Constr.
Proj.
Mgr.
Designer User/
Team Operator
Operator
Mgr.
Proj.
Mgr.
Constructor
Team
When to Use PDRI for Buildings?
High
High
Business Plan
Programming
EXPENDITURES
Schematic Dgn. / Design Dev.
INFLUENCE
Construction Doc.
Procurement
EXPENDITURES
INFLUENCE
Alternative Study
Construction
Low
Commissioning
Best Time to Use PDRI for Buildings
Low
Path Forward
• Weighting workshops (7/98 ~ 10/98)
• Validation by project testing (8/98 ~ 1/99)
• Annual Conference Presentation (8/99)
• CII publications (9/99):
– Implementation Resource (155-2)
– Research Summary (155-1)
– Research Report (155-11)
PDRI for Buildings
To participate:
• See RT members
• Fill out form in packet and fax
See you at:
• Weighting workshops
• Project testing
• 1999 CII Annual Conference