Transcript La disciplina del mercato elettrico
“Market coupling on the Italian border:
results and lessons from the Italy-Slovenia coupling, update on the PCR project”
Electricity Regional Initiative – Central South region 4th Stakeholder Group meeting Rome, May 15th 2012
2
The pilot project on the Italian – Slovenian border A fully decentralized approach
2
- 2 -
3
Market coupling outcomes since 1/1/2011 Traded volumes growth
• Strong liquidity growth on BSP and on the implict auctions 2010* 2011
Reserved quote -
0,31 2012** * since 1/4/2010 0,10 ** until 30/4/2012
Energy (TWh) Market coupling Explicit auction -
1,16 1,20 2,90 0,10
Total -
4,05 1,30
BSP
0,20 1,53 1,41
3
• Strong increase in volumes allocated through mkt coupling in addition to the reserved share (35 MW) MW 600 Reserved quote Market coupling Explicit auction 500 400 300
342 278 290 317 319 386 368 348 462 563 492 453 396 395 461 398 453 525 478 484 437 422 381 395 389 353
200 100
104 64 87 113 173 183 160 93 160 111 120 153 165
0 Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr 2010 2011 2012
- 3 -
4
•
Market coupling outcomes since 1/1/2011 Price convergence
Some increase in frequency of price convergence, considering an higher price difference in average during first four-month 2012
Price (€/MWh) Frequency Pz Nord Pz BSP Delta Pz Nord - Pz BSP Pz Nord > Pz BSP Pz Nord = Pz BSP Pz Nord < Pz BSP
2010* 2011 62,22 70,18 2012** * since 1/4/2010 ** until 30/4/2012 78,23 46,76 57,20 61,52 15,46 12,98 16,71 92% 80% 61% 0% 20% 39% 8% 0% 1% • The rare occasions of negative price differentials (ITp
4
- 4 -
5
Market coupling outcomes since 1/1/2011 Efficient capacity allocation
• In 2011 implicit auction guaranteed efficient allocation and occasional commercial export, while explicit auction always allocated in import.
2011
Import Export
Total Efficient use Market coupling Explicit auction
96% 3%
100%
98% 0%
98% Under-use Market coupling Explicit auction
0% 0%
0%
2% 0%
2% Anti-economic use Market coupling Explicit auction
0% 0%
0%
0% 0%
0% Use Market coupling Explicit auction
96% 3%
100%
100% 0%
100%
• In 2012 explicit auction efficiently exported in 9% of hours of price indifference
2012
Import Export
Total Efficient use Market coupling Explicit auction
98% 1%
99%
74% 9%
83% Under-use Market coupling Explicit auction
0% 0%
0%
2% 1%
3% Anti-economic use Market coupling Explicit auction
0% 0%
0%
0% 1%
1% Use Market coupling Explicit auction
98% 1%
99%
76% 10%
86%
5
- 5 -
6
Lessons learnt/1
6
1.
Coupling with illiquid markets
– The growth of traded volumes on BSP confirms mkt coupling scheme as a natural liquidity provider, which has the potentiality to make benefit to illiquid markets from X-border liquidity. The overall efficiency of capacity allocation are so guaranteed also in this case.
2.
Short term flexibility
– The growth of volumes allocated with respect to the quota reserved to mkt coupling and its peak in january, also due to the entry into force of new delivery contracts, evidences the preference of market participants for the flexibility granted by the daily implicit nomination scheme and the chance for them to efficiently use UIOSI clauses, as financial contracts to fix the price received.
3.
Effectiveness also in wide price differential borders
– The increase of the percentage of hours in which the X border prices converge is an expected beneficial outcome, with an outstanding 20% of hours with the same price during 2011.
– Price differential rarely changes sign due to the small dimension of the slovenian DAM market, whose demand on the market is generally lower than import capacity.
– Implicit auction allocates capacity in import much more frequently than explicit auction, especially in the hours of price convergence.
- 6 -
7
Lessons learnt/2
4.
The benefits of a decentralized solution
– The governance and operational solution for the Italian Slovenian Border reflects the PCR decentralzied approach – This enabled a faster delivery of a reliable market coupling solution between two countries with different institutional and governance frameworks.
5.
The need of a stable framework for post coupling arrangements
– The benefits of market coupling calls for great market volumes, independently from the quota of capacity reserved to market coupling. This calls for stable and sustainable shipping arrangements between the involeved parties.
7
- 7 -
8
The PCR project update General concepts
•
PCR provides coupling solution for the EU market
– Supported by all the European PXs through Europex – Accepted by ACER and EntsoE to support the start up of NWE coupling – Regularly presented and debated at the AESAG, Florence and NWE fora.
•
PCR is a decentralized solution
– In PCR one Coordinator PX runs the coupling algorithm, one Back-Up Coordinator PX provides hot back up service, both on a rotational basis. Other PCR PXs can run shadow auctions with same inputs and tools to check the validity of the results.
– Each PX in the EU can decide wether to be: – – a PCR party entering in the rotation for Coordinator/HorBackUp a PCR party only running shadow auctions to validate its prices (PCR Operator) – a PCR party subcontracting its operational performance to another PCR Party – a serviced PX by a PCR member – Each PX is responsibile for its own DAM prices.
8
- 8 -
9
The PCR project update PCR assets
•
Algorithm
– One single price coupling algorithm encompassing the features of NWE, Mibel, Italy Slovenia and open to embody further EU requirements – – Cosmos longely selected as starting point, validation from EntsoE expected Development of a prototype, including MIC and PUN features, nearly concluded – Industrialization phase to start in May.
•
System design
– PBM (PCR Broker& Matcher) supports the decentralized coupling approach by collecting, validating and exchanging the inputs (bids, ATCs, PTDFs) and the outputs (p, q, net positions, flows).
– Design phase finalized, provider selected and industrialization phase to start in May.
•
Governance
– Cooperation & Coownerhsip agreements nearly approved.
– Agreements consistent with the EU Draft Governance Guidelines.
9
- 9 -
10
The PCR project update State of advancement
• Delivery of PCR assets and PX testing by september 2012, in order to go live on January 2013. • This refers to coupling solution, as provided by PCR. To couple, pre/post coupling arrangements must bealso agreed, either on a border by border basis or based on common agreed regional approach.
• Integration Test for Regional Initiatives will start on 1st October 2012, to be ready to go live by Januray 2013. – They will include the TSOs.
– Finalization of pre/post coupling arrangements required.
– GME will take part only for the technical test, as Italy will not be coupled by such date.
10
- 10 -