No Slide Title
Download
Report
Transcript No Slide Title
Alabama
Professional
Education
Personnel
Evaluation
Program
Field Test of
Special Education II
Teacher
Evaluation System
July 2000
Alabama Special Education II Evaluation System
Field Test
Provides a sense of how well the instruments and
procedures are working
Provides information on what areas of the evaluation
system need changing
Provides feedback from those who are being
evaluated and those who are evaluators
Provides data for setting standards
Alabama Department of Education
Special Education II Field Test Evaluation
Alabama Special Education II System
Competencies
Eight Competencies: Structure parallels other evaluation systems
1.0
Preparation for Instruction (includes initial evaluation)
2.0
Presentation of Instruction
3.0
Assessment of Student Performance
4.0
Classroom Management
5.0
Positive Climate (includes health and safety)
6.0
Communication
7.0
Professional Development and Leadership
8.0
Performance of Professional Responsibility
Alabama Department of Education
Special Education II Field Test Evaluation
Alabama Special Education II System
Data Collection Instruments/Forms
• Self-Assessment
• Interview (oral or written)
• Pre/Post Observation
• Instructional Observation
• Supervisor Review Form
• Professional Development Plan (generates Professional
Development/Leadership Competency score during next cycle)
• Evaluation Summary Report
Alabama Department of Education
Special Education II Field Test Evaluation
Alabama Special Education II System
Self Assessment
Generates data for all competency areas
Optionally used by the teacher and shared with
evaluator only if teacher agrees
Used by the teacher to:
1) Identify areas that need improvement
2) Compare the teacher’s perceptions of
performance with the results of the
evaluation
3) Determine areas for professional growth
activities to be included in a
professional development plan
Alabama Department of Education
Special Education II Field Test Evaluation
Alabama Special Education II Evaluation System
The Interview
Two types of interviews:
A Structured Interview with 4 questions commonly asked of
all special education teachers (oral and written options)
A Clarifying Interview with probing questions focused on
clarifying or bringing understanding to the written
interview (questions differ from teacher to teacher)
Clarifying Interview conducted after the evaluator
analyzes the written interview
Modified scripting is used to record
responses in oral option
Alabama Department of Education
Special Education II Field Test Evaluation
Alabama Special Education II Evaluation System
The Observations
Instructional Observation
The evaluator conducts two observations (3 if a nontenured teacher) observing the special education
teacher in an instructional setting. The observations
may be in the classroom or in the special education
environment.
Alabama Department of Education
Special Education II Field Test Evaluation
Alabama Special Education II Evaluation System
Supervisor’s Review Form
Generates data for competencies in Communication
and Professional Responsibilities
Provides data where a supervisor should have objective,
experiential information
Alabama Department of Education
Special Education II Field Test Evaluation
Alabama Special Education II Evaluation System
Evaluation Summary Report
Used to present the scores developed from each of
the instruments
To complete the ESR, the evaluator:
1. Completes demographic information requested
2. Records the scores from each instrument
3. Writes comments, explanations, or justifications in the space
provided that support the score for the specific area
4. Identifies 1 - 2 areas for focus in planning
professional development for the coming year(s)
Alabama Department of Education
Special Education II Field Test Evaluation
Alabama Special Education II Evaluation System
Professional Development Plan
Activities focus on areas of improvement as identified in the
Evaluation Summary Report
Activities focus on the improvement of student achievement
Used to evaluate Competency 7: Professional Development
and Leadership after first year of evaluation
Alabama Department of Education
Special Education II Field Test Evaluation
Questions?
SYSTEM COMPARISONS
Teachers
Special Ed. II
Speech/Lang.
Counselors
Librarians
Observation
Observation
Observation
Instructional
Observation
Management
Observation
Instructional
Observation
Interview
1 added question 1 added question slight differences slight differences
SRF
SRF
SRF
SRF
SRF
PDP
(Competency 7)
PDP
(Competency 7)
PDP
(Competency 7)
PDP
(Competency 7)
PDP
(Competency 7)
Portfolio
(7 indicators)
ESR
ESR
ESR
Surveys
(Students,
Parents, Faculty/
Staff)
Surveys
(Students,
Faculty/Staff)
ESR
ESR
SPECIAL EDUCATION GROUP II
COMPETENCIES
Teacher System
Eight Competencies
Special Ed System
Eight Competencies
Preparation for Instruction
Preparation for Instruction
New indicator for Initial Evaluation
Presentation of Instruction
Presentation of Instruction
Assessment of Student Performance
Assessment of Student Performance
Classroom Management
Classroom Management
Positive Climate
Positive Climate
Incorporates Health and Safety
Communication
Communication
Prof. Development/Ldrship
Prof. Development/Ldrship
Prof Responsibilities
Prof Responsibilities
SPECIAL EDUCATION GROUP II
CONCEPTS
Teacher System
Special Ed System
Classroom
Classroom and Environments
(e.g. class could be in community
such as grocery stores, restaurants)
Academic Content
Academic Content, Functional, and
Developmental Levels
Equipment/Materials
Equipment/Materials, Resources,
and Adaptations
(e.g. resources include paraprofessionals,
adaptations include assistive technology)
Management of Behavior
Management of Behavior
(could include physical control of student)
Climate
Climate (also emphasizes health and
safety of students
SPECIAL EDUCATION GROUP II
INSTRUMENTS
Teacher System
Special Ed System
Self Assessment
Self Assessment
(Same format)
Interview
(3 questions, 5 indicators)
Interview
(4 questions, 6 indicators. Adds question for
Indicator 1.1. Rest of questions cover same
indicators as teacher system
Pre/Post Observation
Pre/Post Observation
(Same procedures, first two questions
adapted for special education)
Observation
(17 indicators)
Observation
(Same 17 indicators and same procedures)
SPECIAL EDUCATION GROUP II
INSTRUMENTS
Teacher System
Special Ed System
Supervisor’s Review Form
Supervisor’s Review Form
(No difference)
Evaluation Summary Report
ESR is same except for adding new indicator
and reference to health and safety
Competency 7 Scoring
Competency 7 Scoring is same
(Not scored in field test since no past
PDP has been developed)
PDP
PDP has no changes