Transcript District Leadership SCCOE

District Leadership
SCCOE
October, 2010

How are things going with this first SW-PBIS
cohort?



What has worked?
What are challenges?
What tangible outcomes have you seen from Tier
1 PBIS implementation so far?
Vision

Moving forward, what are your goals related to
behavior & discipline in your district & schools?

What would you hope for in your continuing PBIS
efforts?

How would you like this to look in 5 years?

Do you know what your schools want next?

How does your vision & PBIS efforts fit with
other initiatives and district plan?

Is behavior/discipline a formally stated priority?
Where/how?
SW-PBIS Implementation Logic
Funding
Visibility
Political
Support
Policy
LEADERSHIP TEAM
(Coordination)
Training
Coaching
Evaluation
Local School/District Implementation
Demonstrations
Behavioral
Expertise
Re: SW-PBIS

In the past year, what active steps have you
taken at the district level to support or plan
for:






Implementation fidelity in the schools
Sustained implementation
Continuing evolution
Communication between schools & district
Political support & visibility
Funding
Training Outcomes Related to Training Components
Training Outcomes
Training
Components
Presentation/
Lecture
Knowledge of
Content
Skill
Implementation
Classroom
Application
10%
5%
0%
Plus
Demonstration
30%
20%
0%
Plus
Practice
60%
60%
5%
Plus Coaching/
Admin Support
Data Feedback
95%
95%
95%
Joyce & Showers, 2002
Coaching

In this past year, how has your district
coaching plan worked to support SW-PBIS
implementation?
District SW-PBIS Self Assessment &
Action Plan
SW-PBIS: Current Training

Team Problem Solving & Data Based Decision
Making


Coaching is Critical
Check In/Check Out

Begin thinking about:

Who will manage CICO in schools?



Resources, Roles, Job Descriptions
What data systems will be used?
Who will provide coaching: support & monitoring?
Individual Student
Systems
12.4 - Mean Percentage Students (2009-10) (Majors Only)
Students 6+
Students 2 to 5
9%
19%
24%
18%
Students 0 or 1
100%
90%
80%
70%
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
Pre-K
N=
K-6
2565
6-9
713
9-12
266
K8-12
474
Students 6+
12.5 - Mean Percentage ODRs (2009-10) (Majors Only)
82%
74%
84%
Students 2 to 5
79%
Students 0 or 1
100%
90%
80%
70%
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
Pre-K
K-6
6-9
9-12
K8-12
SW-PBIS District Planning
Funding
Visibility
Funding
Visibility
Political
Support
Policy
Political
Support
Policy
LEADERSHIP TEAM
(Coordination)
LEADERSHIP TEAM
(Coordination)
Training
Training
Coaching
Coaching
Evaluation
Behavioral
Expertise
Evaluation
Local School/District Implementation
Demonstrations
Local School/District Implementation
Behavioral
Expertise
CONTINUUM OF
SCHOOL-WIDE
POSITIVE BEHAVIOR
SUPPORT
Tertiary Prevention:
FBABSP for Students
with High-Risk Behavior
~5%
~15%
PRIORITY #1
Primary Prevention:
School/ClassroomWide Systems for
All Students,
Staff, & Settings
PRIORITY #3
Secondary Prevention:
Specialized Group
Systems for Students
with At-Risk Behavior
PRIORITY #2
Implement
Accurately
& Sustain
Implement
Accurately
& Sustain
~80% of Students
Wexelblatt’s Scheduling Algorithm
CHEAP
FAST
GOOD
When implementing an innovation,
you may pick any two.
Behavior
Interventions Audit

Identify all programs, resources & personnel
dedicated to behavioral intervention for students
with challenging behavior
Some examples:
 Counseling groups
 Mentoring programs
 District Behavior Specialists
 Detention monitors
 Behavior analysts
 Behavior classrooms
 Out of district placements
District Behavior Data Audit
Tier 2
Systems Considerations

Personnel

District Behavior Specialist



Examine Roles & Responsibilities
Systems Coaching Capacity for Tier 2
School

Tier 2 Intervention manager


Teaming structure


Examine existing teaming processes
Data Systems


Examine roles & responsibilities of existing personnel
For monitoring individual student progress for behavior (recommended
SWIS-CICO)
Training Needs