Transcript PowerPoint Template - Forms (CDE Intranet)

Accountability
Program Update
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction
Overview
TOM TORLAKSON
State Superintendent
of Public Instruction
• School Accountability Report Card (SARC)
• Safe Harbor
• Changes to the definition of continuous
enrollment and the impact on the Academic
Performance Index (API) and Adequate Yearly
Progress (AYP) reports
• The reassignment of test scores (Senate Bill
219)
• Five-Year Cohort Graduation Rate
2
TOM TORLAKSON
State Superintendent
of Public Instruction
School Accountability
Report Card (SARC)
3
SARCs for the
2011-12 School Year
TOM TORLAKSON
State Superintendent
of Public Instruction
•
•
Prop. 98 requires that all public schools annually produce a
SARC
The State Board of Education (SBE) annually approves a
template that identifies the data elements that are statutorily
required, including:
– Information about the school (enrollment, grades offered,
etc.)
– School Climate
– School Facilities
– Teacher and Support Staff Credentials and Assignments
– Curriculum and Instructional Materials
– School Finance
– Accountability and Assessment Results
– Postsecondary Preparation
4
SARCs for the
2011-12 School Year (cont.)
TOM TORLAKSON
State Superintendent
of Public Instruction
SARC Template was approved by the SBE in
July 2012
• Visit the link below for the most current
SARC information
http://www.cde.ca.gov/ta/ac/sa/
5
SARCs for the
2011-12 School Year (cont.)
TOM TORLAKSON
State Superintendent
of Public Instruction
• Historically, CDE provided local educational
agencies (LEAs) with access to a partially
populated SARCs
• In 2010, due to budget cuts, CDE stopped
providing partially populated SARCs
6
SARCs for the
2011-12 School Year (cont.)
TOM TORLAKSON
State Superintendent
of Public Instruction
• In 2011, CDE leveraged the Ed-Data
partnership to provide a partially populated
SARC on the Ed-data Web site
• Ed-Data is an existing partnership between
CSIS, EdSource and CDE
• The Ed-Data partnership will continue to
produce partially populated SARCs
• We anticipate that the SARCs will be available
on the Ed-Data Web site in late October for
LEA use
7
SARCs for the
2011-12 School Year (cont.)
TOM TORLAKSON
State Superintendent
of Public Instruction
• SARC template with all data collected by CDE
will be made available for download at the EdData Web site:
– Target date is November 1
– http://www.eddata.k12.ca.us/Pages/Home.aspx
• The downloadable SARC templates are:
– Approved as meeting the legal reporting
requirements specified by the SBE once a
school’s local data has been added
– Provided in multiple languages
8
SARCs for the
2011-12 School Year (cont.)
TOM TORLAKSON
State Superintendent
of Public Instruction
• At the July SBE meeting, the SBE discussed
the future of the SARC
– Short Term Improvements
• Revise optional executive summary
• Promulgation of SARC regulations
– Long Term Improvements
• Develop a web application to collect LEA
data
• Revise/modernize SARC template
• Develop a data dashboard with
9
summary information about schools
SARCs for the
2011-12 School Year (cont.)
TOM TORLAKSON
State Superintendent
of Public Instruction
• Revise optional executive summary
– We do not anticipate any changes to the
executive summary will be made this
school year
– CDE will be electronically surveying
accountability coordinators
– Putting together a workgroup of
stakeholders to discuss necessary changes
10
SARCs for the
2011-12 School Year (cont.)
TOM TORLAKSON
State Superintendent
of Public Instruction
• Development of SARC regulations
– CDE staff is working to determine the areas
of focus for the regulations
– CDE anticipates bringing draft regulations
to the January or March 2013 SBE meeting
– Opportunity for public comment
11
SARCs for the
2011-12 School Year (cont.)
TOM TORLAKSON
State Superintendent
of Public Instruction
• Develop a web application to collect LEA data
– CDE is working with budget staff to
determine cost to develop this web
application to collect LEA data
– Will be an optional data collection where
LEAs can complete the LEA portion of the
SARC and CDE would prepare a final
SARC with LEA and CDE data
12
SARCs for the
2011-12 School Year (cont.)
TOM TORLAKSON
State Superintendent
of Public Instruction
• Revise/modernize SARC template
– Longer term discussion
– Foundational question for the revisions
• How best to display the data that is
meaningful to parents and policy
makers?
13
SARCs for the
2011-12 School Year (cont.)
TOM TORLAKSON
State Superintendent
of Public Instruction
• Develop a summary report with rating
information about schools
– Currently doing a survey of how other
states display school data
– As this process commences, CDE will seek
public comment and stakeholder input
14
SARC
TOM TORLAKSON
State Superintendent
of Public Instruction
• The Analysis, Measurement, and
Accountability Reporting Division will be
bringing a board item to the SBE in
January 2013 to discuss our progress on
these improvements
15
LEA Accountability
Report Cards
TOM TORLAKSON
State Superintendent
of Public Instruction
• New stand-alone report card in response to
federal monitoring visit findings
• The CDE will provide all of the data for the
LEA Accountability Report Card and will host
all on the CDE Web site
• 2011-12 version should be available in?
16
TOM TORLAKSON
State Superintendent
of Public Instruction
Safe Harbor
17
Percent Proficient Targets
TOM TORLAKSON
State Superintendent
of Public Instruction
School
Level
2011
ELA
2012
ELA
2011
Math
2012
Math
Elementary
and Middle
67.6%
78.4%
68.5%
79.0%
High
66.7%
77.8%
66.1%
77.4%
18
Impact of Safe Harbor
TOM TORLAKSON
State Superintendent
of Public Instruction
• Number of LEAs and schools that made their
2011 AYP through safe harbor
Type
Made
AYP
Made AYP
Through Safe
Harbor
Schools
LEAs
3,398
212
1,511 (44.5%)
102 (48%)
19
TOM TORLAKSON
State Superintendent
of Public Instruction
Continuous
Enrollment
20
Title 5 Regulations
TOM TORLAKSON
State Superintendent
of Public Instruction
In January 2012, the SBE adopted regulations
that define continuous enrollment for
accountability purposes. These regulations do
not, in any way, mandate local policies about
enrolling or exiting students in the California
Longitudinal Pupil Achievement Data System
(CALPADS).
21
Title 5 Regulations (cont.)
TOM TORLAKSON
State Superintendent
of Public Instruction
California Code of Regulations (CCR), Title 5
Section 1039.2, specifies that a student is
considered continuously enrolled if the student
was enrolled in the same school or LEA from Fall
Census Day to the first day of testing without a
gap of enrollment of 30 or more consecutive
calendar days. This definition was first applied
with the 2011 Base API.
22
Continuous Enrollment
TOM TORLAKSON
State Superintendent
of Public Instruction
Continuous enrollment is determined by using
enrollment and exit code data from CALPADS.
For the October 2012 accountability release,
data was extracted from CALPADS on
August 15, 2012.
23
Continuous Enrollment
(cont.)
TOM TORLAKSON
State Superintendent
of Public Instruction
• The CDE will extract CALPADS enrollment
and exit code data on two more occasions.
The tentative schedule is:
– December 20, 2012
– February 26, 2013
• The CDE will use the extracted data, along
with corrected demographic data, to update
AYP and API Reports
24
Continuous Enrollment
Data
TOM TORLAKSON
State Superintendent
of Public Instruction
Impact of CALPADS Continuous Enrollment
Data Compared to Student Answer Document
(SAD) Data on the 2011 Base API
Type
LEAs
Schools
No Change
1 to 5
point
change
(+ & -)
More than
5 point
change
(+ & -)
42%
55%
53%
40%
5%
5%
25
Continuous Enrollment
Data
TOM TORLAKSON
State Superintendent
of Public Instruction
2012 Standardized Testing and Reporting (STAR)
Continuous Enrollment SAD Data
Compared to CALPADS Data
(Total N = 4,785,444)
Difference
CALPADS
In
CALPADS
Type
SAD
LEAs
4,429,300
(92.5%)
4,542,141
(94.9%)
112,841
Schools
4,508,790
(94.2%)
4,447,207
(92.3%)
-61,583
26
Continuous Enrollment
Data
TOM TORLAKSON
State Superintendent
of Public Instruction
2012 California High School Exit Examination (CAHSEE)
Continuous Enrollment SAD Data
Compared to CALPADS Data
(Total N = 963,006)
Difference
CALPADS
in
CALPADS
Type
SAD
LEAs
824,792
(85.6%)
812,882
(84.4%)
11,910
Schools
782,818
(81.3%)
758,786
(78.8%)
24,032
27
Reassignment of Test
Scores
TOM TORLAKSON
State Superintendent
of Public Instruction
• SB 219 requires assessment and other
accountability results of some students
enrolled in an Alternative Education Program
(AEP) to be assigned back to a school or LEA
of residence in the calculation of the API
28
Reassignment of Test
Scores (cont.)
TOM TORLAKSON
State Superintendent
of Public Instruction
• In January 2012, the SBE adopted CCR, Title
5, Section 1039.3, which specifies how
students’ STAR and CAHSEE test scores will
be reassigned
29
Criteria for Reassignment
of Test Scores
TOM TORLAKSON
State Superintendent
of Public Instruction
• STAR and CAHSEE results are assigned to a
non-AEP school and/or a non-AEP LEA of
residence if both of the student:
– Was referred after Fall Census Day to an
AEP school (i.e., exited using student exit
code T167 in the CALPADS) and
– Took the STAR and/or CAHSEE at the AEP
school
30
Results of Test Score
Reassignments
TOM TORLAKSON
State Superintendent
of Public Instruction
Number of 2012 Test Scores Reassigned
from an AEP School to a Non-AEP School
Test
STAR
CAHSEE
Number of Scores
Reassigned
3,028
1,989
31
Future Use of CALPADS for
Accountability Reporting
TOM TORLAKSON
State Superintendent
of Public Instruction
• In coming years, the CDE will use additional
CALPADS data for API and AYP reporting:
– Race and Ethnicity
– English Learner (EL) Status
– Socioeconomically Disadvantaged
– Special Education
– Gender
32
Benefits of Using CALPADS
for Accountability Reporting
TOM TORLAKSON
State Superintendent
of Public Instruction
• Reduced workload for assessment Pre-ID
• No costs for correcting demographic data in
CALPADS
33
Five-Year Cohort
Graduation Rate
TOM TORLAKSON
State Superintendent
of Public Instruction
• In January 2012, the SBE approved an
amendment to California’s Consolidated State
Application Accountability Workbook to add the
use of a five-year cohort graduation rate for
2013 AYP determinations
• In February 2012, the SBE and CDE submitted
the amendment to the U.S. Department of
Education (ED) for approval
34
Five-Year Cohort
Graduation Rate (cont.)
TOM TORLAKSON
State Superintendent
of Public Instruction
• The updated January 2013 AYP reports will
include the 2012 five-year cohort graduation
rates and growth targets for the 2013 AYP
determinations
• Meeting the four-year or five-year cohort
graduation rate will qualify as meeting the
graduation rate criteria for AYP
35
Five-Year Cohort
Graduation Rate (cont.)
TOM TORLAKSON
State Superintendent
of Public Instruction
• The five-year cohort graduation rate will be
calculated using a similar formula as the fouryear rate
• The five-year cohort graduation rate will be
used as an alternative method for meeting the
graduation rate criteria if the eligibility criterion
is met
36
Five-Year Cohort
Graduation Rate (cont.)
TOM TORLAKSON
State Superintendent
of Public Instruction
• The five-year cohort graduation
rate criterion is:
– The number of new graduates in the
fifth year cohort is equal to or greater
than the number of students who
transfer out, emigrate, or die during
the fifth year
37
New API Indicators
TOM TORLAKSON
State Superintendent
of Public Instruction
• The CDE will convene the Public Schools
Accountability Act (PSAA) Advisory Committee
to discuss incorporating the following
indicators into the API:
– High school graduation rates
– Middle school dropout rates (grade 8, and
grade 9 for schools where grade 9 is the
highest grade offered)
38
Senate Bill 1458
TOM TORLAKSON
State Superintendent
of Public Instruction
• Senate Bill 1458 was sent to the Governor’s
desk on August 29, 2012. If signed, the bill
would require:
– Assessments constitute 60% of a high
school API beginning with the 2016 API
calculations
– New variables be incorporated into the API
one full academic year after the state board
approves the addition of a new variable
39
Contact Information (cont.)
TOM TORLAKSON
Evaluation, Research, and Analysis Unit
916-319-0869
[email protected]
State Superintendent
of Public Instruction
•
•
•
•
•
AYP appeals
Continuous Enrollment
API test score rollbacks
PI identification [email protected]
SARC [email protected]
40